Goodyear UltraGrip Performance+ vs Hankook Winter i cept evo3
In the 5 independent tests that ran both tires, the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 finished ahead 3 times and the UltraGrip Performance+ twice. The UltraGrip Performance+ was stronger in snow, comfort and value, the Winter i cept evo3 in dry and wet.
Performance profile
11 measurements from the 5 shared tests, each tire shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
UltraGrip Performance+
Winter i cept evo3
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 118 ft stop against 112 ft is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. The scale stops at 96%: a point further in sits on the hub's edge, hollow. 9 measurements recorded in only one shared test are left off; every measurement is in the table further down.
Where each scores higher
UltraGrip Performance+
Winter i cept evo3
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tires of the same season and class: 90 means this tire out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Where owners rate each higher
UltraGrip Performance+
Winter i cept evo3
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Owners rate the UltraGrip Performance+ 86% from 20 reviews and the Winter i cept evo3 86% from 23. Each spoke is one question owners answer out of 10; reviews are vetted by hand before publication.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tires posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Wins count the tests in which each tire did better.
| Measurement | UltraGrip Performance+ | Gap | Winter i cept evo3 | Wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Winter i cept evo3 ahead | ||||
| Dry Braking ft | 141 | 1.7% | 139 | 1-2 |
| Dry Handling (s) | 46.01 | 0.4% | 45.81 | 0-1 |
| Dry Handling (mph) | 65.1 | 0.8% | 65.6 | 1-1 |
| Wet Winter i cept evo3 ahead | ||||
| Wet Braking ft | 135 | 4% | 130 | 0-5 |
| Wet Handling (s) | 49.76 | 0.1% | 49.7 | 0-1 |
| Wet Handling (mph) | 44.1 | 2.3% | 45.1 | 0-2 |
| Wet Circle s | 12.7 | 0.4% | 12.65 | 0-1 |
| Straight Aqua mph | 54.7 | 0.5% | 55 | 2-1 |
| Curved Aquaplaning ft/s² | 145 | 3.8% | 145.4 | 1-1 |
| Snow UltraGrip Performance+ ahead | ||||
| Snow Braking ft | 81 | 0.9% | 82 | 3-2 |
| Snow Traction s | 5.3 | 1.5% | 5.38 | 1-0 |
| Snow Traction (lbf) | 662 | 3.4% | 640 | 1-1 |
| Snow Handling s | 87.54 | 0.5% | 87.95 | 1-0 |
| Snow Handling (mph) | 32.7 | 0.2% | 32.6 | 1-1 |
| Snow Circle s | 34.78 | 0.3% | 34.69 | 0-1 |
| Snow Slalom ft/s² | 12 | 1.9% | 12.2 | 0-1 |
| Comfort UltraGrip Performance+ ahead | ||||
| Subj. Comfort pts | scored | 8.9% | scored | 1-0 |
| Noise dB | 73.3 | 0.7 dB | 74.03 | 2-1 |
| Value UltraGrip Performance+ ahead | ||||
| Wear miles | 25,221 | 2.1% | 24,712 | 1-0 |
| Rolling Resistance kg / t | 8.57 | 6.3% | 9.15 | 3-0 |
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tires shared.
Head to head in 5 tests, 2020 to 2022
Each row is one published test in which both tires ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | UltraGrip Performance+ | Field | Winter i cept evo3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Winter Tire Market Overview | P4 of 56 | P9 of 56 | |
| 2021 Auto Bild Sports Car Winter Tire Test | P5 of 13 | P1 of 13 | |
| 2021 Tire Reviews Winter Tire Test | P5 of 9 | P3 of 9 | |
| 2020 Auto Bild Performance Winter Tire Test | P3 of 20 | P6 of 20 | |
| 2020 Winter Tire Market Overview - 52 Tire Braking Test | P9 of 51 | P5 of 51 |
UltraGrip Performance+ vs Winter i cept evo3: your questions
Is the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance+ or the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 the better tire?
In the 5 independent tests that ran both tires, the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 finished ahead 3 times and the UltraGrip Performance+ twice. On the Tire Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the UltraGrip Performance+ scores 9.2 and the Winter i cept evo3 9.2 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the UltraGrip Performance+ or the Winter i cept evo3?
The Winter i cept evo3 led 11 of the 14 wet measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 4% shorter in the wet across 5 tests.
Which is better in the dry?
The Winter i cept evo3 led 4 of the 6 dry measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 1.7% shorter in the dry across 3 tests.
Which is better in snow?
The UltraGrip Performance+ led 7 of the 13 snow measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 0.9% shorter on snow across 5 tests.
Which lasts longer and costs less to run?
The UltraGrip Performance+ had 6.3% lower rolling resistance (3 tests). Owners rate wear 8.9/10 for the UltraGrip Performance+ and 8.8/10 for the Winter i cept evo3.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
The UltraGrip Performance+ was 0.7 dB quieter (3 tests). Owners rate comfort 8.9/10 for the UltraGrip Performance+ and 7.8/10 for the Winter i cept evo3.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the UltraGrip Performance+ 86% from 20 reviews and the Winter i cept evo3 86% from 23. 95% of UltraGrip Performance+ owners would buy it again, against 91% for the Winter i cept evo3.
Which is more expensive?
In the 2 tests that listed prices, the UltraGrip Performance+ was the dearer tire in 2 of them, by 16.1% on average. Prices are the test's own at the time, in its own market.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The UltraGrip Performance+ is made in 93 sizes (15 to 22 inch) and the Winter i cept evo3 in 86 (17 to 22 inch). 46 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the UltraGrip Performance+ is graded B for wet grip and C for rolling resistance in most sizes; the Winter i cept evo3 B and C.
More comparisons with these tires
vs 
Hankook Winter i cept evo3 vs Kumho Winter Craft WP52
5-1 in 6 shared tests
vs 
Hankook Winter i cept evo3 vs Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
1-18 in 20 shared tests
vs
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs Hankook Winter i cept evo3
12-0 in 13 shared tests
vs
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 vs Hankook Winter i cept evo3
8-5 in 14 shared tests
vs
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs Hankook Winter i cept evo3
13-3 in 17 shared tests
vs
Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs Hankook Winter i cept evo3
6-0 in 6 shared tests
vs
Dunlop Winter Sport 5 vs Hankook Winter i cept evo3
2-6 in 9 shared tests
vs 
Hankook Winter i cept evo3 vs Uniroyal WinterExpert
5-1 in 6 shared tests
Every Goodyear vs Hankook test → All comparisons → Compare three or more tires →
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tire wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Review the UltraGrip Performance+ Review the Winter i cept evo3
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tires ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tire Reviews Score rates each tire out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tires can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tire Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tires independently since 2007.