Test Charts / Motor
2026 Motor All Season Tire Test
Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tire, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.
- Tested size
- 205/55 R16
- Tires tested
- 8
- Disciplines
- 15
- Test vehicle
- VW Golf
Read the measurements, not just the rank
Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tires can be separated by very different margins.
Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tires does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.
Focus on your tires
Select tires to highlight them throughout the charts.
Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tires does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.
Dry
3Dry Braking
Dry braking in feet (62 - 0 mph)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 133 ft | Best | 0 mph | |
| 137 ft | +4 ft | 15 mph | |
| 138 ft | +5 ft | 16 mph | |
| 141 ft | +8 ft | 19 mph | |
| 144 ft | +11 ft | 23 mph | |
| 145 ft | +12 ft | 23 mph | |
| 146 ft | +13 ft | 24 mph | |
| 149 ft | +16 ft | 26 mph | |
RefReference Winter Budget |
158 ft | +25 ft | 32 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 19.3% (25 ft ≈ 1.7 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Dunlop All Season 2 would still be travelling at 26 mph when the Michelin CrossClimate 3 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Dry Handling
Dry handling time in seconds
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 53.42 s | Best | |
| 53.53 s | +0.11 s | |
| 53.79 s | +0.37 s | |
| 54.05 s | +0.63 s | |
| 54.07 s | +0.65 s | |
| 54.14 s | +0.72 s | |
| 54.17 s | +0.75 s | |
| 55.27 s | +1.85 s | |
RefReference Winter Budget |
56.59 s | +3.17 s |
The difference between best and worst was 5.9% (3.17 s).
Subj. Dry Handling
Subjective Dry Handling Score
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 7.06 Points | Best | |
| 7 Points | -0.06 Points | |
| 7 Points | -0.06 Points | |
| 6.5 Points | -0.56 Points | |
| 6.25 Points | -0.81 Points | |
| 6.06 Points | -1.00 Points | |
| 6 Points | -1.06 Points | |
| 5.5 Points | -1.56 Points | |
RefReference Winter Budget |
4.75 Points | -2.31 Points |
The difference between best and worst was 32.7% (2.31 Points).
Wet
5Wet Braking
Wet braking in feet (62 - 0 mph)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 157 ft | Best | 0 mph | |
| 157 ft | Best | 0 mph | |
| 163 ft | +6 ft | 15 mph | |
| 170 ft | +13 ft | 22 mph | |
| 171 ft | +14 ft | 22 mph | |
| 172 ft | +15 ft | 23 mph | |
| 174 ft | +17 ft | 25 mph | |
RefReference Winter Budget |
184 ft | +27 ft | 31 mph |
| 188 ft | +31 ft | 32 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 19.4% (31 ft ≈ 2.1 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Compasal Crosstop AS II would still be travelling at 32 mph when the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Wet Handling
Wet handling time in seconds
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 85.9 s | Best | |
| 86.3 s | +0.40 s | |
| 87.7 s | +1.80 s | |
| 88 s | +2.10 s | |
| 88.4 s | +2.50 s | |
| 89.1 s | +3.20 s | |
| 89.7 s | +3.80 s | |
RefReference Winter Budget |
91.6 s | +5.70 s |
| 95.2 s | +9.30 s |
The difference between best and worst was 10.8% (9.3 s).
Wet Circle
Average cornering G force in the wet
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 0.77 g | Best | |
| 0.75 g | -0.02 g | |
| 0.72 g | -0.05 g | |
| 0.72 g | -0.05 g | |
| 0.71 g | -0.06 g | |
| 0.7 g | -0.07 g | |
| 0.7 g | -0.07 g | |
RefReference Winter Budget |
0.64 g | -0.13 g |
| 0.63 g | -0.14 g |
The difference between best and worst was 18.2% (0.14 g).
Straight Aqua
Float Speed in mph
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 54.2 mph | Best | |
| 52.1 mph | -2.1 mph | |
| 51.0 mph | -3.2 mph | |
| 50.3 mph | -3.9 mph | |
| 50.1 mph | -4.1 mph | |
| 48.8 mph | -5.4 mph | |
| 48.5 mph | -5.7 mph | |
RefReference Winter Budget |
46.9 mph | -7.3 mph |
| 44.0 mph | -10.2 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 18.8% (10.2 mph).
Curved Aquaplaning
Remaining lateral acceleration
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 11.8 ft/s² | Best | |
| 10.7 ft/s² | -1.1 ft/s² | |
| 10.5 ft/s² | -1.3 ft/s² | |
| 10.4 ft/s² | -1.4 ft/s² | |
| 10.0 ft/s² | -1.8 ft/s² | |
| 9.7 ft/s² | -2.1 ft/s² | |
| 9.3 ft/s² | -2.5 ft/s² | |
RefReference Winter Budget |
8.5 ft/s² | -3.3 ft/s² |
| 6.6 ft/s² | -5.2 ft/s² |
The difference between best and worst was 44% (5.2 ft/s²).
