Menu

Kleber Quadraxer Test Results

Tested 2011 to 2013 2 publications

Tested 4 times by independent publications, the Kleber Quadraxer averages a finish of 19th.

  • 4Independent tests
  • 0Test wins
  • 0Podium finishes
  • 19thAverage finish
  • 21%Field beaten on average
  • 2Publications
Kleber Quadraxer

4 tests, 2011 to 2013

0%50%100%201120122013Average 21%2011 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test (2011): P7 of 10, Beat 33% of the field2012 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test (2012): P7 of 10, Beat 33% of the field2013 54 Tire Braking Test (2013): P52 of 54, Beat 4% of the field2013 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test (2013): P8 of 9, Beat 13% of the field
Share of the field beaten in each test, oldest to newest. Hover or tap a point for the test.
  • Test win
  • Second
  • Third
  • Average 21%

Head-to-head record

Overall finishing position against the tires that have most often shared a test with the Kleber Quadraxer. Only tires tested alongside it at least three times are listed.

Rival Shared tests Ahead Behind Level Finished ahead
Hankook Optimo 4S 4 shared: 0 ahead, 4 behind 4 0 4 - 0%
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons 4 shared: 0 ahead, 4 behind 4 0 4 - 0%
Bridgestone A001 3 shared: 0 ahead, 3 behind 3 0 3 - 0%
Vredestein Quatrac 3 3 shared: 0 ahead, 3 behind 3 0 3 - 0%

Performance Analysis

Drawn from 4 tests. Updated November 26, 2025.

Across four historical tests, the Kleber Quadraxer consistently ranked near the bottom of the fields, indicating notable shortcomings versus rivals, especially in summer braking-focused evaluations. Its all-season test placements were repeatedly lower-mid pack without standout category wins, suggesting balanced but uncompetitive performance across wet, dry, and snow metrics. The severe result in the large-sample 2013 summer braking test underscores a critical safety-related weakness in dry/wet stopping power.

Overall, the tire shows limited strength in any specific category and lacks awards or recommendations. Results imply it trails contemporary competitors particularly in braking, with only minor stability in all-season contexts preventing an even worse overall assessment.

Performance Strengths

Performance Weaknesses

Do owners agree with the tests?

Every tester write-up on the Kleber Quadraxer (3 tests) and 39 owner reviews were tagged for the aspects they judge. Where both have spoken, this is how they line up.

Where owners and testers agree

  • Ride comfort strength in 2 of 3 tests 8 praise, 0 criticise of 39 reviews · Read those reviews
  • Snow handling strength in 1 of 3 tests 4 praise, 0 criticise of 39 reviews · Read those reviews

Where they disagree

  • Wet grip weakness in 1 of 3 tests 17 praise, 3 criticise of 39 reviews · Read those reviews
  • Aquaplaning resistance weakness in 1 of 3 tests 7 praise, 1 criticise of 39 reviews · Read those reviews

Raised by owners, not by any test of this tire

  • Snow traction no test mentions it 26 praise, 0 criticise of 39 reviews · Read those reviews
  • Tread life no test mentions it 12 praise, 0 criticise of 39 reviews · Read those reviews
  • Road noise no test mentions it 7 praise, 2 criticise of 39 reviews · Read those reviews
  • Ice grip no test mentions it 7 praise, 0 criticise of 39 reviews · Read those reviews
  • Slush performance no test mentions it 5 praise, 0 criticise of 39 reviews · Read those reviews
  • Bedding-in period no test mentions it 0 praise, 4 criticise of 39 reviews · Read those reviews

Every test, newest first 4

Strong = top two of the field in that measurement. Weak = bottom two.

2013 2 tests
2012 1 test
2011 1 test

Back to the Kleber Quadraxer overview

Owner reviews, sizes and EU label data, comparisons and the Tire Reviews score. All Kleber tires

Overview

Rate your tires

My tires

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tires

Save tires from a tire page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tires. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.