Bridgestone Turanza 6 vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
- TR Score
- 8.4/10
- Owners say
- 77% · 73
- TR Score
- 8.4/10
- Owners say
- 80% · 119
In the 5 independent tests that ran both tires, the Bridgestone Turanza 6 finished ahead 3 times and the ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun twice. The Turanza 6 lasted 18.4% longer in the wear tests; the ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun held 6.5% more grip in curved aquaplaning.
Data updated
Which should you buy?
Choose Bridgestone Turanza 6 if you drive high annual mileage, favor wet-road composure, quiet comfort, long wear and lower fuel consumption. Choose Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun if you prioritize lower upfront cost, the shortest dry stopping distances, agile dry handling and strong aquaplaning reserves.
Where the Turanza 6 is stronger
- Class-leading rolling resistance in multiple tests (e.g., 7.6-8.0 kg/t vs Falken 8.2-8.9)
- Very good tread life (e.g., +33% vs Falken in AutoBild; leads in ADAC mileage)
- Balanced wet capability with strong wet handling/circle results in several tests
Where the ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun is stronger
- Consistently shorter dry braking across all shared datasets
- Lively dry handling and good feedback; strong curved aquaplaning reserves
- Competitive wet braking in some tests (notably ADAC on asphalt and concrete)
The bullet points are analysis of the shared tests and of owner reviews; the measured wins in each discipline are in the tables below. Where the two disagree, the figures are right.
Turanza 6 vs ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun at a glance
| Category | Turanza 6 | Gap | ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shared tests won5 shared tests | 3 | 2 | |
| Dry8 measurements | 1 | The ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun stopped 1.1% shorter in the dry (5 tests) | 7 |
| Wet19 measurements | 8 | The ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun held 6.5% more grip in curved aquaplaning (3 tests) | 10 |
| Off road5 measurements | 2 | 3 | |
| Comfort4 measurements | 1 | Level between the two. | 1 |
| Value7 measurements | 6 | The Turanza 6 lasted 18.4% longer in the wear tests (2 tests) | 1 |
| Tire Reviews Scoreevery test and review we hold | 8.4/10 | Level | 8.4/10 |
| Owner rating73 and 119 reviews | 77% | The ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun by 3 points | 80% |
| Would buy againshare of owners | 63% | The ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun by 15 points | 78% |
| Pricein the 3 tests that listed prices | +28.5% | The Turanza 6 was dearer in 3 of 3 | Cheaper |
| Sizes madeEU label registrations | 148 | 49 sizes made in both | 86 |
Wins count every measurement the shared tests recorded for both tires; a tick marks the tire ahead on that line. Subjective driver scores count as wins but are never averaged, because each test uses its own scale.
Head to head in 5 tests, 2023 to 2024
Each row is one published test in which both tires ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | Turanza 6 | Field | ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 AZ Summer Tire Test | P9 of 9 | P6 of 9 | |
| 2024 AutoBild Summer Tire Test | P3 of 20 | P7 of 20 | |
| 2024 ADAC Summer Tire Test | P6 of 16 | P10 of 16 | |
| 2024 Summer Tire Market Overview | P10 of 55 | P7 of 55 | |
| 2023 Best SUV Tires Tested | P2 of 12 | P3 of 12 |
Performance profile
10 measurements from the 5 shared tests, each tire shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
Turanza 6
ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 118 ft stop against 112 ft is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. The scale stops at 94%: a point further in sits on the hub's edge, hollow. 11 measurements recorded in only one shared test are left off; every measurement is in the table further down.
Where each scores higher
Turanza 6
ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tires of the same season and class: 90 means this tire out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Where owners rate each higher
Turanza 6
ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Owners rate the Turanza 6 77% from 73 reviews and the ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun 80% from 119. Each spoke is one question owners answer out of 10; reviews are vetted by hand before publication.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tires posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Open a discipline for its measurements, and a measurement for every test's figure.
| Measurement | Turanza 6 | Gap | ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun | Wins | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 120 | 1.1% | 119 | 0-5 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 76.8 | 0.5% | 76.4 | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 67.4 | 0.3% | 67.3 | 1-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 133 | 1.1% | 131 | 2-2 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 131 | 9% | 119 | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 80.6 | 1.7% | 79.2 | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 50.1 | 1.1% | 49.5 | 2-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 14.1 | 2.6% | 13.7 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 13.39 | 0.2% | 13.46 | 1-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 51.4 | 0.1% | 51.4 | 2-2 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 11.2 | 6.5% | 12 | 0-3 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1,856 | 1.4% | 1,830 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 40.8 | 1.1% | 41.3 | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1,876 | 0.9% | 1,893 | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 515 | 6.8% | 549 | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 659 | 2.1% | 645 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 71.48 | 0.1 dB | 71.43 | 1-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 25,569 | 18.4% | 22,400 | 2-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 7.67 | 10.4% | 8.57 | 3-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 5.7 | 5% | 6 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 73 | 1.4% | 72 | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tires shared. "Scored" rows are subjective driver ratings: each test uses its own scale, so only the wins are counted.
