Kleber Quadraxer 3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
- TR Score
- 9.4/10
- Owners say
- 86% · 32
- TR Score
- 9.5/10
- Owners say
- 80% · 173
In the 10 independent tests that ran both tires, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 finished ahead 9 times and the Quadraxer 3 once. The Quadraxer 3 held 4.8% more grip in curved aquaplaning; the CrossClimate 2 lasted 12.5% longer in the wear tests.
Data updated
Which should you buy?
Choose Michelin CrossClimate 2 for maximum year-round safety, stronger snow ability, shorter dry stops, better efficiency and wear-ideal for high-mileage and mixed-climate drivers. Choose Kleber Quadraxer 3 if you want a quieter, more comfortable and cheaper tire with excellent aquaplaning security and competent all-round performance, accepting slightly longer wet/dry stops and higher rolling resistance.
Where the Quadraxer 3 is stronger
- Excellent aquaplaning resistance (frequent wins in straight and curved tests)
- Very quiet and comfortable ride (often best subjective comfort/noise)
- Strong snow and dry performance close to premium benchmarks
Where the CrossClimate 2 is stronger
- Class-leading dry and snow braking/traction with consistently higher overall rankings
- Stable handling in dry and snow with precise steering
- Lower rolling resistance and typically better wear/mileage in major tests
The bullet points are analysis of the shared tests and of owner reviews; the measured wins in each discipline are in the tables below. Where the two disagree, the figures are right.
Quadraxer 3 vs CrossClimate 2 at a glance
| Category | Quadraxer 3 | Gap | CrossClimate 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shared tests won10 shared tests | 1 | 9 | |
| Dry18 measurements | 0 | The CrossClimate 2 stopped 1.5% shorter in the dry (10 tests) | 16 |
| Wet36 measurements | 13 | The CrossClimate 2 stopped 2.4% shorter in the wet (10 tests) | 23 |
| Snow28 measurements | 4 | The CrossClimate 2 averaged a 1.5% higher speed on the snow handling course (5 tests) | 23 |
| Comfort11 measurements | 5 | 6 | |
| Value15 measurements | 2 | The CrossClimate 2 lasted 12.5% longer in the wear tests (3 tests) | 11 |
| Tire Reviews Scoreevery test and review we hold | 9.4/10 | The CrossClimate 2 by 0.1 | 9.5/10 |
| Owner rating32 and 173 reviews | 86% | The Quadraxer 3 by 6 points | 80% |
| Would buy againshare of owners | 90% | The Quadraxer 3 by 17 points | 73% |
| Pricein the 5 tests that listed prices | Cheaper | The CrossClimate 2 was dearer in 5 of 5 | +19.3% |
| Sizes madeEU label registrations | 72 | 56 sizes made in both | 116 |
Wins count every measurement the shared tests recorded for both tires; a tick marks the tire ahead on that line. Subjective driver scores count as wins but are never averaged, because each test uses its own scale.
Head to head in 10 tests, 2022 to 2025
Each row is one published test in which both tires ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | Quadraxer 3 | Field | CrossClimate 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 Auto Bild Sports Car All Season Tire Test | P6 of 10 | P4 of 10 | |
| 2024 AutoBild All Season Tire Test | P7 of 15 | P3 of 15 | |
| 2024 All Season Tire Market Overview | P7 of 37 | P4 of 37 | |
| 2024 Sports Car All Season Tire Test | P5 of 11 | P2 of 11 | |
| 2023 Auto Zeitung All Season Tire Test | P4 of 9 | P2 of 9 | |
| 2023 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test | P7 of 16 | P1 of 16 | |
| 2023 All Season Tire 35 Set Shootout | P8 of 35 | P2 of 35 | |
| 2023 Tire Reviews All Season Tire Test | P4 of 10 | P1 of 10 | |
| 2022 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test | P4 of 15 | P9 of 15 | |
| 2022 All Season Tire Market Overview | P4 of 35 | P3 of 35 |
Performance profile
20 measurements from the 10 shared tests, each tire shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
Quadraxer 3
CrossClimate 2
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 118 ft stop against 112 ft is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. The scale stops at 94%: a point further in sits on the hub's edge, hollow. 6 measurements recorded in only one shared test are left off; every measurement is in the table further down.
