Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 vs Nokian Powerproof 1
In the 3 independent tests that ran both tires, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 finished ahead 3 times and the Powerproof 1 not once. The Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was stronger in dry, wet and comfort, the Powerproof 1 in value.
Performance profile
6 measurements from the 3 shared tests, each tire shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
Powerproof 1
Not ahead on any measurement here
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 118 ft stop against 112 ft is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. The scale stops at 94%: a point further in sits on the hub's edge, hollow. 8 measurements recorded in only one shared test are left off; every measurement is in the table further down.
Where each scores higher
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
Powerproof 1
Not ahead in any category
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tires of the same season and class: 90 means this tire out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Where owners rate each higher
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
Powerproof 1
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Owners rate the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 86% from 228 reviews and the Powerproof 1 86% from 4. Each spoke is one question owners answer out of 10; reviews are vetted by hand before publication.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tires posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Wins count the tests in which each tire did better.
| Measurement | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 | Gap | Powerproof 1 | Wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 ahead | ||||
| Dry Braking ft | 113 | 3.5% | 117 | 3-0 |
| Dry Handling mph | 75.1 | 3.2% | 72.8 | 1-0 |
| Wet Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 ahead | ||||
| Wet Braking ft | 112 | 6.7% | 120 | 3-0 |
| Wet Braking - Concrete ft | 117 | 8.2% | 128 | 1-0 |
| Wet Handling mph | 45.4 | 1.7% | 44.6 | 1-0 |
| Wet Circle s | 14.72 | 1.8% | 14.99 | 1-0 |
| Straight Aqua mph | 49.6 | 0.1% | 49.6 | 1-1 |
| Curved Aquaplaning ft/s² | 10.3 | 4.2% | 9.9 | 1-1 |
| Comfort Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 ahead | ||||
| Subj. Comfort pts | scored | 9.3% | scored | 1-0 |
| Noise dB | 71.25 | 1.3 dB | 72.55 | 2-0 |
| Value Powerproof 1 ahead | ||||
| Wear miles | 32,566 | 44.6% | 23,090 | 2-0 |
| Rolling Resistance kg / t | 8.97 | 0.4% | 8.93 | 0-1 |
| Fuel Consumption l/100km | 5.6 | 1.8% | 5.5 | 0-1 |
| Abrasion mg/km/t | 74.2 | 8.8% | 67.7 | 0-1 |
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tires shared.
Head to head in 3 tests in 2025
Each row is one published test in which both tires ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 | Field | Powerproof 1 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tire Test | P1 of 20 | P17 of 20 | |
| 2025 ADAC Summer Tire Test | P4 of 18 | P14 of 18 | |
| 2025 Summer Tire Test Shootout | P6 of 52 | P13 of 52 |
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 vs Powerproof 1: your questions
Is the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 or the Nokian Powerproof 1 the better tire?
In the 3 independent tests that ran both tires, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 finished ahead 3 times and the Powerproof 1 not once. On the Tire Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 scores 9.7 and the Powerproof 1 8.4 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 or the Powerproof 1?
The Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 led 8 of the 10 wet measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 6.7% shorter in the wet across 3 tests.
Which is better in the dry?
The Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 led 4 of the 4 dry measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 3.5% shorter in the dry across 3 tests.
Which lasts longer and costs less to run?
The Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 lasted 44.6% longer in the wear tests (2 tests). Owners rate wear 7.6/10 for the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 and 8/10 for the Powerproof 1.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
The Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was 1.3 dB quieter (2 tests). Owners rate comfort 8.3/10 for the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 and 8.8/10 for the Powerproof 1.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 86% from 228 reviews and the Powerproof 1 86% from 4.
Which is more expensive?
In the 2 tests that listed prices, the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was the dearer tire in 2 of them, by 24.8% on average. Prices are the test's own at the time, in its own market.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 is made in 130 sizes (17 to 23 inch) and the Powerproof 1 in 54 (17 to 20 inch). 47 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 is graded A for wet grip and C for rolling resistance in most sizes; the Powerproof 1 A and C.
More comparisons with these tires
vs 
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 vs Michelin Pilot Sport 5
8-5 in 16 shared tests
vs
Continental PremiumContact 7 vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
5-11 in 16 shared tests
vs
Continental SportContact 7 vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
5-2 in 8 shared tests
vs 
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 vs Hankook Ventus Evo
1-5 in 6 shared tests
vs 
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 vs Michelin Primacy 5
2-1 in 3 shared tests
vs 
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 vs Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
3-0 in 4 shared tests
vs 
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 vs Pirelli P Zero PZ5
0-2 in 2 shared tests
vs 
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 vs Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3
8-1 in 9 shared tests
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tire wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tires ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tire Reviews Score rates each tire out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tires can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tire Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tires independently since 2007.