Test Charts / Auto Bild Allrad
2026 Auto Bild Allrad SUV Winter Tire Test
Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tire, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.
- Tested size
- 225/55 R18
- Tires tested
- 10
- Disciplines
- 14
- Test vehicle
- BMW X1
Read the measurements, not just the rank
Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tires can be separated by very different margins.
Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tires does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.
Focus on your tires
Select tires to highlight them throughout the charts.
Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tires does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.
Dry
2Dry Braking
Dry braking in feet (62 - 0 mph)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
RefReference Summer |
115 ft | -21 ft | 0 mph |
| 136 ft | Best | 0 mph | |
| 137 ft | +1 ft | 9 mph | |
| 138 ft | +2 ft | 11 mph | |
| 139 ft | +3 ft | 12 mph | |
| 139 ft | +3 ft | 12 mph | |
| 141 ft | +5 ft | 16 mph | |
| 142 ft | +6 ft | 18 mph | |
| 143 ft | +7 ft | 18 mph | |
| 143 ft | +7 ft | 18 mph | |
| 143 ft | +7 ft | 18 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 24.2% (28 ft ≈ 1.9 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro would still be travelling at 18 mph when the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Dry Handling
Dry Handling Average Speed
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
RefReference Summer |
71.5 mph | +0.6 mph |
| 70.9 mph | Best | |
| 70.1 mph | -0.8 mph | |
| 70.0 mph | -0.9 mph | |
| 70.0 mph | -0.9 mph | |
| 69.5 mph | -1.4 mph | |
| 69.5 mph | -1.4 mph | |
| 69.3 mph | -1.6 mph | |
| 69.0 mph | -1.9 mph | |
| 68.8 mph | -2.1 mph | |
| 68.6 mph | -2.3 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 4.1% (2.9 mph).
Wet
5Wet Braking
Wet braking in feet (62 - 0 mph)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
RefReference Summer |
137 ft | -9 ft | 0 mph |
| 146 ft | Best | 0 mph | |
| 148 ft | +2 ft | 11 mph | |
| 154 ft | +8 ft | 18 mph | |
| 155 ft | +9 ft | 19 mph | |
| 158 ft | +12 ft | 22 mph | |
| 158 ft | +12 ft | 22 mph | |
| 160 ft | +14 ft | 24 mph | |
| 160 ft | +14 ft | 24 mph | |
| 166 ft | +20 ft | 28 mph | |
| 189 ft | +43 ft | 38 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 37.2% (52 ft ≈ 3.5 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Zeetex WH1000 SUV would still be travelling at 38 mph when the Pirelli Cinturato Winter 3 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Wet Handling
Wet Handling Average Speed
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 53.0 mph | Best | |
RefReference Summer |
52.9 mph | -0.1 mph |
| 52.4 mph | -0.6 mph | |
| 52.2 mph | -0.8 mph | |
| 52.0 mph | -1.0 mph | |
| 51.7 mph | -1.3 mph | |
| 51.6 mph | -1.4 mph | |
| 50.7 mph | -2.3 mph | |
| 49.9 mph | -3.1 mph | |
| 48.7 mph | -4.3 mph | |
| 48.0 mph | -5.0 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 9.4% (5 mph).
Wet Circle
Wet Circle Lap Time in seconds
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
RefReference Summer |
15.79 s | -0.32 s |
| 16.11 s | Best | |
| 16.33 s | +0.22 s | |
| 16.34 s | +0.23 s | |
| 16.35 s | +0.24 s | |
| 16.35 s | +0.24 s | |
| 16.36 s | +0.25 s | |
| 16.69 s | +0.58 s | |
| 16.81 s | +0.70 s | |
| 17.18 s | +1.07 s | |
| 17.29 s | +1.18 s |
The difference between best and worst was 9.5% (1.5 s).
Straight Aqua
Float Speed in mph
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 51.6 mph | Best | |
RefReference Summer |
51.3 mph | -0.3 mph |
| 50.3 mph | -1.3 mph | |
| 50.1 mph | -1.5 mph | |
| 49.0 mph | -2.6 mph | |
| 48.8 mph | -2.8 mph | |
| 48.5 mph | -3.1 mph | |
| 48.0 mph | -3.6 mph | |
| 47.8 mph | -3.8 mph | |
| 47.2 mph | -4.4 mph | |
| 45.9 mph | -5.7 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 11% (5.7 mph).
Curved Aquaplaning
Remaining lateral acceleration
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
RefReference Summer |
12.1 ft/s² | +0.3 ft/s² |
| 11.8 ft/s² | Best | |
| 10.8 ft/s² | -1.0 ft/s² | |
| 10.5 ft/s² | -1.3 ft/s² | |
| 10.2 ft/s² | -1.6 ft/s² | |
| 10.2 ft/s² | -1.6 ft/s² | |
| 9.8 ft/s² | -2.0 ft/s² | |
| 9.2 ft/s² | -2.6 ft/s² | |
| 8.9 ft/s² | -2.9 ft/s² | |
| 8.5 ft/s² | -3.3 ft/s² | |
| 7.9 ft/s² | -3.9 ft/s² |
The difference between best and worst was 35.1% (4.2 ft/s²).
