Test Charts / TUV
Michelin Pilot Sport 5 Energy vs Pilot Sport 5: How Much Do You Really Give Up?
Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tire, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.
- Tested size
- 255/40 R20
- Tires tested
- 2
- Disciplines
- 5
- Test vehicle
- Tesla Model Y
Read the measurements, not just the rank
Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tires can be separated by very different margins.
Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tires does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.
Focus on your tires
Select tires to highlight them throughout the charts.
Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tires does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.
Dry
1Dry Braking
Dry braking in feet (62 - 0 mph)
Lower is better ↓| Tire | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 114 ft | Best | 0 mph | |
| 115 ft | +1 ft | 7 mph |
All the tires in the Dry Braking test finished less than 3% apart. From 80 mph, the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 would still be travelling at 7 mph when the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 Energy had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Wet
2Wet Braking
Wet braking in feet (50 - 12 mph)
Lower is better ↓| Tire | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 84 ft | Best | 0 mph | |
| 91 ft | +7 ft | 23 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 8.6% (7 ft ≈ 0.5 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 Energy would still be travelling at 23 mph when the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Subj. Wet Handling
Subjective Wet Handling Score
Higher is better ↑| Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 8.92 Points | Best | |
| 8 Points | -0.92 Points |
The difference between best and worst was 10.3% (0.92 Points).
Value
2Rolling Resistance
Rolling resistance in kg t
Lower is better ↓| Tire | Result | Gap to best | Extra fuel / year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6.5 kg/t | Best | $0 | |
| 7.9 kg/t | +1.40 kg/t | $63 |
The difference between best and worst was 21.5% (1.4 kg / t). Over 12,000 miles a year at $3.60/gal, the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 uses about 18 gal ($63) more fuel than the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 Energy.
Adjust the assumptions
Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tire selection above.
Abrasion
Total weight loss after wear test in grams
Lower is better ↓| Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 901 g | Best | |
| 1138 g | +237.00 g |
The difference between best and worst was 26.3% (237 g).
Test setup & methodology
The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.
Recorded test conditions
Recorded test conditions
- Dry Braking
- 62.1 → 0.0 mph
- Wet Braking
- 49.7 → 12.4 mph
More tire tests
Cross-check this test
Where these tires were tested again, and how the verdict held up.
2026 AutoView Sport Tire Test
225/45 R187 tires tested
Latest Summer Tires test
2026 Tire Rack Streetable Track Tire Test
275/35 R183 tires tested
Latest Summer Tires test
2026 Auto Express Summer Tire Test
205/55 R168 tires tested
Latest Summer Tires test

