Ceat WinterDrive vs Kleber Krisalp HP3
- TR Score
- 9.4/10
- Owners say
- -
- TR Score
- 8.1/10
- Owners say
- 84% · 36
In the 4 independent tests that ran both tires, the Kleber Krisalp HP3 finished ahead 4 times and the WinterDrive not once. The WinterDrive lasted 18.9% longer in the wear tests; the Krisalp HP3 resisted straight aquaplaning at a 7.3% higher speed.
Data updated
Which should you buy?
Choose Kleber Krisalp HP3 for mountainous or consistently snowy regions where snow grip and wet aquaplaning safety are top priority. Choose Ceat WinterDrive if you drive mainly on cleared urban roads, value short dry/ice braking, low noise, and want the best cost-per-kilometer for high mileage on a tight budget.
Where the WinterDrive is stronger
- Excellent value and lowest cost-per-km (lower price and longer wear)
- Shorter dry braking and good ice braking performance
- Lower external noise and good ride comfort
Where the Krisalp HP3 is stronger
- Class-leading snow performance (braking, traction, handling)
- Better wet security in multiple tests, notably aquaplaning resistance
- Consistently higher overall test placements
The bullet points are analysis of the shared tests and of owner reviews; the measured wins in each discipline are in the tables below. Where the two disagree, the figures are right.
WinterDrive vs Krisalp HP3 at a glance
| Category | WinterDrive | Gap | Krisalp HP3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shared tests won4 shared tests | 0 | 4 | |
| Dry3 measurements | 3 | The WinterDrive stopped 6.5% shorter in the dry (2 tests) | 0 |
| Wet11 measurements | 2 | The Krisalp HP3 resisted straight aquaplaning at a 7.3% higher speed (2 tests) | 9 |
| Snow8 measurements | 0 | The Krisalp HP3 stopped 3.5% shorter on snow (4 tests) | 8 |
| Ice1 measurement | 1 | 0 | |
| Comfort3 measurements | 3 | The WinterDrive was 0.7 dB quieter (2 tests) | 0 |
| Value5 measurements | 2 | Level between the two. | 2 |
| Tire Reviews Scoreevery test and review we hold | 9.4/10 | The WinterDrive by 1.3 | 8.1/10 |
| Pricein the 3 tests that listed prices | Cheaper | The Krisalp HP3 was dearer in 3 of 3 | +17.6% |
Wins count every measurement the shared tests recorded for both tires; a tick marks the tire ahead on that line. Subjective driver scores count as wins but are never averaged, because each test uses its own scale.
Head to head in 4 tests, 2024 to 2025
Each row is one published test in which both tires ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | WinterDrive | Field | Krisalp HP3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 Autobild Winter Tire Test | P15 of 20 | P14 of 20 | |
| 2025 Winter Tire Braking Test - 52 Sets! | P19 of 51 | P12 of 51 | |
| 2025 ADAC Winter Tire Test | P10 of 31 | P7 of 31 | |
| 2024 Winter 55 Tire Braking Test | P24 of 55 | P16 of 55 |
Performance profile
7 measurements from the 4 shared tests, each tire shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
WinterDrive
Krisalp HP3
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 118 ft stop against 112 ft is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. The scale stops at 92%: a point further in sits on the hub's edge, hollow. 13 measurements recorded in only one shared test are left off; every measurement is in the table further down.
Where each scores higher
WinterDrive
Krisalp HP3
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tires of the same season and class: 90 means this tire out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tires posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Open a discipline for its measurements, and a measurement for every test's figure.
| Measurement | WinterDrive | Gap | Krisalp HP3 | Wins | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 140 | 6.5% | 150 | 2-0 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 71.3 | 1.1% | 70.5 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 138 | 1.4% | 136 | 1-3 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 130 | 2.5% | 134 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 49.6 | 1.4% | 50.3 | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 5.6 | 4% | 5.8 | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 12.69 | 1.3% | 12.52 | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 44.6 | 7.3% | 47.8 | 0-2 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 6.8 | 22.3% | 8.3 | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 79 | 3.5% | 76 | 0-4 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 314 | 2.2% | 322 | 0-2 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 36 | 1.2% | 36.5 | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 9.3 | 6.7% | 9.9 | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 51 | 7.7% | 55 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | 9% | scored | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 68.55 | 0.7 dB | 69.2 | 2-0 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 36,207 | 18.9% | 30,370 | 2-0 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 9.07 | 3.9% | 8.72 | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 5.8 | 1.7% | 5.7 | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 64 | = | 64 | 0-0 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tires shared. "Scored" rows are subjective driver ratings: each test uses its own scale, so only the wins are counted.
Scores beyond the shared tests
On the Tire Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the WinterDrive scores 9.4 and the Krisalp HP3 8.1 out of 10.
| WinterDrive | Category | Krisalp HP3 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 93 | Dry | 34 | ||
| 54 | Wet | 72 | ||
| 71 | Comfort | 55 | ||
| 84 | Value | 51 | ||
| 76 | Snow | 90 | ||
| 90 | Ice | 20 | ||
Category scores are percentiles among tires of the same season and class: 90 means this tire out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
What owners say
| WinterDrive | Category | Krisalp HP3 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | Dry Grip | 8.5 | ||
| - | Wet Grip | 8.5 | ||
| - | Road Feedback | 8.2 | ||
| - | Handling | 8.1 | ||
| - | Wear | 8.4 | ||
| - | Comfort | 8.8 | ||
| - | Snow Grip | 8.9 | ||
| - | Ice Grip | 8 | ||
Owners rate the Krisalp HP3 84% from 36 reviews; the WinterDrive has no owner reviews yet. Reviews are vetted by hand before publication; ownership is not verified.
