Menu

Test Charts / Auto Bild Allrad

2026 Auto Bild Allrad SUV All Season Tire Test

Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tire, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.

Tested size
225/55 R18
Tires tested
12
Disciplines
14
Test vehicle
Mini Countryman (third generation)

Read the measurements, not just the rank

Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tires can be separated by very different margins.

Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tires does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.

Dry

2

Dry Braking

Dry braking in feet (62 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Dry Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
RefReference Summer
118 ft -10 ft 0 mph
128 ft Best 0 mph
129 ft +1 ft 5 mph
129 ft +1 ft 6 mph
129 ft +1 ft 7 mph
130 ft +2 ft 8 mph
130 ft +2 ft 9 mph
131 ft +3 ft 12 mph
136 ft +8 ft 19 mph
138 ft +10 ft 21 mph
140 ft +12 ft 23 mph
140 ft +12 ft 23 mph
RefReference Winter
143 ft +15 ft 26 mph
144 ft +16 ft 26 mph

The difference between best and worst was 21.5% (26 ft ≈ 1.7 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Dunlop All Season 2 would still be travelling at 26 mph when the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Dry Handling

Dry Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Dry Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
71.5 mph +0.1 mph
71.4 mph Best
70.8 mph -0.6 mph
70.6 mph -0.8 mph
70.5 mph -0.9 mph
70.3 mph -1.1 mph
70.0 mph -1.4 mph
70.0 mph -1.4 mph
69.9 mph -1.5 mph
RefReference Winter
69.7 mph -1.7 mph
69.6 mph -1.8 mph
69.6 mph -1.8 mph
69.4 mph -2.0 mph
67.9 mph -3.5 mph

The difference between best and worst was 5% (3.6 mph).

Wet

5

Wet Braking

Wet braking in feet (62 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Wet Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
RefReference Summer
167 ft -3 ft 0 mph
170 ft Best 0 mph
171 ft +1 ft 7 mph
172 ft +2 ft 8 mph
173 ft +3 ft 10 mph
RefReference Winter
174 ft +4 ft 12 mph
174 ft +4 ft 13 mph
176 ft +6 ft 15 mph
179 ft +9 ft 18 mph
181 ft +11 ft 20 mph
185 ft +15 ft 23 mph
187 ft +17 ft 24 mph
195 ft +25 ft 28 mph
195 ft +25 ft 29 mph

The difference between best and worst was 16.7% (28 ft ≈ 1.9 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Triangle SeasonX TA01 would still be travelling at 29 mph when the Vredestein Quatrac Pro 2 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Wet Handling

Wet Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Wet Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
53.1 mph +0.4 mph
52.7 mph Best
52.5 mph -0.2 mph
52.0 mph -0.7 mph
RefReference Winter
51.9 mph -0.8 mph
51.8 mph -0.9 mph
51.6 mph -1.1 mph
51.5 mph -1.2 mph
51.4 mph -1.3 mph
51.3 mph -1.4 mph
50.9 mph -1.8 mph
50.0 mph -2.7 mph
49.7 mph -3.0 mph
47.6 mph -5.1 mph

The difference between best and worst was 10.3% (5.5 mph).

Wet Circle

Wet Circle Lap Time in seconds

Lower is better ↓
Wet Circle
Position / TireResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
15.22 s -0.72 s
15.94 s Best
16.04 s +0.10 s
16.05 s +0.11 s
RefReference Winter
16.15 s +0.21 s
16.26 s +0.32 s
16.31 s +0.37 s
16.56 s +0.62 s
16.57 s +0.63 s
16.63 s +0.69 s
16.66 s +0.72 s
16.82 s +0.88 s
16.89 s +0.95 s
16.97 s +1.03 s

The difference between best and worst was 11.5% (1.75 s).

Straight Aqua

Float Speed in mph

Higher is better ↑
Straight Aqua
Position / TireResultGap to best
RefReference Winter
64.5 mph +2.4 mph
RefReference Summer
62.9 mph +0.8 mph
62.1 mph Best
60.9 mph -1.2 mph
60.9 mph -1.2 mph
60.7 mph -1.4 mph
60.6 mph -1.5 mph
60.6 mph -1.5 mph
60.6 mph -1.5 mph
60.2 mph -1.9 mph
60.1 mph -2.0 mph
60.0 mph -2.1 mph
59.8 mph -2.3 mph
59.7 mph -2.4 mph

The difference between best and worst was 7.4% (4.8 mph).

Curved Aquaplaning

Remaining lateral acceleration

Higher is better ↑
Curved Aquaplaning
Position / TireResultGap to best
RefReference Winter
12.7 ft/s² +1.0 ft/s²
RefReference Summer
12.6 ft/s² +0.9 ft/s²
11.7 ft/s² Best
10.8 ft/s² -0.9 ft/s²
10.3 ft/s² -1.4 ft/s²
10.3 ft/s² -1.4 ft/s²
10.2 ft/s² -1.5 ft/s²
10.1 ft/s² -1.6 ft/s²
9.9 ft/s² -1.8 ft/s²
9.9 ft/s² -1.8 ft/s²
9.9 ft/s² -1.8 ft/s²
9.5 ft/s² -2.2 ft/s²
8.8 ft/s² -2.9 ft/s²
8.7 ft/s² -3.0 ft/s²

The difference between best and worst was 31.4% (4 ft/s²).