Where each scores higher
Quadraxer 3
Not ahead in any category
CrossClimate 2
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tires of the same season and class: 90 means this tire out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Where owners rate each higher
Quadraxer 3
CrossClimate 2
Not ahead in any category
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Owners rate the Quadraxer 3 86% from 32 reviews and the CrossClimate 2 80% from 173. Each spoke is one question owners answer out of 10; reviews are vetted by hand before publication.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tires posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Open a discipline for its measurements, and a measurement for every test's figure.
| Measurement | Quadraxer 3 | Gap | CrossClimate 2 | Wins | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 127 | 1.5% | 125 | 0-10 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 81.05 | 1% | 80.2 | 0-2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 56.5 | 0.8% | 57 | 0-3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | 3.3% | scored | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 159 | 2.4% | 155 | 1-9 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 81.6 | 0.6% | 80.99 | 0-2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 44.5 | 1.3% | 45 | 1-4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | 2.2% | scored | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 13.69 | 0.3% | 13.65 | 2-4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 50.2 | 0.1% | 50.1 | 5-2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 9.6 | 4.8% | 9.1 | 4-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 78 | 0.6% | 77 | 2-5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 5.71 | 2.5% | 5.57 | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 602 | 2.4% | 616 | 1-5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 68.01 | 0.3% | 67.87 | 1-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 34.7 | 1.5% | 35.2 | 0-5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | = | scored | 0-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 13.7 | 3.2% | 14.2 | 0-6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | 1.8% | scored | 2-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 70.8 | 0.4 dB | 70.45 | 2-4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 8,787 | 0.4% | 8,793 | 1-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 30,141 | 12.5% | 33,878 | 1-2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 7.87 | 4.7% | 7.5 | 0-6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 5.31 | 0.1% | 5.31 | 1-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 15.3 | 6.5% | 14.3 | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 545 | 3.3% | 527 | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tires shared. "Scored" rows are subjective driver ratings: each test uses its own scale, so only the wins are counted.
Scores beyond the shared tests
On the Tire Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Quadraxer 3 scores 9.4 and the CrossClimate 2 9.5 out of 10.
| Quadraxer 3 | Category | CrossClimate 2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 82 | Dry | 95 | ||
| 68 | Wet | 75 | ||
| 79 | Comfort | 82 | ||
| 66 | Value | 84 | ||
| 87 | Snow | 94 | ||
| - | Ice | 47 | ||
Category scores are percentiles among tires of the same season and class: 90 means this tire out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
What owners say
| Quadraxer 3 | Category | CrossClimate 2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8.6 | Dry Grip | 8.6 | ||
| 8.3 | Wet Grip | 7.9 | ||
| 8.4 | Road Feedback | 7.6 | ||
| 7.7 | Handling | 7.5 | ||
| 8.7 | Wear | 8.4 | ||
| 9.1 | Comfort | 8.3 | ||
| 8.5 | Snow Grip | 8.4 | ||
| 8.1 | Ice Grip | 7.5 | ||
Owners rate the Quadraxer 3 86% from 32 reviews and the CrossClimate 2 80% from 173. Reviews are vetted by hand before publication; ownership is not verified.
Kleber Quadraxer 3
- 86%from 32 reviews
- 90%would buy again
- 424,943 milesdriven by reviewers
Owners rate the Kleber Quadraxer 3 highly overall (85% average, with no outright negative reviews), most often praising its low road noise and cushioned, comfortable ride. Winter ability is a standout too, with many reporting strong traction in snow and dependable cold-weather grip, backed up by generally secure wet and dry grip. The main drawback is that a smaller but noticeable group mention the tire getting noisier or losing performance as it wears, and a few also note a slight hit to fuel economy.
