Menu

Test source AutoView

2025 AutoView Extreme Performance Tire Test

Overall test winnerBridgestone Potenza RE 71RS

AutoView's 2025 extreme-performance shootout takes three of the most aggressive R-compound-flavoured summer tires available in the Korean market - the Nexen N'Fera SUR4G, the Bridgestone Potenza RE71RS and the Yokohama Advan A052 - and…

2025 AutoView Extreme Performance Tyre Test
275/35R19 / 2025 View full image
2025 AutoView Extreme Performance Tyre Test
Tires tested
3
Tested size
275/35R19
Test vehicle
BMW M3 (G80)
Disciplines
3

At a glance

Tire shortlist

3 Tires tested

Published finishing positions, with the strengths and considerations from this test. Owner reviews cover other sizes and driving conditions.

1st

Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS

+The Bridgestone Potenza RE71RS posts the shortest stop of the test in both dry (101 ft from 62 mph) and wet (91 ft from 50 mph), with the lowest tire-to-tire weight deviation of the three. Its front-to-rear grip balance is the most even on corner exit, so understeer is well suppressed and the M3 can pick up the throttle earlier than on the Yokohama. The tread blocks are softer than the A052's, which gives it noticeably better curb and bump compliance - the suspension stays composed where the Yokohama gets unsettled. The steer character is a stable progression from light understeer toward neutral and never surprises the driver.

−Steering pointing precision is a step behind the A052; small inputs translate into grip with a slight time lag because the soft tread block sits on a stiff carcass. The tire is intolerant of slip - push past its narrow slip-angle window and it scrubs off speed sharply, so a clean, planned line is mandatory. Longitudinal grip falls off noticeably after the opening hot lap, more than the A052's. And of the three tires on test it is the loudest on highway pavement.

2nd

Yokohama Advan A052

+The Yokohama Advan A052 is the lightest tire on test and the one that talks loudest to the driver: feedback is rigid, direct and consistent across loads, which is exactly the character a track driver looks for. It needs the smallest steering angle to hit a given line, responds fastest to small inputs, and holds grip at higher slip angles than either rival - overcooked entries come back without much speed loss. Its single best lap (1:25.16) is essentially tied with the RE71RS and 1.25 s clear of the SUR4G.

−Wet braking is the weakest of the three at 101 ft from 50 mph - nearly two meters longer than the Bridgestone - and the thin tread that helps in the dry is the obvious culprit; expected service life will also be shorter as a result. On corner exits with long throttle phases (Yeongam's T8 for example) the front gives up before the rear and understeer pulls speed out of the run. The carcass is stiff, so kerbs and bumps unsettle the chassis more than they do on the Bridgestone. Performance falls off after the opening lap, with about 1.4 s lost on lap two - lateral grip in particular drops away.

3rd

Nexen N Fera SUR4G

+The Nexen N'Fera SUR4G's signature strength is thermal stability - across the three flying laps at Yeongam its times barely move, where both rivals shed pace after the opening lap, so the SUR4G is the most forgiving tire on the test for a driver who misses the optimum window. It is also the quietest of the three on highway pavement (both on ISO certification road at 50 mph and on general road at 68 mph), the cheapest by some margin, and clearly the most appropriate of the three for repeated lapping practice.

−Steering feedback is the softest and slowest of the three, with the lightest wheel weight and the least linear response. Under load the rear breaks away ahead of the driver's prediction, turning a neutral entry into a mild oversteer on exit - and recovery from an evasive input takes more steering and more time than on either rival. Both braking columns are the longest of the three (107 ft dry, 95 ft wet), the structure feels soft enough that the line has to be 'steered into' rather than aimed, and the Yeongam best lap (1:26.41) is 1.25 s off the front pair.

Tire shortlist

Compare selected tires

2025 AutoView Extreme Performance Tire Test · 275/35R19

TireBridgestone Potenza RE 71RSYokohama Advan A052Nexen N Fera SUR4G
Position1st2nd3rd
Category scores (% of best)
Dry100%98.1%96.4%
Wet100%89.9%95.5%
Keep researchingRead owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results

Explore the complete results →

The full test

The evidence behind the verdict

AutoView's 2025 extreme-performance shootout takes three of the most aggressive R-compound-flavoured summer tires available in the Korean market - the Nexen N'Fera SUR4G, the Bridgestone Potenza RE71RS and the Yokohama Advan A052 - and runs them on a BMW M3 (G80) in 275/35R19. The SUR4G is the staple of Korean sprint racing and goes in as the domestic benchmark; the RE71RS and A052 are the imported reference tires against which it has to defend that reputation. Michelin declined to send a Pilot Sport Cup 2 / 2R for this round, citing a worry about being beaten by tires with prior test wins overseas - so the obvious fourth contender is missing, but the three that did show up cover the price/performance spectrum cleanly.

The headline result is a narrow win for the Bridgestone Potenza RE71RS: shortest dry stop, shortest wet stop, and the fastest single lap of Korea International Circuit at Yeongam - 1:25.15, just 0.01 s clear of the Yokohama Advan A052. That gap is well inside AutoView's 0.03 s dead-heat threshold, so on outright pace those two tires are effectively tied; the RE71RS earns the overall by carrying its advantage into the braking columns as well. The Nexen N'Fera SUR4G is 1.25 s adrift on lap time, has the longest dry stop, and lacks the steering directness of the imports - but it also stays consistent across all three laps where both rivals fade, is the quietest of the three on highway pavement, and remains the obvious value pick for repeated track-day use.

