Menu

Linglong Sport Master 4S vs Viking Fourtech Plus

Linglong's Sport Master 4S and Viking's FourTech Plus target the same brief-budget-friendly touring all-season grip for everyday cars-but they approach it from opposite ends of the weather spectrum. Across two 2025 Autobild tests (sports car 225/45 R18 and SUV 215/55 R17), the Linglong repeatedly impresses in dry and largely holds its own in mixed wet work, while the Viking leans into winter assurance and aquaplaning security.
Sport-Master-4S VS Fourtech-Plus

Test Results

Independent comparison tire tests are the best source of data to get tire information from, and the good news is there have been two tests which compare both tires directly!

Summary of two total tests comparing both tires directly
TireTest WinsPerformance
Linglong Sport Master 4Sone
one wins
Viking Fourtech Plusone
one wins

The Linglong Sport Master 4S and Viking Fourtech Plus have an equal number of test wins. However, tires are very complicated objects which means where one tire is better than the other can be more important in real world use.

Let's look at how the two tires compare across multiple tire test categories.

Key Strengths

  • Class-leading dry braking in both tests (up to ~13% shorter than Viking)
  • Faster dry handling pace and strong wet lap consistency
  • Better subjective comfort/ride quality in both tests
  • Competitive wet grip on circuits with acceptable handling balance
  • Stronger snow performance (braking, traction, handling) in both tests
  • Superior aquaplaning resistance (straight and curved)
  • Lower rolling resistance and slightly lower pass-by noise
  • Predictable wet-road behavior with stable winter manners

Dry Braking

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Linglong Sport Master 4S was better during two dry braking tests. On average the Linglong Sport Master 4S stopped the vehicle in 12.43% less distance than the Viking Fourtech Plus.

Linglong Sport Master 4S
38.4M
Viking Fourtech Plus
43.85M
Dry braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Dry Braking: Linglong Sport Master 4S

Linglong Sport Master 4S
37M
Viking Fourtech Plus
41.6M (+4.6M)
Linglong Sport Master 4S
39.8M
Viking Fourtech Plus
46.1M (+6.3M)

Dry Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Linglong Sport Master 4S was better during two dry handling [km/h] tests. On average the Linglong Sport Master 4S was 1.08% faster around a lap than the Viking Fourtech Plus.

Linglong Sport Master 4S
92.55Km/H
Viking Fourtech Plus
91.55Km/H
Dry Handling Average Speed, higher is better

Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: Linglong Sport Master 4S

Linglong Sport Master 4S
92.4Km/H
Viking Fourtech Plus
91.6Km/H (-0.8Km/H)
Linglong Sport Master 4S
92.7Km/H
Viking Fourtech Plus
91.5Km/H (-1.2Km/H)

Wet Braking

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Linglong Sport Master 4S was better during one wet braking tests. On average the Linglong Sport Master 4S stopped the vehicle in 2.81% less distance than the Viking Fourtech Plus.

Linglong Sport Master 4S
53.65M
Viking Fourtech Plus
55.2M
Wet braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Wet Braking: Linglong Sport Master 4S

Linglong Sport Master 4S
62.8M (+1.8M)
Viking Fourtech Plus
61M
Linglong Sport Master 4S
44.5M
Viking Fourtech Plus
49.4M (+4.9M)

Wet Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Linglong Sport Master 4S was better during one wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the Linglong Sport Master 4S was 1.37% faster around a wet lap than the Viking Fourtech Plus.

Linglong Sport Master 4S
76.9Km/H
Viking Fourtech Plus
75.85Km/H
Wet Handling Average Speed, higher is better

Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: Linglong Sport Master 4S

Linglong Sport Master 4S
78.9Km/H (-1.6Km/H)
Viking Fourtech Plus
80.5Km/H
Linglong Sport Master 4S
74.9Km/H
Viking Fourtech Plus
71.2Km/H (-3.7Km/H)

Wet Circle

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Linglong Sport Master 4S was better during two wet circle tests. On average the Linglong Sport Master 4S was 1.59% faster around a wet circle than the Viking Fourtech Plus.

