I haven’t had a chance to drive to the end of life cause I sold my car. I remember being quite happy with them.
I bought Nokians for my current car that I drive now. Excellent winter tires. However I understand that from 2022 Nokian is manufacturing tires in china for the market that I live in. I believe that I will switch to Michelin winter tires from next season as Nokian quality dropped for market of south east Europe.
SUV and 4x4 Winter Ultra High Performance Tires
All SUV and 4x4 Winter Ultra High Performance Tires on Tire Reviews, ranked. The 13 tires in this category are scored using 6 independent tire tests and 74 owner reviews covering 1,015,325 miles of driving.
- 13tires in this category
- 6professional tests
- 74owner reviews
- 1,015,325 milescovered on them
The quick answer
| Pick | Tire | The evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Best overall | Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV 9.3 | TR Score 9.3 / 10 medium confidence score |
| Owners' favorite | Michelin Latitude Alpin 2 8.5 | 93% from 6 owner reviews |
| Latest test winner | Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 9.5 | 2024 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tire Test |
Best overall is the highest TR Score in the category; the owners' favorite is the highest rated by the drivers who run them. The full rankings and the evidence behind every pick are below.
The best SUV and 4x4 Winter Ultra High Performance Tires, ranked
The highest scoring tire in the category is the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV, with a TR Score of 9.3 out of 10. 10 of the 13 tires here have earned a score; the rest are listed further down.
| # | Tire | TR Score | Owner rating | Reviews | Distance reviewed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
9.3 | 84% | 14 | 119,200 miles |
| 2 |
|
9.1 | 78% | 5 | 45,000 miles |
| 3 |
|
8.6 | 75% | 6 | 59,428 miles |
| 4 |
|
8.5 | 82% | 17 | 145,000 miles |
| 5 |
|
8.5 | 93% | 6 | 68,000 miles |
| 6 |
|
8.5 | 90% | 4 | 58,000 miles |
| 7 |
|
8.5 | 92% | 3 | 31,500 miles |
| 8 |
|
8.2 | 84% | 1 | 3,000 miles |
| 9 |
|
7.3 | 82% | 7 | 145,250 miles |
| 10 |
|
6.8 | 75% | 5 | 313,510 miles |
TR Score rates each tire out of 10 using independent test results and the full body of owner reviews, weighted by how much evidence backs them. Tires are only scored once enough data exists; discontinued tires are not ranked but remain in the complete record below.
Want to see the data behind the top picks? Best UHP Winter Tires →
The best SUV and 4x4 Winter Ultra High Performance Tires for each condition
The overall ranking hides trade-offs: a tire can lead in the dry and trail in comfort. These are the category leaders in each condition, from the per-condition TR scores.
Best in snow
Rated across 8 tires in this category:
Best in the wet
Rated across 8 tires in this category:
Best in the dry
Rated across 8 tires in this category:
Most comfortable
Rated across 8 tires in this category:
Best value
Rated across 8 tires in this category:
Condition scores run 0-100 within each condition, built from the same test results and owner reviews as the overall TR Score.
What is a Ultra High Performance tire?
Ultra High Performance tires are the enthusiast's road tire - the fitment for hot hatches, performance saloons and fast estates. They prioritize steering response and grip, accepting a little more noise and wear than a touring tire.
Winter tires use soft, high-silica compounds and heavy siping that keep working below roughly 7C, on snow and on ice. The category spans three different products - Central European, Nordic friction and studded tires - built for different winters.
Professional tests of SUV and 4x4 Winter Ultra High Performance Tires
Every published comparison test of this category we have indexed - 6 in total, newest first. Test results feed directly into the TR Scores above.
