Menu

Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Dunlop Winter Sport 5

This head-to-head sets a premium touring winter benchmark against an established UHP winter option: Continental's WinterContact TS 870 vs Dunlop's Winter Sport 5. Across nine shared tests in 16- and 17-inch fitments, the TS 870 repeatedly tops the tables, while the Dunlop counters with strong snow ability and impressive efficiency and mileage. Both target everyday winter safety, but they approach it differently: Continental prioritizes balanced grip with standout wet security, Dunlop leans into snow confidence and running-cost advantages.
WinterContact-TS-870 VS Winter-Sport-5

Test Results

Independent comparison tire tests are the best source of data to get tire information from, and the good news is there have been nine tests which compare both tires directly!

Summary of nine total tests comparing both tires directly
TireTest WinsPerformance
Continental WinterContact TS 870seven
seven wins
Dunlop Winter Sport 5one
one wins
one draws in one tests

While it might look like the Continental WinterContact TS 870 is better than the Dunlop Winter Sport 5 purely based on the higher number of test wins, tires are very complicated objects which means where one tire is better than the other can be more important in real world use.

Let's look at how the two tires compare across multiple tire test categories.

Key Strengths

  • Class-leading wet grip and aquaplaning resistance (often 8-10% advantage)
  • Short, consistent braking across dry, wet, and ice
  • Low noise with high overall comfort
  • Multiple overall test wins indicating balanced all-round performance
  • Strong snow performance (traction/handling frequently ahead or equal)
  • High predicted mileage and low wear
  • Lower rolling resistance and good fuel efficiency
  • Better purchase price/value in several tests

Dry Braking

Looking at data from four tire tests, the Continental WinterContact TS 870 was better during four dry braking tests. On average the Continental WinterContact TS 870 stopped the vehicle in 2.82% less distance than the Dunlop Winter Sport 5.

Continental WinterContact TS 870
44.88M
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
46.18M
Dry braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Dry Braking: Continental WinterContact TS 870

Continental WinterContact TS 870
47.4M
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
47.8M (+0.4M)
Continental WinterContact TS 870
43.5M
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
45.3M (+1.8M)
Continental WinterContact TS 870
44.7M
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
45.6M (+0.9M)
Continental WinterContact TS 870
43.9M
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
46M (+2.1M)

Dry Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Continental WinterContact TS 870 was better during two dry handling [km/h] tests. On average the Continental WinterContact TS 870 was 1.64% faster around a lap than the Dunlop Winter Sport 5.

Continental WinterContact TS 870
124.7Km/H
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
122.65Km/H
Dry Handling Average Speed, higher is better

Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: Continental WinterContact TS 870

Continental WinterContact TS 870
138.8Km/H
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
136.4Km/H (-2.4Km/H)
Continental WinterContact TS 870
110.6Km/H
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
108.9Km/H (-1.7Km/H)

Wet Braking

Looking at data from six tire tests, the Continental WinterContact TS 870 was better during four wet braking tests. On average the Continental WinterContact TS 870 stopped the vehicle in 1.23% less distance than the Dunlop Winter Sport 5.

Continental WinterContact TS 870
42.57M
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
43.1M
Wet braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Wet Braking: Continental WinterContact TS 870

Continental WinterContact TS 870
34.2M (+0.6M)
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
33.6M
Continental WinterContact TS 870
53.4M (+0.9M)
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
52.5M
Continental WinterContact TS 870
37.7M
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
39.4M (+1.7M)
Continental WinterContact TS 870
37.1M
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
37.4M (+0.3M)
Continental WinterContact TS 870
35.1M
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
37.2M (+2.1M)
Continental WinterContact TS 870
57.9M
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
58.5M (+0.6M)

Wet Braking - Concrete

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Continental WinterContact TS 870 was better during one wet braking - concrete tests. On average the Continental WinterContact TS 870 stopped the vehicle in 7.67% less distance than the Dunlop Winter Sport 5.

