Menu

Yokohama Advan A10

The Yokohama Advan A10 is a High Performance Summer tire designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

The quick answer

Owners say 59% from 18 owner reviews 12% would buy again Read the reviews
Tests say Sorry, we don't currently have any test data for the Yokohama Advan A10

Built from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold for this tire - the evidence is all further down the page. Data updated December 2019.

  • 18owner reviews
  • 260,016miles driven
  • 6sizes available

Tire Reviews Score

Yokohama Advan A10

6.3/10

From owner reviews only: no measured test results yet.

  • Limited Confidence
  • 18 owner reviews

How this score is built

Source Better than Weight
Independent testsNo measured test results yet – 0%
Owner reviews18 owner reviews · rated 59% 25% 55%
Typical tireWhere every score starts before its own data counts – 45%
Combined 33% 6.3

A fixed curve turns the combined figure into the 0 to 10 score, so roughly the top 10% of a group score 9 or more.

Confidence

  1. Limited
  2. Medium
  3. High

Owner reviews decide 55% of this score. The other 45% is the typical starting point, and it shrinks as more reviews arrive.

Scored on owner reviews alone, a tire is High once the reviews decide 90% or more, and Medium from 70%. Anything less is Limited: expect the number to move as reviews arrive.

All Tests

Sorry, we don't currently have any magazine tire tests for the Yokohama Advan A10

Dimensions & Label Scores
View All

Size Range5 sizes available

195-225Width45-55Profile16-18Rim87-94 V-WLoad/Speed Index2009First On Market

EU LabelAcross 5 sizes - the grade depends on the size you buy.

Noise

71dB B

Frequently Asked Questions
What is the Yokohama Advan A10's EU tire label rating?
Across its range, the Yokohama Advan A10 most commonly carries EU label ratings of D for fuel efficiency, C for wet grip and 71 dB for noise.
How comfortable and quiet are the Yokohama Advan A10?
Owners rate the Yokohama Advan A10 4.5 out of 10 for comfort and noise across 16 reviews.
How well do the Yokohama Advan A10 wear, according to owners?
Owners rate the Yokohama Advan A10 5.5 out of 10 for wear across 16 reviews. 9 of those reviews come from owners past 10,000 miles, and the typical review covers 10,500 miles.
Would owners buy the Yokohama Advan A10 again?
12% of owners say they would buy the Yokohama Advan A10 again, based on the 17 owner reviews that answered the question. 0% of them gave it the highest possible answer.
What do owners say about the Yokohama Advan A10's tread life?
Of the 15 owner reviews analyzed for the Yokohama Advan A10, 11 mention tread life: 2 praise it (long-lasting) and 9 criticise it (wears quickly). One owner wrote: "Really disappointing wear they have suffered". Read those reviews
More questions about the Yokohama Advan A10 (3)
What do owners say about the Yokohama Advan A10's dry grip?
Of the 15 owner reviews analyzed for the Yokohama Advan A10, 8 mention dry grip: 8 praise it (strong dry grip) and 0 criticise it (limited dry grip). One owner wrote: "Brilliant grip in all conditions - virtually impossible to lose traction". Read those reviews
What do owners say about the Yokohama Advan A10's road noise?
Of the 15 owner reviews analyzed for the Yokohama Advan A10, 8 mention road noise: 0 praise it (quiet) and 8 criticise it (noisy). One owner wrote: "the noise and harshness of these tires were very bad". Read those reviews
What sizes does the Yokohama Advan A10 come in?
The Yokohama Advan A10 is available in 6 sizes, ranging from 195-225/45-55 R16-18.
Owner Questions
Ask a question

Questions and Answers for the Yokohama Advan A10

Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Yokohama Advan A10. Why not submit a question to our tire experts using the form below!

Yokohama Advan A10 Owner Reviews

Review this tire

What owners say

Across 18 owner ratings the Yokohama Advan A10 averages 59%. Owners rate Dry Grip highest at 8.4 out of 10 and Comfort lowest at 4.5. 9 of those reviews come from owners past 10,000 miles. 6% of owners score it 70% or better.

Owner ratings averaged from 18 ratings

  • Owner score 59%
  • Dry Grip 84%
  • Road Feedback 66%
  • Wet Grip 66%
  • Handling 64%
  • Wear 55%
  • Comfort 45%

Featured reviews

Most helpful 65%

“I am a Malaysian living in the town area, these tires came fitted as standard on my Mitsubishi Lancer GTE 2.0 final edition. I am not looking for sports car performance tires, but I know the need for safety at speed. I...”

  • Mitsubishi Lancer GTE 2.0 Ralliart Mivec
  • 10 miles
Read full review → 801 found this helpful
Most critical 44%

“Had these on my Mitsubishi Lancer Ralliart. The sidewalls cracked on all 4 tires after only 10000 miles. Had an MOT advisory on them, that was it.. Threw them away with around 4 mm of tread and fitted Kumho Ecsta's...”

  • Mitsubishi
  • 10,000 miles
Read full review → 605 found this helpful
Longest term 66%

“I am an Australian living in Thailand and these tires came fitted as standard on my Mitsubishi Lancer GT. I am not looking for sports car performance, but know the need for safety at speed. The road holding is very...”