The most successful tire in this category's tests: the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5, with 2 wins from the 6 full comparison tests indexed here.
| Year | Test | Size tested | Winner | Tires |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2024 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tire Test | 245/45 R18 | Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 | 13 |
| 2023 | 2023 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tire Test | 225/60 R18 | - | 11 |
| 2023 | 2023 Tire Reviews SUV Winter Tire Test Tire Reviews test | 235/60 R18 | Continental WinterContact TS 870 P | 9 |
| 2023 | 2023 AMS SUV Winter Tire Test | 255/45 R20 | Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 | 7 |
| 2022 | 2022 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tire Test | 225/45 R19 | Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 | 10 |
| 2011 | 2011 Auto Bild 4x4 Winter Tire Test | 255/55 R18 | Dunlop SP Winter Sport 3D | 8 |
Winners are only named where a test crowned a single overall winner. Tests that rank tires within groups, or test too small a field to compare brands, still count as evidence but name no winner here.
The SUV and 4x4 Winter Ultra High Performance Tires owners rate highest
Rated purely by the people who drive on them, the top tire in the category is the Michelin Latitude Alpin 2 - 93% from 6 owner reviews. 10 tires have enough reviews to qualify; this is the same ranking behind the category position shown on each tire's own page.
| # | Tire | Owner rating | Reviews | Distance reviewed | TR Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
93% | 6 | 68,000 miles | 8.5 |
| 2 |
|
92% | 3 | 31,500 miles | 8.5 |
| 3 |
|
90% | 4 | 58,000 miles | 8.5 |
| 4 |
|
84% | 14 | 119,200 miles | 9.3 |
| 5 |
|
82% | 17 | 145,000 miles | 8.5 |
| 6 |
|
82% | 7 | 145,250 miles | 7.3 |
| 7 |
|
81% | 4 | 12,537 miles | - |
| 8 |
|
78% | 5 | 45,000 miles | 9.1 |
| 9 |
|
75% | 6 | 59,428 miles | 8.6 |
| 10 |
|
75% | 5 | 313,510 miles | 6.8 |
A tire needs at least 3 owner reviews to appear here. Owner ratings reward different things to tests - comfort, wear and value show up over thousands of miles, not on a test track.
What drivers say about SUV and 4x4 Winter Ultra High Performance Tires
The most recent owner reviews from this category, in their own words.
I fitted these Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 X W330A 225/55R19 99H 3PMSF tires to my Mazda CX-5 2.0 naturally aspirated (N/A) AWD in November 2024, when the car had 162,742 km (101,123 miles) on the odometer. The tires were manufactured in 2024, and I have driven 60,558 km (37,628 miles) on them without removing them at any point, including during the summer months. My car currently has 223,300 km (138,752 miles) on the odometer.
In July 2026, I rotated the front and rear tires because the front tires had visibly more tread wear than the rear ones. I am still using them in this configuration, but I will be purchasing a new set of winter tires soon.
Throughout more than 60,000 km (37,000 miles) of driving, including many long-distance journeys, these tires have given me an excellent sense of security and confidence on the road. I have never experienced any loss of grip or sliding, not even once. They provided excellent traction under hard braking, and their performance on dry roads was also very good. The slight increase in fuel consumption on dry roads was negligible and hardly worth mentioning.
Durability has been another major strength. Despite being used for almost two years in all weather conditions, including summer heat, these 2024-manufactured tires have shown no cracking, tearing, chunking, or any other signs of structural damage or deformation. Their overall durability has been impressive.
Considering the distance covered and the time they have been in use, the tread is still in reasonably good condition. I am not replacing them because the tread is completely worn out; rather, I believe they have reached the end of their intended service life, and it is time for a new set. There is still some usable tread remaining, and even at this stage, the tires continue to inspire confidence on both wet and dry roads.
I am extremely satisfied with these tires. The only real downside is that they are quite noisy, which is particularly noticeable during longer journeys. However, the level of grip, reliability, and confidence they provide far outweighs this drawback.
Because these tires have made me feel so safe and secure behind the wheel, I have decided to stick with the same brand and model range. I will be purchasing a new set of Hankook Winter i*cept evo tires manufactured in 2026.
The overall proposition is to offer a good tire at a price discount to market leaders Michelin or Continental. That also comes with a discount in road abilities. It represents a different optimum than premium offers: less for less in proportion.
