“Had Pirelli scorpion verde originally on my SUV which were a high performing tires. Had to change due to wear and decided to give the Kumho a try. Ill be brief, this is a very sluggish tire which will make your car feel...”
Kumho Ecsta PS91
Replaced by the Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72
The Kumho Ecsta PS91 is a mid-range extreme performance summer tire that majors on sharp, confidence-inspiring dry handling and keen pricing. Drivers often praise its stiff sidewalls for fast steering response, strong cornering stability and generally low noise levels. Where it divides opinion is wet-road assurance: it can feel decent when new, but confidence often drops in greasy conditions or as tread wears. Overall, it offers an appealing 'budget UHP' feel on dry roads, but with clear compromises versus the class leaders.
The quick answer
Built from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold for this tire - the evidence is all further down the page. Data updated August 2026.
- 47owner reviews
- 428,710miles driven
- 8professional tests
All Tests
View Test ResultsTested 8 times by independent publications, the Kumho Ecsta PS91 averages a finish of 7th.
Finishing position in each test
2023 Sport Auto UHP Tire Test P8 of 11
The PS91 is a quiet tire but has weaknesses in wet and dry grip.
| Year | Test | Result | Award |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2023 Sport Auto UHP Tire TestSport Auto · 225/40 R18 | P8 / 11 | |
| 2023 | 2023 AZ UHP Summer Tire TestAuto Zeitung · 235/35 R19 | P8 / 10 | |
| 2019 | 2019 Tire Reviews UHP Summer Tire TestTire Reviews · 265/35 R19 | P7 / 8 | Tested by Tire Reviews |
| 2017 | 2017 Motor Mag UHP Tire Test235/35 R19 | P4 / 9 | |
| 2017 | 2017 Sport Auto UHP and Track Day TestSport Auto · 225/40 R18 | P7 / 10 | |
| 2017 | 2017 Auto Bild Sports Cars Tire TestAuto Bild Sportscars · 235/35 R19 | P7 / 9 | |
| 2015 | 2015 Sport Auto 235/35 R19 UHP Tire TestAuto Express · 235/35 R19 | P7 / 7 | |
| 2015 | 2015 AZ 225/40 R18 Summer Tire TestAuto Zeitung · 225/40 R18 | P10 / 14 |
On the full record: Record by disciplineHead-to-head recordEvery published verdict
Videos
The ULTIMATE tire test! These are the best UHP tires you can buy for your car!
Frequently Asked Questions
How good is the Kumho Ecsta PS91 in the wet?
How good is the Kumho Ecsta PS91 in the dry?
How fuel efficient is the Kumho Ecsta PS91?
How many miles does the Kumho Ecsta PS91 last?
What do owners say about the Kumho Ecsta PS91?
More questions about the Kumho Ecsta PS91 (7)
How comfortable and quiet are the Kumho Ecsta PS91?
How well do the Kumho Ecsta PS91 wear, according to owners?
Would owners buy the Kumho Ecsta PS91 again?
What do owners say about the Kumho Ecsta PS91's dry grip?
What do owners say about the Kumho Ecsta PS91's tread life?
What do owners say about the Kumho Ecsta PS91's wet grip?
Has the Kumho Ecsta PS91 been replaced?
Owner Questions
Ask a questionQuestions and Answers for the Kumho Ecsta PS91
Kumho Ecsta PS91 Owner Reviews
Review this tireWhat owners say summarised from 43 reviews
Overall, drivers describe the Kumho Ecsta PS91 as a strong value-focused max-performance summer tire, with many high-scoring reviews praising sharp, responsive handling from its stiff sidewalls and strong dry grip, plus generally low noise levels. Wet grip is often reported as good for the price, but experiences are mixed and several users note reduced confidence in greasy conditions or once tread depth drops. The most consistent drawback across reviews is short/variable tread life (especially on heavier or high-torque cars), making it feel like false economy for some despite the attractive purchase price.
What owners mention most counted across 42 reviews
Tap one to read only the reviews that mention it.
Owner ratings averaged from 47 ratings
- Owner score 71%
- Dry Grip 82%
- Road Feedback 76%
- Handling 75%
- Comfort 73%
- Wet Grip 73%
- Wear 56%
Featured reviews
“Put them on my Golf R after reading some good reviews. The tread depth seemed a little shallow so i checked it with a digital depth guage. 5.66mm on the inside grove for a brand new tire this is a rip off. Checked with...”
“Bought my 2015 f10 520d with 210k kms 2 years ago had these tires but *star branded OE bmw, the car now has nearly 290k kms and these tires are still around 4.5mm of tread left after more than 80.000 kilometers of...”
All 43 Kumho Ecsta PS91 reviews
- 275/35 R18
- 22,000 miles
Tire were used on a 470 HP RWD 1.7 t car. For the money, this is a very good budget tire for spirited driving and even occasional track use. The tire offers decent grip, a stiff sidewall, and responsive handling that gives you confidence when pushing the car on twisty roads or during a track day.
