Menu

Test Charts / Auto Bild Allrad

2025 Auto Bild Allrad 215/55 R17 SUV Winter Tire Test

Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tire, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.

Tested size
215/55 R17
Tires tested
12
Disciplines
14
Test vehicle
VW T-Roc

Read the measurements, not just the rank

Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tires can be separated by very different margins.

Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tires does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.

Dry

2

Dry Braking

Dry braking in feet (62 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Dry Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
RefReference Summer
121 ft -14 ft 0 mph
135 ft Best 0 mph
136 ft +1 ft 9 mph
138 ft +3 ft 12 mph
139 ft +4 ft 14 mph
139 ft +4 ft 14 mph
140 ft +5 ft 15 mph
140 ft +5 ft 15 mph
141 ft +6 ft 16 mph
141 ft +6 ft 17 mph
142 ft +7 ft 18 mph
143 ft +8 ft 19 mph
145 ft +10 ft 22 mph

The difference between best and worst was 20.1% (24 ft ≈ 1.6 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Tomket Snowroad Pro 3 would still be travelling at 22 mph when the Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Dry Handling

Dry Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Dry Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
63.1 mph +1.4 mph
61.7 mph Best
61.7 mph Best
61.5 mph -0.2 mph
61.4 mph -0.3 mph
61.3 mph -0.4 mph
61.2 mph -0.5 mph
61.1 mph -0.6 mph
61.1 mph -0.6 mph
61.1 mph -0.6 mph
61.0 mph -0.7 mph
60.6 mph -1.1 mph
60.4 mph -1.3 mph

The difference between best and worst was 4.3% (2.7 mph).

Wet

5

Wet Braking

Wet braking in feet (62 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Wet Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
RefReference Summer
130 ft -14 ft 0 mph
144 ft Best 0 mph
148 ft +4 ft 14 mph
148 ft +4 ft 14 mph
149 ft +5 ft 15 mph
149 ft +5 ft 15 mph
151 ft +7 ft 17 mph
156 ft +12 ft 22 mph
159 ft +15 ft 25 mph
161 ft +17 ft 26 mph
162 ft +18 ft 27 mph
167 ft +23 ft 30 mph
176 ft +32 ft 34 mph

The difference between best and worst was 34.8% (46 ft ≈ 3.1 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Tomket Snowroad Pro 3 would still be travelling at 34 mph when the Hankook Winter I cept RS3 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Wet Handling

Wet Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Wet Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
52.6 mph +1.3 mph
51.3 mph Best
51.1 mph -0.2 mph
51.1 mph -0.2 mph
50.9 mph -0.4 mph
50.6 mph -0.7 mph
50.4 mph -0.9 mph
50.3 mph -1.0 mph
50.0 mph -1.3 mph
49.3 mph -2.0 mph
48.4 mph -2.9 mph
46.9 mph -4.4 mph
45.7 mph -5.6 mph

The difference between best and worst was 13.2% (6.9 mph).

Wet Circle

Wet Circle Lap Time in seconds

Lower is better ↓
Wet Circle
Position / TireResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
15.21 s -0.95 s
16.16 s Best
16.17 s +0.01 s
16.17 s +0.01 s
16.18 s +0.02 s
16.29 s +0.13 s
16.4 s +0.24 s
16.41 s +0.25 s
16.53 s +0.37 s
16.58 s +0.42 s
16.66 s +0.50 s
17.25 s +1.09 s
17.55 s +1.39 s

The difference between best and worst was 15.4% (2.34 s).

Straight Aqua

Float Speed in mph

Higher is better ↑
Straight Aqua
Position / TireResultGap to best
51.8 mph Best
50.9 mph -0.9 mph
50.5 mph -1.3 mph
RefReference Summer
49.3 mph -2.5 mph
49.3 mph -2.5 mph
49.1 mph -2.7 mph
48.6 mph -3.2 mph
48.3 mph -3.5 mph
48.2 mph -3.6 mph
48.1 mph -3.7 mph
46.9 mph -4.9 mph
46.5 mph -5.3 mph
45.7 mph -6.1 mph

The difference between best and worst was 11.8% (6.1 mph).

Curved Aquaplaning

Remaining lateral acceleration

Higher is better ↑
Curved Aquaplaning
Position / TireResultGap to best
11.7 ft/s² Best
11.6 ft/s² -0.1 ft/s²
11.4 ft/s² -0.3 ft/s²
RefReference Summer
11.3 ft/s² -0.4 ft/s²
10.8 ft/s² -0.9 ft/s²
10.7 ft/s² -1.0 ft/s²
10.6 ft/s² -1.1 ft/s²
10.5 ft/s² -1.2 ft/s²
10.4 ft/s² -1.3 ft/s²
10.3 ft/s² -1.4 ft/s²
10.3 ft/s² -1.4 ft/s²
9.6 ft/s² -2.1 ft/s²
9.3 ft/s² -2.4 ft/s²

The difference between best and worst was 20.7% (2.4 ft/s²).

