Kleber Quadraxer 3 vs Linglong Grip Master 4S
The data highlights a clear theme: the Kleber delivers broader, more balanced performance, especially in wet, snow, and aquaplaning safety metrics, whereas the Linglong shows flashes of strength in isolated braking results and price-led value. Drivers prioritizing year-round safety margins and efficiency will likely lean Kleber; strict budget shoppers or dry-focused urban use may find the Linglong compelling.
Test Results
Independent comparison tire tests are the best source of data to get tire information from, and the good news is there have been four tests which compare both tires directly!
| Tire | Test Wins | Performance |
|---|---|---|
| Kleber Quadraxer 3 | three | |
| Linglong Grip Master 4S | one |
While it might look like the Kleber Quadraxer 3 is better than the Linglong Grip Master 4S purely based on the higher number of test wins, tires are very complicated objects which means where one tire is better than the other can be more important in real world use.
Let's look at how the two tires compare across multiple tire test categories.
Key Strengths
- Excellent wet and snow performance (wins in wet handling, circle, aquaplaning; all snow tests)
- Consistently shorter braking distances across multiple years (notably wet: up to +8.5%)
- Lower rolling resistance and fuel use (RR ~18% lower; ~2.6% fuel saving)
- Lower abrasion and solid wear (20% less abrasion; ~2% higher mileage)
- Very competitive price/value (≈29% better price index)
- Strong single-test braking in 2025 (dry and wet wins; 4/30 overall)
- Comfortable, safe dry-road manners per qualitative notes
- High claimed mileage potential
Dry Braking
Looking at data from four tire tests, the Kleber Quadraxer 3 was better during three dry braking tests. On average the Kleber Quadraxer 3 stopped the vehicle in 3.33% less distance than the Linglong Grip Master 4S.
Best In Dry Braking: Kleber Quadraxer 3
See how the Dry Braking winner was calculated >>
Dry Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Kleber Quadraxer 3 was better during one dry handling [km/h] tests. On average the Kleber Quadraxer 3 was 0.85% faster around a lap than the Linglong Grip Master 4S.
Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: Kleber Quadraxer 3
See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Braking
Looking at data from four tire tests, the Kleber Quadraxer 3 was better during three wet braking tests. On average the Kleber Quadraxer 3 stopped the vehicle in 3.14% less distance than the Linglong Grip Master 4S.
Best In Wet Braking: Kleber Quadraxer 3
See how the Wet Braking winner was calculated >>
Wet Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Kleber Quadraxer 3 was better during one wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the Kleber Quadraxer 3 was 2.52% faster around a wet lap than the Linglong Grip Master 4S.
Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: Kleber Quadraxer 3
See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Circle
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Kleber Quadraxer 3 was better during one wet circle tests. On average the Kleber Quadraxer 3 was 1.96% faster around a wet circle than the Linglong Grip Master 4S.
Best In Wet Circle: Kleber Quadraxer 3
See how the Wet Circle winner was calculated >>
Straight Aqua
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Kleber Quadraxer 3 was better during one straight aqua tests. On average the Kleber Quadraxer 3 floated at a 5.71% higher speed than the Linglong Grip Master 4S.
Best In Straight Aqua: Kleber Quadraxer 3
See how the Straight Aqua winner was calculated >>
Curved Aquaplaning
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Kleber Quadraxer 3 was better during one curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Kleber Quadraxer 3 slipped out at a 7.07% higher speed than the Linglong Grip Master 4S.
Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Kleber Quadraxer 3
See how the Curved Aquaplaning winner was calculated >>
Snow Braking
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Kleber Quadraxer 3 was better during one snow braking tests. On average the Kleber Quadraxer 3 stopped the vehicle in 5.08% less distance than the Linglong Grip Master 4S.
Best In Snow Braking: Kleber Quadraxer 3
See how the Snow Braking winner was calculated >>
Snow Traction
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Kleber Quadraxer 3 was better during one snow traction tests. On average the Kleber Quadraxer 3 had 7.3% better snow traction than the Linglong Grip Master 4S.
Best In Snow Traction: Kleber Quadraxer 3
See how the Snow Traction winner was calculated >>
Snow Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Kleber Quadraxer 3 was better during one snow handling [km/h] tests. On average the Kleber Quadraxer 3 was 4.27% faster around a lap than the Linglong Grip Master 4S.
Best In Snow Handling [Km/H]: Kleber Quadraxer 3
See how the Snow Handling winner was calculated >>
Snow Slalom
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Kleber Quadraxer 3 was better during one snow slalom tests. On average the Kleber Quadraxer 3 was 7.11% faster through a slalom than the Linglong Grip Master 4S.
