Menu

Falken Eurowinter HS01 - Test Results

Test Statistics

24

Tests Completed

11th

Average Position

5th

Best Result

31st

Worst Result

Performance Analysis

Falken Eurowinter HS01 - Official Image

Across 24 winter-focused tests, the Falken Eurowinter HS01 delivers mixed but recognizable patterns: strong aquaplaning resistance and occasional wet braking competence, offset by persistently high rolling resistance and inconsistent snow/wet handling. It often finishes mid-pack overall (average 10.6), with standout straight-line aquaplaning wins and frequent top-3 aquaplaning results. However, energy efficiency is a clear liability, and snow performance varies by size/type, sometimes dropping to the bottom group.
Overall, the HS01 suits drivers prioritizing hydroplaning safety and fair value, but it lags in efficiency and can trail leaders in cohesive wet/snow handling balance. Later tests hint at competitive dry/wet handling in UHP sizes, but the tire is frequently penalized by rolling resistance and variability on snow.

Performance Strengths
  • Aquaplaning Resistance Strong
    • 1st place straight aquaplaning in 2022 Auto Bild SUV test (225/45 R19)
    • 1st place straight and curved aquaplaning in 2022 AMS UHP test (245/45 R19)
    • 1st place straight aquaplaning in 2018 Auto Bild Winter Test (195/65 R15)
  • Wet Braking (select sizes) and Overall Wet Safety Moderate
    • 3rd place wet braking in 2022 Sports Car UHP test (+8.5% from best)
    • 2nd place wet braking in 2021 AMS test (195/55 R16, +6.1% from best)
  • Dry Handling (UHP contexts) and Value Moderate
    • 2nd place dry handling in 2022 AMS UHP test (245/45 R19, +0.6% from best)
    • Top-5 dry braking in multiple tests (e.g., 4th/10 in 2022 UHP; 4th/14 in 2020 AZ)
    • Competitive pricing positions (e.g., 2nd/8 in 2022 AMS; 3rd/13 in 2021 AB Sportscars)
  • Noise/Comfort (select tests) Minor
    • 1st place lowest external noise in 2021 AMS (195/55 R16)
    • Top-half noise results in 2022 UHP (4/10)
Performance Weaknesses
  • Rolling Resistance / Efficiency Strong
    • Last place rolling resistance in 2022 UHP (10/10, +27.6%)
    • Last place in 2022 Auto Bild Winter Test (22/22, +48.8%)
    • Last place in 2021 AB Sportscars (14/14, +29.2%)
    • Bottom in 2022 SUV (11/11, +36.3%)
  • Snow Performance Consistency Strong
    • Last in snow braking/traction/handling in 2022 AMS UHP (8/8; +18-21% from best)
    • Bottom group snow metrics in 2022 SUV (10/11 braking, 10/11 traction, 10/11 slalom)
    • Mid-to-lower snow results in 2021 AB Winter (19/22 braking, 20/22 traction)
  • Wet Handling Balance (non-UHP/mid sizes) Moderate
    • 13/14 wet handling and 13/14 wet circle in 2021 AB Sportscars (+6-9% from best)
    • 9/11 wet handling in 2022 SUV (+2.7% from best)
    • 13/22 to 19/22 wet metrics in 2022 AB Winter (e.g., wet circle 19/22, +5.3%)
Performance Over Time

Test History

5
of 10
2022 Sports Car UHP Winter Tire Test

2022
Winner: Bridgestone Blizzak LM005

Good.
Strong:
Straight Aqua
Weak:
Rolling Resistance, Curved Aquaplaning, Wet Circle
13
of 22
2022 Auto Bild Winter Tire Test

2022
Winner: Michelin Alpin 6

Good.
Weak:
Rolling Resistance
8
of 10
2022 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tire Test

2022
Winner: Michelin Pilot Alpin 5

Satisfying.
Strong:
Straight Aqua
Weak:
Noise, Dry Handling, Snow Braking, Snow Slalom, Snow Traction, Rolling Resistance
12
of 57
2022 Winter Tire Market Overview

2022
Winner: Bridgestone Blizzak LM005

14
of 17
2022 ADAC SUV Winter Tire Test - 215/60 R16

2022
Winner: Continental WinterContact TS 870

The FALKEN Eurowinter HS01 shows weaknesses on dry roads, which is why it is only just rated as satisfactory overall. He can convince in all other main criteria, but due to his pronounced lack of d...
6
of 8
2022 AMS Winter Tire Test

2022
Winner: Michelin Pilot Alpin 5

Sufficient.
Strong:
Dry Handling, Snow Circle, Price, Curved Aquaplaning, Straight Aqua, Wet Handling
Weak:
Noise, Snow Braking, Snow Handling, Snow Traction, Rolling Resistance
9
of 14
2021 Auto Bild Sports Car Winter Tire Test

2021
Winner: Hankook Winter i cept evo3

Weak:
Rolling Resistance, Wet Circle, Wet Handling
12
of 22
2021 Auto Bild Winter Tire Test

2021
Winner: Continental WinterContact TS 870

Weak:
Rolling Resistance
8
of 10
2021 AMS Winter Tire Test

2021
Winner: Bridgestone Blizzak LM005

Strong:
Noise, Price, Straight Aqua, Wet Braking
Weak:
Dry Braking, Snow Traction, Rolling Resistance
7
of 16
2021 ADAC 15 Inch Winter Tire Test

2021
Winner: Dunlop Winter Response 2

19
of 49
2021 Winter Tire Market Overview

2021
Winner: Bridgestone Blizzak LM005

8
of 14
2020 Auto Zeitung Winter Tire Test

2020
Winner: Bridgestone Blizzak LM005

6
of 9
2020 Auto Express Winter Tire Test

2020
Winner: Bridgestone Blizzak LM005

9
of 9
2020 ACE Winter Tire Test

2020
Winner: Bridgestone Blizzak LM005

Conditionally Recommended.
6
of 15
2020 ADAC Winter Tire Test - 205/55 R16

2020
Winner: Bridgestone Blizzak LM005

31
of 49
2020 Winter Tire Market Overview - 52 Tire Braking Test

2020
Winner: Bridgestone Blizzak LM005

5
of 12
2019 Auto Express Winter Tire Test

2019
Winner: Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Plus

25
of 47
2019 Winter Tire Test Market Overview

2019
Winner: Bridgestone Blizzak LM005

7
of 16
2019 ADAC 185/65 R15 Winter Tire Test

2019
Winner: Dunlop Winter Response 2

Good
8
of 11
2018 Autobild UHP Winter Tire Test

2018
Winner: Vredestein Wintrac Pro

Weak:
Noise, Rolling Resistance
8
of 10
2018 Auto Express Winter Tire Test

2018
Winner: Continental WinterContact TS 860

8
of 22
2018 Auto Bild Winter Tire Test

2018
Winner: Dunlop Winter Sport 5

Strong:
Price, Straight Aqua
11
of 52
2018 51 Winter Tire Shootout

2018
Winner: Continental WinterContact TS 860

9
of 16
2017 ADAC Winter Tire Test - 195/65 R15

2017
Winner: Continental WinterContact TS 860