Falken Eurowinter HS01 - Test Results
Test Statistics
24
Tests Completed11th
Average Position5th
Best Result31st
Worst ResultPerformance Analysis
Across 24 winter-focused tests, the Falken Eurowinter HS01 delivers mixed but recognizable patterns: strong aquaplaning resistance and occasional wet braking competence, offset by persistently high rolling resistance and inconsistent snow/wet handling. It often finishes mid-pack overall (average 10.6), with standout straight-line aquaplaning wins and frequent top-3 aquaplaning results. However, energy efficiency is a clear liability, and snow performance varies by size/type, sometimes dropping to the bottom group.
Overall, the HS01 suits drivers prioritizing hydroplaning safety and fair value, but it lags in efficiency and can trail leaders in cohesive wet/snow handling balance. Later tests hint at competitive dry/wet handling in UHP sizes, but the tire is frequently penalized by rolling resistance and variability on snow.
Performance Strengths
-
Aquaplaning Resistance
Strong
Details
• 1st place straight aquaplaning in 2022 Auto Bild SUV test (225/45 R19)
• 1st place straight and curved aquaplaning in 2022 AMS UHP test (245/45 R19)
• 1st place straight aquaplaning in 2018 Auto Bild Winter Test (195/65 R15)
-
Wet Braking (select sizes) and Overall Wet Safety
Moderate
Details
• 3rd place wet braking in 2022 Sports Car UHP test (+8.5% from best)
• 2nd place wet braking in 2021 AMS test (195/55 R16, +6.1% from best)
-
Dry Handling (UHP contexts) and Value
Moderate
Details
• 2nd place dry handling in 2022 AMS UHP test (245/45 R19, +0.6% from best)
• Top-5 dry braking in multiple tests (e.g., 4th/10 in 2022 UHP; 4th/14 in 2020 AZ)
• Competitive pricing positions (e.g., 2nd/8 in 2022 AMS; 3rd/13 in 2021 AB Sportscars)
-
Noise/Comfort (select tests)
Minor
Details
• 1st place lowest external noise in 2021 AMS (195/55 R16)
• Top-half noise results in 2022 UHP (4/10)
Performance Weaknesses
-
Rolling Resistance / Efficiency
Strong
Details
• Last place rolling resistance in 2022 UHP (10/10, +27.6%)
• Last place in 2022 Auto Bild Winter Test (22/22, +48.8%)
• Last place in 2021 AB Sportscars (14/14, +29.2%)
• Bottom in 2022 SUV (11/11, +36.3%)
-
Snow Performance Consistency
Strong
Details
• Last in snow braking/traction/handling in 2022 AMS UHP (8/8; +18-21% from best)
• Bottom group snow metrics in 2022 SUV (10/11 braking, 10/11 traction, 10/11 slalom)
• Mid-to-lower snow results in 2021 AB Winter (19/22 braking, 20/22 traction)
-
Wet Handling Balance (non-UHP/mid sizes)
Moderate
Details
• 13/14 wet handling and 13/14 wet circle in 2021 AB Sportscars (+6-9% from best)
• 9/11 wet handling in 2022 SUV (+2.7% from best)
• 13/22 to 19/22 wet metrics in 2022 AB Winter (e.g., wet circle 19/22, +5.3%)
Performance Over Time
Test History
Straight Aqua
Rolling Resistance, Curved Aquaplaning, Wet Circle
Rolling Resistance
Straight Aqua
Noise, Dry Handling, Snow Braking, Snow Slalom, Snow Traction, Rolling Resistance
2022 ADAC SUV Winter Tire Test - 215/60 R16
2022
Winner: Continental WinterContact TS 870
Dry Handling, Snow Circle, Price, Curved Aquaplaning, Straight Aqua, Wet Handling
Noise, Snow Braking, Snow Handling, Snow Traction, Rolling Resistance
2021 Auto Bild Sports Car Winter Tire Test
2021
Winner: Hankook Winter i cept evo3
Rolling Resistance, Wet Circle, Wet Handling
2021 Auto Bild Winter Tire Test
2021
Winner: Continental WinterContact TS 870
Rolling Resistance
2021 AMS Winter Tire Test
2021
Winner: Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
Noise, Price, Straight Aqua, Wet Braking
Dry Braking, Snow Traction, Rolling Resistance
2020 Winter Tire Market Overview - 52 Tire Braking Test
2020
Winner: Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
2018 Autobild UHP Winter Tire Test
2018
Winner: Vredestein Wintrac Pro
Noise, Rolling Resistance
2018 Auto Bild Winter Tire Test
2018
Winner: Dunlop Winter Sport 5
Price, Straight Aqua