Menu

Continental Eco Contact 5 Owner Reviews

Review this tire

What owners say summarised from 74 reviews

Driver feedback on the Continental EcoContact 5 is mixed overall. Many higher-scoring reviews praise its low rolling resistance/fuel economy, strong dry grip and braking, and in some cases excellent longevity. However, a large share of mid/low scores report poor wet and cold-weather traction (including aquaplaning and winter use), along with frequent complaints about road noise on coarse surfaces and a soft/vague sidewall feel that reduces steering precision.

What owners mention most counted across 73 reviews

Tap one to read only the reviews that mention it.

Owner ratings averaged from 91 ratings

  • Owner score 69%
  • Dry Grip 79%
  • Wear 74%
  • Handling 69%
  • Road Feedback 68%
  • Comfort 68%
  • Wet Grip 68%

Continental Eco Contact 5 Reviews - Page 3

Score spread across 71 written reviews
Member
  • Nissan Juke
  • 225/45 R17 R
  • 14,000 miles
  • A Combination of Roads
  • Average
I have bought Nisaan Juke in June 2018. Brand new car and brand new tires. 14 000 miles later both front tires are bold with metal bits sticking out. I am driving on A3 most of the time and locally near Guilford. Will avoid these tires as much as possible. Will not recommend to anyone.
76%
Member
Good tires, long lasting, and have great fuel savings. The only problem with them is that the sidewalls are mad thin to reduce weight, and with all the potholes in the UK it can lead to gouges forming on the sidewall.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 8
  • Wet Grip 7
  • Road Feedback 5
  • Handling 6
  • Wear 8
  • Comfort 10
  • Buy again 9
Helpful 958
65%
Member
Having come fitted on our new Clio 4 we were not disappointed. We live in Crete, Greece so 95% of our driving is on dry roads. Having said that the roads here are VERY winding and great fun to push the car around. The tires make you feel confident and have great grip on tight country road corners. I have never felt at risk from these tires at all. Our national road ( motorway) is also very winding but the tires feel well able to handle fast driving on good tarmac. As for the wet, I cannot comment as you always drive carefully after a dry spell when it first rains. I love these tires for our type of driving but cannot comment on wet conditions.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 9
  • Wet Grip 6
  • Road Feedback 7
  • Handling 8
  • Comfort 4
  • Buy again 5
Helpful 795

Which tires do you drive?

Researching the Continental Eco Contact 5? Rate the tires you actually drive - and help the next buyer choose.

Own the Continental Eco Contact 5?
86%
Member
  • Ford Focus
  • 195/60 R15 V
  • 15,000 miles
  • Mostly Country Roads
  • Spirited
Returned to these tires after fitting budget option. The car is a pleasure to drive again.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 9
  • Wet Grip 9
  • Road Feedback 9
  • Handling 9
  • Wear 7
  • Comfort 8
  • Buy again 9
Helpful 734
63%
Member
Very average tires, grips ok both in dry and wet, atrocious in snow or low temperature. However is quite hardwearing (30,000 miles) at the expense of comfort and noise. There are better and cheaper tires, so will not recommend.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 7
  • Wet Grip 6
  • Road Feedback 6
  • Handling 6
  • Wear 9
  • Comfort 5
  • Buy again 5
Helpful 808
Member
  • Renault 12
  • 205/50 R17 V
  • 15,000 miles
  • A Combination of Roads
  • Average
20000 were bald. We're noisy and expensive to replace .
50%
Member
About average in dry, but very bad, even dangerous in wet especially in lower temperatures.
Good on wear.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 5
  • Wet Grip 3
  • Road Feedback 4
  • Handling 6
  • Wear 9
  • Comfort 7
  • Buy again 1
Helpful 735
87%
Member
I have these on a Renault Grand Scenic 150PS, quite heavy car and they feel great. I don't have any grip issues in any weather with my driving style. To be fair on an MPV you don't really push them to the limit. Wear is good, driven 10k miles hardly visible on them. I would definitely buy these again.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 9
  • Wet Grip 8
  • Road Feedback 8
  • Handling 8
  • Wear 9
  • Comfort 9
  • Buy again 10
Helpful 795
79%
Member
These were the originals of the car when I bought it new. They did 63.000km of 90% motorway and 10% city driving before coming down to 3,3mm when I decided to replace them, because they couldn't drain (heavy) rainwater so easily anymore.