Snow
4Snow Braking
Snow braking in feet (31 - 0 mph)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 91 ft | Best | 0 mph | |
| 92 ft | +1 ft | 10 mph | |
| 93 ft | +2 ft | 11 mph | |
| 93 ft | +2 ft | 13 mph | |
| 94 ft | +3 ft | 13 mph | |
| 95 ft | +4 ft | 16 mph | |
| 95 ft | +4 ft | 17 mph | |
| 95 ft | +4 ft | 17 mph | |
| 96 ft | +5 ft | 19 mph | |
| 104 ft | +13 ft | 29 mph | |
RefReference Summer |
274 ft | +183 ft | 65 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 201.1% (183 ft ≈ 12.4 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Zeetex WH1000 SUV would still be travelling at 29 mph when the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Snow Traction
Pulling Force in pounds-force
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 850 lbf | Best | |
| 850 lbf | Best | |
| 842 lbf | -8 lbf | |
| 827 lbf | -23 lbf | |
| 825 lbf | -25 lbf | |
| 809 lbf | -41 lbf | |
| 807 lbf | -43 lbf | |
| 792 lbf | -58 lbf | |
| 785 lbf | -65 lbf | |
| 712 lbf | -138 lbf | |
RefReference Summer |
153 lbf | -697 lbf |
The difference between best and worst was 82% (697 lbf).
Snow Handling
Snow handling average speed
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 26.7 mph | Best | |
| 26.4 mph | -0.3 mph | |
| 26.4 mph | -0.3 mph | |
| 26.3 mph | -0.4 mph | |
| 26.2 mph | -0.5 mph | |
| 26.0 mph | -0.7 mph | |
| 25.9 mph | -0.8 mph | |
| 25.8 mph | -0.9 mph | |
| 25.5 mph | -1.2 mph | |
| 24.2 mph | -2.5 mph | |
RefReference Summer |
15.4 mph | -11.3 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 42.3% (11.3 mph).
Snow Slalom
Lateral acceleration
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 13.8 ft/s² | Best | |
| 13.7 ft/s² | -0.1 ft/s² | |
| 13.6 ft/s² | -0.2 ft/s² | |
| 13.5 ft/s² | -0.3 ft/s² | |
| 13.4 ft/s² | -0.4 ft/s² | |
| 13.4 ft/s² | -0.4 ft/s² | |
| 13.4 ft/s² | -0.4 ft/s² | |
| 13.3 ft/s² | -0.5 ft/s² | |
| 12.7 ft/s² | -1.1 ft/s² | |
| 12.2 ft/s² | -1.6 ft/s² | |
RefReference Summer |
6.1 ft/s² | -7.7 ft/s² |
The difference between best and worst was 56.2% (7.7 ft/s²).
Comfort
2Subj. Comfort
Subjective Comfort Score
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 9.6 Points | Best | |
| 9.6 Points | Best | |
| 9.4 Points | -0.20 Points | |
| 9.2 Points | -0.40 Points | |
| 9 Points | -0.60 Points | |
| 8.4 Points | -1.20 Points | |
| 7.8 Points | -1.80 Points | |
| 7.6 Points | -2.00 Points | |
| 7.4 Points | -2.20 Points | |
| 6.2 Points | -3.40 Points |
The difference between best and worst was 35.4% (3.4 Points).
Noise
External noise in dB
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 70.9 dB | Best | |
| 71.1 dB | +0.20 dB | |
| 71.1 dB | +0.20 dB | |
| 71.2 dB | +0.30 dB | |
| 71.8 dB | +0.90 dB | |
| 71.9 dB | +1.00 dB | |
| 72 dB | +1.10 dB | |
| 72.5 dB | +1.60 dB | |
| 72.6 dB | +1.70 dB | |
| 73.7 dB | +2.80 dB | |
RefReference Summer |
76.4 dB | +5.50 dB |
The difference between best and worst was 7.8% (5.5 dB).
Value
1Rolling Resistance
Rolling resistance in kg t
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | Extra fuel / year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6.8 kg/t | Best | $0 | |
| 6.8 kg/t | Best | $0 | |
| 7.3 kg/t | +0.50 kg/t | $22 | |
RefReference Summer |
7.4 kg/t | +0.60 kg/t | $26 |
| 7.7 kg/t | +0.90 kg/t | $39 | |
| 7.8 kg/t | +1.00 kg/t | $43 | |
| 7.8 kg/t | +1.00 kg/t | $43 | |
| 7.8 kg/t | +1.00 kg/t | $43 | |
| 8 kg/t | +1.20 kg/t | $52 | |
| 8.1 kg/t | +1.30 kg/t | $56 | |
| 8.4 kg/t | +1.60 kg/t | $69 |
The difference between best and worst was 23.5% (1.6 kg / t). Over 12,000 miles a year at $3.60/gal, the Zeetex WH1000 SUV uses about 19 gal ($69) more fuel than the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3.
Adjust the assumptions
Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tire selection above.
Test setup & methodology
The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.
Recorded test conditions
Recorded test conditions
- Dry Braking
- 62.1 → 0.0 mph
- Wet Braking
- 62.1 → 0.0 mph
- Snow Braking
- 31.1 → 0.0 mph
More tire tests
Cross-check this test
Where these tires were tested again, and how the verdict held up.
2026 Winter Tire Braking Test - 50 Sets
245/45 R1950 tires tested
7 of these 10 tires tested again
2026 Auto Bild Winter Tire Test
245/45 R1920 tires tested
5 of these 10 tires tested again
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P / Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
This test’s winner finished 3rd there2026 Auto Bild Sportscars Winter Tire Test
225/45 R1812 tires tested
5 of these 10 tires tested again

