Menu

Test Charts / Motor

2026 Motor All Season Tire Test

Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tire, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.

Tested size
205/55 R16
Tires tested
8
Disciplines
15
Test vehicle
VW Golf

Read the measurements, not just the rank

Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tires can be separated by very different margins.

Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tires does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.

Dry

3

Dry Braking

Dry braking in feet (62 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Dry Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
133 ft Best 0 mph
137 ft +4 ft 15 mph
138 ft +5 ft 16 mph
141 ft +8 ft 19 mph
144 ft +11 ft 23 mph
145 ft +12 ft 23 mph
146 ft +13 ft 24 mph
149 ft +16 ft 26 mph
RefReference Winter Budget
158 ft +25 ft 32 mph

The difference between best and worst was 19.3% (25 ft ≈ 1.7 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Dunlop All Season 2 would still be travelling at 26 mph when the Michelin CrossClimate 3 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Dry Handling

Dry handling time in seconds

Lower is better ↓
Dry Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
53.42 s Best
53.53 s +0.11 s
53.79 s +0.37 s
54.05 s +0.63 s
54.07 s +0.65 s
54.14 s +0.72 s
54.17 s +0.75 s
55.27 s +1.85 s
RefReference Winter Budget
56.59 s +3.17 s

The difference between best and worst was 5.9% (3.17 s).

Subj. Dry Handling

Subjective Dry Handling Score

Higher is better ↑
Subj. Dry Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
7.06 Points Best
7 Points -0.06 Points
7 Points -0.06 Points
6.5 Points -0.56 Points
6.25 Points -0.81 Points
6.06 Points -1.00 Points
6 Points -1.06 Points
5.5 Points -1.56 Points
RefReference Winter Budget
4.75 Points -2.31 Points

The difference between best and worst was 32.7% (2.31 Points).

Wet

5

Wet Braking

Wet braking in feet (62 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Wet Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
157 ft Best 0 mph
157 ft Best 0 mph
163 ft +6 ft 15 mph
170 ft +13 ft 22 mph
171 ft +14 ft 22 mph
172 ft +15 ft 23 mph
174 ft +17 ft 25 mph
RefReference Winter Budget
184 ft +27 ft 31 mph
188 ft +31 ft 32 mph

The difference between best and worst was 19.4% (31 ft ≈ 2.1 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Compasal Crosstop AS II would still be travelling at 32 mph when the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Wet Handling

Wet handling time in seconds

Lower is better ↓
Wet Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
85.9 s Best
86.3 s +0.40 s
87.7 s +1.80 s
88 s +2.10 s
88.4 s +2.50 s
89.1 s +3.20 s
89.7 s +3.80 s
RefReference Winter Budget
91.6 s +5.70 s
95.2 s +9.30 s

The difference between best and worst was 10.8% (9.3 s).

Wet Circle

Average cornering G force in the wet

Higher is better ↑
Wet Circle
Position / TireResultGap to best
0.77 g Best
0.75 g -0.02 g
0.72 g -0.05 g
0.72 g -0.05 g
0.71 g -0.06 g
0.7 g -0.07 g
0.7 g -0.07 g
RefReference Winter Budget
0.64 g -0.13 g
0.63 g -0.14 g

The difference between best and worst was 18.2% (0.14 g).

Straight Aqua

Float Speed in mph

Higher is better ↑
Straight Aqua
Position / TireResultGap to best
54.2 mph Best
52.1 mph -2.1 mph
51.0 mph -3.2 mph
50.3 mph -3.9 mph
50.1 mph -4.1 mph
48.8 mph -5.4 mph
48.5 mph -5.7 mph
RefReference Winter Budget
46.9 mph -7.3 mph
44.0 mph -10.2 mph

The difference between best and worst was 18.8% (10.2 mph).

Curved Aquaplaning

Remaining lateral acceleration

Higher is better ↑
Curved Aquaplaning
Position / TireResultGap to best
11.8 ft/s² Best
10.7 ft/s² -1.1 ft/s²
10.5 ft/s² -1.3 ft/s²
10.4 ft/s² -1.4 ft/s²
10.0 ft/s² -1.8 ft/s²
9.7 ft/s² -2.1 ft/s²
9.3 ft/s² -2.5 ft/s²
RefReference Winter Budget
8.5 ft/s² -3.3 ft/s²
6.6 ft/s² -5.2 ft/s²

The difference between best and worst was 44% (5.2 ft/s²).