Scores beyond the shared tests
On the Tire Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Turanza 6 scores 8.4 and the ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun 8.4 out of 10.
| Turanza 6 | Category | ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 70 | Dry | 70 | ||
| 68 | Wet | 79 | ||
| 57 | Comfort | 62 | ||
| 85 | Value | 42 | ||
Category scores are percentiles among tires of the same season and class: 90 means this tire out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
What owners say
| Turanza 6 | Category | ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8.5 | Dry Grip | 8.6 | ||
| 8.4 | Wet Grip | 8.2 | ||
| 7.4 | Road Feedback | 8.1 | ||
| 7.6 | Handling | 8 | ||
| 7.2 | Wear | 7.7 | ||
| 7.7 | Comfort | 7.9 | ||
Owners rate the Turanza 6 77% from 73 reviews and the ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun 80% from 119. Reviews are vetted by hand before publication; ownership is not verified.
Bridgestone Turanza 6
- 77%from 73 reviews
- 63%would buy again
- 616,298 milesdriven by reviewers
Owners generally rate the Bridgestone Turanza 6 as a quiet, very comfortable touring tire with strong wet and dry grip, reflected in a 74% average score and around seven in ten positive reviews. Comfort and refinement are the clear headline, with about half of owners mentioning low road noise and a smooth ride, while wet grip is widely praised by those who discuss it. The main drawback is a fairly common complaint about muted or vague steering feel (around one in five owners), and a similar share report issues with wear behavior, including uneven wear and shorter-than-expected life for some.
- Very comfortable ride quality
- Low road noise
- Strong wet grip and confidence in the rain
- Good dry grip
- Vague or heavy steering feel
- Soft sidewalls affecting precision and confidence
- Uneven wear across the tread
Summarised by AI from 65 vetted reviews; the reviews themselves are on the tire page.
All 73 Turanza 6 reviewsSuperb, very low noise, superb confort, mid handling. Over 20k miles and not even at 50%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
- 80%from 119 reviews
- 78%would buy again
- 1,000,122 milesdriven by reviewers
Drivers generally describe the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun as an excellent value summer touring tire with strong wet-weather safety (including aquaplaning resistance) and confident dry grip, often punching above its price class. A very common highlight is low cabin noise and an overall smooth, secure feel, with many users also reporting good wear life over high mileage. The most recurring drawbacks are higher rolling resistance (fuel consumption increase for some cars) and a softer/less precise steering feel that can disappoint more performance-focused drivers, with a subset also finding the ride firmer on rough roads.
- Strong wet grip and reassuring aquaplaning resistance
- Good dry grip and braking
- Low road noise / quiet cabin
- Good value for money
- Higher rolling resistance leading to increased fuel consumption for some drivers
- Soft sidewalls or less precise steering/feedback (not ideal for hard sporty driving)
- Firm/harsh ride on rough roads for some vehicles/setups
Summarised by AI from 107 vetted reviews; the reviews themselves are on the tire page.
All 119 ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun reviewsA quiet tire, very predictable/forgiving at the limit, especially in the rain, with a soft sidewall.These miles were covered with spirited driving on winding roads.
Sizes, EU label and lineage
From the EU label registrations for each tire: 148 sizes of the Turanza 6 and 86 of the ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun, 49 of them made in both.
| Category | Turanza 6 | ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun |
|---|---|---|
| Season | Summer | Summer |
| Sizes made | 148 sizes, 15 to 22 inch | 86 sizes, 14 to 19 inch |
| Made in both | 49 sizes 205/65 R15195/45 R16195/50 R16195/55 R16195/60 R16205/45 R16205/50 R16205/55 R16205/60 R16215/45 R16215/55 R16215/60 R16and 37 more | |
| EU label wet grip | A63%B37% | A100% |
| EU label rolling resistance | B47%A44%C8% | D50%C47%B2%A1% |
| EU label noise | 66-73 dB B60%A40% | 67-72 dB A74%B26% |
| On the market since | - | 2017 |
| Replaced | Bridgestone Turanza T005 (2016) | Falken ZIEX ZE914 EcoRun (2012) |
| Replaced by | - | Falken ZIEX ZE320 |
| Awards | Highly Recommended: Best Tires for Small & Mid-Size SUVs (DriverReviews, 2026/27) Recommended: Best Tires for Large Family Cars (DriverReviews, 2026/27) Winner: Best Tires for Family Cars (DriverReviews, 2026/27) Winner: Best Tires for Large SUVs (DriverReviews, 2026/27) Winner: Summer Tire of the Year (WhatTire, 2025) Winner: Best Tires for Family Cars (DriverReviews, 2024/25) | - |
| Price in the shared tests | The Turanza 6 was the dearer tire in 3 of the 3 tests that listed prices, by 28.5% on average. Each test priced the tires in its own market at the time; only the gap is comparable. | |
Label grades are shown as the share of registered sizes carrying each grade, so "B (88%), C (12%)" means most sizes are B. Grades vary by size; check the label for yours.