Linglong Sport Master 4S
15.45s
Viking Fourtech Plus
15.7s
Wet Circle Lap Time in seconds, lower is better

Best In Wet Circle: Linglong Sport Master 4S

Linglong Sport Master 4S
16.37s
Viking Fourtech Plus
16.47s (+0.1s)
Linglong Sport Master 4S
14.53s
Viking Fourtech Plus
14.92s (+0.39s)

Straight Aqua

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Viking Fourtech Plus was better during two straight aqua tests. On average the Viking Fourtech Plus floated at a 7.89% higher speed than the Linglong Sport Master 4S.

Linglong Sport Master 4S
71.2Km/H
Viking Fourtech Plus
77.3Km/H
Float Speed in Km/H, higher is better

Best In Straight Aqua: Viking Fourtech Plus

Linglong Sport Master 4S
71.2Km/H (-5.9Km/H)
Viking Fourtech Plus
77.1Km/H
Linglong Sport Master 4S
71.2Km/H (-6.3Km/H)
Viking Fourtech Plus
77.5Km/H

Curved Aquaplaning

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Viking Fourtech Plus was better during one curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Viking Fourtech Plus slipped out at a 26.18% higher speed than the Linglong Sport Master 4S.

Linglong Sport Master 4S
2.34m/sec2
Viking Fourtech Plus
3.17m/sec2
Remaining lateral acceleration, higher is better

Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Viking Fourtech Plus

Linglong Sport Master 4S
2.34m/sec2 (-0.83m/sec2)
Viking Fourtech Plus
3.17m/sec2

Snow Braking

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Viking Fourtech Plus was better during two snow braking tests. On average the Viking Fourtech Plus stopped the vehicle in 11.09% less distance than the Linglong Sport Master 4S.

Linglong Sport Master 4S
26.6M
Viking Fourtech Plus
23.65M
Snow braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Snow Braking: Viking Fourtech Plus

Linglong Sport Master 4S
26M (+3M)
Viking Fourtech Plus
23M
Linglong Sport Master 4S
27.2M (+2.9M)
Viking Fourtech Plus
24.3M

Snow Traction

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Viking Fourtech Plus was better during two snow traction tests. On average the Viking Fourtech Plus had 8.26% better snow traction than the Linglong Sport Master 4S.

Linglong Sport Master 4S
2833.5N
Viking Fourtech Plus
3088.5N
Pulling Force in Newtons, higher is better

Best In Snow Traction: Viking Fourtech Plus

Linglong Sport Master 4S
3168N (-289N)
Viking Fourtech Plus
3457N
Linglong Sport Master 4S
2499N (-221N)
Viking Fourtech Plus
2720N

Snow Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Viking Fourtech Plus was better during two snow handling [km/h] tests. On average the Viking Fourtech Plus was 1.71% faster around a lap than the Linglong Sport Master 4S.

Linglong Sport Master 4S
74.75Km/H
Viking Fourtech Plus
76.05Km/H
Snow handling average speed, higher is better

Best In Snow Handling [Km/H]: Viking Fourtech Plus

Linglong Sport Master 4S
97Km/H (-1.6Km/H)
Viking Fourtech Plus
98.6Km/H
Linglong Sport Master 4S
52.5Km/H (-1Km/H)
Viking Fourtech Plus
53.5Km/H

Snow Slalom

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Linglong Sport Master 4S was better during one snow slalom tests. On average the Linglong Sport Master 4S was 1.79% faster through a slalom than the Viking Fourtech Plus.

Linglong Sport Master 4S
3.9m/sec2
Viking Fourtech Plus
3.83m/sec2
Lateral acceleration, higher is better

Best In Snow Slalom: Linglong Sport Master 4S

Linglong Sport Master 4S
4.09m/sec2
Viking Fourtech Plus
3.86m/sec2 (-0.23m/sec2)
Linglong Sport Master 4S
3.7m/sec2 (-0.1m/sec2)
Viking Fourtech Plus
3.8m/sec2

Subj. Comfort

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Linglong Sport Master 4S was better during two subj. comfort tests. On average the Linglong Sport Master 4S scored 16.26% more points than the Viking Fourtech Plus.