Snow

4

Snow Braking

Snow braking in feet (31 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Snow Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
75 ft Best 0 mph
76 ft +1 ft 7 mph
76 ft +1 ft 9 mph
76 ft +1 ft 10 mph
76 ft +1 ft 10 mph
77 ft +2 ft 12 mph
78 ft +3 ft 16 mph
79 ft +4 ft 18 mph
81 ft +6 ft 22 mph
81 ft +6 ft 22 mph
85 ft +10 ft 27 mph
86 ft +11 ft 28 mph
RefReference Summer
122 ft +47 ft 50 mph

The difference between best and worst was 62.4% (47 ft ≈ 3.2 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Tomket Snowroad Pro 3 would still be travelling at 28 mph when the Hankook Winter I cept RS3 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Snow Traction

Pulling Force in pounds-force

Higher is better ↑
Snow Traction
Position / TireResultGap to best
680 lbf Best
680 lbf 0 lbf
674 lbf -6 lbf
672 lbf -8 lbf
667 lbf -13 lbf
667 lbf -13 lbf
653 lbf -27 lbf
612 lbf -68 lbf
608 lbf -72 lbf
580 lbf -100 lbf
539 lbf -141 lbf
529 lbf -151 lbf
RefReference Summer
216 lbf -464 lbf

The difference between best and worst was 68.2% (464 lbf).

Snow Handling

Snow handling average speed

Higher is better ↑
Snow Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
38.2 mph Best
38.1 mph -0.1 mph
37.9 mph -0.3 mph
37.8 mph -0.4 mph
37.7 mph -0.5 mph
37.6 mph -0.6 mph
37.3 mph -0.9 mph
37.3 mph -0.9 mph
36.9 mph -1.3 mph
36.2 mph -2.0 mph
35.5 mph -2.7 mph
34.9 mph -3.3 mph
RefReference Summer
24.8 mph -13.4 mph

The difference between best and worst was 35% (13.4 mph).

Snow Slalom

Lateral acceleration

Higher is better ↑
Snow Slalom
Position / TireResultGap to best
15.1 ft/s² Best
15.0 ft/s² -0.1 ft/s²
14.8 ft/s² -0.3 ft/s²
14.7 ft/s² -0.4 ft/s²
14.5 ft/s² -0.6 ft/s²
14.2 ft/s² -0.9 ft/s²
14.2 ft/s² -0.9 ft/s²
14.1 ft/s² -1.0 ft/s²
14.1 ft/s² -1.0 ft/s²
13.9 ft/s² -1.2 ft/s²
13.7 ft/s² -1.4 ft/s²
10.9 ft/s² -4.2 ft/s²
RefReference Summer
7.2 ft/s² -7.9 ft/s²

The difference between best and worst was 52.6% (7.9 ft/s²).

Comfort

2

Subj. Comfort

Subjective Comfort Score

Higher is better ↑
Subj. Comfort
Position / TireResultGap to best
8 Points Best
8 Points Best
7.3 Points -0.70 Points
7.3 Points -0.70 Points
7.3 Points -0.70 Points
7.3 Points -0.70 Points
7.3 Points -0.70 Points
6.7 Points -1.30 Points
6.7 Points -1.30 Points
6.7 Points -1.30 Points
6.7 Points -1.30 Points
6.7 Points -1.30 Points

The difference between best and worst was 16.3% (1.3 Points).

Noise

External noise in dB

Lower is better ↓
Noise
Position / TireResultGap to best
71.7 dB Best
72 dB +0.30 dB
72.3 dB +0.60 dB
72.5 dB +0.80 dB
72.7 dB +1.00 dB
72.9 dB +1.20 dB
73.1 dB +1.40 dB
73.3 dB +1.60 dB
73.5 dB +1.80 dB
RefReference Summer
73.9 dB +2.20 dB
73.9 dB +2.20 dB
74.3 dB +2.60 dB
74.7 dB +3.00 dB

The difference between best and worst was 4.2% (3 dB).

Value

1

Rolling Resistance

Rolling resistance in kg t

Lower is better ↓
Rolling Resistance
Position / TireResultGap to bestExtra fuel / year
7.11 kg/t Best $0
7.22 kg/t +0.11 kg/t $5
7.81 kg/t +0.70 kg/t $29
RefReference Summer
7.85 kg/t +0.74 kg/t $31
7.87 kg/t +0.76 kg/t $31
8 kg/t +0.89 kg/t $37
8.08 kg/t +0.97 kg/t $40
8.29 kg/t +1.18 kg/t $49
8.31 kg/t +1.20 kg/t $50
8.33 kg/t +1.22 kg/t $50
8.36 kg/t +1.25 kg/t $52
8.45 kg/t +1.34 kg/t $55
8.75 kg/t +1.64 kg/t $68

The difference between best and worst was 23.1% (1.64 kg / t). Over 12,000 miles a year at $3.60/gal, the Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2 uses about 19 gal ($68) more fuel than the Michelin Alpin 7.

Adjust the assumptions

Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tire selection above.

12,000 mi
$3.60/gal
Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tire age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.

Test setup & methodology

The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.

Recorded test conditions

Recorded test conditions

Dry Braking
62.1 → 0.0 mph
Wet Braking
62.1 → 0.0 mph
Snow Braking
31.1 → 0.0 mph

More tire tests

Cross-check this test

All tire tests

Where these tires were tested again, and how the verdict held up.

Rate your tires

My tires

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tires

Save tires from a tire page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tires. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.

Where to buy

Affiliate links: if you buy, we may earn a commission. It never changes our tests, scores or recommendations. How we stay independent