Menu

Kumho Ecsta PS91

Replaced by the Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72

The Kumho Ecsta PS91 is a mid-range extreme performance summer tire that majors on sharp, confidence-inspiring dry handling and keen pricing. Drivers often praise its stiff sidewalls for fast steering response, strong cornering stability and generally low noise levels. Where it divides opinion is wet-road assurance: it can feel decent when new, but confidence often drops in greasy conditions or as tread wears. Overall, it offers an appealing 'budget UHP' feel on dry roads, but with clear compromises versus the class leaders.

The quick answer

Owners say 71% from 47 owner reviews 53% would buy again Read the reviews
Tests say 7th average finish across 8 independent tests Latest: P8 of 11 · 2023 See every test
Strengths & weaknesses Wet, Comfort Dry Relative to its rivals across every test we hold

Built from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold for this tire - the evidence is all further down the page. Data updated August 2026.

  • 47owner reviews
  • 428,710miles driven
  • 8professional tests

Tire Reviews Score

Kumho Ecsta PS91

5.7/10

Better than 24% of track and competition tires

  • High Confidence
  • 6 tests
  • 47 owner reviews
Scores of the 48 track and competition tires we have tested

How this score is built

Source Better than Weight
Independent tests6 tests · 4 publications · 2017-2023 25% 89%
Owner reviews47 owner reviews · rated 71% 21% 11%
Combined 24% 5.7

A fixed curve turns the combined figure into the 0 to 10 score, so roughly the top 10% of a group score 9 or more.

Category by category

How it compares with other track and competition tires in each area, and how much each area counts. 50 is the middle of the group.

Category Better than Weight Tests
DryBraking and handling on dry roads 11% 59% 6
WetBraking, handling and aquaplaning in the wet 94% 35% 6
ValueWear, efficiency and cost 39% 5% 3
ComfortNoise and ride comfort 64% 2% 3

Weights are shares of the test result. Owner reviews are blended in afterwards.

By discipline

The same results grouped by what the tire was doing. They are not counted a second time.

BrakingEvery braking test, on any surface 87% 6
HandlingEvery handling test, on any surface 52% 6

Confidence

  1. Limited
  2. Medium
  3. High

Its own test results decide 97% of the test figure. The other 3% is the average for its group, and it shrinks as more tests arrive.

High needs at least 3 tests, with its own results deciding 90% or more. Medium needs 2 tests and 70%. Anything less is Limited: expect the number to move as tests arrive.

The tests behind it

Only measured results count. A test that published its placings alone is listed, but not scored.

  1. 2023 2023 Sport Auto UHP Tire Test Sport Auto · 225/40 R18 P8 / 11
  2. 2023 2023 AZ UHP Summer Tire Test Auto Zeitung · 235/35 R19 P8 / 10
  3. 2019 2019 Tire Reviews UHP Summer Tire Test Tire Reviews · 265/35 R19 P7 / 8
  4. 2017 2017 Motor Mag UHP Tire Test 235/35 R19 P4 / 9
  5. 2017 2017 Sport Auto UHP and Track Day Test Sport Auto · 225/40 R18 P7 / 10
  6. 2017 2017 Auto Bild Sports Cars Tire Test Auto Bild Sportscars · 235/35 R19 P7 / 9
Show all 8 tests
  1. 2015 2015 Sport Auto 235/35 R19 UHP Tire Test Auto Express · 235/35 R19 P7 / 7 Placing only
  2. 2015 2015 AZ 225/40 R18 Summer Tire Test Auto Zeitung · 225/40 R18 P10 / 14 Placing only

Tested 8 times by independent publications, the Kumho Ecsta PS91 averages a finish of 7th.

8 Tests
0 Test Wins
7th Average
4th Best
10th Worst
Finishing position in each test1stLast20152023

Finishing position in each test

The latest test

2023 Sport Auto UHP Tire Test P8 of 11

The PS91 is a quiet tire but has weaknesses in wet and dry grip.