I live on the shores of Lake Geneva in Switzerland. I drive every week in the winter to a ski resort in the Alps. Roads are mostly cold, dry or wet. Approx. 10-12 days of snow on roads, add 10 days for snowy/icy access to the chalet.
The tire is very good in snow traction and breaking. However road feel is numb when cornering and the tire starts to slide relatively quickly.
In comparison to previous Michelin Lattitude Alpin 2 and Continental WinterContact 850P SUV, it is noticeably worse in cornering. I have less confidence in the tire and deliberately slow down to corner.
It feels better than the Conti on traction and breaking, at par with the Michelin.
On cold dry roads, the tire feels good. Traction and breaking feel satisfactory and road handling is good up to speed limits. It loses traction when cornered hard and understeers. When the weather warms up, the tire feels less confident and seems more floaty, less precise.
Comfort is OK in W speed rating, always on the firm sides on pot holes or speed bumps.
Road noise feels OK/average at all speeds. Not quiet though. But not the failure identified in many tests.
Overall less convinced on wet roads. Traction seems to breaks faster, breaking feels less grippy/planted and seems to lead to some wavering. Road handling is moderately reassuring. Quite numb overall but feels prone to understeer early.
Straight aquaplanning isnt a problem: the car ploughs through higher water without taking off or wavering.
If you can afford a premium tire, skip the Hankook. Else you can consider it as a safe alternative, if not spirited/inspiring.
Great tire, happy to see Hankook on the premium segment. Have it on my Chrysler Town&Country 2014 and are so good, comfortable, confident, and not at least for great price.
Definitely better and more comfortable than any winter Continental or Goodyear I've had in the past.
Disclaimer2. While my preferred summer tire is a Michelin I never chose Michelin winter tires (Pilot Alpin) as I find them exceptional in snow but not necessarily in overall winter conditions. This time I was forced to buy them as two full sets of my preferred Conti’s were warranty claimed with Continental (and claim accepted) and there was no other tire in my dimensions and in XL available.
Plus
Ultra quiet tire. While this is last on my list of requirements and one I don’t care about I have never driven on a tire that quiet – almost unnoticeable and this being said for a winter/snow tire.
Best snow grip and traction. Very good breaking in the snow. Highly predictable driving. Probably best snow tires I have experienced across my winter tires to-date although Bridgestone Blizzak LM22 and Dunlop Wintersport M2/M3 I used as purely snow tires were also outstanding.
Comfortable under low speeds up to 80kph. Especially predestined for cities and regular roads with lower than highway or expressway speed limits.
Reservations
Noticeable higher fuel consumption – on average almost 0.8-1.0 liter/100 km more.
Very soft and overly too progressive. While this is expected from a snow tire with a snow compound they are too soft for my liking even though in Extra Load version and even though I had to add 0.3 bar pressure per tire. Still not what I would like them to be. The relative softness makes highway dynamic lane changing a poor experience and one that I am never sure how the tire is reacting. Similar when taking curves at higher speeds the lateral holding and stability are questionable or at least causing doubts/concerns. Nothing compared to proper UHP winter tires I have used to-date
Lot’s of road feedback but in my opinion much too much especially above 80-100 kph. Perfect road/traction feedback up to 80kph
Never sure how they are going to react under specific loads and driving conditions which probably is the worst thing to say about a tire.
Limited FR protection.
Highest speed index available for my tires was H (210kph) which is understood if these tires are snow tires.
Also all four tires were so different that there was a problem with wheel balancing. Two were perfect, one ok and the fourth required extended road testing to get it within manufacturers norms.
Conclusion
Great for snow covered ski resorts and driving up to 80 km/h. I would definitely use them as a second set of tires dedicated to pure snowy conditions. Otherwise for winter slush and varied road conditions in city and on highway I would opt for other tires.
Initially, the Pilot Alpin 5 SUV made a great impression for their grip, both in the dry and in the wet, and the quietness is just incredible in comparison with the Nokians.