Continental WinterContact TS 870
38.5M
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
41.7M
Wet braking on Concrete in meters, lower is better

Best In Wet Braking - Concrete: Continental WinterContact TS 870

Continental WinterContact TS 870
38.5M
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
41.7M (+3.2M)

Wet Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Continental WinterContact TS 870 was better during one wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the Continental WinterContact TS 870 was 0.34% faster around a wet lap than the Dunlop Winter Sport 5.

Continental WinterContact TS 870
73.57Km/H
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
73.32Km/H
Wet Handling Average Speed, higher is better

Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: Continental WinterContact TS 870

Continental WinterContact TS 870
72Km/H (-0.5Km/H)
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
72.5Km/H
Continental WinterContact TS 870
75.14Km/H
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
74.13Km/H (-1.01Km/H)

Wet Circle

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Continental WinterContact TS 870 was better during one wet circle tests. On average the Continental WinterContact TS 870 was 0.24% faster around a wet circle than the Dunlop Winter Sport 5.

Continental WinterContact TS 870
12.53s
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
12.56s
Wet Circle Lap Time in seconds, lower is better

Best In Wet Circle: Continental WinterContact TS 870

Continental WinterContact TS 870
12.77s (+0.13s)
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
12.64s
Continental WinterContact TS 870
12.29s
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
12.48s (+0.19s)

Straight Aqua

Looking at data from four tire tests, the Continental WinterContact TS 870 was better during four straight aqua tests. On average the Continental WinterContact TS 870 floated at a 8.3% higher speed than the Dunlop Winter Sport 5.

Continental WinterContact TS 870
82.93Km/H
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
76.05Km/H
Float Speed in Km/H, higher is better

Best In Straight Aqua: Continental WinterContact TS 870

Continental WinterContact TS 870
82.3Km/H
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
76.4Km/H (-5.9Km/H)
Continental WinterContact TS 870
81.1Km/H
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
73.8Km/H (-7.3Km/H)
Continental WinterContact TS 870
84Km/H
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
76.5Km/H (-7.5Km/H)
Continental WinterContact TS 870
84.3Km/H
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
77.5Km/H (-6.8Km/H)

Curved Aquaplaning

Looking at data from four tire tests, the Continental WinterContact TS 870 was better during four curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Continental WinterContact TS 870 slipped out at a 5.92% higher speed than the Dunlop Winter Sport 5.

Continental WinterContact TS 870
3.55m/sec2
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
3.34m/sec2
Remaining lateral acceleration, higher is better

Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Continental WinterContact TS 870

Continental WinterContact TS 870
3.38m/sec2
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
2.95m/sec2 (-0.43m/sec2)
Continental WinterContact TS 870
3.3m/sec2
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
3.1m/sec2 (-0.2m/sec2)
Continental WinterContact TS 870
3.7m/sec2
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
3.6m/sec2 (-0.1m/sec2)
Continental WinterContact TS 870
3.82m/sec2
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
3.71m/sec2 (-0.11m/sec2)

Snow Braking

Looking at data from six tire tests, the Dunlop Winter Sport 5 was better during three snow braking tests. On average the Dunlop Winter Sport 5 stopped the vehicle in 0.54% less distance than the Continental WinterContact TS 870.

Continental WinterContact TS 870
22.17M
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
22.05M
Snow braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Snow Braking: Dunlop Winter Sport 5

Continental WinterContact TS 870
27.7M (+0.4M)
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
27.3M
Continental WinterContact TS 870
27.7M (+0.4M)
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
27.3M
Continental WinterContact TS 870
9.5M (+0.1M)
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
9.4M
Continental WinterContact TS 870
29.1M
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
29.2M (+0.1M)
Continental WinterContact TS 870
9.9M
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
9.9M
Continental WinterContact TS 870
29.1M
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
29.2M (+0.1M)

Snow Traction

Looking at data from four tire tests, the Dunlop Winter Sport 5 was better during three snow traction tests. On average the Dunlop Winter Sport 5 had 0.9% better snow traction than the Continental WinterContact TS 870.