Strong: Noise Weak: Dry Handling Winner: Continental SportContact 7

Every independent test of the Kumho Ecsta PS91, newest first
YearTestResultAward
20232023 Sport Auto UHP Tire TestSport Auto · 225/40 R18P8 / 11
20232023 AZ UHP Summer Tire TestAuto Zeitung · 235/35 R19P8 / 10
20192019 Tire Reviews UHP Summer Tire TestTire Reviews · 265/35 R19P7 / 8Tested by Tire Reviews
20172017 Motor Mag UHP Tire Test235/35 R19P4 / 9
20172017 Sport Auto UHP and Track Day TestSport Auto · 225/40 R18P7 / 10
20172017 Auto Bild Sports Cars Tire TestAuto Bild Sportscars · 235/35 R19P7 / 9
20152015 Sport Auto 235/35 R19 UHP Tire TestAuto Express · 235/35 R19P7 / 7
20152015 AZ 225/40 R18 Summer Tire TestAuto Zeitung · 225/40 R18P10 / 14

On the full record: Record by disciplineHead-to-head recordEvery published verdict

Videos

The ULTIMATE tire test! These are the best UHP tires you can buy for your car!

The ULTIMATE tire test! These are the best UHP tires you can buy for your car!

Frequently Asked Questions
How good is the Kumho Ecsta PS91 in the wet?
Across the 6 wet-braking tests it has featured in, the Kumho Ecsta PS91 stops 3.8% longer than premium rivals, 1.3% longer than mid-range rivals and 17% shorter than budget rivals. It has a Tire Reviews wet score of 94/100, and owners rate it 7.3/10 in the wet from 47 reviews.
How good is the Kumho Ecsta PS91 in the dry?
Across the 6 dry-braking tests it has featured in, the Kumho Ecsta PS91 stops 1.9% longer than premium rivals, 2.4% shorter than mid-range rivals and 6.9% shorter than budget rivals. It has a Tire Reviews dry score of 11/100, and owners rate it 8.2/10 in the dry from 47 reviews.
How fuel efficient is the Kumho Ecsta PS91?
Across the 3 tests measuring rolling resistance, the Kumho Ecsta PS91's rolling resistance is 7.1% higher than premium rivals, 8.3% higher than mid-range rivals and 13.2% higher than budget rivals.
How many miles does the Kumho Ecsta PS91 last?
Based on test and owner data, the Kumho Ecsta PS91 is expected to last around 13,824 miles (22,248 km).
What do owners say about the Kumho Ecsta PS91?
Across 47 owner ratings the Kumho Ecsta PS91 averages 71%. Owners rate Dry Grip highest at 8.2 out of 10 and Wear lowest at 5.6. 16 of those reviews come from owners past 10,000 miles. 61% of owners score it 70% or better.
More questions about the Kumho Ecsta PS91 (7)
How comfortable and quiet are the Kumho Ecsta PS91?
Owners rate the Kumho Ecsta PS91 7.3 out of 10 for comfort and noise across 43 reviews.
How well do the Kumho Ecsta PS91 wear, according to owners?
Owners rate the Kumho Ecsta PS91 5.6 out of 10 for wear across 43 reviews. 16 of those reviews come from owners past 10,000 miles, and the typical review covers 6,000 miles.
Would owners buy the Kumho Ecsta PS91 again?
53% of owners say they would buy the Kumho Ecsta PS91 again, based on the 43 owner reviews that answered the question. 28% of them gave it the highest possible answer.
What do owners say about the Kumho Ecsta PS91's dry grip?
Of the 42 owner reviews analyzed for the Kumho Ecsta PS91, 27 mention dry grip: 24 praise it (strong dry grip) and 3 criticise it (limited dry grip). One owner wrote: "the Kumho are a FAR SUPERIOR tire to the Uniroyals". Read those reviews
What do owners say about the Kumho Ecsta PS91's tread life?
Of the 42 owner reviews analyzed for the Kumho Ecsta PS91, 23 mention tread life: 8 praise it (long-lasting) and 15 criticise it (wears quickly). One owner wrote: "very disappointed with the wear, as only lasted 10k on the rears & possibly 12k on the fronts". Read those reviews
What do owners say about the Kumho Ecsta PS91's wet grip?
Of the 42 owner reviews analyzed for the Kumho Ecsta PS91, 19 mention wet grip: 13 praise it (confident wet grip) and 6 criticise it (weak wet grip). Read those reviews
Has the Kumho Ecsta PS91 been replaced?
The Kumho Ecsta PS91 has been replaced by the Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72.
Owner Questions
Ask a question

