The Kumho WinterCraft Ice finishes last. The pattern was updated a few years ago but that appears to apply to only a limited number of sizes, and in this test size it combines low stud protrusion with the hardest compound in the field, which is a poor recipe for a studded tire. It is competent on dry asphalt and cheap to run, but a studded tire is bought for ice, and here it cannot deliver.
Where the Kumho WinterCraft Ice Wi32 finished in each measured discipline, across every test that measured it against at least two other tires. Field beaten is the share of the other tires it outranked in that measurement.
Record by discipline
Discipline
Tests
Avg finish
Field beaten
Firsts
Dry
Dry Braking
3
P5.7 of 8
34%
-
Subj. Dry Handling
2
P5 of 7.5
36%
-
Wet
Wet Braking
3
P7.3 of 8
9%
-
Wet Handling
3
P8 of 8
0%
-
Subj. Wet Handling
2
P6.5 of 7.5
14%
-
Straight Aqua
2
P7 of 8
14%
-
Snow
Snow Braking
3
P7 of 8
14%
-
Snow Traction
3
P5 of 8
43%
-
Snow Handling
2
P6.5 of 8.5
25%
-
Subj. Snow Handling
1
P6 of 8
29%
-
Ice
Ice Braking
3
P6 of 8
32%
-
Ice Traction
3
P6 of 8
32%
-
Ice Handling
2
P6 of 8.5
31%
-
Subj. Ice Handling
1
P3 of 8
71%
-
Comfort
Subj. Comfort
1
P8 of 8
0%
-
Subj. Noise
3
P5.3 of 8
43%
1
Noise
1
P7 of 8
14%
-
Value
Fuel Consumption
2
P2 of 8
86%
1
Head-to-head record
Overall finishing position against the tires that have most often shared a test with the Kumho WinterCraft Ice Wi32. Only tires tested alongside it at least three times are listed.
The Kumho WinterCraft Ice Wi32 usually finishes near the back of its studded winter field, with wet-road performance and noise recurring concerns. Wet handling was last among nine studded tires in the 2021 Teknikens Varld test, last of seven in the 2025 Tekniikan Maailma test and last of eight in the 2026 Vi Bilagare test. Wet braking was also weak, including 40.8m and last in its class in the 2025 Finnish comparison.
Ice results vary unusually widely. In 205/55 R16, Tekniikan Maailma 2025 recorded second of seven for ice braking and traction, but Vi Bilagare 2026, in 215/65 R17, found it last for ice braking, traction and handling, with the stopping distance 113.1% longer than best. Noise also has an unusual exception: it led its class on the subjective rating in the Finnish 2025 test, despite noise criticism in the other three comparisons. Comfort was last in its studded class in Teknikens Varld 2025. Dry-road stability and efficiency were better in Vi Bilagare 2026, including the lowest fuel consumption, but the testers criticised abrupt breakaway on snow. Different sizes and tests give sharply different ice and refinement results, while wet weaknesses are more consistent.
Performance Strengths
Ice gripMinorin 3 of 4 testsDetails
Second of seven studded tires for ice braking and traction, 2025 Tekniikan Maailma, 205/55 R16
Third of eight in class for subjective ice handling, 2025 Teknikens Varld
Last of eight for all three ice disciplines, 2026 Vi Bilagare, 215/65 R17, contradicts those stronger results
the V60 becomes choppy, loses its fine directional stability, and during mild cornering, the tire makes the car disturbingly unpredictable in its reactions - 2025 Studded, Friction and European Winter Tire Test (2025)
Dry handlingMinorin 1 of 4 testsDetails
control becomes difficult during evasive maneuvers as the front tires are prone to losing grip easily in both wet and dry conditions - 2025 Friction and Studded Winter Tire Test (2025)
Every test, newest first 4
Strong = top two of the field in that measurement. Weak = bottom two.
No tests match these filters. Clear a filter to see more.
The Kumho WinterCraft Ice finishes last. The pattern was updated a few years ago but that appears to apply to only a limited number of sizes, and in this test size it combines low stud protrusion with the hardest compound in the field, which is a poor recipe for a studded tire. It is competent on dry asphalt and cheap to run, but a studded tire is bought for ice, and here it cannot deliver.
The Kumho WinterCraft ice Wi32 absolutely destroys any notion of comfort with brutally high and distinctive noise levels - the stud noise is so loud and characteristic that it resembles an airplane propeller engine, suddenly making the Volvo V60 test car remarkably uncomfortable. When switched to Nordic friction Michelin X-Ice Snow afterward, nearly all road noise vanishes and the car suddenly becomes remarkably quiet, highlighting just how extreme Kumho's noise problem is. Beyond the noise disaster, Kumho also negatively affects how the car behaves on the road - the V60 becomes choppy, loses its fine directional stability, and during mild cornering, the tire makes the car disturbingly unpredictable in its reactions. While it manages decent ice grip when pointing straight ahead, this is completely overshadowed by the comfort catastrophe. Even with a significantly lower price than competitors, the appalling noise levels and poor road manners make this tire impossible to recommend. It represents everything that gives studded tires a bad reputation, taken to an extreme that's simply unacceptable for modern motoring.
The Kumho WinterCraft ice Wi32 has excellent grip for braking and accelerating on ice, though its cornering grip is weaker. It tends to understeer in fast situations but remains easy to control, and its behavior on snow is calm despite an imprecise steering feel. On asphalt, its characteristics are mediocre, and control becomes difficult during evasive maneuvers as the front tires are prone to losing grip easily in both wet and dry conditions.