Bridgestone Turanza ER300 Reviews - Page 3
Given 41%
while driving a
Alfa Romeo Giulietta
(225/45 R17 W)
on a combination of roads
for 25,000 average miles
Quite good in the dry, scary in wet. After a year (20,000k) they dried and the abs kept working even on low speed braking. I put the fronts back and the backs in front to no avail. They produced an annoying noise particularly over bad quality asphalt. Definitely I would not buy them again.
Given 81%
while driving a
SEAT LEON 1.8TSI
(225/45 R17 W)
on a combination of roads
for 22,000 spirited miles
The best tires for everyday use.
Good performance on dry and wet surfaces, excellent handling. A bit noisy on the large asphalt.
A rigid sidewall allows you to go on track days, time is not the best, but you can go.
The next step is POTENZA.
Good performance on dry and wet surfaces, excellent handling. A bit noisy on the large asphalt.
A rigid sidewall allows you to go on track days, time is not the best, but you can go.
The next step is POTENZA.
Given 44%
while driving a
Alfa Romeo Giulietta
(225/45 R17 W)
on a combination of roads
for 0 average miles
terrible! after 10 months / 11000km became very hard, and dangerous when braking and very unriliable on wet road. abs/antispin always active !!!!
Given 86%
while driving a
SEAT Ibiza 16V
(195/50 R15 V)
on a combination of roads
for 53,200 spirited miles
I really like this set of tires. Progressive and reliable..
Volkswagen Golf 7 TDI
(205/55 R16)
on mostly town
for 54,000 average miles
Bridgestone Er300 came on my Mk7 VW Golf from new. I have changed the front tires st 30 & 52k miles (each time with Bridgestone Er300's) and changed the rear tires at 54k miles with 3mm grip left. A great all round tire which never gives any unwelcome surprises in either wet or dry driving conditions. Wouldn't use anything else.
Given 94%
while driving a
Opel Astra 1.4
(205/55 R16)
on mostly motorways
for 0 average miles
the best tires ever fitted in this car.they last easily 80k km.excellent in wet and very informative. in dry give all the information you need to feel safe even when you ride fast. not very comfortable but i care more for safety and lifespan. i have used also continental sportcontact2.extremelly dissapointed from continentals. good in wet,awful in dry as always abs is on in hard braking. their lifespan was also disapointed.they lasted 50k kms. i will definatelly buy again the er300 and not continentals.
Given 43%
while driving a
BMW 320d efficient dynamics
(225/45 R17)
on a combination of roads
for 16 spirited miles
Had a full set fitted to my BMW 320D at Costco in Derby rode pretty well but, they only lasted for 16,000 and were nearly bald then. Worst tires for wear ever, I've now gone for Michelin cross climate. will keep you informed
Given 10%
while driving a
Nissan Note tekna 1.6 Auto
(225/45 R17)
on a combination of roads
for 11,000 easy going miles
In fifty years of driving these are the worst wearing tires I have ever had
Given 60%
while driving a
Ford 05 Mondeo 185 (modded) diesel
(205/65 R15)
on mostly town
for 30,000 average miles
not bad tires would buy again, had good balance between wear and grip
Given 67%
while driving a
Toyota Avensis
(215/55 R17 V)
on mostly motorways
for 58,000 easy going miles
SEt of tires make 58.000 kms, still have tread to wear but very dangererous on wet corners. very poor wet grip. very uncorfortabble too. Not buy again
Given 93%
while driving a
Volkswagen Jetta 2.0 FSI Sport
(225/45 R17 W)
on a combination of roads
for 1,500 average miles
excellent very good tire grip on dry and wonderful curves, by far the best tire I've driven and would buy
Given 70%
while driving a
Honda 1.8 VTi
(225/45 R17)
on a combination of roads
for 0 average miles
Unfortunately the noise created by these tires is far too high .A shame as the rest of the tire spec is good
Have now changed to Michellins Cross Climates - what a difference ,very quiet
Have now changed to Michellins Cross Climates - what a difference ,very quiet