Imperial All Season Driver vs Vredestein Quatrac Pro+
In the 2 independent tests that ran both tires, the Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ finished ahead 2 times and the All Season Driver not once. The Quatrac Pro+ was stronger in dry, wet, snow, comfort and value.
Performance profile
8 measurements from the 2 shared tests, each tire shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
All Season Driver
Quatrac Pro+
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 118 ft stop against 112 ft is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. The scale stops at 95%: a point further in sits on the hub's edge, hollow. 10 measurements recorded in only one shared test are left off; every measurement is in the table further down.
Where each scores higher
All Season Driver
Quatrac Pro+
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tires of the same season and class: 90 means this tire out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Where owners rate each higher
All Season Driver
Quatrac Pro+
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Owners rate the All Season Driver 68% from 4 reviews and the Quatrac Pro+ 81% from 15. Each spoke is one question owners answer out of 10; reviews are vetted by hand before publication.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tires posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Wins count the tests in which each tire did better.
| Measurement | All Season Driver | Gap | Quatrac Pro+ | Wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Quatrac Pro+ ahead | ||||
| Dry Braking ft | 142 | 1.6% | 140 | 0-1 |
| Dry Handling (s) | 54.84 | 1.3% | 55.54 | 1-0 |
| Dry Handling (mph) | 57.4 | 0.6% | 57.8 | 0-1 |
| Wet Quatrac Pro+ ahead | ||||
| Wet Braking ft | 176 | 11.8% | 155 | 0-2 |
| Wet Handling (s) | 90.6 | 3.4% | 87.5 | 0-1 |
| Wet Handling (mph) | 49 | 6.2% | 52 | 0-1 |
| Wet Circle s | 16.89 | 5.9% | 15.89 | 0-1 |
| Straight Aqua mph | 46.8 | 3.2% | 48.2 | 0-2 |
| Curved Aquaplaning ft/s² | 9.4 | 12.1% | 10.4 | 0-2 |
| Snow Quatrac Pro+ ahead | ||||
| Snow Braking ft | 75 | 2.4% | 74 | 1-1 |
| Snow Traction s | 11.01 | 2.7% | 10.71 | 0-1 |
| Snow Traction (lbf) | 329 | 2.5% | 323 | 1-1 |
| Snow Handling s | 82.7 | 1.3% | 81.6 | 0-1 |
| Snow Handling (mph) | 58.9 | 3.5% | 61 | 0-1 |
| Snow Slalom ft/s² | 12.5 | 2.6% | 12.8 | 0-1 |
| Comfort Quatrac Pro+ ahead | ||||
| Subj. Comfort pts | scored | 8.3% | scored | 0-1 |
| Noise dB | 69 | 0.4 dB | 69.4 | 1-1 |
| Value Quatrac Pro+ ahead | ||||
| Rolling Resistance kg / t | 4.16 | 3.6% | 3.89 | 0-2 |
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tires shared.
Head to head in 2 tests, 2023 to 2024
Each row is one published test in which both tires ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | All Season Driver | Field | Quatrac Pro+ |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Motor SUV All Season Tire Test | P9 of 9 | P6 of 9 | |
| 2023 SUV All Season Tire Test | P9 of 10 | P5 of 10 |
All Season Driver vs Quatrac Pro+: your questions
Is the Imperial All Season Driver or the Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ the better tire?
In the 2 independent tests that ran both tires, the Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ finished ahead 2 times and the All Season Driver not once. On the Tire Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the All Season Driver scores 5.9 and the Quatrac Pro+ 8.1 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the All Season Driver or the Quatrac Pro+?
The Quatrac Pro+ led 9 of the 9 wet measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 11.8% shorter in the wet across 2 tests.
Which is better in the dry?
The Quatrac Pro+ led 2 of the 4 dry measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 1.6% shorter in the dry across 2 tests.
Which is better in snow?
The Quatrac Pro+ led 6 of the 8 snow measurements the shared tests recorded.
Which lasts longer and costs less to run?
The Quatrac Pro+ had 3.6% lower rolling resistance (2 tests). Owners rate wear 7.8/10 for the All Season Driver and 7.1/10 for the Quatrac Pro+.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
Owners rate comfort 7.8/10 for the All Season Driver and 8.1/10 for the Quatrac Pro+.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the All Season Driver 68% from 4 reviews and the Quatrac Pro+ 81% from 15.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The All Season Driver is made in 6 sizes (17 to 20 inch) and the Quatrac Pro+ in 103 (17 to 22 inch). 5 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the All Season Driver is graded B for wet grip and C for rolling resistance in most sizes; the Quatrac Pro+ B and C.
More comparisons with these tires
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tire wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tires ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tire Reviews Score rates each tire out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tires can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tire Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tires independently since 2007.