Snow

4

Snow Braking

Snow braking in feet (31 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Snow Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
82 ft Best 0 mph
85 ft +3 ft 15 mph
85 ft +3 ft 16 mph
85 ft +3 ft 16 mph
85 ft +3 ft 16 mph
RefReference Winter
86 ft +4 ft 18 mph
87 ft +5 ft 20 mph
87 ft +5 ft 20 mph
88 ft +6 ft 21 mph
89 ft +7 ft 23 mph
94 ft +12 ft 29 mph
96 ft +14 ft 31 mph
103 ft +21 ft 37 mph
RefReference Summer
231 ft +149 ft 64 mph

The difference between best and worst was 182.3% (149 ft ≈ 10.1 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Delinte AW6 would still be travelling at 37 mph when the Michelin CrossClimate 3 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Snow Traction

Pulling Force in pounds-force

Higher is better ↑
Snow Traction
Position / TireResultGap to best
909 lbf Best
881 lbf -28 lbf
RefReference Winter
871 lbf -38 lbf
846 lbf -63 lbf
844 lbf -65 lbf
844 lbf -65 lbf
834 lbf -75 lbf
834 lbf -75 lbf
832 lbf -77 lbf
801 lbf -108 lbf
789 lbf -120 lbf
759 lbf -150 lbf
697 lbf -212 lbf
RefReference Summer
208 lbf -701 lbf

The difference between best and worst was 77.1% (701 lbf).

Snow Handling

Snow handling average speed

Higher is better ↑
Snow Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
39.3 mph Best
39.3 mph 0.0 mph
39.1 mph -0.2 mph
39.1 mph -0.2 mph
RefReference Winter
39.0 mph -0.3 mph
39.0 mph -0.3 mph
38.8 mph -0.5 mph
38.6 mph -0.7 mph
38.6 mph -0.7 mph
38.3 mph -1.0 mph
38.2 mph -1.1 mph
37.0 mph -2.3 mph
36.2 mph -3.1 mph

The difference between best and worst was 7.9% (3.1 mph).

Snow Slalom

Lateral acceleration

Higher is better ↑
Snow Slalom
Position / TireResultGap to best
15.6 ft/s² Best
15.4 ft/s² -0.2 ft/s²
15.4 ft/s² -0.2 ft/s²
15.0 ft/s² -0.6 ft/s²
14.9 ft/s² -0.7 ft/s²
14.8 ft/s² -0.8 ft/s²
14.8 ft/s² -0.8 ft/s²
14.8 ft/s² -0.8 ft/s²
14.6 ft/s² -1.0 ft/s²
RefReference Winter
14.2 ft/s² -1.4 ft/s²
13.7 ft/s² -1.9 ft/s²
13.2 ft/s² -2.4 ft/s²
13.1 ft/s² -2.5 ft/s²
RefReference Summer
7.4 ft/s² -8.2 ft/s²

The difference between best and worst was 52.5% (8.2 ft/s²).

Comfort

2

Subj. Comfort

Subjective Comfort Score

Higher is better ↑
Subj. Comfort
Position / TireResultGap to best
9.8 Points Best
9.8 Points Best
9.4 Points -0.40 Points
9.4 Points -0.40 Points
9.4 Points -0.40 Points
9.4 Points -0.40 Points
9 Points -0.80 Points
9 Points -0.80 Points
8.6 Points -1.20 Points
8.6 Points -1.20 Points
7.8 Points -2.00 Points
7.4 Points -2.40 Points

The difference between best and worst was 24.5% (2.4 Points).

Noise

External noise in dB

Lower is better ↓
Noise
Position / TireResultGap to best
68.2 dB Best
70.4 dB +2.20 dB
RefReference Summer
70.6 dB +2.40 dB
70.8 dB +2.60 dB
70.9 dB +2.70 dB
71.2 dB +3.00 dB
71.4 dB +3.20 dB
71.4 dB +3.20 dB
71.6 dB +3.40 dB
71.8 dB +3.60 dB
72.2 dB +4.00 dB
72.2 dB +4.00 dB
73.4 dB +5.20 dB
RefReference Winter
73.6 dB +5.40 dB

The difference between best and worst was 7.9% (5.4 dB).

Value

1

Rolling Resistance

Rolling resistance in kg t

Lower is better ↓
Rolling Resistance
Position / TireResultGap to bestExtra fuel / year
6.49 kg/t Best $0
6.58 kg/t +0.09 kg/t $4
6.71 kg/t +0.22 kg/t $10
6.86 kg/t +0.37 kg/t $17
6.95 kg/t +0.46 kg/t $21
7.06 kg/t +0.57 kg/t $26
7.16 kg/t +0.67 kg/t $30
7.16 kg/t +0.67 kg/t $30
7.39 kg/t +0.90 kg/t $41
RefReference Summer
7.43 kg/t +0.94 kg/t $43
7.64 kg/t +1.15 kg/t $52
7.72 kg/t +1.23 kg/t $56
8 kg/t +1.51 kg/t $68
RefReference Winter
8.54 kg/t +2.05 kg/t $93

The difference between best and worst was 31.6% (2.05 kg / t). Over 12,000 miles a year at $3.60/gal, the Nokian Seasonproof 2 uses about 19 gal ($68) more fuel than the Cooper All Season.

Adjust the assumptions

Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tire selection above.

12,000 mi
$3.60/gal
Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tire age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.

Test setup & methodology

The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.

Recorded test conditions

Recorded test conditions

Dry Braking
62.1 → 0.0 mph
Wet Braking
62.1 → 0.0 mph
Snow Braking
31.1 → 0.0 mph

More tire tests

Cross-check this test

All tire tests

Where these tires were tested again, and how the verdict held up.

Rate your tires

My tires

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tires

Save tires from a tire page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tires. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.