Bridgestone Turanza ER300 Owner Reviews

What owners say summarised from 157 reviews

Owners most consistently praise the Bridgestone Turanza ER300 for dry grip, while wet grip receives more praise than criticism but is less convincing. Longer-term accounts often describe good tread life, although wear varies substantially and around one in five reviews criticise it. Road noise is the clearest recurring complaint, raised in roughly one in four reviews, despite quieter experiences from others. Comfort is evenly divided between praise and criticism. A minority of longer-term accounts describe declining wet grip, but repeat reviews do not establish a consistent ageing pattern.

What owners mention most counted across 151 reviews

Tap one to read only the reviews that mention it.

Owner ratings averaged from 197 ratings

Owner score 75%
Dry Grip 83%
Wear 78%
Road Feedback 77%
Wet Grip 76%
Handling 72%
Comfort 71%

Bridgestone Turanza ER300 Reviews - Page 14

Score spread across 155 written reviews

Sort by

miles

Review stage

Road type Driving style Car make

76%

Member January 20, 2008

Honda Civic Coupe 1.6i SR VTEC
185/60 R14 H
25,000 miles
A Combination of Roads
Spirited

Very nice tires. Dry grip was very good indeed, wet grip was relatively even better. I was really impressed by how much these tires held on wet roads. Very confidence inspiring. Wear rate was excellent, noise and comfort similarly so. For a "touring" tire, these are superb and much better than the P6000s so common for this size tire (which I've also driven). They're only let you down a little when you push them (but then you really should be buying a performance tire, not a touring tire!), where you get a lot of scrabbling and sudden break away, and also steering response isn't the best, so they're not the best for fast country road driving. Everything else, especially motorway miles, bring it on!