Menu

Yokohama Geolandar AT G015 Owner Reviews

Review this tire

What owners say summarised from 38 reviews

Owners generally rate the Yokohama Geolandar AT G015 well (77.9% average), most often praising its strong off-road traction and reassuring snow traction while remaining impressively civilised on tarmac. Around a third of owners specifically highlight low road noise, and about half mention decent longevity, though a notable minority report quicker wear than expected. Wet grip is viewed as acceptable rather than class-leading, and around one in six owners warn it can feel weak on ice (and, less commonly, sidewalls and puncture resistance can disappoint).

What owners mention most counted across 42 reviews

Tap one to read only the reviews that mention it.

Owner ratings averaged from 47 ratings

  • Owner score 78%
  • Comfort 85%
  • Dry Grip 84%
  • Wear 81%
  • Wet Grip 79%
  • Snow Grip 76%
  • Handling 76%
  • Road Feedback 76%
  • Ice Grip 65%

Yokohama Geolandar AT G015 Reviews - Page 2

Score spread across 40 written reviews
62%
ColoradoJosh
Initial Impressions
Tires are a good all around tire with good highway manners... they unfortunately did not wear well for me and I warrantied them out at about 35k miles because two of the tires had steel belt separations at the shoulder and tread... This was on my daily driven GX470 with little off-road use (only a couple camping trips with rocky 4x4 roads). Due to the faster wear and warranty issue I would not buy them again even for a road queen.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 8
  • Wet Grip 8
  • Road Feedback 6
  • Handling 8
  • Wear 4
  • Comfort 9
  • Buy again 1
  • Snow Grip 7
  • Ice Grip 5
Helpful 189
60%
Member
Initial Impressions
Quite good on dry and gravel, comfortable and silent for an AT tire, but not so good on wet
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 7
  • Wet Grip 5
  • Road Feedback 5
  • Handling 6
  • Wear 7
  • Comfort 6
  • Buy again 6
  • Snow Grip 6
  • Ice Grip 6
Helpful 197
62%
Member
I have about 40,000 miles on these tires on a 2021 Ford F-150 Powerboost Lariat. I bought them because I wanted a semi-aggressive A/T tire that was 3PMSF rated and had 10 ply (LT load range E) construction. I do about 90% dry on-road & highway driving, with occasional towing of a 5,000 lb trailer. I live in a cold climate that gets snow & icy roads in the winter.

My first impression of these tires were disappointing. Steering was very numb & floaty due to the soft sidewalls, I also had to have 2 of the tires replaced under warranty because they had radial runout issues and wouldn't balance. Dry traction is good. Wet traction is okay, but getting worse as they age along with noise. Snow & ice traction is good enough, but not great. Wear has been the most surprising thing about them. I think they could make it legitimately 60k, and that is with about 2,000 miles of towing on them. The PB is hard on the rear tires due to the truck braking the rear tires primarily with the energy recovery system, and the truck is in 2WD 95% of the time. I have rotated them every 10k miles. Other than the initial issues I have had zero other problems with them.

I will not be buying this tire again, mainly because I have wholesale relationships with suppliers and want to try something else. I am looking very closely to the new Pirelli XTM AT, Michelin Defender Platinum, and Goodyear Wrangler Duratrac RT. I am not shopping the KO3 right now because of the lack of circumferential channels, that I believe, will lead to worse hydroplaning characteristics and numb on center tracking.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 8
  • Wet Grip 7
  • Road Feedback 4
  • Handling 4
  • Wear 9
  • Comfort 8
  • Buy again 4
  • Snow Grip 6
  • Ice Grip 6
Helpful 315

Which tires do you drive?

Researching the Yokohama Geolandar AT G015? Rate the tires you actually drive - and help the next buyer choose.