  • Mitsubishi Lancer EX 2.0 GT
  • 31,000 miles
Read full review → 577 found this helpful

All 16 Yokohama Advan A10 reviews

Score spread across 16 written reviews
65%
Member
I am a Malaysian living in the town area, these tires came fitted as standard on my Mitsubishi Lancer GTE 2.0 final edition. I am not looking for sports car performance tires, but I know the need for safety at speed. I was really frustrated when the sidewall of my 2 front tires cracked at just 10000 miles of driving. I heard many people suffered the same problem. So I wont buy this Yokohama tires anymore since they made me lost so much money plus it was hard to find stokis in my area. In terms of the road holding, it was impressive and we felt safe at all times in dry conditions. However the noise and harshness of these tires were very bad. Any journey greater than an hour and everyone suffered bad aches. During wet condition the handling felt a bit slippery and not so stable. They made u to stay cautious at all time during the rain. The wear was just ok. Malaysia's roads are unforgiving. Some areas have nice highway style driving, but most areas are B roads at best. Now Im using Michelin Primacy 4 tire as i heard it has a better performance. But they are still new for me to be reviewed. Just wait until i ve tested in all features first, then I'll let u all know.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 8
  • Wet Grip 6
  • Road Feedback 7
  • Handling 6
  • Wear 6
  • Comfort 6
Helpful 801
47%
Member
These tires came as stick on my Lancer Ralliart in 2014. rotated only about 3 times max, i should've do 2 times more. but anyways. The front tire's outside tread, all gone. thats only at 24000K driven. Mostly australian Town road. occasionally I go for bit of fast driving for the feel of push against the seat. I also go corners bit fast, probably 50% of the time. Thats probably why it wears out on the outside mostly. the inner and center tread still got maybe 4-5mm left ( front two) the rear two goes normal so far but the outside tread has started to show signs of uneven wear, need an alignment...anyways, Dry grip are very good. Wet grip, scared me by surprise. In a rainy day or non raining but just wet/oil (standard Aussie town's tarmac road), it looses it. When I tried to turn corner after stopping, Fish tail the car, going like a snake pattern. lucky there was no car nearby. This is after I have the car for about 2 month. The road noise just terrible over all. Im not sure whether its due to Mitsubishi general poor road/cabin noise isolation or just the tire itself. the Vibration, the hash ride, the coarse feeling while driving, the noise from tire or the road, Im glade now its due for a change. I just ordered the KU39, Reviews and suggestions from friends have been good. I will test it out soon and make a review on that tire. I would genuinely advise people to avoid the A10 tire. they are ok when new, not so great when worn down.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 7
  • Wet Grip 6
  • Road Feedback 6
  • Handling 5
  • Wear 4
  • Comfort 4
  • Buy again 1
Helpful 664
50%
Member
Really disappointing wear they have suffered, the change because they have lost grip and wear suffered has been severe, without aggressive driving. The front two are completely smooth on the inside (possibly either by misalignment, even that if he left the factory is by the fall of the front axle) but after five years the change for two reasons the desgate primarily and how long they have mounted. I will never buy this brand, also far Car Series is 215-45 R18 and 225/40 R18 now be installing some that are much more economical.

Saludos desde Barcelona.!
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 7
  • Wet Grip 5
  • Road Feedback 5
  • Handling 6
  • Wear 5
  • Comfort 4
  • Buy again 3
Helpful 589

Which tires do you drive?

Researching the Yokohama Advan A10? Rate the tires you actually drive - and help the next buyer choose.

Own the Yokohama Advan A10?
44%
Member
  • Mitsubishi
  • 225/45 R17
  • 10,000 miles
  • Mostly Country Roads
  • Spirited
Had these on my Mitsubishi Lancer Ralliart. The sidewalls cracked on all 4 tires after only 10000 miles. Had an MOT advisory on them, that was it.. Threw them away with around 4 mm of tread and fitted Kumho Ecsta's, what a difference, far superior tire. Never again would I buy Yokohamas, beware sidewall cracking, since then I have heard of other people suffering the same problem.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 8
  • Wet Grip 7
  • Road Feedback 7
  • Handling 4
  • Wear 1
  • Comfort 3
  • Buy again 1
Helpful 605
69%
Member
This is a standard tires on my Lexus but I found it not really matching the character of this type of vechicle. Perhaps if I'm in early 20s then might consider about it, but at meantime I'll better stick to something softer and quieter.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 10
  • Wet Grip 5
  • Road Feedback 8
  • Handling 8
  • Wear 7
  • Comfort 5
  • Buy again 5
Helpful 588
66%
Member
I am an Australian living in Thailand and these tires came fitted as standard on my Mitsubishi Lancer GT. I am not looking for sports car performance, but know the need for safety at speed. The road holding is very impressive and we felt safe at all times in all conditions. However the noise and harshness of these tires was very bad. Any journey greater than an hour and everyone suffered bad aches. The wear was impressive though....50,000kms. And Thailand roads are unforgiving. Some areas have nice highway style driving, but most areas are B roads at best. I used this website to review tires when I needed to change. I was hoping to move away from Yokohama altogether. However sourcing alternate tires for my Lancer locally proved frustrating. Reluctantly I chose Yokohama Advan dBs. To my delight these tires are sensational. The same road holding with great comfort and low noise. Now I just hope to get as much life from them as the previous.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 9
  • Wet Grip 9
  • Road Feedback 9
  • Handling 7
  • Wear 9
  • Comfort 2
  • Buy again 1
Helpful 577
54%
Member
I've never owned before a tire that lasts less than 10000 miles.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 8
  • Wet Grip 8
  • Road Feedback 7
  • Handling 7
  • Wear 2
  • Comfort 5
  • Buy again 1
Helpful 632
51%
Member
  • Honda CR Z
  • 195/55 R16
  • 7,990 miles
  • A Combination of Roads
  • Spirited
These tires were fitted as standard to my Honda CR-Z when I bought it. The car itself had only done about 6900 miles and was bought as an ex-Honda rep mobile so presumably most of those had been done on motorways and test tracks. I've put about 1000 miles on them myself and they are already down to about 50% tread, so I wouldn't expect more than 15-18,000 miles out of a set.