Questions and Answers for the Kumho Ecsta PS91

Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Kumho Ecsta PS91. Why not submit a question to our tire experts using the form below!

Kumho Ecsta PS91 Owner Reviews

Review this tire

What owners say summarised from 43 reviews

Overall, drivers describe the Kumho Ecsta PS91 as a strong value-focused max-performance summer tire, with many high-scoring reviews praising sharp, responsive handling from its stiff sidewalls and strong dry grip, plus generally low noise levels. Wet grip is often reported as good for the price, but experiences are mixed and several users note reduced confidence in greasy conditions or once tread depth drops. The most consistent drawback across reviews is short/variable tread life (especially on heavier or high-torque cars), making it feel like false economy for some despite the attractive purchase price.

What owners mention most counted across 42 reviews

Tap one to read only the reviews that mention it.

Owner ratings averaged from 47 ratings

  • Owner score 71%
  • Dry Grip 82%
  • Road Feedback 76%
  • Handling 75%
  • Comfort 73%
  • Wet Grip 73%
  • Wear 56%

Featured reviews

Most helpful 58%

“Had Pirelli scorpion verde originally on my SUV which were a high performing tires. Had to change due to wear and decided to give the Kumho a try. Ill be brief, this is a very sluggish tire which will make your car feel...”

  • Volkswagen Tiuan R Line
  • 700 miles
Read full review → 970 found this helpful
Most critical 23%

“Put them on my Golf R after reading some good reviews. The tread depth seemed a little shallow so i checked it with a digital depth guage. 5.66mm on the inside grove for a brand new tire this is a rip off. Checked with...”

  • Volkswagen (B8) 1.4 TSI (150 Hp) DSG ACT
  • 400 miles
Read full review → 1,024 found this helpful
Longest term 83%

“Bought my 2015 f10 520d with 210k kms 2 years ago had these tires but *star branded OE bmw, the car now has nearly 290k kms and these tires are still around 4.5mm of tread left after more than 80.000 kilometers of...”

  • BMW 520d Tourer
  • 80,000 miles
Read full review → 298 found this helpful

All 43 Kumho Ecsta PS91 reviews

Score spread across 41 written reviews
79%
Bonny
Initial Impressions
  • 275/35 R18
  • 22,000 miles

Tire were used on a 470 HP RWD 1.7 t car. For the money, this is a very good budget tire for spirited driving and even occasional track use. The tire offers decent grip, a stiff sidewall, and responsive handling that gives you confidence when pushing the car on twisty roads or during a track day.

What impressed me the most was its durability. Compared to some other performance-oriented tires, the tread lasted quite a long time, which makes it an attractive option if you're looking for a balance between performance and running costs. Wet weather performance was also perfectly acceptable. I never experienced any unpleasant surprises and always felt comfortable driving in the rain.

However, once the tire reached around 60-50% tread depth, its characteristics changed noticeably. Dry grip dropped significantly, and the tire no longer delivered the same confidence and performance it had when new. This was especially noticeable during more aggressive driving, where the reduced grip became quite apparent. For my application I did not mind as first half of the tire I used for track days and fast road driving and second half was used for doing skids and enjoying RWD car as you should :D

Noise levels were never an issue and remained low throughout its lifespan.

Overall, I would recommend this tire to anyone looking for a budget-friendly performance tire that can handle spirited road driving and the occasional track day. Just be aware that its dry performance deteriorates quite a bit once the tread wears down to around half of its original depth.