Own the Yokohama Geolandar AT G015?
87%
Member
Tires mostly used for long distance travelling with SUV. 90% tar and 10% dirt roads. Poor road conditions in South Afrika. Both dry and wet grip are acceptable. Did 56 000 miles. Very impressed.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 8
  • Wet Grip 8
  • Road Feedback 8
  • Handling 8
  • Wear 10
  • Comfort 9
  • Buy again 10
Helpful 405
100%
Member
Hello
Our SUV Eclipse Cross 2.2 8-autom 4x4 came with Yokohama summer tires, so it was obvious that the Geolander 225/55/R18 would be a good fit for the car, the included 2nd set of aluminum rims was fitted with Yokohama Geolanders. The vehicle is great to drive with them, the 4x4 provides drive, always. Safe driving in snow and mud, dry and wet too. But of course you should drive according to the weather conditions, because even a Geolander is no panacea! It has been in use in autumn/winter/spring for 5 years now and does a good job, never let us down! Air has not been an issue all these years, checked when changing and done! The tread is now slowly running out, it is clear that the Crossi will get Yokohamas again, and my next car will probably too. An A+ from me! Robust, holds up, drives well with a total permissible weight of 2.3t and a towing capacity of 2t - a good choice!
I recommend the tire.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 10
  • Wet Grip 10
  • Road Feedback 10
  • Handling 10
  • Wear 10
  • Comfort 10
  • Buy again 10
  • Snow Grip 10
  • Ice Grip 10
Helpful 1,061
87%
Member
good on snowy roads, very good on mud and rocks, slippery on icy and heavy snow, excellent wear it is durable
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 10
  • Wet Grip 10
  • Road Feedback 10
  • Handling 10
  • Wear 10
  • Comfort 10
  • Buy again 10
  • Snow Grip 6
  • Ice Grip 2
Helpful 1,210
76%
Member
Great tire done 30000 miles brilliant on all roads
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 8
  • Wet Grip 6
  • Road Feedback 6
  • Handling 7
  • Wear 9
  • Comfort 7
  • Buy again 9
  • Snow Grip 8
  • Ice Grip 8
Helpful 1,066
76%
Member
They are pretty good on dry roads for an AT tire. To be honest I haven’t seen much difference from my previous which were pure on road tires ( Bridgestone Turanza t005). Maybe in very high speeds you need to grasp the wheel harder. Moreover, they are very comfortable both in the city and in the highway. Up to now, they are more than decent in the rain. I haven’t got the chance to test them on snow yet. However, I have done plenty of km off-road, mostly on dirt- rocky roads, in which I am very pleased with the grip and cut resistance of the tire, for such an on-road oriented AT tire. The only downside is that small stones constantly stuck onto the tire. It can handle some light to medium mud but It starts”dancing” in deeper mud. No problem in sand and grass either. The biggest issue of the tire is its consumption, which of course is apparent from the rolling resistance rating “E”. Since, I put them on the consumption has increased 1,2L/100Km. Of course the previous tires were “A” rated, hence the big difference. Nevertheless, I would definitely buy them again because it’s a great all around tire, for both every day use and field trips. It’s too early to comment on their lifespan.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 8
  • Wet Grip 7
  • Road Feedback 7
  • Handling 7
  • Wear 7
  • Comfort 9
  • Buy again 8
Helpful 893
73%
Member
I have these on a 2013 Subaru Outback 2.0 diesel. By and large I have been really pleased with them, they are really good in the wet.
Today they showed their weakness and that was in the snow.
We have had about 5 inch of wet snow, they are not to bad on the fresh stuff but
driving back in my own tracks they were all over the place, not very confidence giving.
Won't be getting another set.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 9
  • Wet Grip 9
  • Road Feedback 9
  • Handling 8
  • Wear 8
  • Comfort 9
  • Buy again 9
  • Snow Grip 4
  • Ice Grip 1
Helpful 941
66%
Member
Good AT/Mud tires. Even with 3 mountain pikes with snowflake symbol on them, no good on snow due lack of lamells on blocks, no grip on ice becose no lamells and spikes.
Tirewear is slow and hard enough on rocks not to worrie about sharp edges pierce them. Looks nice on LR4 with sidegrip treads.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 7
  • Wet Grip 7
  • Road Feedback 7
  • Handling 5
  • Wear 10
  • Comfort 10
  • Buy again 9
  • Snow Grip 3
  • Ice Grip 1
Helpful 892
61%
Member
  • Chevrolet
  • 255/65 R17
  • 35,000 miles
  • A Combination of Roads
  • Easy Going
4th set of Geolanders I've had for big mileage over the years. This most recent set on Chevy Colorado p/u truck. 3 previous sets on midsize SUVs lasted into the 50,000 mile plus range. This set now at 35,000 miles and service tells me they're worn at 4/32, 4/32, 4/32, and 3/32. SO probably bought my last set of Geo's.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 7
  • Wet Grip 7
  • Road Feedback 9
  • Handling 7
  • Wear 1
  • Comfort 8
  • Buy again 1
  • Snow Grip 9
Helpful 981
81%
Member
I've put few thousand miles on these now so feel I can review them properly. I'm on my third Freelander2 but this is the first one I've had Yokohamas on. These tires were excellent in snow and ice, they're good in the wet and great in the dry. Compared to other a/t tires I've had, they're quite and comfortable. I have found them a brilliant road & trail tire, with only one real weakness, wet mud. These are a road oriented a/t tire and wet mud or wet rutted tracks will result in a call to the local farmer (luckily, that's my father in-law).
They're cheap, great on the road and adequate off it. BFGs they ain't.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 8
  • Wet Grip 8
  • Road Feedback 8
  • Handling 8
  • Wear 8
  • Comfort 9
  • Buy again 8
  • Snow Grip 8
  • Ice Grip 8
Helpful 898
Find your next tire
All tire tests
Rate your tires

My tires

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tires

Save tires from a tire page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tires. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.