These tires are a bit of a mystery to me actually because they have all the hallmarks of an economy tire (hard compound, asymmetric tread design, come as standard equipment on a car designed for economy) yet somehow still manage to return pretty disappointing economy figures and are officially rated as a D for economy. I'm getting around 42mpg out of my hybrid CR-Z, and while I drive in a spirited manner, I'm not a hooligan redlining at every traffic light or smashing 100 on motorways, I stick to speed limits and hit the Eco button when in heavy traffic. If the official figures are to be believed, and I don't think in this case that they are in any way unreasonable, I should be returning around 48mpg, which I'm obviously not. I can only suspect it has something to do with the tires.

Grip in the dry is as good as can be expected from any Yokohama tire (this is the third set I've tried) but wet grip leaves a lot to be desired, on properly wet roads they seem sure footed enough and they've never come unstuck round a corner on me, but you know that point where a road isn't wet-wet and it isn't dry, it's sort of oily/slick? That's when this tire really suffers. Cornering remains stable at sensible speeds but pulling out of junctions becomes more about taking it slow and steady, as any revs over about 1700rpm spins the wheels in these oily conditions causing the ESC to kick in, making a quick junction getaway become a juddery, slow crawl from the line, not good on roundabouts or crossing carriageways. That said, if you understand this and adjust your driving accordingly it shouldn't be an issue, just drive safely and take a bit extra time on oily roads.

I bought the car in December so had the opportunity to treat it to some British snow and the tires performed exactly as you'd expect summer tires to.

All-in-all they aren't the worst tire out there, they just aren't the best and definitely don't live up to the Yokohama name. Considering a new set of these for my car will cost around £110 a corner, I think it's safe to say I will not be buying them again, I'll stick with a tire I know to grip better in oily conditions like the S-Drive or go for a tire that returns better mpg figures.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 8
  • Wet Grip 5
  • Road Feedback 2
  • Handling 2
  • Wear 6
  • Comfort 8
  • Buy again 5
Helpful 590
84%
Member
  • Subaru
  • 225/45 R17
  • 30,000 miles
  • Mostly Town
  • Spirited
Got these tires on my AWD Subaru 3years ago. Just needed to replace 2 now.
Great grip on the dry, I found them fine in the wet too.
Only average offroad.
I drive very aggressively so extremely impressed that they lasted 3 years.

This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 10
  • Wet Grip 7
  • Road Feedback 8
  • Handling 8
  • Wear 10
  • Comfort 7
  • Buy again 9
Helpful 605
46%
Member
Handled well in the dry, couldn't lose grip if I wanted to. However, a completely different story in the wet, moist, snow, or ice. I don't drive that aggressively but I could feel the limit of grip more often than I should have. Noise was okay, getting pretty loud over 65mph though. The main downfall of these tires is that they wore down so quickly. Properly balanced they only lasted 25,000 miles. I'm in the military so most (about 85%) of that mileage is motorway miles.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 8
  • Wet Grip 5
  • Road Feedback 7
  • Handling 5
  • Wear 2
  • Comfort 4
  • Buy again 1
Helpful 612
56%
Member
Loud and hard.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 8
  • Wet Grip 6
  • Road Feedback 3
  • Handling 8
  • Wear 7
  • Comfort 3
  • Buy again 4
Helpful 554
67%
Member
  • Mitsubishi
  • 215/45 R18
  • 8,500 miles
  • Mostly Town
  • Average
Excellent Dry Grip tires..car stick to the road like a glue on a dry hot weather,but wearthread does too wear off easily
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 9
  • Wet Grip 7
  • Road Feedback 7
  • Handling 8
  • Wear 5
  • Comfort 5
  • Buy again 6
Helpful 650
Find your next tire
All tire tests
Rate your tires

My tires

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tires

Save tires from a tire page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tires. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.