Test Charts / Tire Rack
2024 Tire Rack Highway All Season Tire Test
Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tire, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.
- Tested size
- 265/70 R17
- Tires tested
- 9
- Disciplines
- 7
- Test vehicle
- 2024 Toyota Tacoma
Read the measurements, not just the rank
Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tires can be separated by very different margins.
Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tires does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.
Focus on your tires
Select tires to highlight them throughout the charts.
Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tires does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.
Dry
3Dry Braking
Dry braking in feet (60 - 0 mph)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 130 ft | Best | 0 mph | |
| 130 ft | Best | 0 mph | |
| 131 ft | +1 ft | 7 mph | |
| 133 ft | +3 ft | 12 mph | |
| 134 ft | +4 ft | 14 mph | |
| 135 ft | +5 ft | 15 mph | |
| 138 ft | +8 ft | 19 mph | |
| 138 ft | +8 ft | 19 mph | |
| 140 ft | +10 ft | 21 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 7.7% (10 ft ≈ 0.7 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Michelin Defender LTX MS2 would still be travelling at 21 mph when the Continental TerrainContact HT had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Dry Circle
Average cornering G force in the dry
Higher is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 0.76 g | Best | |
| 0.75 g | -0.01 g | |
| 0.75 g | -0.01 g | |
| 0.74 g | -0.02 g | |
| 0.74 g | -0.02 g | |
| 0.73 g | -0.03 g | |
| 0.73 g | -0.03 g | |
| 0.73 g | -0.03 g | |
| 0.73 g | -0.03 g |
The difference between best and worst was 3.9% (0.03 g).
Subj. Road Score
Subjective Real World Driving Score
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 7.5 Points | Best | |
| 7.5 Points | Best | |
| 7.33 Points | -0.17 Points | |
| 7.33 Points | -0.17 Points | |
| 7.25 Points | -0.25 Points | |
| 7.25 Points | -0.25 Points | |
| 7.25 Points | -0.25 Points | |
| 6.92 Points | -0.58 Points | |
| 6.83 Points | -0.67 Points |
The difference between best and worst was 8.9% (0.67 Points).
Wet
3Wet Braking
Wet braking in feet (60 - 0 mph)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 155 ft | Best | 0 mph | |
| 155 ft | Best | 0 mph | |
| 156 ft | +1 ft | 6 mph | |
| 156 ft | +1 ft | 6 mph | |
| 158 ft | +3 ft | 11 mph | |
| 168 ft | +13 ft | 22 mph | |
| 169 ft | +14 ft | 23 mph | |
| 170 ft | +15 ft | 24 mph | |
| 173 ft | +18 ft | 26 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 11.6% (18 ft ≈ 1.2 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Vredestein Pinza HT would still be travelling at 26 mph when the Goodyear Wrangler Workhorse HT had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Wet Handling
Wet handling time in seconds
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 36.24 s | Best | |
| 36.88 s | +0.64 s | |
| 37.06 s | +0.82 s | |
| 37.47 s | +1.23 s | |
| 37.51 s | +1.27 s | |
| 37.87 s | +1.63 s | |
| 37.94 s | +1.70 s | |
| 38.31 s | +2.07 s | |
| 38.38 s | +2.14 s |
The difference between best and worst was 5.9% (2.14 s).
Wet Circle
Average cornering G force in the wet
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 0.65 g | Best | |
| 0.64 g | -0.01 g | |
| 0.62 g | -0.03 g | |
| 0.61 g | -0.04 g | |
| 0.61 g | -0.04 g | |
| 0.6 g | -0.05 g | |
| 0.59 g | -0.06 g | |
| 0.59 g | -0.06 g | |
| 0.58 g | -0.07 g |
The difference between best and worst was 10.8% (0.07 g).
Snow
1Snow Handling
Snow handling time in seconds
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 26.4 s | Best | |
| 26.5 s | +0.10 s | |
| 27.1 s | +0.70 s | |
| 27.8 s | +1.40 s | |
| 28 s | +1.60 s | |
| 28.9 s | +2.50 s | |
| 30.5 s | +4.10 s | |
| 30.7 s | +4.30 s | |
| 30.9 s | +4.50 s |
The difference between best and worst was 17% (4.5 s).
Test setup & methodology
The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.
Recorded test conditions
Recorded test conditions
- Dry Braking
- 60.3 → 0.0 mph
- Wet Braking
- 60.3 → 0.0 mph
More tire tests
Cross-check this test
Where these tires were tested again, and how the verdict held up.
2026 Tire Rack All Terrain Tire Snow Test
265/70 R1730 tires tested
9 of these 9 tires tested again
Best HT All Season Tires for 2026 Tested!
265/65 R187 tires tested
4 of these 9 tires tested again
All Season vs All Terrain Tires Tested: Do You Actually Need an All Terrain?
265/70 R172 tires tested
Tested in the same size