Continental WinterContact TS 870
1460N
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
1473.3N
Pulling Force in Newtons, higher is better

Best In Snow Traction: Dunlop Winter Sport 5

Continental WinterContact TS 870
2839N
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
2830N (-9N)
Continental WinterContact TS 870
252N (-6.2N)
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
258.2N
Continental WinterContact TS 870
229N (-6N)
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
235N
Continental WinterContact TS 870
2520N (-50N)
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
2570N

Snow Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Continental WinterContact TS 870 was better during two snow handling [km/h] tests. On average the Continental WinterContact TS 870 was 0.85% faster around a lap than the Dunlop Winter Sport 5.

Continental WinterContact TS 870
58.65Km/H
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
58.15Km/H
Snow handling average speed, higher is better

Best In Snow Handling [Km/H]: Continental WinterContact TS 870

Continental WinterContact TS 870
57.3Km/H
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
56.7Km/H (-0.6Km/H)
Continental WinterContact TS 870
60Km/H
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
59.6Km/H (-0.4Km/H)

Snow Slalom

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Dunlop Winter Sport 5 was better during one snow slalom tests. On average the Dunlop Winter Sport 5 was 0.91% faster through a slalom than the Continental WinterContact TS 870.

Continental WinterContact TS 870
3.28m/sec2
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
3.31m/sec2
Lateral acceleration, higher is better

Best In Snow Slalom: Dunlop Winter Sport 5

Continental WinterContact TS 870
3.28m/sec2 (-0.03m/sec2)
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
3.31m/sec2

Ice Braking

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Continental WinterContact TS 870 was better during two ice braking tests. On average the Continental WinterContact TS 870 stopped the vehicle 5.97% shorter than the Dunlop Winter Sport 5.

Continental WinterContact TS 870
18.9M
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
20.1M
Ice braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Ice Braking: Continental WinterContact TS 870

Continental WinterContact TS 870
19.5M
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
20.2M (+0.7M)
Continental WinterContact TS 870
18.3M
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
20M (+1.7M)

Noise

Looking at data from four tire tests, the Continental WinterContact TS 870 was better during four noise tests. On average the Continental WinterContact TS 870 measured 2.53% quieter than the Dunlop Winter Sport 5.

Continental WinterContact TS 870
71.18dB
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
73.03dB
External noise in dB, lower is better

Best In Noise: Continental WinterContact TS 870

Continental WinterContact TS 870
70.6dB
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
72.3dB (+1.7dB)
Continental WinterContact TS 870
72dB
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
74.3dB (+2.3dB)
Continental WinterContact TS 870
71.1dB
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
73dB (+1.9dB)
Continental WinterContact TS 870
71dB
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
72.5dB (+1.5dB)

Wear

Looking at data from four tire tests, the Continental WinterContact TS 870 was better during one wear tests. On average the Continental WinterContact TS 870 is predicted to cover 1.8% miles before reaching 1.6mm than the Dunlop Winter Sport 5.

Continental WinterContact TS 870
48267.5KM
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
47397.5KM
Predicted tread life in KM, higher is better

Best In Wear: Continental WinterContact TS 870

Continental WinterContact TS 870
45400KM
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
30700KM (-14700KM)
Continental WinterContact TS 870
55900KM (-5600KM)
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
61500KM
Continental WinterContact TS 870
43800KM (-4900KM)
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
48700KM
Continental WinterContact TS 870
47970KM (-720KM)
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
48690KM

Value

Looking at data from three tire tests, the Continental WinterContact TS 870 was better during one value tests. On average the Continental WinterContact TS 870 proved to have a 3.72% better value based on price/1000km than the Dunlop Winter Sport 5.

