Menu

2011 Long Term Subjective Touring Shootout

Jonathan Benson
Data analyzed and reviewed by Jonathan Benson
3 min read Updated
Contents
  1. Introduction
  2. Continental Eco Contact 3
  3. Toyo 350
  4. Falken SN828
  5. Nexen SB652
Tire Reviews presents possibly the least scientific tire test in the world - our first "long term subjective touring shootout."



165/65 R13 isn't a big tire, but with the increase in small wheeled EVs it could be a tire size of the future. With that in mind, and with a suitable test vehicle turning up in the car park (Ford KA) we bought 4 sets of tires and covered 30,000 miles across all surfaces and during all conditions to work out which tire is the best in the real world.

While commuting in a Ford KA isn't as glamorous as chucking an Audi R8 around a track in Portugal, the little KA has a dynamic chassis which both rewards a balanced tire and punishes a bad one.

On test we have one premium brand, a Continental Eco Contact 3, two mid range brands comprising of a Toyo 350 and Falken SN828 and a budget Nexen SB652. Can one of the lesser brands upset the order and topple the premium Contenental? Check out the totally un-scientific results below!

1st

Continental Eco Contact 3

165/65 R13
Continental Eco Contact 3
  • 3PMSF: no
Total: 54
Dry 10
Wet 10
Subjective 5
Comfort 10
Noise 10
Wear 9
2nd

Toyo 350

165/65 R13
Toyo 350
  • 3PMSF: no
Total: 46
Dry 8
Wet 7
Subjective 10
Comfort 5
Noise 6
Wear 10
3rd

Falken SN828

165/65 R13
Falken SN828
  • 3PMSF: no
Total: 41
Dry 7
Wet 7
Subjective 8
Comfort 6
Noise 7
Wear 6
4th

Nexen SB652

165/65 R13
Nexen SB652
  • 3PMSF: no
Total: 36
Dry 5
Wet 4
Subjective 4
Comfort 9
Noise 7
Wear 7
comments powered by Disqus