Best In Snow Slalom: Kleber Quadraxer 3
See how the Snow Slalom winner was calculated >>
Noise
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Kleber Quadraxer 3 and Linglong Grip Master 4S performed equally well in noise tests.
Best In Noise: Both tires performed equally well
See how the Noise winner was calculated >>
Wear
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Kleber Quadraxer 3 was better during one wear tests. On average the Kleber Quadraxer 3 is predicted to cover 1.93% miles before reaching 1.6mm than the Linglong Grip Master 4S.
Best In Wear: Kleber Quadraxer 3
See how the Wear winner was calculated >>
Value
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Linglong Grip Master 4S was better during one value tests. On average the Linglong Grip Master 4S proved to have a 29.06% better value based on price/1000km than the Kleber Quadraxer 3.
Best In Value: Linglong Grip Master 4S
See how the Value winner was calculated >>
Rolling Resistance
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Kleber Quadraxer 3 was better during one rolling resistance tests. On average the Kleber Quadraxer 3 had a 18.31% lower rolling resistance than the Linglong Grip Master 4S.
Best In Rolling Resistance: Kleber Quadraxer 3
See how the Rolling Resistance winner was calculated >>
Fuel Consumption
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Kleber Quadraxer 3 was better during one fuel consumption tests. On average the Kleber Quadraxer 3 used 2.64% less fuel than the Linglong Grip Master 4S.
Best In Fuel Consumption: Kleber Quadraxer 3
See how the Fuel Consumption winner was calculated >>
Abrasion
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Kleber Quadraxer 3 was better during one abrasion tests. On average the Kleber Quadraxer 3 lost 20.32% less particle wear matter than the Linglong Grip Master 4S.
Best In Abrasion: Kleber Quadraxer 3
See how the Abrasion winner was calculated >>
Real World Driver Reviews
Tire Reviews also collects real world driver reviews for the Kleber Quadraxer 3 and Linglong Grip Master 4S.
In total the Kleber Quadraxer 3 has been reviewed 25 times and drivers have given the tire 86% overall.
The Linglong Grip Master 4S has been reviewed 0 times and drivers have given the tire 0% overall.
This means in real world driving, people prefer the Kleber Quadraxer 3.
Motorway driving is on par with many other tires; the wind noise coming from the car is always louder than the tires themselves, so no trouble there; you get just a wee bit less fuel efficiency overall (compared to the more expensive choice), but it is nothing to transcendental, on the dry they... Continue reading this review using the link below
View all Linglong Grip Master 4S driver reviews >>
Conclusion
The Linglong Grip Master 4S counters with sharp value and a strong 2025 braking showing (4/30 overall, narrowly ahead in both dry and wet braking in that test). However, its weaker wet and snow performance in broader testing, plus higher rolling resistance, limit its all-round appeal. Choose the Kleber for confident four-season safety and efficiency; pick the Linglong if upfront cost is critical and your driving is mostly fair-weather, urban, and moderate speeds.
Key Differences
- Overall consistency: Kleber places 7/17, 7/37, 8/35 vs Linglong 15/17, 14/37, 20/35; Linglong peaks at 4/30 in 2025 braking test
- Wet safety: Kleber leads wet braking in 3/4 tests (up to +8.5%) and wins wet handling/circle; Linglong lags
- Aquaplaning reserves: Kleber stronger in straight (+6%) and curved (+7.6%) aquaplaning
- Snow performance: Kleber ahead in braking, traction, handling, and slalom (gaps ~4-8%)
- Efficiency: Kleber lower rolling resistance (~18%); lower fuel use (~2.6%) and abrasion (~20%)
- Value/price: Linglong significantly cheaper (better price index), appealing for budget-led purchases
Overall Winner: Kleber Quadraxer 3
Based on the tire test data and user reviews we have in our database, the Kleber Quadraxer 3 has demonstrated better overall performance in this comparison. However, as you can see from the spider diagram above, each tire has its own strengths which should be considered in your final tire buying choice.Similar Comparisons
Looking for more tire comparisons? Here are other direct comparisons involving these tires:
Kleber Quadraxer 3 Top Comparisons
No other comparisons available for this tire.
Linglong Grip Master 4S Top Comparisons
No other comparisons available for this tire.
Footnote
This page has been developed using tire industry testing best practices. This means we are only comparing tests which have had both tires in the same test.
Why is this important? Tire testing is heavily affected by things like surface grip levels and surface temperature, which means you can only compare values from the same day. During a tire test external condition changes are calculated into the overall results, but it is not possible to calculate this between tire tests performed on different days or at different locations.
As a result you will see other tests on Tire Reviews which feature both the %s and %s, but as they weren't conducted on the same day, the results are not comparable.
Lots of other websites do this sort of tire comparison, Tire Reviews doesn't.