Nexen N Fera Primus vs Continental PremiumContact 7
In the 4 independent tests that ran both tires, the Continental PremiumContact 7 finished ahead 4 times and the N Fera Primus not once. The PremiumContact 7 was stronger in dry, wet, comfort and value.
Performance profile
7 measurements from the 4 shared tests, each tire shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
N Fera Primus
PremiumContact 7
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 118 ft stop against 112 ft is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. The scale stops at 92%: a point further in sits on the hub's edge, hollow. 12 measurements recorded in only one shared test are left off; every measurement is in the table further down.
Where each scores higher
N Fera Primus
PremiumContact 7
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tires of the same season and class: 90 means this tire out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Where owners rate each higher
N Fera Primus
PremiumContact 7
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Owners rate the N Fera Primus 85% from 11 reviews and the PremiumContact 7 82% from 71. Each spoke is one question owners answer out of 10; reviews are vetted by hand before publication.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tires posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Wins count the tests in which each tire did better.
| Measurement | N Fera Primus | Gap | PremiumContact 7 | Wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry PremiumContact 7 ahead | ||||
| Dry Braking ft | 129 | 5.8% | 121 | 0-4 |
| Dry Handling mph | 71.1 | 1% | 71.8 | 0-1 |
| Subj. Dry Handling pts | scored | 66.7% | scored | 0-1 |
| Wet PremiumContact 7 ahead | ||||
| Wet Braking ft | 116 | 8.3% | 107 | 0-4 |
| Wet Braking - Concrete ft | 122 | 14% | 105 | 0-1 |
| Wet Handling (s) | 74.3 | 1.9% | 72.9 | 0-1 |
| Wet Handling (mph) | 46.8 | 0.3% | 46.9 | 0-1 |
| Wet Circle (mph) | 14 | 4.1% | 14.6 | 0-1 |
| Wet Circle (s) | 11.52 | 0.1% | 11.53 | 1-0 |
| Straight Aqua mph | 49.9 | = | 49.9 | 2-1 |
| Curved Aquaplaning ft/s² | 12.5 | 6.2% | 12 | 1-1 |
| Comfort PremiumContact 7 ahead | ||||
| Subj. Comfort pts | scored | 50% | scored | 0-1 |
| Subj. Noise pts | scored | 66.7% | scored | 0-1 |
| Noise dB | 72.45 | 0.3 dB | 72.7 | 1-1 |
| Rough Noise dB | 73.2 | 0.4 dB | 72.8 | 0-1 |
| Value PremiumContact 7 ahead | ||||
| Wear miles | 18,719 | 52.9% | 28,288 | 0-2 |
| Rolling Resistance kg / t | 8.6 | 6% | 8.08 | 0-1 |
| Fuel Consumption l/100km | 5.7 | = | 5.7 | 0-0 |
| Abrasion mg/km/t | 73.5 | 18.2% | 60.1 | 0-1 |
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tires shared.
Head to head in 4 tests, 2024 to 2026
Each row is one published test in which both tires ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | N Fera Primus | Field | PremiumContact 7 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 Vi Bilagare Summer Tire Test | P7 of 10 | P1 of 10 | |
| 2024 AutoBild Summer Tire Test | P17 of 20 | P2 of 20 | |
| 2024 ADAC Summer Tire Test | P11 of 16 | P1 of 16 | |
| 2024 Summer Tire Market Overview | P11 of 55 | P1 of 55 |
N Fera Primus vs PremiumContact 7: your questions
Is the Nexen N Fera Primus or the Continental PremiumContact 7 the better tire?
In the 4 independent tests that ran both tires, the Continental PremiumContact 7 finished ahead 4 times and the N Fera Primus not once. On the Tire Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the N Fera Primus scores 8.2 and the PremiumContact 7 9.5 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the N Fera Primus or the PremiumContact 7?
The PremiumContact 7 led 10 of the 14 wet measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 8.3% shorter in the wet across 4 tests.
Which is better in the dry?
The PremiumContact 7 led 6 of the 6 dry measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 5.8% shorter in the dry across 4 tests.
Which lasts longer and costs less to run?
The PremiumContact 7 lasted 52.9% longer in the wear tests (2 tests). Owners rate wear 8.7/10 for the N Fera Primus and 7.3/10 for the PremiumContact 7.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
Owners rate comfort 8.2/10 for the N Fera Primus and 7.5/10 for the PremiumContact 7.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the N Fera Primus 85% from 11 reviews and the PremiumContact 7 82% from 71. 60% of N Fera Primus owners would buy it again, against 74% for the PremiumContact 7.
Which is more expensive?
In the 3 tests that listed prices, the PremiumContact 7 was the dearer tire in 3 of them, by 18.9% on average. Prices are the test's own at the time, in its own market.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The N Fera Primus is made in 50 sizes (15 to 19 inch) and the PremiumContact 7 in 56 (16 to 21 inch). 19 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the N Fera Primus is graded A for wet grip and C for rolling resistance in most sizes; the PremiumContact 7 A and C.
Which is the newer tire?
The PremiumContact 7 is the newer design: it reached the market in 2022, the N Fera Primus in 2020. The PremiumContact 7 replaced the Continental Premium Contact 6.
More comparisons with these tires
vs 
Continental PremiumContact 7 vs Michelin Primacy 5
8-2 in 11 shared tests
vs 
Continental PremiumContact 7 vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
5-11 in 16 shared tests
vs 
Continental PremiumContact 7 vs Michelin Pilot Sport 5
7-4 in 11 shared tests
vs
Bridgestone Turanza 6 vs Continental PremiumContact 7
0-14 in 14 shared tests
vs 
Continental PremiumContact 7 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4
11-0 in 11 shared tests
vs 
Continental PremiumContact 7 vs Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
9-0 in 9 shared tests
vs 
Continental PremiumContact 7 vs Falken ZIEX ZE320
5-3 in 8 shared tests
vs 
Continental PremiumContact 7 vs Pirelli Cinturato C3
6-3 in 12 shared tests
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tire wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tires ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tire Reviews Score rates each tire out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tires can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tire Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tires independently since 2007.