Continental WinterContact TS 870
6.98Price/1000
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
7.25Price/1000
Euros/1000km based on cost/wear, lower is better

Best In Value: Continental WinterContact TS 870

Continental WinterContact TS 870
8.37Price/1000
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
11.56Price/1000 (+3.19Price/1000)
Continental WinterContact TS 870
2.99Price/1000 (+0.6Price/1000)
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
2.39Price/1000
Continental WinterContact TS 870
9.59Price/1000 (+1.79Price/1000)
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
7.8Price/1000

Price

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Dunlop Winter Sport 5 was better during two price tests. On average the Dunlop Winter Sport 5 cost 8.23% less than the Continental WinterContact TS 870.

Continental WinterContact TS 870
273.5
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
251
Price in local currency, lower is better

Best In Price: Dunlop Winter Sport 5

Continental WinterContact TS 870
380 (+25)
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
355
Continental WinterContact TS 870
167 (+20)
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
147

Rolling Resistance

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Continental WinterContact TS 870 was better during one rolling resistance tests. On average the Continental WinterContact TS 870 had a 3.55% lower rolling resistance than the Dunlop Winter Sport 5.

Continental WinterContact TS 870
7.89kg / t
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
8.18kg / t
Rolling resistance in kg t, lower is better

Best In Rolling Resistance: Continental WinterContact TS 870

Continental WinterContact TS 870
7.94kg / t
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
8.53kg / t (+0.59kg / t)
Continental WinterContact TS 870
7.83kg / t (+0.01kg / t)
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
7.82kg / t

Fuel Consumption

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Dunlop Winter Sport 5 was better during one fuel consumption tests. On average the Dunlop Winter Sport 5 used 1.85% less fuel than the Continental WinterContact TS 870.

Continental WinterContact TS 870
5.4l/100km
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
5.3l/100km
Fuel consumption in Litres per 100 km, lower is better

Best In Fuel Consumption: Dunlop Winter Sport 5

Continental WinterContact TS 870
5.7l/100km (+0.2l/100km)
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
5.5l/100km
Continental WinterContact TS 870
5.1l/100km
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
5.1l/100km

Abrasion

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Dunlop Winter Sport 5 was better during one abrasion tests. On average the Dunlop Winter Sport 5 emitted 1.61% less particle wear matter than the Continental WinterContact TS 870.

Continental WinterContact TS 870
62.15mg/km/t
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
61.15mg/km/t
Weight of Tire Wear Particles Lost (mg/km/t), lower is better

Best In Abrasion: Dunlop Winter Sport 5

Continental WinterContact TS 870
65.3mg/km/t
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
65.3mg/km/t
Continental WinterContact TS 870
59mg/km/t (+2mg/km/t)
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
57mg/km/t

Real World Driver Reviews

Continental WinterContact TS 870 Driver Reviews

Drivers of the Continental WinterContact TS 870 overwhelmingly praise its exceptional wet grip and braking, superb aquaplaning resistance, and confident dry-road handling for a winter tire. Comfort and low noise are frequently highlighted, and many report strong traction in fresh or soft snow. A minority note that traction can be weaker on hard-packed snow or ice-particularly on steep hills or heavier vehicles-compared to expectations. Overall sentiment is strongly positive, with most users feeling safe and confident in varied winter conditions.

Based on 22 reviews with an average rating of 84%

Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Driver Reviews

Drivers largely praise the Dunlop Winter Sport 5 for outstanding snow and ice traction, strong wet grip in cold conditions, predictable handling, good comfort/low noise (for a winter tire), and excellent tread life. A minority report softer sidewalls and reduced dry performance or understeer as temperatures rise, with a few notes on noise increase over time and isolated quality/balance issues. Overall sentiment is strongly positive, with most buyers willing to repurchase.

