Test Charts / Auto Bild
2026 AutoBild Track Day Tire Test
Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tire, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.
- Tested size
- 275/35 R19
- Tires tested
- 5
- Disciplines
- 5
- Test vehicle
- BMW M2
Read the measurements, not just the rank
Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tires can be separated by very different margins.
Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tires does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.
Focus on your tires
Select tires to highlight them throughout the charts.
Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tires does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.
Dry
3Dry Braking
Dry braking in feet
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 94 ft | Best | |
| 98 ft | +4 ft | |
| 99 ft | +5 ft | |
| 101 ft | +7 ft | |
RefMichelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 |
101 ft | +7 ft |
| 102 ft | +8 ft | |
RefReference Slick |
112 ft | +18 ft |
The difference between best and worst was 18.2% (18 ft ≈ 1.2 Car Lengths).
Dry Handling
Dry handling time in seconds
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
RefReference Slick |
147.67 s | -0.86 s |
| 148.53 s | Best | |
| 149.56 s | +1.03 s | |
| 150.09 s | +1.56 s | |
| 150.11 s | +1.58 s | |
RefMichelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 |
150.58 s | +2.05 s |
| 150.88 s | +2.35 s |
All the tires in the Dry Handling test finished less than 3% apart.
Dry Handling Long Run
Average long run time in seconds
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 152.35 s | Best | |
| 153.12 s | +0.77 s | |
RefMichelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 |
155.6 s | +3.25 s |
| 157.27 s | +4.92 s | |
| 157.42 s | +5.07 s | |
RefReference Slick |
158.08 s | +5.73 s |
| 158.98 s | +6.63 s |
The difference between best and worst was 4.4% (6.63 s).
Wet
2Wet Braking
Wet braking in feet (62 - 0 mph)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
RefMichelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 |
154 ft | -1 ft | 0 mph |
| 155 ft | Best | 0 mph | |
| 164 ft | +9 ft | 19 mph | |
| 170 ft | +15 ft | 24 mph | |
| 175 ft | +20 ft | 27 mph | |
| 182 ft | +27 ft | 31 mph | |
RefReference Slick |
373 ft | +218 ft | 61 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 142.1% (219 ft ≈ 14.8 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R would still be travelling at 31 mph when the Yokohama Advan A052 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Wet Handling
Wet handling time in seconds
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 129.17 s | Best | |
| 133.96 s | +4.79 s | |
| 134.01 s | +4.84 s | |
| 138.49 s | +9.32 s | |
| 138.55 s | +9.38 s | |
RefMichelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 |
139.31 s | +10.14 s |
RefReference Slick |
154.1 s | +24.93 s |
The difference between best and worst was 19.3% (24.93 s).
Test setup & methodology
The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.
- Test Driver
- Guido Naumann
Recorded test conditions
Recorded test conditions
- Wet Braking
- 62.1 → 0.0 mph
More tire tests
Cross-check this test
Where these tires were tested again, and how the verdict held up.
2025 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tire Test
275/35 R187 tires tested
3 of these 5 tires tested again
The FASTEST Track Tires In The World Tested
235/35 R194 tires tested
2 of these 5 tires tested again
The BEST Track Day Tires for 2024
335/30 R216 tires tested
2 of these 5 tires tested again
Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 / Pirelli P Zero Trofeo RS
This test’s winner finished 1st there
