Test Charts / Tire Reviews

Michelin Pilot Sport 4S vs Cup 2 vs Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperCar 3 vs 3R vs Toyo R888R

Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tire, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.

Tested size: 305/30 R19
Tires tested: 5
Disciplines: 2

Read the measurements, not just the rank

Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tires can be separated by very different margins.

Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tires does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.

Dry

Dry Handling
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best
1Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperCar 3R	70.44 s	Best
2Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2	71.14 s	+0.70 s
3Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperCar 3	71.77 s	+1.33 s
4Toyo R888 R	72.25 s	+1.81 s
5Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S	72.78 s	+2.34 s

The difference between best and worst was 3.3% (2.34 s).

Subj. Dry Handling
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best
1Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperCar 3R	10 Points	Best
2Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperCar 3	9.5 Points	-0.50 Points
3Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2	9 Points	-1.00 Points
4Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S	8.5 Points	-1.50 Points
5Toyo R888 R	8 Points	-2.00 Points

The difference between best and worst was 20% (2 Points).

Test setup & methodology

The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.

Show full testing methodology

Score Weighting

Weights express the scoring priorities, not how much each discipline actually changed the finishing order. The size of the performance gaps matters too. Category weights contribute to the overall score. Within each category, discipline weights divide that category’s share. Published finishing positions also need to be read alongside the editorial verdict.

Test	Within category	Share of overall score
Dry · 100%
Dry Handling	83%	83%
Subj. Dry Handling	17%	17%

Our standard methods

The conditions above are recorded for this test. The descriptions below explain our standard procedures; measurement windows and run counts can vary by test.

Dry Handling

For dry handling, I drive at the limit of adhesion around a dedicated handling circuit with ESC disabled where possible so I can assess the tire's natural balance, transient response, and limit behavior without electronic intervention masking the result. I usually complete between two and five timed laps per tire set, depending on the circuit, tire type, and consistency of conditions. I exclude laps affected by clear driver error or obvious environmental inconsistency. Control runs are carried out frequently throughout the session, and I often use multiple sets of control tires so that wear on the references does not become a meaningful variable. For more track-focused products, I also do endurance testing, which is a set number of laps at race pace to determine tire wear patterns and heat resistance over longer driving.

Subj. Dry Handling

I also carry out a structured subjective handling assessment at the limit of adhesion on a dedicated dry handling circuit. I score steering precision, steering response, turn-in behavior, mid-corner balance, corner-exit traction, breakaway characteristics, and overall confidence using a standardised 1–10 scale used consistently across my testing. The final assessment combines numeric scoring with written technical commentary. I complete familiarisation laps on the control tire before evaluating each candidate.

Read our complete testing methodology →

Tire shortlist →Read the test →

More tire tests