Based on 43 reviews with an average rating of 84%

Best Review for the Continental WinterContact TS 870
Given 69% 185/65 R15 on a combination of roads for 5,000 average miles
it was really nice, but on the hard snow, hill climbing is not really good, I am not sure about any other tires that can climb, all roads was good but I can park my to my home because it can't climb the %20-30 hill to my home
Helpful 1228 - tire reviewed on April 18, 2023
View all Continental WinterContact TS 870 driver reviews >>
Best Review for the Dunlop Winter Sport 5
Given 81% 225/40 R18 W on a combination of roads for 24,000 spirited miles
I bought these as the successor to Dunlop WinterSport4 which I had been very happy with before, especially with wet grip and good feel in wet/poor conditions. Living and driving around Scotland I use the WinterSport as an all-season tire. The 5's have improved in all areas and especially in dry handling which was a slight letdown with the 4's. Performance now tails off above around 12 degrees ambient, compared to around 7 degrees with the 4's. At high speed in summer the tires can get a little 'floaty', but for me this is an acceptable compromise to the excellent grip in cold wet... Continue reading this review using the link below
Helpful 1162 - tire reviewed on September 24, 2016
View all Dunlop Winter Sport 5 driver reviews >>

Conclusion

The Continental WinterContact TS 870 is the more complete winter tire. It consistently stops shorter and grips better in the wet, leads aquaplaning performance by meaningful margins (often ~8-10% higher thresholds), and is quieter-key safety and comfort wins for typical mixed winter conditions. It also posts excellent ice braking and repeatedly takes overall test victories (7 wins vs 1 for Dunlop, plus one draw). The trade-off is price, where Continental tends to cost more up front.
Dunlop's Winter Sport 5 shines for value and ownership costs: higher predicted mileage, lower rolling resistance, competitive fuel use, and often the better purchase price. On snow it's frequently neck-and-neck or slightly ahead in traction and braking, and its aquaplaning resistance is solid, though usually a step behind the Continental. If you prioritize economy and frequent snow use over ultimate wet-road performance, the Dunlop remains a smart, confidence-inspiring choice.
Practical takeaway: Choose Continental for the safest all-rounder-especially where wet roads and slush dominate. Choose Dunlop to stretch your budget and mileage in colder, snow-reliable regions without giving up core winter security.
Key Differences
  • Overall dominance: TS 870 wins 7 of 9 shared tests vs 1 for Winter Sport 5 (plus 1 draw)
  • Wet safety: TS 870 repeatedly shorter wet braking (e.g., ADAC 2024 −5.7% to −7.7%) and higher aquaplaning limits (~+9-10%)
  • Snow emphasis: Winter Sport 5 edges snow traction/braking in several tests; TS 870 often leads snow handling
  • Ice braking: TS 870 consistently shorter (e.g., −8.5% ADAC 2024; −3.5% ADAC 2023)
  • Ownership costs: Dunlop delivers higher mileage and lower price; TS 870 typically costs more
  • Comfort/efficiency: TS 870 is quieter; Dunlop often posts slightly lower rolling resistance/fuel use
Continental WinterContact TS 870

Overall Winner: Continental WinterContact TS 870

Based on the tire test data and user reviews we have in our database, the Continental WinterContact TS 870 has demonstrated better overall performance in this comparison. However, as you can see from the spider diagram above, each tire has its own strengths which should be considered in your final tire buying choice.

Similar Comparisons

Looking for more tire comparisons? Here are other direct comparisons involving these tires:

Continental WinterContact TS 870 Top Comparisons

No other comparisons available for this tire.

Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Top Comparisons

No other comparisons available for this tire.

Footnote

This page has been developed using tire industry testing best practices. This means we are only comparing tests which have had both tires in the same test.

Why is this important? Tire testing is heavily affected by things like surface grip levels and surface temperature, which means you can only compare values from the same day. During a tire test external condition changes are calculated into the overall results, but it is not possible to calculate this between tire tests performed on different days or at different locations.

As a result you will see other tests on Tire Reviews which feature both the %s and %s, but as they weren't conducted on the same day, the results are not comparable.

Lots of other websites do this sort of tire comparison, Tire Reviews doesn't.