Previous generation: Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun (19 shared tests)
Reading the results
Written from the test results and owner reviews above. It is analysis, not a measurement: where it and the tables disagree, the tables are right.
Bridgestone's Turanza 6 and Falken's ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun target the same brief: a comfortable, efficient summer touring tire for everyday passenger cars. Across five shared tests in 2023-2024, they trade blows in dry and wet safety, economy, noise and longevity, with some clear trends emerging by size and test focus.
The Falken often edges short-distance dry braking and shows strong curved aquaplaning reserves, while the Bridgestone consistently delivers lower rolling resistance, longer tread life and generally stronger wet balance outside of curved aquaplaning. Price sharply favors Falken, but total running costs and efficiency lean toward Bridgestone. This comparison clarifies which tire suits drivers prioritizing upfront price and crisp dry responses versus those valuing efficiency, wet composure and lifespan.
Conclusion
Patterns across tests show a split personality: Falken typically stops shorter in the dry (won dry braking in all shared datasets) and feels a touch more agile there, but it trails in efficiency and wear. Bridgestone pairs very low rolling resistance (leading or joint-leading in multiple tests) with strong mileage and broadly secure wet performance-though curved aquaplaning is a relative weak spot and some tests noted average steering feedback.
Value depends on how you drive and what you pay for fuel. Budget-conscious buyers who want confident dry braking and good aquaplaning reserves will appreciate the lower purchase price and lively dry handling of the Falken. High-mileage or motorway drivers will likely save more with the Bridgestone thanks to lower fuel use, better tread life, and consistently balanced wet grip. If you want the sharpest dry stop per dollar today, choose Falken; if you want the calmer, quieter, longer-lasting and more economical ownership experience, choose Bridgestone.
Turanza 6 vs ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: your questions
Is the Bridgestone Turanza 6 or the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun the better tire?
In the 5 independent tests that ran both tires, the Bridgestone Turanza 6 finished ahead 3 times and the ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun twice. On the Tire Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Turanza 6 scores 8.4 and the ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun 8.4 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the Turanza 6 or the ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun?
The ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun led 10 of the 19 wet measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it held 6.5% more grip in curved aquaplaning across 3 tests.
Which is better in the dry?
The ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun led 7 of the 8 dry measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 1.1% shorter in the dry across 5 tests.
Which lasts longer and costs less to run?
The Turanza 6 lasted 18.4% longer in the wear tests (2 tests) and had 10.4% lower rolling resistance (3 tests). Owners rate wear 7.2/10 for the Turanza 6 and 7.7/10 for the ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
Owners rate comfort 7.7/10 for the Turanza 6 and 7.9/10 for the ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the Turanza 6 77% from 73 reviews and the ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun 80% from 119. 63% of Turanza 6 owners would buy it again, against 78% for the ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun.
Which is more expensive?
In the 3 tests that listed prices, the Turanza 6 was the dearer tire in 3 of them, by 28.5% on average. Prices are the test's own at the time, in its own market.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The Turanza 6 is made in 148 sizes (15 to 22 inch) and the ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun in 86 (14 to 19 inch). 49 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the Turanza 6 is graded A for wet grip and B for rolling resistance in most sizes; the ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun A and D.
More comparisons with these tires
vs
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
17-2 in 19 shared tests
vs 
Bridgestone Turanza 6 vs Continental PremiumContact 7
0-14 in 14 shared tests
vs 
Bridgestone Turanza 6 vs Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
5-2 in 7 shared tests
vs 
Bridgestone Turanza 6 vs Michelin Primacy 5
3-4 in 7 shared tests
vs 
Bridgestone Turanza 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4+
1-4 in 5 shared tests
vs 
Bridgestone Turanza 6 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4
6-1 in 7 shared tests
vs 
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun vs Kumho Ecsta HS52
3-4 in 7 shared tests
vs 
Bridgestone Turanza 6 vs Uniroyal RainSport 5
4-0 in 4 shared tests
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tire wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tires ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tire Reviews Score rates each tire out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tires can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tire Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tires independently since 2007.
Discussion