- Quiet on the road for an all-season tire
- Strong snow traction and winter confidence
- Comfortable, compliant ride
- Reassuring wet grip
- Can lose grip or feel less consistent as it wears
- Slightly higher rolling resistance / fuel use
- Road noise can be an issue for some (especially at certain speeds)
Summarised by AI from 28 vetted reviews; the reviews themselves are on the tire page.
All 32 Quadraxer 3 reviews5 years on the Citroen C8, they held up good, with no remarks on ride quality or wear. Easily comparable to vector 4 season or crossclimate.
Michelin CrossClimate 2
- 80%from 173 reviews
- 73%would buy again
- 2,411,545 milesdriven by reviewers
Owners generally rate the Michelin CrossClimate 2 highly, most often praising its dependable all-weather grip with standout snow traction and strong dry and wet grip for an all-season tire. Comfort is commonly reported as very good and a sizeable minority also find it quiet, though road noise is a recurring talking point with roughly one in eight owners complaining it can hum or rumble. The main consistent drawback is efficiency: around one in seven owners report noticeably worse fuel economy/EV range (rolling resistance). A smaller but meaningful group also criticise wet handling confidence, particularly when pushed, even though straight-line wet grip and aquaplaning resistance tend to be viewed positively.
- Excellent snow traction and winter security
- Strong dry grip and traction
- Confident wet grip in everyday driving
- Good ride comfort over longer distances
- Noticeable hit to fuel economy/EV range (higher rolling resistance)
- Wet handling can feel nervous or lack confidence when cornering/braking
- Can be louder than expected on certain surfaces or at speed
Summarised by AI from 153 vetted reviews; the reviews themselves are on the tire page.
All 173 CrossClimate 2 reviewsAfter 2 hot summers the tires are dangerous on wet and cold,
That was actually very much appreciated since i drive them on a GR Yaris mostly on the weekends in the night on snowfall but normal use would be very very dangerous.
Sizes, EU label and lineage
From the EU label registrations for each tire: 72 sizes of the Quadraxer 3 and 116 of the CrossClimate 2, 56 of them made in both.
| Category | Quadraxer 3 | CrossClimate 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Season | All Season | All Season |
| Sizes made | 72 sizes, 14 to 20 inch | 116 sizes, 15 to 22 inch |
| Made in both | 56 sizes 175/65 R15185/60 R15185/65 R15195/55 R15195/60 R15195/65 R15205/60 R15185/50 R16185/55 R16195/45 R16195/50 R16195/55 R16and 44 more | |
| EU label wet grip | B100% | B81%C19% |
| EU label rolling resistance | C67%D26%B7% | C55%B33%D11%A1% |
| EU label noise | 69-71 dB A74%B26% | 69-73 dB B78%A22% |
| Severe snow (3PMSF) sizes | 121 of 121 | 176 of 176 |
| On the market since | 2022 | 2020 |
| Replaced | Kleber Quadraxer 2 (2016) | Michelin CrossClimate+ (2017) |
| Replaced by | - | Michelin CrossClimate 3 |
| Awards | - | Winner: Best All-Season Tires (DriverReviews, 2024/25) Winner: All-Season SUV Tire of the Year (WhatTire, 2024) Winner: All-Season Tire of the Year (WhatTire, 2023) Winner: All-Season SUV Tire of the Year (WhatTire, 2022) Winner: All-Season Tire of the Year (WhatTire, 2022) |
| Price in the shared tests | The CrossClimate 2 was the dearer tire in 5 of the 5 tests that listed prices, by 19.3% on average. Each test priced the tires in its own market at the time; only the gap is comparable. | |
Label grades are shown as the share of registered sizes carrying each grade, so "B (88%), C (12%)" means most sizes are B. Grades vary by size; check the label for yours.
Reading the results
Written from the test results and owner reviews above. It is analysis, not a measurement: where it and the tables disagree, the tables are right.
This head-to-head pits Michelin's benchmark CrossClimate 2 against its value-oriented stablemate, the Kleber Quadraxer 3. Both are all-season touring tires for passenger cars, but they target different buyers: Michelin aims for class-leading, do-it-all performance, while Kleber offers much of the family DNA at a friendlier price.