What impressed me the most was its durability. Compared to some other performance-oriented tires, the tread lasted quite a long time, which makes it an attractive option if you're looking for a balance between performance and running costs. Wet weather performance was also perfectly acceptable. I never experienced any unpleasant surprises and always felt comfortable driving in the rain.
However, once the tire reached around 60-50% tread depth, its characteristics changed noticeably. Dry grip dropped significantly, and the tire no longer delivered the same confidence and performance it had when new. This was especially noticeable during more aggressive driving, where the reduced grip became quite apparent. For my application I did not mind as first half of the tire I used for track days and fast road driving and second half was used for doing skids and enjoying RWD car as you should :D
Noise levels were never an issue and remained low throughout its lifespan.
Overall, I would recommend this tire to anyone looking for a budget-friendly performance tire that can handle spirited road driving and the occasional track day. Just be aware that its dry performance deteriorates quite a bit once the tread wears down to around half of its original depth.
- BMW 520d Tourer
- 245/45 R18
- 80,000 miles
- Mostly Motorways
- Average
When these tires are done i will def put some touring tires on the car as i feel these UUHP are not really needed.
Cant comment too much about handling as ive never really pushed the car just driven fast in straight line.
- BMW 320d touring
- 255/30 R19
- 5,000 miles
- A Combination of Roads
- Average
Which tires do you drive?
Researching the Kumho Ecsta PS91? Rate the tires you actually drive - and help the next buyer choose.
- Mercedes Benz V220 CDI
- 245/45 R19
- 10,000 miles
- A Combination of Roads
- Easy Going
- Volkswagen Tiuan R Line
- 255/45 R19
- 700 miles
- Mostly Motorways
- Average
- BMW E92 M3 V8
- 275/35 R19
- 6,000 miles
- Mostly Town
- Average
Initial impressions were ok, but over the space of a few weeks started to notice their flaws. I found that even when you engaged a little bit of power (not flooring the pedal) the traction light would regularly light up. This was not the case with the outgoing Michelins PS4's. I also found in the wet they did not give much confidence. In dry condition they are improved, but certainly not in the same league as Goodyear Eagle F1's, PS4/PS5's etc. That I could somewhat live with given their price...but regretted not buying Michelin or Continentals.
What I have found really poor though is the wear....and reading the reviews here I am clearly not the only one! They have only lasted about 6k miles and it is not driven particularly hard. This is roughly half, maybe closer to a third of the life of the outgoing Michelins. Having also had PS5's on a Mercedes A35 AMG that have lasted 20k miles and that is AWD, along with PS4's on a 335d Tourer Xdrive lasting 17k miles, these fall seriously short.
So therefore they really are false economy. Not only do they somewhat impede the performance of a powerful car (and that's what they seem to be aimed at), if they only last 30-50% of that of a Michelin they work out to be quite expensive!
- Holden 2016 VF SSV Redline
- 275/35 R19
- 100 miles
- A Combination of Roads
- Average
They are quite soft and grip well and comfort wise are great value for money.
I have only driven in the dry to date so cannot comment on wet grip.
One thing I didn't like is they are only 265 wide when inflated. They are 275 at rest off the rims but are only 265 when fitted to rims and inflated.
A little misleading and as such I won't be buying them again. For spirited weekend driving in the dry, they are good value for money.
- BMW 535d M Sport
- 275/35 R19
- 15,000 miles
- A Combination of Roads
- Spirited
Due to hard sidewalls and compound it is quite firm, you will feel the ruts in the road.
Dry use is fine, sticks to the road very well - especially when warmed up - no major complaints in dry weather (which isn't very often in the UK).
Wet/greasy use is different story, on the rear wheels of my 300+bhp diesel barge it is quite skittish. Accelerating off roundabouts - even at a normal pace - you feel little-to-no reassurance that the back-end won't try to kick itself out.
Take the above information as you will, but I won't be buying these tires again for a daily runner.
However, I definitely would do if it was for a track car only used in summer.
- Dodge Challenger
- 245/45 R20
- Mostly Country Roads
- Average
- Volkswagen (B8) 1.4 TSI (150 Hp) DSG ACT
- 235/35 R19
- 400 miles
- A Combination of Roads
- Porsche Cayman
- 235/35 R19
- 3,700 miles
- Mostly Country Roads
- Spirited
- BMW 320D
- 255/30 R19
- 7,000 miles
- Mostly Motorways
- Easy Going
No reviews match those filters.
Find your next tire
All tire testsThe latest Tire Reviews tests
- Oct 2026The BEST All Weather Tires for 2026/27 →
- Oct 2026All Season vs All Terrain Tires Tested: Do You Actually Need an All Terrain? →
- Oct 2026The BEST Winter Tires for 2026/27 →
Summer Tires
All Season Tires
Winter Tires
SUV and All Terrain Tires
Track Tires
Which tires do you drive?
You're reading real-world reviews from other drivers - add yours and help the next buyer choose the right tires.