Snow
4Snow Braking
Snow braking in feet (31 - 0 mph)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 93 ft | Best | 0 mph | |
RefReference Winter Budget |
94 ft | +1 ft | 7 mph |
| 95 ft | +2 ft | 12 mph | |
| 97 ft | +4 ft | 15 mph | |
| 97 ft | +4 ft | 17 mph | |
| 98 ft | +5 ft | 18 mph | |
| 102 ft | +9 ft | 24 mph | |
| 106 ft | +13 ft | 28 mph | |
| 109 ft | +16 ft | 30 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 16.5% (16 ft ≈ 1 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Nokian Seasonproof 2 would still be travelling at 30 mph when the Michelin CrossClimate 3 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Snow Traction
Snow acceleration distance in feet (0 - 12 mph)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 30 ft | Best | |
RefReference Winter Budget |
30 ft | 0 ft |
| 31 ft | +1 ft | |
| 31 ft | +1 ft | |
| 31 ft | +1 ft | |
| 31 ft | +1 ft | |
| 32 ft | +2 ft | |
| 32 ft | +2 ft | |
| 33 ft | +3 ft |
The difference between best and worst was 11.8% (3 ft).
Snow Traction
Pulling Force in pounds-force
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
RefReference Winter Budget |
593 lbf | +5 lbf |
| 588 lbf | Best | |
| 586 lbf | -2 lbf | |
| 578 lbf | -10 lbf | |
| 574 lbf | -14 lbf | |
| 571 lbf | -17 lbf | |
| 544 lbf | -44 lbf | |
| 530 lbf | -58 lbf | |
| 520 lbf | -68 lbf |
The difference between best and worst was 12.3% (73 lbf).
Snow Handling
Snow handling time in seconds
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
RefReference Winter Budget |
82.1 s | 0.00 s |
| 82.1 s | Best | |
| 82.7 s | +0.60 s | |
| 82.9 s | +0.80 s | |
| 83 s | +0.90 s | |
| 83.8 s | +1.70 s | |
| 85.2 s | +3.10 s | |
| 86 s | +3.90 s | |
| 88.1 s | +6.00 s |
The difference between best and worst was 7.3% (6 s).
Comfort
2Subj. Comfort
Subjective Comfort Score
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Points | Best | |
| 7 Points | Best | |
| 7 Points | Best | |
| 7 Points | Best | |
RefReference Winter Budget |
6.5 Points | -0.50 Points |
| 6.5 Points | -0.50 Points | |
| 6.5 Points | -0.50 Points | |
| 6 Points | -1.00 Points | |
| 6 Points | -1.00 Points |
The difference between best and worst was 14.3% (1 Points).
Noise
External noise in dB
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 64.4 dB | Best | |
| 64.5 dB | +0.10 dB | |
| 64.8 dB | +0.40 dB | |
| 64.8 dB | +0.40 dB | |
| 65.2 dB | +0.80 dB | |
| 65.2 dB | +0.80 dB | |
| 65.5 dB | +1.10 dB | |
| 66 dB | +1.60 dB | |
RefReference Winter Budget |
67.3 dB | +2.90 dB |
The difference between best and worst was 4.5% (2.9 dB).
Value
1Rolling Resistance
Rolling resistance in kg t
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | Extra fuel / year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7.62 kg/t | Best | $0 | |
| 7.7 kg/t | +0.08 kg/t | $3 | |
| 7.79 kg/t | +0.17 kg/t | $7 | |
| 7.98 kg/t | +0.36 kg/t | $14 | |
| 7.99 kg/t | +0.37 kg/t | $14 | |
| 8.18 kg/t | +0.56 kg/t | $22 | |
| 8.25 kg/t | +0.63 kg/t | $24 | |
RefReference Winter Budget |
8.34 kg/t | +0.72 kg/t | $28 |
| 9.42 kg/t | +1.80 kg/t | $69 |
The difference between best and worst was 23.6% (1.8 kg / t). Over 12,000 miles a year at $3.60/gal, the Laufenn G Fit 4S uses about 19 gal ($69) more fuel than the Debica Navigator 3.
Adjust the assumptions
Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tire selection above.
Test setup & methodology
The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.
Recorded test conditions
Recorded test conditions
- Dry Braking
- 62.1 → 0.0 mph
- Wet Braking
- 62.1 → 0.0 mph
- Snow Braking
- 31.1 → 0.0 mph
- Snow Traction
- 0.0 → 12.4 mph
More tire tests
Cross-check this test
Where these tires were tested again, and how the verdict held up.
2026 All Season Tire Braking Test - 30 Sets
225/45 R1730 tires tested
5 of these 8 tires tested again
2026 Auto Bild Allrad SUV All Season Tire Test
225/55 R1812 tires tested
5 of these 8 tires tested again
2025 All Season 30 Tire Braking Test
225/40 R1830 tires tested
5 of these 8 tires tested again