Test setup & methodology

The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.

Recorded test conditions

Recorded test conditions

Dry Braking
62.1 → 0.0 mph
Wet Braking
49.7 → 0.0 mph

Objective braking and skidpad work was done at KATRI on the M3 at factory cold pressures; the circuit session was run separately at Yeongam with AutoView's Jeon In-ho driving on a hot day with track surface temperatures over 50 °C. AutoView also captured tire weight, tread thickness, weight-to-weight deviation across the set, and a 25 mph coast-down rolling-resistance proxy in the video, none of which convert cleanly into our breakdown units - the relevant observations from those are folded into the per-tire commentary below.

Dry braking

 The RE71RS pulls up roughly two meters shorter than the SUR4G - a wider margin than expected on what is supposed to be the home-market tire's strongest test.

Dry Braking

Dry braking in feet (62 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Dry Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
101 ft Best 0 mph
105 ft +4 ft 15 mph
107 ft +6 ft 19 mph

The difference between best and worst was 6.2% (6 ft ≈ 0.4 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Nexen N Fera SUR4G would still be travelling at 19 mph when the Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Wet braking

Wet braking from 50 mph on a depth-controlled flooded surface. The order reshuffles in the lower placings: the Bridgestone holds its lead, but the SUR4G beats the A052 by nearly two meters here. The thin, narrow-grooved A052 tread shows its limits in standing water.

Wet Braking

Wet braking in feet (50 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Wet Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
91 ft Best 0 mph
95 ft +4 ft 17 mph
101 ft +10 ft 25 mph

The difference between best and worst was 11.2% (10 ft ≈ 0.7 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Yokohama Advan A052 would still be travelling at 25 mph when the Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Dry handling - Yeongam circuit

Three flying laps on the full 2 miles Korea International Circuit at Yeongam, with the best lap from each tire recorded below. The RE71RS and A052 both peaked on their opening flying lap and fell off about a second on lap two; the SUR4G held its time consistently across all three laps but ~1.25 s slower than the imports. AutoView also ran a 98 ft skidpad to find the lateral-grip limit on each tire - all three carried essentially the same ~42 mph before sliding, so steady-state lateral grip on its own doesn't separate them; the difference is what they do around the limit.

Dry Handling

Dry handling time in seconds

Lower is better ↓
Dry Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
85.15 s Best
85.16 s +0.01 s
86.41 s +1.26 s

All the tires in the Dry Handling test finished less than 3% apart.

Results

The Bridgestone Potenza RE71RS takes the overall on combined braking and one-lap pace, the Yokohama Advan A052 ties on lap time but loses both braking columns and degrades hardest, and the Nexen N'Fera SUR4G is the value and durability pick - slower, but the only tire on the test you would happily lap on all afternoon.

2025 AutoView Extreme Performance Tire TestWatch the full video of this test on YouTube Watch on YouTube

1st

Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS

275/35R19
Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS
The Bridgestone Potenza RE71RS is AutoView's narrow winner: best in both braking columns, fastest single-lap pace at Yeongam (1:25.15 - 0.01 s ahead of the A052 and inside AutoView's 0.03 s dead-heat threshold, so the two are effectively tied for outright pace), and the most balanced steer character of the three. A demanding tire that punishes overdriving, but the most rewarding when driven cleanly.
Dry100%
Wet100%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (3)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better1st / 3101 ftBest in this discipline
Dry HandlingLower is better1st / 385.15 sBest in this discipline
Wet BrakingLower is better1st / 391 ftBest in this discipline
2nd

Yokohama Advan A052

275/35R19
Yokohama Advan A052
The Yokohama Advan A052 is a one-flying-lap qualifier tire: superb feedback, tiniest steering effort, ties the RE71RS for fastest lap. Pay for it with the worst wet braking on test and a clear pace drop after the first lap. If your weekend is timed-attack singles, take this one; if it's stints, take the Bridgestone.
Dry98.1%
Wet89.9%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (3)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better2nd / 3105 ft+4 ft
Dry HandlingLower is better2nd / 385.16 s+0.01 s
Wet BrakingLower is better3rd / 3101 ft+10 ft
3rd

Nexen N Fera SUR4G

275/35R19
Nexen N Fera SUR4G
The Nexen N'Fera SUR4G finishes third, but the model is now overdue for replacement and AutoView frames it as still credibly competing with much more expensive imported rivals. As an endurance / sprint-race tire for Korean domestic series it remains the obvious value pick - predictable, durable, repeatable, and meaningfully cheaper to consume than the Bridgestone or Yokohama.
Dry96.4%
Wet95.5%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (3)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better3rd / 3107 ft+6 ft
Dry HandlingLower is better3rd / 386.41 s+1.26 s
Wet BrakingLower is better2nd / 395 ft+4 ft

More tire tests

Cross-check this test

All tire tests

Where these tires were tested again, and how the verdict held up.

Discussion

  1. No comments yet — be the first.
Rate your tires

My tires

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tires

Save tires from a tire page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tires. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.