Hankook Winter i cept evo3 vs Leao Winter Defender UHP
In the 2 independent tests that ran both tires, the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 finished ahead 2 times and the Winter Defender UHP not once. The Winter i cept evo3 was stronger in dry, wet and snow, the Winter Defender UHP in value.
Performance profile
6 measurements from the 2 shared tests, each tire shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
Winter i cept evo3
Winter Defender UHP
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 118 ft stop against 112 ft is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. 14 measurements recorded in only one shared test are left off; every measurement is in the table further down.
Where each scores higher
Winter i cept evo3
Winter Defender UHP
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tires of the same season and class: 90 means this tire out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tires posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Wins count the tests in which each tire did better.
| Measurement | Winter i cept evo3 | Gap | Winter Defender UHP | Wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Winter i cept evo3 ahead | ||||
| Dry Braking ft | 143 | 1.4% | 145 | 1-1 |
| Dry Handling (s) | 71.68 | 2.1% | 73.24 | 1-0 |
| Dry Handling (mph) | 60.3 | 1% | 59.7 | 1-0 |
| Subj. Dry Handling pts | scored | 6.5% | scored | 1-0 |
| Wet Winter i cept evo3 ahead | ||||
| Wet Braking ft | 146 | 14.7% | 169 | 2-0 |
| Wet Handling (s) | 58.15 | 12% | 66.05 | 1-0 |
| Wet Handling (mph) | 43 | 8.1% | 39.8 | 1-0 |
| Subj. Wet Handling pts | scored | 22.5% | scored | 1-0 |
| Straight Aqua mph | 54.2 | 10.6% | 49.4 | 2-0 |
| Curved Aquaplaning ft/s² | 10 | 38.6% | 7.2 | 1-0 |
| Snow Winter i cept evo3 ahead | ||||
| Snow Braking ft | 72 | 4.8% | 75 | 2-0 |
| Snow Traction s | 5.65 | 5% | 5.95 | 1-0 |
| Snow Traction (lbf) | 587 | 1.5% | 579 | 1-0 |
| Snow Handling s | 85.24 | 5.2% | 89.95 | 1-0 |
| Snow Handling (mph) | 40.8 | 1.5% | 40.2 | 1-0 |
| Subj. Snow Handling pts | scored | 5.6% | scored | 1-0 |
| Snow Slalom ft/s² | 13.2 | 3.4% | 12.7 | 1-0 |
| Comfort Level | ||||
| Subj. Comfort pts | scored | 4.9% | scored | 1-0 |
| Noise dB | 73.6 | 2.5 dB | 71.1 | 0-1 |
| Value Winter Defender UHP ahead | ||||
| Rolling Resistance kg / t | 8.9 | 4.1% | 8.52 | 0-2 |
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tires shared.
Head to head in 2 tests, 2023 to 2026
Each row is one published test in which both tires ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | Winter i cept evo3 | Field | Winter Defender UHP |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 Auto Bild Sportscars Winter Tire Test | P8 of 12 | P12 of 12 | |
| 2023 Tire Reviews Winter Tire Test | P4 of 11 | P11 of 11 |
Winter i cept evo3 vs Winter Defender UHP: your questions
Is the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 or the Leao Winter Defender UHP the better tire?
In the 2 independent tests that ran both tires, the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 finished ahead 2 times and the Winter Defender UHP not once. On the Tire Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Winter i cept evo3 scores 9.2 and the Winter Defender UHP 3.2 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the Winter i cept evo3 or the Winter Defender UHP?
The Winter i cept evo3 led 8 of the 8 wet measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 14.7% shorter in the wet across 2 tests.
Which is better in the dry?
The Winter i cept evo3 led 4 of the 5 dry measurements the shared tests recorded.
Which is better in snow?
The Winter i cept evo3 led 8 of the 8 snow measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 4.8% shorter on snow across 2 tests.
Which lasts longer and costs less to run?
The Winter Defender UHP had 4.1% lower rolling resistance (2 tests).
What do owners say?
Owners rate the Winter i cept evo3 86% from 23 reviews; the Winter Defender UHP has no owner reviews yet.
Which is more expensive?
In the 2 tests that listed prices, the Winter i cept evo3 was the dearer tire in 2 of them, by 49.3% on average. Prices are the test's own at the time, in its own market.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The Winter i cept evo3 is made in 86 sizes (17 to 22 inch) and the Winter Defender UHP in 38 (15 to 20 inch). 15 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the Winter i cept evo3 is graded B for wet grip and C for rolling resistance in most sizes; the Winter Defender UHP C and C.
Which is the newer tire?
The Winter i cept evo3 is the newer design: it reached the market in 2021, the Winter Defender UHP in 2014. The Winter i cept evo3 replaced the Hankook Winter i cept evo2.
More comparisons with these tires
vs 
Hankook Winter i cept evo3 vs Kumho Winter Craft WP52
5-1 in 6 shared tests
vs 
Hankook Winter i cept evo3 vs Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
1-18 in 20 shared tests
vs
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs Hankook Winter i cept evo3
12-0 in 13 shared tests
vs
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 vs Hankook Winter i cept evo3
8-5 in 14 shared tests
vs
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs Hankook Winter i cept evo3
13-3 in 17 shared tests
vs
Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs Hankook Winter i cept evo3
6-0 in 6 shared tests
vs
Dunlop Winter Sport 5 vs Hankook Winter i cept evo3
2-6 in 9 shared tests
vs 
Hankook Winter i cept evo3 vs Uniroyal WinterExpert
5-1 in 6 shared tests
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tire wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Review the Winter i cept evo3 Review the Winter Defender UHP
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tires ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tire Reviews Score rates each tire out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tires can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tire Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tires independently since 2007.