Ceat WinterDrive
No owner reviews yet. Be the first to review it →
Kleber Krisalp HP3
- 84%from 36 reviews
- 71%would buy again
- 459,168 milesdriven by reviewers
Most drivers rate the Kleber Krisalp HP3 highly, praising its strong snow and wet performance, low noise/comfort for a winter tire, and decent wear/value. Dry grip and handling precision are adequate for normal driving but can feel soft with noticeable understeer if pushed; several users report a 'jelly/boat-like' feel. A minority mention noise at certain speeds, vibration/manufacturing issues in specific batches, and weaker performance on ice or slush at higher speeds. Overall sentiment is positive with safety and winter capability as standout strengths.
- snow traction and braking
- wet grip and aquaplaning resistance
- low noise/comfort for a winter tire
- good wear and value
- soft sidewalls/boat-like feel; weak handling precision when pushed
- dry grip/cornering weaker vs summer tires
- ice/slush performance can be limited at higher speeds
Summarised by AI from 26 vetted reviews; the reviews themselves are on the tire page.
All 36 Krisalp HP3 reviewsGreat snow and ice grip, much better than any winter tire i had before.
Good durability as well. Dry grip is fine, wet grip not as much and must be kept in mind. Not very noisy for a winter tire either. Would buy again if they are on discount.
Sizes, EU label and lineage
| Category | WinterDrive | Krisalp HP3 |
|---|---|---|
| Season | Winter | Winter |
| On the market since | - | 2016 |
| Replaced | - | Kleber Krisalp HP2 (2013) |
| Price in the shared tests | The Krisalp HP3 was the dearer tire in 3 of the 3 tests that listed prices, by 17.6% on average. Each test priced the tires in its own market at the time; only the gap is comparable. | |
Reading the results
Written from the test results and owner reviews above. It is analysis, not a measurement: where it and the tables disagree, the tables are right.
This head-to-head puts two budget-friendly European winter touring tires under the microscope: Ceat WinterDrive and Kleber Krisalp HP3. Both target everyday passenger cars, but they approach winter differently-Ceat leans on value, mileage and balanced braking, while Kleber prioritizes snow mastery and stronger wet security in several disciplines.
Across four shared tests (2024-2025) the Kleber generally places higher overall and dominates most snow categories, while Ceat counters with shorter dry braking, lower noise, longer wear life and a far stronger purchase price. The trade-off is clear: Kleber is the snow specialist; Ceat is the cost-per-kilometer champion with acceptable all-round safety, albeit weaker in wet aquaplaning.
Conclusion
Kleber Krisalp HP3 is the safer bet for regions with frequent snow and slush. It repeatedly stops shorter on snow (around 3-4% advantage), offers better snow traction and handling, and shows measurably stronger aquaplaning resistance (straight-line +7% in multiple tests), giving it a margin of security in wet, wintery transitions. Its overall test rankings are consistently higher.
Ceat WinterDrive makes a compelling value case: significantly cheaper per set (~€380 vs ~€500) with top-tier mileage (+15-23% wear advantage) and lower noise, while also delivering reliably short dry braking and even a win in ice braking at ADAC. For urban/cleared-road drivers or high-mileage users on a budget who meet snow occasionally, Ceat is a pragmatic, economical choice. The practical takeaway: pick Kleber for mountain or persistently snowy routes; pick Ceat for budget-led daily use on mainly dry/cold or cleared roads, accepting modest wet/aquaplaning compromises.
WinterDrive vs Krisalp HP3: your questions
Is the Ceat WinterDrive or the Kleber Krisalp HP3 the better tire?
In the 4 independent tests that ran both tires, the Kleber Krisalp HP3 finished ahead 4 times and the WinterDrive not once. On the Tire Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the WinterDrive scores 9.4 and the Krisalp HP3 8.1 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the WinterDrive or the Krisalp HP3?
The Krisalp HP3 led 9 of the 11 wet measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it resisted straight aquaplaning at a 7.3% higher speed across 2 tests.
Which is better in the dry?
The WinterDrive led 3 of the 3 dry measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 6.5% shorter in the dry across 2 tests.
Which is better in snow?
The Krisalp HP3 led 8 of the 8 snow measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 3.5% shorter on snow across 4 tests.
Which lasts longer and costs less to run?
The WinterDrive lasted 18.9% longer in the wear tests (2 tests).
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
The WinterDrive was 0.7 dB quieter (2 tests).
What do owners say?
Owners rate the Krisalp HP3 84% from 36 reviews; the WinterDrive has no owner reviews yet.
Which is more expensive?
In the 3 tests that listed prices, the Krisalp HP3 was the dearer tire in 3 of them, by 17.6% on average. Prices are the test's own at the time, in its own market.
More comparisons with these tires
vs
Barum Polaris 6 vs Kleber Krisalp HP3
2-1 in 4 shared tests
vs
Firestone Winterhawk 4 vs Kleber Krisalp HP3
5-10 in 15 shared tests
vs
Hankook Winter I cept RS3 vs Kleber Krisalp HP3
6-0 in 6 shared tests
vs
Hankook Winter i cept evo3 vs Kleber Krisalp HP3
5-3 in 8 shared tests
vs
BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2 vs Kleber Krisalp HP3
13-5 in 20 shared tests
vs 
Kleber Krisalp HP3 vs Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
0-11 in 11 shared tests
vs
Fulda Kristall Control HP2 vs Kleber Krisalp HP3
4-18 in 22 shared tests
vs
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs Kleber Krisalp HP3
8-1 in 10 shared tests
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tire wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tires ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tire Reviews Score rates each tire out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tires can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tire Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tires independently since 2007.
Discussion