Dunlop Winter Sport 5 vs GT Radial WinterPro2 Evo
In the 3 independent tests that ran both tires, the Dunlop Winter Sport 5 finished ahead 2 times and the WinterPro2 Evo once. The Winter Sport 5 was stronger in dry, wet, snow, ice and value, the WinterPro2 Evo in comfort.
Performance profile
8 measurements from the 3 shared tests, each tire shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
Winter Sport 5
WinterPro2 Evo
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 118 ft stop against 112 ft is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. The scale stops at 96%: a point further in sits on the hub's edge, hollow. 10 measurements recorded in only one shared test are left off; every measurement is in the table further down.
Where each scores higher
Winter Sport 5
WinterPro2 Evo
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tires of the same season and class: 90 means this tire out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tires posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Wins count the tests in which each tire did better.
| Measurement | Winter Sport 5 | Gap | WinterPro2 Evo | Wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Winter Sport 5 ahead | ||||
| Dry Braking ft | 150 | 0.7% | 149 | 1-1 |
| Dry Handling mph | 67.7 | 0.6% | 67.3 | 1-0 |
| Wet Winter Sport 5 ahead | ||||
| Wet Braking ft | 146 | 2.8% | 141 | 0-3 |
| Wet Braking - Concrete ft | 137 | 1.4% | 139 | 1-0 |
| Wet Handling mph | 46.1 | 1.9% | 45.2 | 1-0 |
| Wet Circle s | 12.48 | 1.8% | 12.71 | 1-0 |
| Straight Aqua mph | 47.8 | 1.7% | 47 | 2-0 |
| Curved Aquaplaning ft/s² | 12 | 31.3% | 9.2 | 2-0 |
| Snow Winter Sport 5 ahead | ||||
| Snow Braking ft | 75 | 1.5% | 75 | 3-0 |
| Snow Traction lbf | 315 | 2.8% | 305 | 2-0 |
| Snow Handling mph | 37 | 1.3% | 37.5 | 0-1 |
| Snow Slalom ft/s² | 10.9 | 3.1% | 10.5 | 1-0 |
| Ice Winter Sport 5 ahead | ||||
| Ice Braking ft | 66 | 1.5% | 67 | 1-0 |
| Comfort WinterPro2 Evo ahead | ||||
| Noise dB | 72.75 | 1.7 dB | 71.05 | 0-2 |
| Value Winter Sport 5 ahead | ||||
| Wear miles | 30,258 | 29.1% | 23,437 | 2-0 |
| Rolling Resistance kg / t | 7.82 | 11% | 8.79 | 1-0 |
| Fuel Consumption l/100km | 5.1 | = | 5.1 | 0-0 |
| Abrasion mg/km/t | 57 | 20.8% | 72 | 1-0 |
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tires shared.
Head to head in 3 tests in 2024
Each row is one published test in which both tires ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | Winter Sport 5 | Field | WinterPro2 Evo |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Auto Bild Winter Tire Test | P7 of 20 | P16 of 20 | |
| 2024 ADAC 16 Inch Winter Tire Test | P5 of 12 | P9 of 12 | |
| 2024 Winter 55 Tire Braking Test | P11 of 55 | P3 of 55 |
Winter Sport 5 vs WinterPro2 Evo: your questions
Is the Dunlop Winter Sport 5 or the GT Radial WinterPro2 Evo the better tire?
In the 3 independent tests that ran both tires, the Dunlop Winter Sport 5 finished ahead 2 times and the WinterPro2 Evo once. On the Tire Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Winter Sport 5 scores 8.9 and the WinterPro2 Evo 8.3 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the Winter Sport 5 or the WinterPro2 Evo?
The Winter Sport 5 led 7 of the 10 wet measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it held 31.3% more grip in curved aquaplaning across 2 tests.
Which is better in the dry?
The Winter Sport 5 led 2 of the 3 dry measurements the shared tests recorded.
Which is better in snow?
The Winter Sport 5 led 6 of the 7 snow measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 1.5% shorter on snow across 3 tests.
Which lasts longer and costs less to run?
The Winter Sport 5 lasted 29.1% longer in the wear tests (2 tests). Owners rate wear 8.7/10 for the Winter Sport 5 and 10/10 for the WinterPro2 Evo.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
The WinterPro2 Evo was 1.7 dB quieter (2 tests). Owners rate comfort 8.4/10 for the Winter Sport 5 and 8/10 for the WinterPro2 Evo.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the Winter Sport 5 83% from 47 reviews and the WinterPro2 Evo 87% from 1.
More comparisons with these tires
vs 
Dunlop Winter Sport 5 vs Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
0-8 in 8 shared tests
vs 
Dunlop Winter Sport 5 vs Hankook Winter i cept evo3
2-6 in 9 shared tests
vs
Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Dunlop Winter Sport 5
7-1 in 9 shared tests
vs 
Dunlop Winter Sport 5 vs Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
21-1 in 22 shared tests
vs 
Dunlop Winter Sport 5 vs Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
0-9 in 9 shared tests
vs
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 vs Dunlop Winter Sport 5
16-7 in 23 shared tests
vs 
Dunlop Winter Sport 5 vs Hankook Winter I cept RS3
5-2 in 7 shared tests
vs 
Dunlop Winter Sport 5 vs Firestone Winterhawk 4
10-2 in 12 shared tests
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tire wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tires ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tire Reviews Score rates each tire out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tires can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tire Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tires independently since 2007.