Menu

Test Charts / Wybór Kierowców

2025 Mid Range All Season Tire Test

Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tire, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.

Tested size
215/55 R17
Tires tested
6
Disciplines
6
Test vehicle
VW Troc

Read the measurements, not just the rank

Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tires can be separated by very different margins.

Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tires does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.

Dry

2

Dry Braking

Dry braking in feet (62 - 3 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Dry Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
128 ft Best 0 mph
136 ft +8 ft 20 mph
136 ft +8 ft 20 mph
142 ft +14 ft 26 mph
144 ft +16 ft 27 mph
147 ft +19 ft 29 mph

The difference between best and worst was 15.2% (19 ft ≈ 1.3 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Kumho Solus 4S HA32+ would still be travelling at 29 mph when the Michelin CrossClimate 2 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Dry Handling

Dry handling time in seconds

Lower is better ↓
Dry Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
113 s Best
113.2 s +0.20 s
113.3 s +0.30 s
113.4 s +0.40 s
113.6 s +0.60 s
113.7 s +0.70 s

All the tires in the Dry Handling test finished less than 3% apart.

Wet

2

Wet Braking

Wet braking in feet (50 - 3 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Wet Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
94 ft Best 0 mph
101 ft +7 ft 22 mph
104 ft +10 ft 25 mph
107 ft +13 ft 28 mph
114 ft +20 ft 34 mph
116 ft +22 ft 35 mph

The difference between best and worst was 23.8% (22 ft ≈ 1.5 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Sunny NC501 would still be travelling at 35 mph when the Nokian Seasonproof 2 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Wet Handling

Wet handling time in seconds

Lower is better ↓
Wet Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
73.8 s Best
74.9 s +1.10 s
75.7 s +1.90 s
75.9 s +2.10 s
76.1 s +2.30 s
78.5 s +4.70 s

The difference between best and worst was 6.4% (4.7 s).

Snow

2

Snow Braking

Snow braking in feet (25 - 3 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Snow Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
52 ft Best 0 mph
53 ft +1 ft 13 mph
53 ft +1 ft 14 mph
54 ft +2 ft 18 mph
54 ft +2 ft 19 mph
56 ft +4 ft 23 mph

The difference between best and worst was 8.9% (4 ft ≈ 0.3 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ would still be travelling at 23 mph when the Michelin CrossClimate 2 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Snow Handling

Snow handling time in seconds

Lower is better ↓
Snow Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
86.9 s Best
88.9 s +2.00 s
90.4 s +3.50 s
91.1 s +4.20 s
91.2 s +4.30 s
91.6 s +4.70 s

The difference between best and worst was 5.4% (4.7 s).

Test setup & methodology

The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.

Recorded test conditions

Recorded test conditions

Dry Braking
62.1 → 3.1 mph
Wet Braking
49.7 → 3.1 mph
Snow Braking
24.9 → 3.1 mph

More tire tests

Cross-check this test

All tire tests

Where these tires were tested again, and how the verdict held up.

Rate your tires

My tires

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tires

Save tires from a tire page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tires. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.