Nokian Snowproof P vs Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
In the 5 independent tests that ran both tires, the Continental WinterContact TS 870 P finished ahead 5 times and the Snowproof P not once. The Snowproof P was stronger in ice and comfort, the WinterContact TS 870 P in wet, snow and value.
Performance profile
14 measurements from the 5 shared tests, each tire shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
Snowproof P
WinterContact TS 870 P
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 118 ft stop against 112 ft is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. The scale stops at 92%: a point further in sits on the hub's edge, hollow. 11 measurements recorded in only one shared test are left off; every measurement is in the table further down.
Where each scores higher
Snowproof P
WinterContact TS 870 P
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tires of the same season and class: 90 means this tire out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Where owners rate each higher
Snowproof P
WinterContact TS 870 P
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Owners rate the Snowproof P 88% from 10 reviews and the WinterContact TS 870 P 85% from 33. Each spoke is one question owners answer out of 10; reviews are vetted by hand before publication.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tires posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Wins count the tests in which each tire did better.
| Measurement | Snowproof P | Gap | WinterContact TS 870 P | Wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Level | ||||
| Dry Braking ft | 139 | 0.7% | 140 | 2-2 |
| Dry Handling (s) | 45.31 | 0.4% | 45.51 | 1-0 |
| Dry Handling (mph) | 68 | 0.2% | 68.1 | 0-1 |
| Wet WinterContact TS 870 P ahead | ||||
| Wet Braking ft | 138 | 5.4% | 130 | 0-5 |
| Wet Braking - Concrete ft | 124 | 0.8% | 125 | 1-0 |
| Wet Handling (s) | 51.31 | 2.7% | 49.94 | 0-1 |
| Wet Handling (mph) | 45.6 | 1.8% | 46.4 | 0-2 |
| Wet Circle (mph) | 4.5 | 35% | 6 | 0-1 |
| Wet Circle (s) | 14.41 | 3.1% | 13.95 | 0-2 |
| Straight Aqua mph | 43.8 | 8.3% | 47.4 | 0-4 |
| Curved Aquaplaning ft/s² | 89.2 | 31.6% | 99.5 | 0-3 |
| Snow WinterContact TS 870 P ahead | ||||
| Snow Braking ft | 68 | 1% | 67 | 2-3 |
| Snow Traction s | 5.55 | 1.3% | 5.48 | 0-1 |
| Snow Traction (lbf) | 483 | 2.4% | 492 | 0-3 |
| Snow Handling s | 90.1 | 2.1% | 88.22 | 0-1 |
| Snow Handling (mph) | 36.9 | 1.9% | 37.6 | 0-2 |
| Snow Circle s | 34.4 | 1% | 34.76 | 1-0 |
| Snow Slalom ft/s² | 12.7 | 6.1% | 13.5 | 0-2 |
| Ice Snowproof P ahead | ||||
| Ice Braking ft | 52 | 11.6% | 59 | 1-0 |
| Comfort Snowproof P ahead | ||||
| Subj. Comfort pts | scored | 5.6% | scored | 0-1 |
| Noise dB | 69.95 | 0.6 dB | 70.55 | 3-1 |
| Value WinterContact TS 870 P ahead | ||||
| Wear miles | 28,060 | 11.8% | 26,001 | 1-1 |
| Rolling Resistance kg / t | 7.98 | 1.3% | 7.85 | 1-2 |
| Fuel Consumption l/100km | 5.7 | 1.8% | 5.6 | 0-1 |
| Abrasion mg/km/t | 61 | 1.6% | 60 | 0-1 |
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tires shared.
Head to head in 5 tests, 2021 to 2025
Each row is one published test in which both tires ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | Snowproof P | Field | WinterContact TS 870 P |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 ADAC Winter Tire Test | P8 of 31 | P6 of 31 | |
| 2022 Auto Bild Winter Tire Test | P18 of 20 | P8 of 20 | |
| 2022 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tire Test | P9 of 10 | P2 of 10 | |
| 2022 Winter Tire Market Overview | P13 of 56 | P2 of 56 | |
| 2021 Tire Reviews Winter Tire Test | P7 of 9 | P1 of 9 |
Snowproof P vs WinterContact TS 870 P: your questions
Is the Nokian Snowproof P or the Continental WinterContact TS 870 P the better tire?
In the 5 independent tests that ran both tires, the Continental WinterContact TS 870 P finished ahead 5 times and the Snowproof P not once. On the Tire Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Snowproof P scores 9.2 and the WinterContact TS 870 P 9.3 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the Snowproof P or the WinterContact TS 870 P?
The WinterContact TS 870 P led 18 of the 19 wet measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it held 31.6% more grip in curved aquaplaning across 3 tests.
Which is better in the dry?
Across the shared tests the dry measurements are split 3-3 between the Snowproof P and the WinterContact TS 870 P.
Which is better in snow?
The WinterContact TS 870 P led 12 of the 15 snow measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 1% shorter on snow across 5 tests.
Which lasts longer and costs less to run?
The WinterContact TS 870 P had 1.3% lower rolling resistance (3 tests). Owners rate wear 8.2/10 for the Snowproof P and 8.7/10 for the WinterContact TS 870 P.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
The Snowproof P was 0.6 dB quieter (4 tests). Owners rate comfort 8/10 for the Snowproof P and 8.9/10 for the WinterContact TS 870 P.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the Snowproof P 88% from 10 reviews and the WinterContact TS 870 P 85% from 33. 80% of Snowproof P owners would buy it again, against 83% for the WinterContact TS 870 P.
Which is more expensive?
In the 4 tests that listed prices, the WinterContact TS 870 P was the dearer tire in 4 of them, by 12% on average. Prices are the test's own at the time, in its own market.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The Snowproof P is made in 46 sizes (17 to 21 inch) and the WinterContact TS 870 P in 121 (16 to 23 inch). 30 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the Snowproof P is graded B for wet grip and C for rolling resistance in most sizes; the WinterContact TS 870 P B and C.
More comparisons with these tires
vs 
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
8-16 in 25 shared tests
vs 
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
3-14 in 21 shared tests
vs 
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs Michelin Alpin 7
5-0 in 5 shared tests
vs
Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
5-9 in 15 shared tests
vs 
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV
1-2 in 4 shared tests
vs 
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs Hankook Winter i cept evo3
13-3 in 17 shared tests
vs
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
8-10 in 18 shared tests
vs 
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs Semperit Speed Grip 5
9-1 in 10 shared tests
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tire wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tires ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tire Reviews Score rates each tire out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tires can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tire Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tires independently since 2007.