This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 8
  • Wet Grip 7
  • Road Feedback 8
  • Handling 8
  • Wear 9
  • Comfort 7
  • Buy again 8
Helpful 23
83%
Nidjo95 Contributor
Bought my 2015 f10 520d with 210k kms 2 years ago had these tires but *star branded OE bmw, the car now has nearly 290k kms and these tires are still around 4.5mm of tread left after more than 80.000 kilometers of driving, all 4 tires are the same and i rotate them roughly every 15.000kms but i am impressed by wear of these tires even tho its a 2liter diesel, the previous owner bought these tires i would personally never buy tires like these for a 2.0diesel 5 series but overall the wear is really good, noise has always been relatively quiet and comfort is ok, altho its a luxury line 5 series so i cannot really comment on comfort much as ive only had winter tires on to compare and they are about the same, fuel consumption has always been around 6.5l to 7l per 100km in this car with these tires, they have been good in the wet also never felt the car struggle even when giving it some power in the rain, im not sure how the normal ps91 is compared to the *star branded OE but i have been quite impressed with these tires, especially the wear, as i drove maybe 5000km on winter tires and everything else was done on these ps91*
When these tires are done i will def put some touring tires on the car as i feel these UUHP are not really needed.
Cant comment too much about handling as ive never really pushed the car just driven fast in straight line.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 8
  • Wet Grip 8
  • Road Feedback 8
  • Handling 8
  • Wear 10
  • Comfort 8
Helpful 298
79%
Member
Need a lot of heat to get good grip
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 8
  • Wet Grip 8
  • Road Feedback 8
  • Handling 8
  • Wear 7
  • Comfort 8
  • Buy again 8
Helpful 289

Which tires do you drive?

Researching the Kumho Ecsta PS91? Rate the tires you actually drive - and help the next buyer choose.

Own the Kumho Ecsta PS91?
64%
Member
Put a set of these on my Mercedes V Class, very disappointed with the wear, as only lasted 10k on the rears & possibly 12k on the fronts, I expected at least 15k as not a budget brand!
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 9
  • Wet Grip 8
  • Road Feedback 8
  • Handling 9
  • Wear 1
  • Comfort 9
  • Buy again 1
Helpful 764
58%
Member
Had Pirelli scorpion verde originally on my SUV which were a high performing tires. Had to change due to wear and decided to give the Kumho a try. Ill be brief, this is a very sluggish tire which will make your car feel heavy and demand more power during acceleration. If you’re looking for performance tires this isnt the one. This is more of a day to day commute tire.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 7
  • Road Feedback 7
  • Handling 6
  • Comfort 8
  • Buy again 1
Helpful 970
49%
Member
Purchased these for my 2008 BMW E92 M3. They were recommended on an M3 facebook page by multiple people as a decent value alternative to Michelins etc. Some people even said they were better than the flagship premium brands, so thought they were worth a go!

Initial impressions were ok, but over the space of a few weeks started to notice their flaws. I found that even when you engaged a little bit of power (not flooring the pedal) the traction light would regularly light up. This was not the case with the outgoing Michelins PS4's. I also found in the wet they did not give much confidence. In dry condition they are improved, but certainly not in the same league as Goodyear Eagle F1's, PS4/PS5's etc. That I could somewhat live with given their price...but regretted not buying Michelin or Continentals.

What I have found really poor though is the wear....and reading the reviews here I am clearly not the only one! They have only lasted about 6k miles and it is not driven particularly hard. This is roughly half, maybe closer to a third of the life of the outgoing Michelins. Having also had PS5's on a Mercedes A35 AMG that have lasted 20k miles and that is AWD, along with PS4's on a 335d Tourer Xdrive lasting 17k miles, these fall seriously short.