I agree with what people say here about these tires, except wet grip and wear. They never seem to have any problem whatsoever with wet conditions. The grip was always there, whether I faced a light drizzle or heavy rainfall or slippery roads, you name it.

Dry grip was very good, never faced a problem there. On feedback, comfort and handling, I think that they perform on par with their league, no surprises there. They do what they are supposed to do.

I left wear for the end because I just don't understand people who want their tires to outlive Highlander. Surely, I wouldn't be happy with my tires if I had to replace them every 15-20.000km, but this is not the case here according to my experience. And afterall, better grip affects longevity. How each of us defines better or worse wear is a matter of semantics.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 9
  • Wet Grip 9
  • Road Feedback 7
  • Handling 8
  • Wear 7
  • Comfort 7
  • Buy again 8
Helpful 905
52%
Member
These tires were fitted as standard to my new 2018 vehicle. I retained them for but a couple of months (& 1,500 miles) before replacing with Nokian Weatherproof All Season tires. Something of an extravagance I accept, but I also had these tires ( although the Ecocontact 3's at that time) factory-fitted to my previous car - the same model, albeit the 2015 version. Those lasted but 4.5k miles (& but a few more months) before I lashed out & replaced those with Goodyear Vector 4 Seasons Generation 2 tires - another possible extravagance. However the Mark 3 Continentals had only just replaced the Mark 1, & within around 1 year the Mark 3 had been replaced by the Mark 5. The Mark 5 has now been replaced by the Mark 6 (in what? just a few months), so with such a constant replacement/improvement, I personally have little faith in them. The Goodyear 4 Seasons I found to be absolutely first class, and I rate the Nokian Weatherproofs' equally highly, & never regretted the expense involved in changing them, & while probably unnecessary, to me, it was money well worth spending - one needs to have confidence in their tires, as there's but 4 chunks of palm-sized rubber that keeps the vehicle on the road, & one out of their "box".
You pays your money & you makes your choice - but there's no pockets in Shrouds.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 7
  • Wet Grip 6
  • Comfort 5
  • Buy again 1
Helpful 814
53%
Member
  • SEAT Mii
  • 175/65 R14 T
  • 500 miles
  • Mostly Town
  • Spirited
These came fitted to my SEAT Mii when new. They grip rather well in the dry and give assured cornering BUT they have a habit of flicking the car back to a straight line, as though they are underinflated (they are not) and they give very little feedback from the road - it isn't obvious when or whether they will slip. They seem quite soft so they are quite comfortable but their major drawback is NOISE. You would swear that the car was fitted with solid rubber as, even at low speeds, you can hear the rubber blocks flicking on the road surface. I have had Sportcontact 5 in the past and had to change those (for Avon VZ7s) just to be able to hear the radio! As one of the other reviewers has said I suspect brand snobbery is what sells these tires. VW appear to part own Continental so perhaps that is why so many VW group cars have them fitted.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 8
  • Wet Grip 5
  • Road Feedback 4
  • Handling 5
  • Comfort 7
  • Buy again 3
Helpful 857
40%
Member
  • Skoda Citygo
  • 185/65 R15 H
  • 1,000 miles
  • A Combination of Roads
  • Easy Going
These tires were fitted to the new car I purchased in February 2018. I had bought the same model of car 2 years earlier, but as these were factory-fitted with Ecocontact 3 tires, I replaced them at 4.5k with Goodyear Vector 4 Seasons generation 2 tires - and never regretted the additional expense. NOT being a fan of the Continental Ecocontact tires, I proceeded to fork out the extra money to replace the factory-fitted tires on my latest car, this time at just 1.6k miles - this time having Nokian Weatherproof tires fitted. Expensive to be sure, and "possibly" not "absolutely" essential, but in our Country where heavy rain is to be a fact of life, having all-season tires (rather than merely summer tires) is a factor about which I feel quite strongly, and am prepared to pay quite heavily for the peace-of-mind.. The Nokians are (I feel) just as reassuring: quiet & comfortable as the Goodyears - no cheaper, I admit, but you pays your money & you takes your choice - AND there's no pockets in shrouds. Peace of mind comes at a price!
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 5
  • Wet Grip 4
  • Comfort 5
  • Buy again 1
Helpful 847
Find your next tire
All tire tests
Rate your tires

My tires

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tires

Save tires from a tire page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tires. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.