Michelin CrossClimate+ vs Hankook Kinergy 4S2
In the 13 independent tests that ran both tires, the Michelin CrossClimate+ finished ahead 8 times and the Kinergy 4S2 5 times. The CrossClimate+ was stronger in dry and value, the Kinergy 4S2 in wet, snow and comfort.
Performance profile
14 measurements from the 13 shared tests, each tire shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
CrossClimate+
Kinergy 4S2
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 118 ft stop against 112 ft is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. The scale stops at 95%: a point further in sits on the hub's edge, hollow. 11 measurements recorded in only one shared test are left off; every measurement is in the table further down.
Where each scores higher
CrossClimate+
Kinergy 4S2
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tires of the same season and class: 90 means this tire out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Where owners rate each higher
CrossClimate+
Kinergy 4S2
Not ahead in any category
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Owners rate the CrossClimate+ 83% from 120 reviews and the Kinergy 4S2 75% from 72. Each spoke is one question owners answer out of 10; reviews are vetted by hand before publication.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tires posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Wins count the tests in which each tire did better.
| Measurement | CrossClimate+ | Gap | Kinergy 4S2 | Wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry CrossClimate+ ahead | ||||
| Dry Braking - Cool ft | 131 | 4% | 125 | 0-1 |
| Dry Braking ft | 129 | 4.2% | 135 | 8-0 |
| Dry Handling - Cool s | 76.9 | 0.1% | 77 | 1-0 |
| Dry Handling (s) | 85.17 | 0.5% | 85.58 | 2-0 |
| Dry Handling (mph) | 59.8 | 0.4% | 59.6 | 2-0 |
| Subj. Dry Handling pts | scored | 8% | scored | 1-0 |
| Wet Kinergy 4S2 ahead | ||||
| Wet Braking ft | 161 | 1.1% | 159 | 3-5 |
| Wet Braking - Cool ft | 185 | 11.5% | 209 | 1-0 |
| Wet Handling - Cool s | 90.6 | 4% | 94.4 | 1-0 |
| Wet Handling (s) | 70.06 | 2.3% | 68.49 | 0-2 |
| Wet Handling (mph) | 43.9 | 0.8% | 44.2 | 2-2 |
| Subj. Wet Handling pts | scored | = | scored | 0-0 |
| Straight Aqua mph | 46.5 | 5.5% | 49 | 0-6 |
| Curved Aquaplaning ft/s² | 5.9 | 19.4% | 7 | 0-1 |
| Snow Kinergy 4S2 ahead | ||||
| Snow Braking ft | 90 | 1.9% | 89 | 1-5 |
| Snow Traction s | 22.74 | 5.9% | 24.17 | 1-0 |
| Snow Traction (lbf) | 625 | 0.3% | 624 | 1-1 |
| Snow Handling s | 56.96 | 1.9% | 55.96 | 0-2 |
| Snow Handling (mph) | 30.7 | 0.2% | 30.7 | 1-3 |
| Subj. Snow Handling pts | scored | 2.9% | scored | 0-1 |
| Comfort Kinergy 4S2 ahead | ||||
| Subj. Comfort pts | scored | 8.9% | scored | 0-1 |
| Noise dB | 68.73 | 0.1 dB | 68.63 | 3-3 |
| Rough Noise dB | 68.4 | 1.3 dB | 67.1 | 0-1 |
| Value CrossClimate+ ahead | ||||
| Wear miles | 41,385 | 55.3% | 26,948 | 3-0 |
| Rolling Resistance kg / t | 8.47 | 2.4% | 8.68 | 4-2 |
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tires shared.
Head to head in 13 tests, 2018 to 2021
Each row is one published test in which both tires ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | CrossClimate+ | Field | Kinergy 4S2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 AZ All Season Tire Test | P4 of 9 | P5 of 9 | |
| 2020 Auto Express All Season Tire Test | P4 of 6 | P3 of 6 | |
| 2020 Auto Bild SUV All Season Tire Test | P5 of 11 | P1 of 11 | |
| 2020 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test | P4 of 14 | P7 of 14 | |
| 2020 All Season Tire Market Overview - 32 Tire Braking Test | P5 of 32 | P3 of 32 | |
| 2020 Tire Reviews All Season Tire Test | P5 of 9 | P2 of 9 | |
| 2019 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test | P1 of 10 | P5 of 10 | |
| 2019 ACE GTU All Season Tire Test | P6 of 8 | P5 of 8 | |
| 2019 Auto Express All Season Tire Test | P3 of 11 | P7 of 11 | |
| 2019 All Season Tire Performance Overview | P2 of 31 | P8 of 31 | |
| 2018 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test | P4 of 10 | P5 of 10 | |
| 2018 27 All Season Tire Shootout | P2 of 27 | P4 of 27 | |
| 7 of the best all season tires | P1 of 10 | P5 of 10 |
CrossClimate+ vs Kinergy 4S2: your questions
Is the Michelin CrossClimate+ or the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 the better tire?
In the 13 independent tests that ran both tires, the Michelin CrossClimate+ finished ahead 8 times and the Kinergy 4S2 5 times. On the Tire Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the CrossClimate+ scores 9.4 and the Kinergy 4S2 8.9 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the CrossClimate+ or the Kinergy 4S2?
The Kinergy 4S2 led 16 of the 24 wet measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it resisted straight aquaplaning at a 5.5% higher speed across 6 tests.
Which is better in the dry?
The CrossClimate+ led 14 of the 17 dry measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 4.2% shorter in the dry across 8 tests.
Which is better in snow?
The Kinergy 4S2 led 12 of the 16 snow measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 1.9% shorter on snow across 6 tests.
Which lasts longer and costs less to run?
The CrossClimate+ lasted 55.3% longer in the wear tests (3 tests) and had 2.4% lower rolling resistance (6 tests). Owners rate wear 8.7/10 for the CrossClimate+ and 7.6/10 for the Kinergy 4S2.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
Owners rate comfort 8.6/10 for the CrossClimate+ and 7.3/10 for the Kinergy 4S2.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the CrossClimate+ 83% from 120 reviews and the Kinergy 4S2 75% from 72. 87% of CrossClimate+ owners would buy it again, against 74% for the Kinergy 4S2.
Which is more expensive?
In the 6 tests that listed prices, the CrossClimate+ was the dearer tire in 6 of them, by 29.6% on average. Prices are the test's own at the time, in its own market.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The CrossClimate+ is made in 63 sizes (13 to 19 inch) and the Kinergy 4S2 in 96 (14 to 20 inch). 54 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the CrossClimate+ is graded B for wet grip and C for rolling resistance in most sizes; the Kinergy 4S2 B and C.
More comparisons with these tires
vs 
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 vs Nexen N Blue 4Season 2
5-1 in 6 shared tests
vs
Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Hankook Kinergy 4S2
11-1 in 12 shared tests
vs 
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
6-9 in 16 shared tests
vs 
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 vs Kleber Quadraxer 3
7-3 in 10 shared tests
vs 
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 vs Vredestein Quatrac
3-12 in 16 shared tests
vs
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 vs Hankook Kinergy 4S2
15-10 in 25 shared tests
vs
Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 vs Hankook Kinergy 4S2
8-3 in 13 shared tests
vs
Continental AllSeasonContact vs Hankook Kinergy 4S2
11-8 in 19 shared tests
Every Michelin vs Hankook test → All comparisons → Compare three or more tires →
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tire wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tires ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tire Reviews Score rates each tire out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tires can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tire Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tires independently since 2007.