Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO vs Continental AllSeasonContact 2
The Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO and the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 have met in one independent test so far, and the AllSeasonContact 2 finished ahead. The Weather Control A005 EVO was stronger in wet, the AllSeasonContact 2 in dry, snow, ice, comfort and value.
Performance profile
12 measurements from the one shared test, each tire shown as its share of the better figure.
Where each is furthest ahead
Weather Control A005 EVO
AllSeasonContact 2
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 118 ft stop against 112 ft is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. The scale stops at 92%: a point further in sits on the hub's edge, hollow.
Where each scores higher
Weather Control A005 EVO
Not ahead in any category
AllSeasonContact 2
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tires of the same season and class: 90 means this tire out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Where owners rate each higher
Weather Control A005 EVO
AllSeasonContact 2
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Owners rate the Weather Control A005 EVO 73% from 46 reviews and the AllSeasonContact 2 83% from 70. Each spoke is one question owners answer out of 10; reviews are vetted by hand before publication.
Every measurement, side by side
Both tires' figures from the one test that ran them together, on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The bar grows towards the tire that did better.
| Measurement | Weather Control A005 EVO | Gap | AllSeasonContact 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry AllSeasonContact 2 ahead | |||
| Dry Braking ft | 138 | 0.2% | 138 |
| Wet Weather Control A005 EVO ahead | |||
| Wet Braking ft | 107 | 0.6% | 108 |
| Wet Braking - Concrete ft | 127 | 1.5% | 129 |
| Straight Aqua mph | 56 | 2.2% | 54.8 |
| Curved Aquaplaning ft/s² | 12.1 | = | 12.1 |
| Snow AllSeasonContact 2 ahead | |||
| Snow Braking ft | 42 | 9.3% | 38 |
| Snow Traction lbf | 502 | 14.2% | 573 |
| Ice AllSeasonContact 2 ahead | |||
| Ice Braking ft | 74 | 6.2% | 69 |
| Comfort AllSeasonContact 2 ahead | |||
| Noise dB | 71.3 | 0.4 dB | 70.9 |
| Value AllSeasonContact 2 ahead | |||
| Wear miles | 26,657 | 3.9% | 25,663 |
| Fuel Consumption l/100km | 5.6 | 3.6% | 5.4 |
| Abrasion mg/km/t | 62 | 4.8% | 59 |
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tires shared.
Head to head in 1 test in 2026
Each row is one published test in which both tires ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | Weather Control A005 EVO | Field | AllSeasonContact 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 ADAC All Season Tire Test - 185/65 R15 | P13 of 16 | P1 of 16 |
Weather Control A005 EVO vs AllSeasonContact 2: your questions
Is the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO or the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 the better tire?
The Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO and the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 have met in one independent test so far, and the AllSeasonContact 2 finished ahead. On the Tire Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Weather Control A005 EVO scores 8.6 and the AllSeasonContact 2 9.5 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the Weather Control A005 EVO or the AllSeasonContact 2?
The Weather Control A005 EVO led 3 of the 4 wet measurements the shared tests recorded.
Which is better in the dry?
The AllSeasonContact 2 led 1 of the 1 dry measurements the shared tests recorded.
Which is better in snow?
The AllSeasonContact 2 led 2 of the 2 snow measurements the shared tests recorded.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
Owners rate comfort 7.6/10 for the Weather Control A005 EVO and 8.9/10 for the AllSeasonContact 2.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the Weather Control A005 EVO 73% from 46 reviews and the AllSeasonContact 2 83% from 70. 62% of Weather Control A005 EVO owners would buy it again, against 82% for the AllSeasonContact 2.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The Weather Control A005 EVO is made in 82 sizes (15 to 21 inch) and the AllSeasonContact 2 in 140 (15 to 22 inch). 78 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the Weather Control A005 EVO is graded A for wet grip and C for rolling resistance in most sizes; the AllSeasonContact 2 B and B.
More comparisons with these tires
Every Bridgestone vs Continental test → All comparisons → Compare three or more tires →
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tire wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Review the Weather Control A005 EVO Review the AllSeasonContact 2
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tires ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tire Reviews Score rates each tire out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tires can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tire Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tires independently since 2007.

