Test Charts / AvD
2026 AvD Winter Tire Test
Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tire, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.
- Tested size
- 225/45 R17
- Tires tested
- 15
- Disciplines
- 6
- Test vehicle
- Audi A3
Read the measurements, not just the rank
Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tires can be separated by very different margins.
Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tires does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.
Focus on your tires
Select tires to highlight them throughout the charts.
Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tires does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.
Dry
1Dry Braking
Dry braking in feet (62 - 0 mph)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 136 ft | Best | 0 mph | |
| 137 ft | +1 ft | 6 mph | |
| 137 ft | +1 ft | 7 mph | |
| 138 ft | +2 ft | 9 mph | |
| 139 ft | +3 ft | 11 mph | |
| 139 ft | +3 ft | 11 mph | |
| 140 ft | +4 ft | 13 mph | |
| 142 ft | +6 ft | 17 mph | |
| 142 ft | +6 ft | 17 mph | |
| 143 ft | +7 ft | 17 mph | |
| 144 ft | +8 ft | 18 mph | |
| 144 ft | +8 ft | 19 mph | |
| 144 ft | +8 ft | 19 mph | |
| 147 ft | +11 ft | 22 mph | |
| 147 ft | +11 ft | 22 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 8.2% (11 ft ≈ 0.8 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Rockblade Icecruiser 1 would still be travelling at 22 mph when the Toyo Observe EWS1 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Wet
1Wet Braking
Wet braking in feet (62 - 0 mph)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 151 ft | Best | 0 mph | |
| 155 ft | +4 ft | 13 mph | |
| 155 ft | +4 ft | 13 mph | |
| 156 ft | +5 ft | 14 mph | |
| 157 ft | +6 ft | 16 mph | |
| 157 ft | +6 ft | 16 mph | |
| 157 ft | +6 ft | 16 mph | |
| 159 ft | +8 ft | 18 mph | |
| 160 ft | +9 ft | 19 mph | |
| 160 ft | +9 ft | 19 mph | |
| 162 ft | +11 ft | 20 mph | |
| 168 ft | +17 ft | 25 mph | |
| 180 ft | +29 ft | 32 mph | |
| 206 ft | +55 ft | 41 mph | |
| 210 ft | +59 ft | 42 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 38.6% (59 ft ≈ 4 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Rockblade Icecruiser 1 would still be travelling at 42 mph when the Pirelli Cinturato Winter 3 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Snow
1Snow Braking
Snow braking in feet (31 - 0 mph)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 79 ft | Best | 0 mph | |
| 80 ft | +1 ft | 7 mph | |
| 81 ft | +2 ft | 11 mph | |
| 81 ft | +2 ft | 13 mph | |
| 81 ft | +2 ft | 13 mph | |
| 82 ft | +3 ft | 16 mph | |
| 82 ft | +3 ft | 16 mph | |
| 82 ft | +3 ft | 16 mph | |
| 83 ft | +4 ft | 17 mph | |
| 83 ft | +4 ft | 17 mph | |
| 83 ft | +4 ft | 17 mph | |
| 83 ft | +4 ft | 17 mph | |
| 83 ft | +4 ft | 17 mph | |
| 85 ft | +6 ft | 21 mph | |
| 88 ft | +9 ft | 25 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 10.8% (9 ft ≈ 0.6 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Toyo Observe EWS1 would still be travelling at 25 mph when the Rockblade Icecruiser 1 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Value
3Wear
Predicted tread life in KM
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 34,172 miles | Best | |
| 32,249 miles | -1,923 miles | |
| 28,410 miles | -5,762 miles | |
| 27,447 miles | -6,725 miles | |
| 26,495 miles | -7,677 miles | |
| 26,129 miles | -8,043 miles | |
| 24,124 miles | -10,048 miles | |
| 23,774 miles | -10,398 miles | |
| 23,715 miles | -10,457 miles | |
| 22,352 miles | -11,820 miles | |
| 21,784 miles | -12,388 miles | |
| 21,422 miles | -12,750 miles | |
| 20,423 miles | -13,749 miles | |
| 18,905 miles | -15,267 miles | |
| 17,283 miles | -16,889 miles |
The difference between best and worst was 49.4% (16,889 miles).