So therefore they really are false economy. Not only do they somewhat impede the performance of a powerful car (and that's what they seem to be aimed at), if they only last 30-50% of that of a Michelin they work out to be quite expensive!
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 7
  • Wet Grip 5
  • Road Feedback 6
  • Handling 7
  • Wear 1
  • Comfort 7
  • Buy again 1
Helpful 965
74%
Member
Bought these for the rear of my VF Redline Commodore.
They are quite soft and grip well and comfort wise are great value for money.
I have only driven in the dry to date so cannot comment on wet grip.
One thing I didn't like is they are only 265 wide when inflated. They are 275 at rest off the rims but are only 265 when fitted to rims and inflated.
A little misleading and as such I won't be buying them again. For spirited weekend driving in the dry, they are good value for money.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 8
  • Road Feedback 8
  • Handling 7
  • Comfort 8
  • Buy again 6
Helpful 1,092
60%
Member
After 12 months and 15,000 miles of aggressive use on my RWD 2 ton saloon, I've come the the conclusion that:

Due to hard sidewalls and compound it is quite firm, you will feel the ruts in the road.

Dry use is fine, sticks to the road very well - especially when warmed up - no major complaints in dry weather (which isn't very often in the UK).

Wet/greasy use is different story, on the rear wheels of my 300+bhp diesel barge it is quite skittish. Accelerating off roundabouts - even at a normal pace - you feel little-to-no reassurance that the back-end won't try to kick itself out.

Take the above information as you will, but I won't be buying these tires again for a daily runner.
However, I definitely would do if it was for a track car only used in summer.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 8
  • Wet Grip 4
  • Road Feedback 7
  • Handling 7
  • Wear 6
  • Comfort 4
  • Buy again 6
Helpful 887
36%
Member
Used only in summer with roughly 5 thousand miles and failed to pass inspection the following spring. Tires didn't even last long enough to get rotated. I'm out on Kumho's and could have got this with the cheapest available tire. Even a summer performance tire should last a few years at low miles.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 5
  • Wet Grip 3
  • Road Feedback 5
  • Handling 5
  • Wear 1
  • Comfort 5
  • Buy again 1
Helpful 881
23%
Member
Put them on my Golf R after reading some good reviews. The tread depth seemed a little shallow so i checked it with a digital depth guage. 5.66mm on the inside grove for a brand new tire this is a rip off. Checked with Kuhmo and they said the new tread depth should be 7.1mm. returned them and swaped them for Dunlop. Kuhmo what a rip off. I will never trust them again and encourage others to check their new tread depth before putting them on the car.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 3
  • Wet Grip 2
  • Road Feedback 3
  • Handling 2
  • Wear 1
  • Comfort 4
  • Buy again 1
Helpful 1,024
71%
Member
Used them on my Cayman from new to legal thread thickness. Definitely NOT a UHP tire from a grip perspective, as you can easily overheat it on a normal twisty mountain road. When warmed-up the grip is almost ok, steering feeling is also good, but when pushing after a while you loose confidence, feeling and grip. Tested once on track and it is absolutely the wrong tire, as soon becoming unpredictable (spinning at same speed, same corner at second lap). You can buy it for a normal everiday usage of the car, if in you size this is the Kumho offer, as this is a very cheap tire. Avoid it for sporty road or track usage.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 6
  • Wet Grip 7
  • Road Feedback 7
  • Handling 8
  • Wear 8
  • Comfort 8
  • Buy again 6
Helpful 866
53%
zwer
  • BMW 320D
  • 255/30 R19
  • 7,000 miles
  • Mostly Motorways
  • Easy Going
Fitted this Kumho Ecsta ps91 on rear axle of my 2010 e90 2.0D Fitted in end of April 2021, taken off in start of October 2021, driven 12 000Km, and they are spent to the end, bald.... Wear is absolute disaster....
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 7
  • Wet Grip 6
  • Road Feedback 7
  • Handling 7
  • Wear 1
  • Comfort 7
  • Buy again 2
Helpful 1,028
Find your next tire
All tire tests
Rate your tires

My tires

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tires

Save tires from a tire page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tires. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.