Vredestein Ultrac Cento Reviews - Page 2

Given 97% while driving a Renault Megane (205/55 R16 V) on a combination of roads for 10,000 average miles
Good tires!
Helpful 17 - tire reviewed on November 20, 2010
Given 76% while driving a Volkswagen Tdi 4 motion (225/45 R17 W) on mostly country roads for 3,000 average miles
The Vredestein Cento does what it says; a very good all round tire.
I replaced the Continental Sportcontact 3 which where on the car with these tires.
The Conti Sport 3 is a very good tire for handling and braking in both the dry and wet. However, it has a few drawbacks:-
Expensive
Poor wear rate
Increased fuel consumption; around 2 MPG less.
Tram lining
Tires aged and went soft causing an acceleration lag

The Cento is virtually as go as the Conti Sport 3 for handling in the dry and wet.
Like the Conti, it is one of the few tires which can cope with the Golf's torque in the wet.

Cento plus points:-
An all rounder.
Good handling in dry and wet.
Refined and comfortable, for a directional reinforced high performance tire.
Strong tire so very little acceleration lag.
Sit well on narrower width rims.
Reduced fuel consumption.
Reinforced tire in 225/45 R17 is standard.
Very good value for money.

Cento lesser points:-
Feedback is acceptable, however, room for improvement.
Braking is good, just not excellent like the Conti Sport 3.
Limited availability.

Will I choose the Vredestein or Conti next time?
It would mainly come down to cost.
The Conti is the slightly better performer; just not worth the premium price, and then some more for the reinforced option.
Helpful 20 - tire reviewed on April 16, 2010
Given 67% while driving a Saab Automobile 9 3 SE Turbo (205/50 R16 W) on a combination of roads for 2,000 spirited miles
I've replaced the front set of Vredestein Sportrac 3 with these new Ultrac Centos on my SAAB 9-3 Turbo. These new tires offer exceptional refinement and low road noise something which makes them ideal for long distance highway driving. Keeping up with the Vredestein tradition, the Ultrac Cento offers respectable grip in the wet which translates into a reassuring and sure-footed handling in adverse weather conditions.

The downside that comes at the cost of refinement is reduced feedback and average dry grip. Specifically, under hard acceleration in 1st and 2nd gear my car torque-steered excessively, something which was almost completely absent with the Sportrac 3. The same can be said for the roadholding which, although progressive, is nowhere near as good as before.

Overall, the Ultrac Cento seems an ideal choice for someone looking for a refined, quiet and sure-footed tire. Any spirited driving will not be rewarded accordingly with this tire.
Helpful 16 - tire reviewed on March 18, 2010
What to know the BEST All Season Tires for 2024? Click to find out!
Given 77% while driving a Audi A4 (205/55 R16 W) on a combination of roads for 4,000 spirited miles
I have had these tires for a few months now and the tires are awesome for motorway cruising...and excellent rain grip and awesome on handling and cornering...We've had some crazy snow and ice and they are bad, probably the worse in snow and ice i've ever had i think its due to the tread pattern...but overall i am happy with them...hence i have noticed my fuel consumption to have increased... but i dont think i would buy them again...probably try something different...dunno yet
Helpful 12 - tire reviewed on January 7, 2010
Given 68% while driving a Mercedes Benz E Class Estate (225/55 R16 W) on a combination of roads for 3,000 easy going miles
Fitted these tires as replacements for Continental Premium Contacts which were on the car and half worn when I bought it.
I immediately noticed how smooth and quiet they were compared to the worn-out Contis.
My only issue with them is the fuel consumption. Part of the reason for buying them was their low rolling resistance claim. I have found that my fuel consumption has been worse since they were fitted which is disappointing.


Helpful 11 - tire reviewed on January 6, 2010
Given 83% while driving a MG ZR (205/45 R17 W) on a combination of roads for 600 average miles
I haven't driven many miles with these yet but so far i'm reasonably impressed with them. I've gone from Uniroyal Rainsport 2's (which i still have on another set of alloys) as i wanted a smoother ride over the amazingly sporty Rainsport 2's.
These Centos' are unbelievably quite.
It's a very smooth ride even in a MG ZR 160.
I'm not 100% confident of them in the wet (again, my only comparison are the rainsport 2's): i think there straight line characteristics are very good but i'm not yet so sure about cornering/handling characteristics. BUT, i need to do more miles.
So far i would say these are worth a punt: vredestein have a good reputation and this is a flagship product for them and so far i can see why. It's not, in my opinion, a sports tire, more a saloon executive tire. I could easily see these on Mercs & BMW's with lots of straight line speed, smooth cornering but not out & out sports cornering & aggressive driving. A pleasant compromise between smoothness & quite versus grip & handling (not that i've had a problem with either).
Will post more feedback after a few more thousand miles. Costs ?95 a corner.
Helpful 10 - tire reviewed on September 9, 2009