Hankook Winter i cept evo3 vs Star Performer Stratos UHP
In the 2 independent tests that ran both tires, the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 finished ahead 2 times and the Stratos UHP not once. The Winter i cept evo3 was stronger in dry, wet and value, the Stratos UHP in comfort.
Performance profile
12 measurements from the 2 shared tests, each tire shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
Winter i cept evo3
Stratos UHP
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 118 ft stop against 112 ft is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it.
Where each scores higher
Winter i cept evo3
Stratos UHP
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tires of the same season and class: 90 means this tire out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tires posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Wins count the tests in which each tire did better.
| Measurement | Winter i cept evo3 | Gap | Stratos UHP | Wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Winter i cept evo3 ahead | ||||
| Dry Braking ft | 143 | 1.6% | 146 | 1-0 |
| Wet Winter i cept evo3 ahead | ||||
| Wet Braking ft | 112 | 15.6% | 133 | 2-0 |
| Wet Braking - Concrete ft | 123 | 20.4% | 155 | 1-0 |
| Wet Circle mph | 6.5 | 31.8% | 4.9 | 1-0 |
| Straight Aqua mph | 46 | 10.8% | 41.5 | 1-0 |
| Snow Level | ||||
| Snow Braking ft | 32 | 2% | 32 | 1-0 |
| Snow Traction lbf | 54 | 0.4% | 54 | 0-1 |
| Ice Level | ||||
| Ice Braking ft | 57 | = | 57 | 0-0 |
| Comfort Stratos UHP ahead | ||||
| Noise dB | 75.3 | 3.4 dB | 71.9 | 0-1 |
| Value Winter i cept evo3 ahead | ||||
| Wear miles | 44,987 | 20.7% | 37,282 | 1-0 |
| Fuel Consumption l/100km | 5.7 | 1.8% | 5.6 | 0-1 |
| Abrasion mg/km/t | 56 | 9.7% | 62 | 1-0 |
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tires shared.
Head to head in 2 tests in 2025
Each row is one published test in which both tires ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | Winter i cept evo3 | Field | Stratos UHP |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 Winter Tire Braking Test - 52 Sets! | P14 of 51 | P45 of 51 | |
| 2025 ADAC Winter Tire Test | P4 of 31 | P27 of 31 |
Winter i cept evo3 vs Stratos UHP: your questions
Is the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 or the Star Performer Stratos UHP the better tire?
In the 2 independent tests that ran both tires, the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 finished ahead 2 times and the Stratos UHP not once. On the Tire Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Winter i cept evo3 scores 9.2 and the Stratos UHP 5.1 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the Winter i cept evo3 or the Stratos UHP?
The Winter i cept evo3 led 5 of the 5 wet measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 15.6% shorter in the wet across 2 tests.
Which is better in the dry?
The Winter i cept evo3 led 1 of the 1 dry measurements the shared tests recorded.
Which is better in snow?
Across the shared tests the snow measurements are split 1-1 between the Winter i cept evo3 and the Stratos UHP.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
Owners rate comfort 7.8/10 for the Winter i cept evo3 and 10/10 for the Stratos UHP.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the Winter i cept evo3 86% from 23 reviews and the Stratos UHP 98% from 1.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The Winter i cept evo3 is made in 86 sizes (17 to 22 inch) and the Stratos UHP in 1 (18 to 18 inch). 1 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the Winter i cept evo3 is graded B for wet grip and C for rolling resistance in most sizes; the Stratos UHP C and D.
Which is the newer tire?
The Stratos UHP is the newer design: it reached the market in 2023, the Winter i cept evo3 in 2021. The Winter i cept evo3 replaced the Hankook Winter i cept evo2.
More comparisons with these tires
vs 
Hankook Winter i cept evo3 vs Kumho Winter Craft WP52
5-1 in 6 shared tests
vs 
Hankook Winter i cept evo3 vs Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
1-18 in 20 shared tests
vs
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs Hankook Winter i cept evo3
12-0 in 13 shared tests
vs
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 vs Hankook Winter i cept evo3
8-5 in 14 shared tests
vs
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs Hankook Winter i cept evo3
13-3 in 17 shared tests
vs
Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs Hankook Winter i cept evo3
6-0 in 6 shared tests
vs
Dunlop Winter Sport 5 vs Hankook Winter i cept evo3
2-6 in 9 shared tests
vs 
Hankook Winter i cept evo3 vs Uniroyal WinterExpert
5-1 in 6 shared tests
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tire wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tires ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tire Reviews Score rates each tire out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tires can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tire Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tires independently since 2007.