- Skoda
- 205/40 R17
- 2,000 miles
- A Combination of Roads
- Spirited
Vredestein Ultrac Satin Owner Reviews
Review this tireWhat owners say summarised from 43 reviews
Drivers generally rate the Vredestein Ultrac Satin as a very comfortable, refined tire with notably low road noise and strong everyday grip, especially in the wet, often describing a big improvement over older premium tires. Many also highlight good stability at speed and solid braking, with value-for-money frequently mentioned. The main recurring complaint is a relatively soft sidewall that can reduce steering sharpness and confidence when pushing hard in fast corners compared with more performance-focused tires.
What owners mention most counted across 42 reviews
Tap one to read only the reviews that mention it.
Owner ratings averaged from 45 ratings
- Owner score 87%
- Dry Grip 92%
- Comfort 90%
- Wet Grip 87%
- Handling 86%
- Wear 86%
- Road Feedback 85%
Vredestein Ultrac Satin Reviews - Page 2
- Volvo
- 225/45 R17
- 2,000 miles
- A Combination of Roads
- Spirited
- BMW 525D
- 225/50 R17 V
- A Combination of Roads
- Average
Which tires do you drive?
Researching the Vredestein Ultrac Satin? Rate the tires you actually drive - and help the next buyer choose.
- Ford Mondeo Titanium 2.0 TCDI
- 235/50 R17
- 2,000 miles
- A Combination of Roads
- Average
- Saab Automobile 93 Aero 1.9 TTiD
- 225/40 R18 W
- 25,000 miles
- Mostly Town
- Average
- SEAT Leon FR 2.0 tdi 170
- 225/40 R18 W
- 5,000 miles
- Mostly Town
- Spirited
- Opel insignia
- 245/45 R18 W
- 2,000 miles
- A Combination of Roads
- Spirited
- Peugeot
- 205/55 R16 W
- Mostly Motorways
- Easy Going
Vredestein and especially from the new Ultrac Satin.Ι'll follow Vredestein and I suggest the above tires unreservedly.
- Ford Focus MK3
- 215/55 R16 W
- 45,000 miles
- Mostly Town
- Average
- Mazda CX7
- 235/55 R19 W
- 500 miles
- Mostly Motorways
- Average
- Kia Motors ceed
- 205/55 R16 W
- 3,100 miles
- A Combination of Roads
- Average
- Volvo V60 D3
- 235/40 R18
- 1,200 miles
- Mostly Town
- Average
I compare them to a Contisportcontact 5 and i have to say that the vredestein are much more comfortable and a much quiter.
As for the grip, the conti's on dry were better, i didn't have a situation that the tires loosed traction at start. The ultrac satin looses traction on start on high revs but only for a split of a second. In corners I can easliy feel the car and the grip is and road feed back is ok. Probably in very aggressive driving the tire will not be as good as HP tires.
On wet i can't see any diffrences, but i try to drive safe so i can't test it on the edge of loosing grip.
Fuel consumption is at the same level as the contisport5 (C vs F) and this is the only disappoitment of it.
As for the price, I bought 4 tires for 440€ (110€ per tire). In this price I couldn't find and alternative in mid range tires.
I'm very satisfied with this purchase and if I have to i would by them again.
No reviews match those filters.
Find your next tire
All tire testsThe latest Tire Reviews tests
- Oct 2026The BEST All Weather Tires for 2026/27 →
- Oct 2026All Season vs All Terrain Tires Tested: Do You Actually Need an All Terrain? →
- Oct 2026The BEST Winter Tires for 2026/27 →
Summer Tires
All Season Tires
Winter Tires
SUV and All Terrain Tires
Track Tires
Which tires do you drive?
You're reading real-world reviews from other drivers - add yours and help the next buyer choose the right tires.

