Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 vs Yokohama iceGUARD iG53
The Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 and the Yokohama iceGUARD iG53 have met in one independent test so far, and the Hakkapeliitta R5 finished ahead. The Hakkapeliitta R5 was stronger in dry, wet, snow, ice, comfort and value.
Performance profile
20 measurements from the one shared test, each tire shown as its share of the better figure.
Where each is furthest ahead
Hakkapeliitta R5
iceGUARD iG53
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 118 ft stop against 112 ft is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. The scale stops at 90%: a point further in sits on the hub's edge, hollow.
Where each scores higher
Hakkapeliitta R5
iceGUARD iG53
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tires of the same season and class: 90 means this tire out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Every measurement, side by side
Both tires' figures from the one test that ran them together, on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The bar grows towards the tire that did better.
| Measurement | Hakkapeliitta R5 | Gap | iceGUARD iG53 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Hakkapeliitta R5 ahead | |||
| Dry Braking ft | 156 | 4.1% | 162 |
| Dry Handling s | 72.96 | 0.5% | 73.31 |
| Subj. Dry Handling pts | 100 | 5.3% | 95 |
| Wet Hakkapeliitta R5 ahead | |||
| Wet Braking ft | 116 | 9.1% | 127 |
| Wet Handling s | 83.2 | 1.1% | 84.16 |
| Subj. Wet Handling pts | 95 | 26.7% | 75 |
| Straight Aqua mph | 44.4 | 6.3% | 47.2 |
| Curved Aquaplaning ft/s² | 183.1 | 6.5% | 194.9 |
| Snow Hakkapeliitta R5 ahead | |||
| Snow Braking ft | 51 | 0.9% | 50 |
| Snow Traction s | 5.55 | 6.3% | 5.92 |
| Snow Handling s | 87.8 | 3.5% | 90.99 |
| Subj. Snow Handling pts | 95 | 18.8% | 80 |
| Snow Circle s | 28.98 | 4.5% | 30.35 |
| Ice Hakkapeliitta R5 ahead | |||
| Ice Braking ft | 33 | 7.2% | 36 |
| Ice Traction s | 6.06 | 5.5% | 6.41 |
| Ice Handling s | 53.5 | 2.3% | 54.74 |
| Subj. Ice Handling pts | 95 | 5.6% | 90 |
| Comfort Hakkapeliitta R5 ahead | |||
| Subj. Comfort pts | 100 | = | 100 |
| Noise dB | 61.9 | 1.5 dB | 63.4 |
| Value Hakkapeliitta R5 ahead | |||
| Rolling Resistance kg / t | 7.34 | 2.1% | 7.5 |
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tires shared.
Head to head in 1 test in 2022
Each row is one published test in which both tires ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | Hakkapeliitta R5 | Field | iceGUARD iG53 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022/23 Tire Reviews Studless Winter Tire Test | P1 of 7 | P5 of 7 |
Hakkapeliitta R5 vs iceGUARD iG53: your questions
Is the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 or the Yokohama iceGUARD iG53 the better tire?
The Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 and the Yokohama iceGUARD iG53 have met in one independent test so far, and the Hakkapeliitta R5 finished ahead. On the Tire Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Hakkapeliitta R5 scores 8.7 and the iceGUARD iG53 3.2 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the Hakkapeliitta R5 or the iceGUARD iG53?
The Hakkapeliitta R5 led 3 of the 5 wet measurements the shared tests recorded.
Which is better in the dry?
The Hakkapeliitta R5 led 3 of the 3 dry measurements the shared tests recorded.
Which is better in snow?
The Hakkapeliitta R5 led 4 of the 5 snow measurements the shared tests recorded.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
Owners rate comfort 8.9/10 for the Hakkapeliitta R5 and 8/10 for the iceGUARD iG53.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the Hakkapeliitta R5 86% from 17 reviews and the iceGUARD iG53 50% from 1.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The Hakkapeliitta R5 is made in 60 sizes (14 to 20 inch) and the iceGUARD iG53 in 44 (15 to 21 inch). 20 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the Hakkapeliitta R5 is graded D for wet grip and B for rolling resistance in most sizes; the iceGUARD iG53 E and C.
Which is the newer tire?
The Hakkapeliitta R5 is the newer design: it reached the market in 2021, the iceGUARD iG53 in 2019. The Hakkapeliitta R5 replaced the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R3.
More comparisons with these tires
vs 
Michelin X Ice Snow vs Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
0-6 in 8 shared tests
vs
Continental VikingContact 8 vs Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
6-0 in 6 shared tests
vs
Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 vs Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
2-2 in 6 shared tests
vs
Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 3 vs Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
7-1 in 8 shared tests
vs
Michelin X Ice North 4 vs Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
1-2 in 5 shared tests
vs 
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 vs Pirelli Ice Zero 2
1-0 in 4 shared tests
vs
Continental IceContact 3 vs Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
2-0 in 4 shared tests
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tire wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tires ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tire Reviews Score rates each tire out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tires can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tire Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tires independently since 2007.