Linglong Sport Master 4S
10.15 Points
Viking Fourtech Plus
8.5 Points
Subjective Comfort Score, higher is better

Best In Subj. Comfort: Linglong Sport Master 4S

Linglong Sport Master 4S
7.3 Points
Viking Fourtech Plus
7 Points (-0.3 Points)
Linglong Sport Master 4S
13 Points
Viking Fourtech Plus
10 Points (-3 Points)

Noise

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Viking Fourtech Plus was better during two noise tests. On average the Viking Fourtech Plus measured 0.49% quieter than the Linglong Sport Master 4S.

Linglong Sport Master 4S
70.85dB
Viking Fourtech Plus
70.5dB
External noise in dB, lower is better

Best In Noise: Viking Fourtech Plus

Linglong Sport Master 4S
72.8dB (+0.4dB)
Viking Fourtech Plus
72.4dB
Linglong Sport Master 4S
68.9dB (+0.3dB)
Viking Fourtech Plus
68.6dB

Rolling Resistance

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Viking Fourtech Plus was better during two rolling resistance tests. On average the Viking Fourtech Plus had a 2.64% lower rolling resistance than the Linglong Sport Master 4S.

Linglong Sport Master 4S
8.33kg / t
Viking Fourtech Plus
8.11kg / t
Rolling resistance in kg t, lower is better

Best In Rolling Resistance: Viking Fourtech Plus

Linglong Sport Master 4S
8.06kg / t (+0.24kg / t)
Viking Fourtech Plus
7.82kg / t
Linglong Sport Master 4S
8.6kg / t (+0.2kg / t)
Viking Fourtech Plus
8.4kg / t

Real World Driver Reviews

Tire Reviews also collects real world driver reviews for the Linglong Sport Master 4S and Viking Fourtech Plus.

In total the Linglong Sport Master 4S has been reviewed 0 times and drivers have given the tire 0% overall.

The Viking Fourtech Plus has been reviewed 1 times and drivers have given the tire 84% overall.

This means in real world driving, people prefer the Viking Fourtech Plus.

Best Review for the Linglong Sport Master 4S
View all Linglong Sport Master 4S driver reviews >>
Best Review for the Viking Fourtech Plus
Given 84% 155/80 R13 on for 1,000 miles
A good all season tire with excellent braking and grip on snow, like a winter tire. High comfort and low noise.
Helpful 5 - tire reviewed on March 13, 2026
View all Viking Fourtech Plus driver reviews >>

Conclusion

Patterns are clear: the Linglong dominates dry with consistently shorter braking (up to ~13% shorter) and the best dry handling pace in class, plus better ride comfort. Its trade-off is weaker snow performance and slightly higher rolling resistance. The Viking counters with stronger snow capability across braking, traction, and handling, and safer aquaplaning margins-especially in curved aquaplaning-while giving up too much dry braking distance and precision. Value-wise, both are budget propositions; pick based on climate and priority. If you rarely see snow and want confident dry road stopping and comfort, the Linglong is the safer everyday choice. If winter traction and aquaplaning safety trump dry prowess, the Viking is the smarter fit.
Key Differences
  • Dry safety: Linglong stops notably shorter on dry (11-14% advantage).
  • Snow capability: Viking wins all core snow metrics across both tests.
  • Aquaplaning: Viking leads in straight and curved aquaplaning by meaningful margins.
  • Comfort vs. feedback: Linglong rides more comfortably; Viking feels less precise on dry.
  • Efficiency/noise: Viking has lower rolling resistance and marginally less noise.
  • Wet mixed picture: Linglong better in wet circles; Viking edges wet braking/handling once and resists aquaplaning better.

Similar Comparisons

Looking for more tire comparisons? Here are other direct comparisons involving these tires:

Linglong Sport Master 4S Top Comparisons

No other comparisons available for this tire.

Viking Fourtech Plus Top Comparisons

No other comparisons available for this tire.

Footnote

This page has been developed using tire industry testing best practices. This means we are only comparing tests which have had both tires in the same test.

Why is this important? Tire testing is heavily affected by things like surface grip levels and surface temperature, which means you can only compare values from the same day. During a tire test external condition changes are calculated into the overall results, but it is not possible to calculate this between tire tests performed on different days or at different locations.

As a result you will see other tests on Tire Reviews which feature both the %s and %s, but as they weren't conducted on the same day, the results are not comparable.

Lots of other websites do this sort of tire comparison, Tire Reviews doesn't.