But: the real test was in the snow. They scared me off. At urban speeds (!) I slipped on snow when gently accelerating from stop and I slid sideways when driving on snow and on slush. This is miles away from the reassuring Nokians, which just ploughed the car through 10 cm of snow on the fast lane while the rest of the traffic was stuck behind lorries on the slow lane. What a bummer these Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 on my Tesla Model X…
I should have gone for the Nokian WR4 SUVs…
Would I buy them again? No. But I will keep driving them until they need replacement or the car will be replaced.
SUV and 4x4 Winter Ultra High Performance Tires EU label data
10 of the 13 tires in this category carry EU label data. These are the category's label headliners, using each tire's best available size figures.
A Best wet grip
1 tires reach EU wet grip class A. The highest scoring:
B Lowest rolling resistance
The most fuel efficient choice: 5 tires reach rolling resistance class B. The highest scoring:
68dB Quietest tires
The quietest tires in this category are labelled from 68 dB external noise:
Label values come from the EU EPREL database and vary by size - the figures here are each tire's best declared size. Wet grip and rolling resistance run from class A (best) to E; noise is the measured drive-by figure. A good label is a floor, not a verdict: the tests and rankings above tell you far more.
New SUV and 4x4 Winter Ultra High Performance Tires
The newest arrival in the category is the Hankook Winter I*cept Evo 4 Suv. 1 tires have joined in the last two years:
| Tire | On the market since | TR Score |
|---|---|---|
| Hankook Winter I*cept Evo 4 Suv | 2025 | not yet scored |
New tires take time to earn a TR Score - tests have to be run and owner reviews have to arrive. A missing score is a data gap, not a verdict.
All SUV and 4x4 Winter Ultra High Performance Tires on Tire Reviews
The complete record, including discontinued tires and tires with too little evidence to rank, ordered by the amount of evidence. The most researched this month: Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV, Hankook Winter i cept evo 3 X, Continental Winter Contact TS 850 P SUV.
| Tire | TR Score | Owner rating | Reviews | Distance reviewed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nokian WR SUV 3 Replaced by Nokian WR SUV 4 | 8.5 | 82% | 17 | 145,000 miles |
| Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV | 9.3 | 84% | 14 | 119,200 miles |
| Nokian W RG2 SUV | 7.3 | 82% | 7 | 145,250 miles |
| Hankook Winter i cept evo 3 X | 8.6 | 75% | 6 | 59,428 miles |
| Michelin Latitude Alpin 2 | 8.5 | 93% | 6 | 68,000 miles |
| Continental Winter Contact TS 850 P SUV | 9.1 | 78% | 5 | 45,000 miles |
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 4X4 | 6.8 | 75% | 5 | 313,510 miles |
| Dunlop Winter Sport 5 SUV | 8.5 | 90% | 4 | 58,000 miles |
| Nexen Winguard Sport 2 SUV Replaced by Nexen Winguard Sport 3 SUV | - | 81% | 4 | 12,537 miles |
| Goodyear UltraGrip Performance SUV Gen 1 | 8.5 | 92% | 3 | 31,500 miles |
| Hankook Winter i cept evo2 SUV | 8.2 | 84% | 1 | 3,000 miles |
| Goodyear UltraGrip SUV Replaced by Goodyear UltraGrip+ SUV | - | 77% | 1 | 14,000 miles |
| Hankook Winter I*cept Evo 4 Suv | - | 93% | 1 | 900 miles |
Run SUV and 4x4 Winter Ultra High Performance Tires?
Review your tires and help the next driver choose. It takes about five minutes, and every rating on this page came from a driver who took them.
Where this data comes from
Rankings combine independent test results with owner reviews submitted through this site, each naming the car, the tire, the size and the distance covered. Reviews are checked by hand before publication, and the page rebuilds automatically as new evidence arrives.
About the TR Score
The Tire Reviews Score rates each tire out of 10 using independent test results and the full body of owner reviews, weighted by how much evidence backs them.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tire Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tires independently since 2007.

