Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Uniroyal AllSeasonExpert 3
In the 3 independent tests that ran both tires, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 finished ahead 3 times and the AllSeasonExpert 3 not once. The AllSeasonContact 2 was stronger in dry, wet, comfort and value, the AllSeasonExpert 3 in snow.
Performance profile
13 measurements from the 3 shared tests, each tire shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
AllSeasonContact 2
AllSeasonExpert 3
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 118 ft stop against 112 ft is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. The scale stops at 96%: a point further in sits on the hub's edge, hollow. 8 measurements recorded in only one shared test are left off; every measurement is in the table further down.
Where each scores higher
AllSeasonContact 2
AllSeasonExpert 3
Not ahead in any category
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tires of the same season and class: 90 means this tire out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Where owners rate each higher
AllSeasonContact 2
AllSeasonExpert 3
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Owners rate the AllSeasonContact 2 83% from 70 reviews and the AllSeasonExpert 3 78% from 3. Each spoke is one question owners answer out of 10; reviews are vetted by hand before publication.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tires posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Wins count the tests in which each tire did better.
| Measurement | AllSeasonContact 2 | Gap | AllSeasonExpert 3 | Wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry AllSeasonContact 2 ahead | ||||
| Dry Braking ft | 133 | 3.3% | 138 | 3-0 |
| Dry Handling mph | 66.5 | 2% | 65.3 | 2-0 |
| Subj. Dry Handling pts | scored | 12.5% | scored | 1-0 |
| Subj. Road Score pts | scored | = | scored | 0-0 |
| Wet AllSeasonContact 2 ahead | ||||
| Wet Braking ft | 130 | 2% | 133 | 3-0 |
| Wet Handling mph | 50.1 | 1% | 49.6 | 2-0 |
| Subj. Wet Handling pts | scored | 25% | scored | 1-0 |
| Wet Circle (mph) | 17.4 | 1.3% | 17.2 | 1-0 |
| Wet Circle (s) | 10.92 | 0.6% | 10.99 | 1-0 |
| Straight Aqua mph | 45.4 | 0.7% | 45.7 | 1-1 |
| Curved Aquaplaning ft/s² | 9.5 | 1.1% | 9.4 | 1-0 |
| Snow AllSeasonExpert 3 ahead | ||||
| Snow Braking ft | 97 | 1.1% | 98 | 1-0 |
| Snow Traction lbf | 214 | 2.9% | 222 | 0-2 |
| Snow Handling mph | 44.1 | 0.6% | 44.1 | 1-1 |
| Subj. Snow Handling pts | scored | = | scored | 0-0 |
| Snow Slalom ft/s² | 10.3 | 0.5% | 10.2 | 1-1 |
| Comfort AllSeasonContact 2 ahead | ||||
| Subj. Comfort pts | scored | 9.8% | scored | 1-0 |
| Noise dB | 71.3 | 0.4 dB | 71.7 | 2-0 |
| Value AllSeasonContact 2 ahead | ||||
| Wear miles | 39,737 | 20% | 33,119 | 1-0 |
| Rolling Resistance kg / t | 7.7 | 1.6% | 7.8 | 1-1 |
| Abrasion g | 275 | 3.8% | 286 | 1-0 |
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tires shared.
Head to head in 3 tests in 2026
Each row is one published test in which both tires ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | AllSeasonContact 2 | Field | AllSeasonExpert 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test | P5 of 15 | P12 of 15 | |
| 2026 All Season Tire Braking Test - 30 Sets | P8 of 30 | P14 of 30 | |
| 2026 AMS All Season Tire Test - 195/55 R16 | P1 of 9 | P6 of 9 |
AllSeasonContact 2 vs AllSeasonExpert 3: your questions
Is the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 or the Uniroyal AllSeasonExpert 3 the better tire?
In the 3 independent tests that ran both tires, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 finished ahead 3 times and the AllSeasonExpert 3 not once. On the Tire Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the AllSeasonContact 2 scores 9.5 and the AllSeasonExpert 3 8.7 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the AllSeasonContact 2 or the AllSeasonExpert 3?
The AllSeasonContact 2 led 10 of the 12 wet measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 2% shorter in the wet across 3 tests.
Which is better in the dry?
The AllSeasonContact 2 led 6 of the 7 dry measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 3.3% shorter in the dry across 3 tests.
Which is better in snow?
The AllSeasonExpert 3 led 4 of the 9 snow measurements the shared tests recorded.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
Owners rate comfort 8.9/10 for the AllSeasonContact 2 and 8/10 for the AllSeasonExpert 3.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the AllSeasonContact 2 83% from 70 reviews and the AllSeasonExpert 3 78% from 3.
Which is more expensive?
In the 2 tests that listed prices, the AllSeasonContact 2 was the dearer tire in 2 of them, by 32.8% on average. Prices are the test's own at the time, in its own market.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The AllSeasonContact 2 is made in 140 sizes (15 to 22 inch) and the AllSeasonExpert 3 in 78 (15 to 21 inch). 78 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the AllSeasonContact 2 is graded B for wet grip and B for rolling resistance in most sizes; the AllSeasonExpert 3 B and C.
More comparisons with these tires
vs 
Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3
10-15 in 26 shared tests
vs 
Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
8-4 in 13 shared tests
vs 
Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3
15-1 in 17 shared tests
vs 
Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Goodyear Vector All Season 4
0-7 in 7 shared tests
vs
Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 vs Continental AllSeasonContact 2
9-18 in 30 shared tests
vs 
Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Michelin CrossClimate 3
6-3 in 9 shared tests
vs 
Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Hankook Kinergy 4S2
11-1 in 12 shared tests
vs 
Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Michelin CrossClimate 3 Sport
2-4 in 6 shared tests
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tire wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tires ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tire Reviews Score rates each tire out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tires can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tire Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tires independently since 2007.