Across 10 shared tests from 2022-2025, Michelin consistently finishes higher overall (9 test wins to 1) and dominates key safety metrics-especially dry and snow braking-while Kleber counters with strong aquaplaning resistance, excellent comfort/low noise, and better value. The pattern is clear: CC2 brings the performance ceiling; Quadraxer 3 brings balance and savings.
Conclusion
If you prioritize outright capability and safety margins, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 is the more complete tire. It repeatedly stops shorter in the dry (clean sweep of dry-braking) and is typically stronger on snow (wins in braking/traction/handling/slalom in most tests), while also delivering lower rolling resistance and class-leading mileage in the latest large AutoBild wear testing. Its recurring weakness is modestly longer wet braking/handling than the very best, but it still tends to edge the Kleber in the wet on average.
The Kleber Quadraxer 3 is the pragmatic alternative. It mirrors much of Michelin's snow and dry competence with only small gaps, rides quieter and more comfortably, and often tops aquaplaning tests (both straight and curved). For everyday drivers in rainy climates or those sensitive to cabin noise and purchase price, it's compelling. Choose Michelin for maximum all-round safety and longevity; choose Kleber if you value comfort, aquaplaning security, and lower upfront cost-with the trade-off of slightly longer stops and higher rolling resistance.
Quadraxer 3 vs CrossClimate 2: your questions
Is the Kleber Quadraxer 3 or the Michelin CrossClimate 2 the better tire?
In the 10 independent tests that ran both tires, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 finished ahead 9 times and the Quadraxer 3 once. On the Tire Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Quadraxer 3 scores 9.4 and the CrossClimate 2 9.5 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the Quadraxer 3 or the CrossClimate 2?
The CrossClimate 2 led 23 of the 36 wet measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 2.4% shorter in the wet across 10 tests.
Which is better in the dry?
The CrossClimate 2 led 16 of the 18 dry measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 1.5% shorter in the dry across 10 tests.
Which is better in snow?
The CrossClimate 2 led 23 of the 28 snow measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it averaged a 1.5% higher speed on the snow handling course across 5 tests.
Which lasts longer and costs less to run?
The CrossClimate 2 lasted 12.5% longer in the wear tests (3 tests) and had 4.7% lower rolling resistance (7 tests). Owners rate wear 8.7/10 for the Quadraxer 3 and 8.4/10 for the CrossClimate 2.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
Owners rate comfort 9.1/10 for the Quadraxer 3 and 8.3/10 for the CrossClimate 2.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the Quadraxer 3 86% from 32 reviews and the CrossClimate 2 80% from 173. 90% of Quadraxer 3 owners would buy it again, against 73% for the CrossClimate 2.
Which is more expensive?
In the 5 tests that listed prices, the CrossClimate 2 was the dearer tire in 5 of them, by 19.3% on average. Prices are the test's own at the time, in its own market.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The Quadraxer 3 is made in 72 sizes (14 to 20 inch) and the CrossClimate 2 in 116 (15 to 22 inch). 56 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the Quadraxer 3 is graded B for wet grip and C for rolling resistance in most sizes; the CrossClimate 2 B and C.
Which is the newer tire?
The Quadraxer 3 is the newer design: it reached the market in 2022, the CrossClimate 2 in 2020. The Quadraxer 3 replaced the Kleber Quadraxer 2. The CrossClimate 2 replaced the Michelin CrossClimate+.
More comparisons with these tires
vs
Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
8-4 in 13 shared tests
vs
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
7-19 in 26 shared tests
vs 
Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3
3-9 in 12 shared tests
vs
Hankook iON FlexClimate vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
2-0 in 2 shared tests
vs
Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
8-5 in 15 shared tests
vs 
Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs Nexen N Blue 4Season 2
8-0 in 8 shared tests
vs
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
6-9 in 16 shared tests
vs
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 vs Kleber Quadraxer 3
7-3 in 10 shared tests
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tire wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tires ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tire Reviews Score rates each tire out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tires can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tire Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tires independently since 2007.
Discussion