Test Charts / Tire Reviews
The BEST Streetable Track Tires in 2026 Tested
Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tire, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.
- Tested size
- 275/35 R18
- Tires tested
- 5
- Disciplines
- 3
- Test vehicle
- F80 BMW M3
Read the measurements, not just the rank
Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tires can be separated by very different margins.
Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tires does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.
Focus on your tires
Select tires to highlight them throughout the charts.
Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tires does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.
Dry
3Dry Handling
Dry handling time in seconds
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 98.6 s | Best | |
| 101.37 s | +2.77 s | |
| 101.59 s | +2.99 s | |
| 101.66 s | +3.06 s | |
| 101.69 s | +3.09 s |
The difference between best and worst was 3.1% (3.09 s).
Dry Handling Long Run
Average long run time in seconds
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 102.5 s | Best | |
| 102.59 s | +0.09 s | |
| 103.32 s | +0.82 s | |
| 104.15 s | +1.65 s |
All the tires in the Dry Handling Long Run test finished less than 3% apart.
Subj. Dry Handling
Subjective Dry Handling Score
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Points | Best | |
| 9 Points | Best | |
| 8.5 Points | -0.50 Points | |
| 8.5 Points | -0.50 Points | |
| 8.5 Points | -0.50 Points |
The difference between best and worst was 5.6% (0.5 Points).
Test setup & methodology
The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.
- Tire Pressures (as recorded)
- 30psi hot target
- Test Driver
- Jonathan Benson
Show full testing methodology
Score Weighting
Weights express the scoring priorities, not how much each discipline actually changed the finishing order. The size of the performance gaps matters too. Category weights contribute to the overall score. Within each category, discipline weights divide that category’s share. Published finishing positions also need to be read alongside the editorial verdict.
| Test | Within category | Share of overall score |
|---|---|---|
| Dry · 100% | ||
| Dry Handling | 46% | 46% |
| Dry Handling Long Run | 45% | 45% |
| Subj. Dry Handling | 9% | 9% |
Our standard methods
The conditions above are recorded for this test. The descriptions below explain our standard procedures; measurement windows and run counts can vary by test.
Dry Handling
For dry handling, I drive at the limit of adhesion around a dedicated handling circuit with ESC disabled where possible so I can assess the tire's natural balance, transient response, and limit behavior without electronic intervention masking the result. I usually complete between two and five timed laps per tire set, depending on the circuit, tire type, and consistency of conditions. I exclude laps affected by clear driver error or obvious environmental inconsistency. Control runs are carried out frequently throughout the session, and I often use multiple sets of control tires so that wear on the references does not become a meaningful variable. For more track-focused products, I also do endurance testing, which is a set number of laps at race pace to determine tire wear patterns and heat resistance over longer driving.
Dry Handling Long Run
For long-run handling assessment, I drive an extended session on a dry handling circuit, completing a high number of consecutive laps per tire set. The average lap time across the full session is used rather than the best laps, capturing how consistent each tire remains as it heats up under sustained high-load driving. This specifically tests thermal stability and performance degradation over extended use — a characteristic that standard short-format handling tests do not reveal.
Subj. Dry Handling
I also carry out a structured subjective handling assessment at the limit of adhesion on a dedicated dry handling circuit. I score steering precision, steering response, turn-in behavior, mid-corner balance, corner-exit traction, breakaway characteristics, and overall confidence using a standardised 1–10 scale used consistently across my testing. The final assessment combines numeric scoring with written technical commentary. I complete familiarisation laps on the control tire before evaluating each candidate.
More tire tests
Cross-check this test
Where these tires were tested again, and how the verdict held up.
2026 Tire Rack Streetable Track Tire Test
275/35 R183 tires tested
3 of these 5 tires tested again
2026 AutoView Sport Tire Test
225/45 R187 tires tested
Latest Summer Tires test
2026 Auto Express Summer Tire Test
205/55 R168 tires tested
Latest Summer Tires test
