Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 vs Continental MaxContact MC7
Ahead in each discipline
The Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 and the Continental MaxContact MC7 have met in one independent test so far, and the MaxContact MC7 finished ahead. The Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was stronger in value, the MaxContact MC7 in wet.
Performance profile
12 measurements from the one shared test, each tire shown as its share of the better figure.
Where each is furthest ahead
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
MaxContact MC7
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 118 ft stop against 112 ft is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it.
Where each scores higher
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
MaxContact MC7
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tires of the same season and class: 90 means this tire out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Where owners rate each higher
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
MaxContact MC7
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Owners rate the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 86% from 228 reviews and the MaxContact MC7 84% from 17. Each spoke is one question owners answer out of 10; reviews are vetted by hand before publication.
Every measurement, side by side
Both tires' figures from the one test that ran them together, on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The bar grows towards the tire that did better.
| Measurement | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 | Gap | MaxContact MC7 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Level | |||
| Dry Braking ft | 116 | 4.2% | 112 |
| Dry Handling s | 53.64 | 0.3% | 53.79 |
| Subj. Dry Handling pts | 7.5 | = | 7.5 |
| Wet MaxContact MC7 ahead | |||
| Wet Braking ft | 103 | 7% | 96 |
| Wet Handling s | 82.69 | 3.2% | 80.05 |
| Subj. Wet Handling pts | 6.8 | 10.3% | 7.5 |
| Wet Circle mph | 2.1 | 0.3% | 2.1 |
| Straight Aqua mph | 48.3 | 0.1% | 48.4 |
| Curved Aquaplaning ft/s² | 10.5 | 3.5% | 10.2 |
| Comfort Level | |||
| Subj. Comfort pts | 6.5 | 9.2% | 7.1 |
| Noise dB | 68.8 | 0.4 dB | 69.2 |
| Value Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 ahead | |||
| Rolling Resistance kg / t | 8.12 | 2.5% | 8.33 |
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tires shared.
Head to head in 1 test in 2024
Each row is one published test in which both tires ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 | Field | MaxContact MC7 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 TopTireReview Best UHP Tires for Asia Test | P4 of 6 | P1 of 6 |
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 vs MaxContact MC7: your questions
Is the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 or the Continental MaxContact MC7 the better tire?
The Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 and the Continental MaxContact MC7 have met in one independent test so far, and the MaxContact MC7 finished ahead. On the Tire Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 scores 9.7 and the MaxContact MC7 9.6 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 or the MaxContact MC7?
The MaxContact MC7 led 5 of the 6 wet measurements the shared tests recorded.
Which is better in the dry?
Across the shared tests the dry measurements are split 1-1 between the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 and the MaxContact MC7.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
Owners rate comfort 8.3/10 for the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 and 8.5/10 for the MaxContact MC7.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 86% from 228 reviews and the MaxContact MC7 84% from 17. 83% of Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 owners would buy it again, against 87% for the MaxContact MC7.
More comparisons with these tires
Every Goodyear vs Continental test → All comparisons → Compare three or more tires →
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tire wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tires ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tire Reviews Score rates each tire out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tires can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tire Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tires independently since 2007.