Snow

4

Snow Braking

Snow braking in feet (31 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Snow Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
93 ft Best 0 mph
RefReference Winter Budget
94 ft +1 ft 7 mph
95 ft +2 ft 12 mph
97 ft +4 ft 15 mph
97 ft +4 ft 17 mph
98 ft +5 ft 18 mph
102 ft +9 ft 24 mph
106 ft +13 ft 28 mph
109 ft +16 ft 30 mph

The difference between best and worst was 16.5% (16 ft ≈ 1 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Nokian Seasonproof 2 would still be travelling at 30 mph when the Michelin CrossClimate 3 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Snow Traction

Snow acceleration distance in feet (0 - 12 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Snow Traction
Position / TireResultGap to best
30 ft Best
RefReference Winter Budget
30 ft 0 ft
31 ft +1 ft
31 ft +1 ft
31 ft +1 ft
31 ft +1 ft
32 ft +2 ft
32 ft +2 ft
33 ft +3 ft

The difference between best and worst was 11.8% (3 ft).

Snow Traction

Pulling Force in pounds-force

Higher is better ↑
Snow Traction
Position / TireResultGap to best
RefReference Winter Budget
593 lbf +5 lbf
588 lbf Best
586 lbf -2 lbf
578 lbf -10 lbf
574 lbf -14 lbf
571 lbf -17 lbf
544 lbf -44 lbf
530 lbf -58 lbf
520 lbf -68 lbf

The difference between best and worst was 12.3% (73 lbf).

Snow Handling

Snow handling time in seconds

Lower is better ↓
Snow Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
RefReference Winter Budget
82.1 s 0.00 s
82.1 s Best
82.7 s +0.60 s
82.9 s +0.80 s
83 s +0.90 s
83.8 s +1.70 s
85.2 s +3.10 s
86 s +3.90 s
88.1 s +6.00 s

The difference between best and worst was 7.3% (6 s).

Comfort

2

Subj. Comfort

Subjective Comfort Score

Higher is better ↑
Subj. Comfort
Position / TireResultGap to best
7 Points Best
7 Points Best
7 Points Best
7 Points Best
RefReference Winter Budget
6.5 Points -0.50 Points
6.5 Points -0.50 Points
6.5 Points -0.50 Points
6 Points -1.00 Points
6 Points -1.00 Points

The difference between best and worst was 14.3% (1 Points).

Noise

External noise in dB

Lower is better ↓
Noise
Position / TireResultGap to best
64.4 dB Best
64.5 dB +0.10 dB
64.8 dB +0.40 dB
64.8 dB +0.40 dB
65.2 dB +0.80 dB
65.2 dB +0.80 dB
65.5 dB +1.10 dB
66 dB +1.60 dB
RefReference Winter Budget
67.3 dB +2.90 dB

The difference between best and worst was 4.5% (2.9 dB).

Value

1

Rolling Resistance

Rolling resistance in kg t

Lower is better ↓
Rolling Resistance
Position / TireResultGap to bestExtra fuel / year
7.62 kg/t Best $0
7.7 kg/t +0.08 kg/t $3
7.79 kg/t +0.17 kg/t $7
7.98 kg/t +0.36 kg/t $14
7.99 kg/t +0.37 kg/t $14
8.18 kg/t +0.56 kg/t $22
8.25 kg/t +0.63 kg/t $24
RefReference Winter Budget
8.34 kg/t +0.72 kg/t $28
9.42 kg/t +1.80 kg/t $69

The difference between best and worst was 23.6% (1.8 kg / t). Over 12,000 miles a year at $3.60/gal, the Laufenn G Fit 4S uses about 19 gal ($69) more fuel than the Debica Navigator 3.

Adjust the assumptions

Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tire selection above.

12,000 mi
$3.60/gal
Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tire age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.

Test setup & methodology

The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.

Recorded test conditions

Recorded test conditions

Dry Braking
62.1 → 0.0 mph
Wet Braking
62.1 → 0.0 mph
Snow Braking
31.1 → 0.0 mph
Snow Traction
0.0 → 12.4 mph

More tire tests

Cross-check this test

All tire tests

Where these tires were tested again, and how the verdict held up.

Rate your tires

My tires

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tires

Save tires from a tire page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tires. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.

Where to buy

Affiliate links: if you buy, we may earn a commission. It never changes our tests, scores or recommendations. How we stay independent