Value
Euros/1000km based on cost/wear
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | cost per 1,000 miles |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7.98 Price/1000 | Best | €26.55 | |
| 8.52 Price/1000 | +0.54 Price/1000 | €26.64 | |
| 8.71 Price/1000 | +0.73 Price/1000 | €28.52 | |
| 8.9 Price/1000 | +0.92 Price/1000 | €28.53 | |
| 9.28 Price/1000 | +1.30 Price/1000 | €26.93 | |
| 9.35 Price/1000 | +1.37 Price/1000 | €27.22 | |
| 9.4 Price/1000 | +1.42 Price/1000 | €27.96 | |
| 9.62 Price/1000 | +1.64 Price/1000 | €24.97 | |
| 10.19 Price/1000 | +2.21 Price/1000 | €27.14 | |
| 11.64 Price/1000 | +3.66 Price/1000 | €24.26 | |
| 11.66 Price/1000 | +3.68 Price/1000 | €30.04 | |
| 11.84 Price/1000 | +3.86 Price/1000 | €33.41 | |
| 12.6 Price/1000 | +4.62 Price/1000 | €22.96 | |
| 12.68 Price/1000 | +4.70 Price/1000 | €30.32 | |
| 14.19 Price/1000 | +6.21 Price/1000 | €30.76 |
The difference between best and worst was 77.8% (6.21 Price/1000). Over 25,000 miles the cheapest tire to own (Bridgestone Blizzak 6) works out €261 cheaper than the most expensive (Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro).
How this is calculated
Assumes a typical car doing 29 mpg (rolling resistance causing 20% of fuel use), fuel at €6.25 per gallon and €70 fitting per set of four. Purchase prices are from the time of the 2026 test; financing costs are excluded.
Rolling Resistance
Rolling resistance in kg t
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | Extra fuel / year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7.32 kg/t | Best | $0 | |
| 7.92 kg/t | +0.60 kg/t | $24 | |
| 8.23 kg/t | +0.91 kg/t | $37 | |
| 8.53 kg/t | +1.21 kg/t | $49 | |
| 8.58 kg/t | +1.26 kg/t | $51 | |
| 8.59 kg/t | +1.27 kg/t | $51 | |
| 8.72 kg/t | +1.40 kg/t | $56 | |
| 8.88 kg/t | +1.56 kg/t | $63 | |
| 8.89 kg/t | +1.57 kg/t | $63 | |
| 9.03 kg/t | +1.71 kg/t | $69 | |
| 9.04 kg/t | +1.72 kg/t | $69 | |
| 9.12 kg/t | +1.80 kg/t | $72 | |
| 9.18 kg/t | +1.86 kg/t | $75 | |
| 9.23 kg/t | +1.91 kg/t | $77 | |
| 9.24 kg/t | +1.92 kg/t | $77 |
The difference between best and worst was 26.2% (1.92 kg / t). Over 12,000 miles a year at $3.60/gal, the Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro uses about 21 gal ($77) more fuel than the Bridgestone Blizzak 6.
Adjust the assumptions
Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tire selection above.
Test setup & methodology
The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.
Recorded test conditions
Recorded test conditions
- Dry Braking
- 62.1 → 0.0 mph
- Wet Braking
- 62.1 → 0.0 mph
- Snow Braking
- 31.1 → 0.0 mph
More tire tests
Cross-check this test
Where these tires were tested again, and how the verdict held up.
2026 ADAC Winter Tire Test - 225/50 R17
225/50 R1716 tires tested
8 of these 15 tires tested again
2026 Auto Express Winter Tire Test
205/55 R1611 tires tested
7 of these 15 tires tested again
2025 Auto Express Winter Tire Test
225/45 R178 tires tested
7 of these 15 tires tested again

