Optimo Winter Touring vs Linglong Sport Master Winter
The Optimo Winter Touring and the Linglong Sport Master Winter have met in one independent test so far, and the Sport Master Winter finished ahead. The Winter Touring was stronger in snow and ice, the Sport Master Winter in dry, comfort and value.
Performance profile
12 measurements from the one shared test, each tire shown as its share of the better figure.
Where each is furthest ahead
Winter Touring
Sport Master Winter
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 118 ft stop against 112 ft is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. The scale stops at 85%: a point further in sits on the hub's edge, hollow.
Where each scores higher
Winter Touring
Sport Master Winter
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tires of the same season and class: 90 means this tire out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Every measurement, side by side
Both tires' figures from the one test that ran them together, on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The bar grows towards the tire that did better.
| Measurement | Winter Touring | Gap | Sport Master Winter |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Sport Master Winter ahead | |||
| Dry Braking ft | 146 | 2.9% | 142 |
| Wet Level | |||
| Wet Braking ft | 128 | 3.6% | 124 |
| Wet Braking - Concrete ft | 138 | 4.5% | 132 |
| Straight Aqua mph | 58.7 | 12.9% | 52 |
| Curved Aquaplaning ft/s² | 12.8 | 34.5% | 9.5 |
| Snow Winter Touring ahead | |||
| Snow Braking ft | 35 | 1.8% | 36 |
| Snow Traction lbf | 639 | 10.6% | 578 |
| Ice Winter Touring ahead | |||
| Ice Braking ft | 71 | 4% | 73 |
| Comfort Sport Master Winter ahead | |||
| Noise dB | 72.3 | 0.7 dB | 71.6 |
| Value Sport Master Winter ahead | |||
| Wear miles | 17,523 | 2.8% | 18,020 |
| Fuel Consumption l/100km | 5.6 | 3.4% | 5.8 |
| Abrasion mg/km/t | 110 | 25.5% | 82 |
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tires shared.
Head to head in 1 test in 2026
Each row is one published test in which both tires ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | Winter Touring | Field | Sport Master Winter |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 ADAC Winter Tire Test - 185/65 R15 | P5 of 16 | P3 of 16 |
Winter Touring vs Sport Master Winter: your questions
Is the Optimo Winter Touring or the Linglong Sport Master Winter the better tire?
The Optimo Winter Touring and the Linglong Sport Master Winter have met in one independent test so far, and the Sport Master Winter finished ahead. On the Tire Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Winter Touring scores 8.5 and the Sport Master Winter 7.3 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the Winter Touring or the Sport Master Winter?
Across the shared tests the wet measurements are split 2-2 between the Winter Touring and the Sport Master Winter.
Which is better in the dry?
The Sport Master Winter led 1 of the 1 dry measurements the shared tests recorded.
Which is better in snow?
The Winter Touring led 2 of the 2 snow measurements the shared tests recorded.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the Sport Master Winter 82% from 4 reviews; the Winter Touring has no owner reviews yet.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The Winter Touring is made in 10 sizes (14 to 15 inch) and the Sport Master Winter in 95 (14 to 21 inch). 8 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the Winter Touring is graded C for wet grip and D for rolling resistance in most sizes; the Sport Master Winter A and D.
More comparisons with these tires
vs 
Linglong Sport Master Winter vs Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
0-5 in 5 shared tests
vs
Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs Linglong Sport Master Winter
10-0 in 10 shared tests
vs
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs Linglong Sport Master Winter
10-1 in 11 shared tests
vs
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs Linglong Sport Master Winter
3-1 in 4 shared tests
vs
Hankook Winter I cept RS3 vs Linglong Sport Master Winter
4-0 in 5 shared tests
vs 
Linglong Sport Master Winter vs Vredestein Wintrac Pro+
2-4 in 6 shared tests
vs
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs Linglong Sport Master Winter
6-0 in 6 shared tests
vs
Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro vs Linglong Sport Master Winter
1-5 in 6 shared tests
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tire wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tires ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tire Reviews Score rates each tire out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tires can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tire Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tires independently since 2007.