Menu

Test Charts / Teknikens Varld

2021 Studless and Studded Winter Tire Test

Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tire, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.

Tested size
205/55 R16
Tires tested
16
Disciplines
10

Read the measurements, not just the rank

Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tires can be separated by very different margins.

Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tires does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.

This test ranks different groups separately. Read the full verdicts for each group; there is no single overall finishing order.

Dry

1

Dry Braking

Dry braking in feet (50 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓

Central European Winter Tires

Dry Braking: Central European Winter Tires
TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
96 ft — —

Nordic Friction Winter Tires

Dry Braking: Nordic Friction Winter Tires
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
103 ft Best 0 mph
103 ft Best 0 mph
103 ft Best 0 mph
104 ft +1 ft 5 mph
104 ft +1 ft 8 mph
104 ft +1 ft 8 mph

Studded Winter Tires

Dry Braking: Studded Winter Tires
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
98 ft Best 0 mph
102 ft +4 ft 15 mph
102 ft +4 ft 16 mph
103 ft +5 ft 17 mph
103 ft +5 ft 18 mph
103 ft +5 ft 18 mph
104 ft +6 ft 19 mph
107 ft +9 ft 23 mph
110 ft +12 ft 26 mph

The difference between best and worst was 13.7% (14 ft ≈ 0.9 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Hankook Winter i pike RS2 would still be travelling at 28 mph when the CST Medallion Winter WCP1 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Wet

2

Wet Braking

Wet braking in feet (50 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓

Central European Winter Tires

Wet Braking: Central European Winter Tires
TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
95 ft — —

Nordic Friction Winter Tires

Wet Braking: Nordic Friction Winter Tires
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
106 ft Best 0 mph
110 ft +4 ft 15 mph
111 ft +5 ft 17 mph
111 ft +5 ft 17 mph
113 ft +7 ft 20 mph
118 ft +12 ft 26 mph

Studded Winter Tires

Wet Braking: Studded Winter Tires
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
110 ft Best 0 mph
111 ft +1 ft 4 mph
112 ft +2 ft 9 mph
115 ft +5 ft 15 mph
116 ft +6 ft 18 mph
118 ft +8 ft 20 mph
118 ft +8 ft 21 mph
122 ft +12 ft 25 mph
122 ft +12 ft 25 mph

The difference between best and worst was 29.1% (27 ft ≈ 1.9 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Kumho WinterCraft Ice Wi32 would still be travelling at 38 mph when the CST Medallion Winter WCP1 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Wet Handling

Wet handling time in seconds

Lower is better ↓

Central European Winter Tires

Wet Handling: Central European Winter Tires
TireResultGap to best
33.5 s —

Nordic Friction Winter Tires

Wet Handling: Nordic Friction Winter Tires
Position / TireResultGap to best
35.4 s Best
35.5 s +0.10 s
35.5 s +0.10 s
35.5 s +0.10 s
35.6 s +0.20 s
35.7 s +0.30 s

Studded Winter Tires

Wet Handling: Studded Winter Tires
Position / TireResultGap to best
35 s Best
35.2 s +0.20 s
35.2 s +0.20 s
35.3 s +0.30 s
35.3 s +0.30 s
35.7 s +0.70 s
35.8 s +0.80 s
36.2 s +1.20 s
36.5 s +1.50 s

The difference between best and worst was 9% (3 s).

Snow

3

Snow Braking

Snow braking in feet (50 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓

Central European Winter Tires

Snow Braking: Central European Winter Tires
TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
179 ft — —

Nordic Friction Winter Tires

Snow Braking: Nordic Friction Winter Tires
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
167 ft Best 0 mph
168 ft +1 ft 4 mph
169 ft +2 ft 8 mph
171 ft +4 ft 12 mph
172 ft +5 ft 13 mph
172 ft +5 ft 13 mph

Studded Winter Tires

Snow Braking: Studded Winter Tires
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
166 ft Best 0 mph
166 ft 0 ft 4 mph
167 ft +1 ft 7 mph
169 ft +3 ft 10 mph
169 ft +3 ft 10 mph
169 ft +3 ft 11 mph
170 ft +4 ft 13 mph
171 ft +5 ft 14 mph
172 ft +6 ft 15 mph

The difference between best and worst was 7.7% (13 ft ≈ 0.9 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the CST Medallion Winter WCP1 would still be travelling at 21 mph when the Goodyear UltraGrip Arctic 2 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Snow Traction

Snow acceleration time (3 - 22 mph)

Lower is better ↓

Central European Winter Tires

Snow Traction: Central European Winter Tires
TireResultGap to best
6.3 s —

Nordic Friction Winter Tires

Snow Traction: Nordic Friction Winter Tires
Position / TireResultGap to best
5.7 s Best
5.8 s +0.10 s
5.8 s +0.10 s
5.9 s +0.20 s
5.9 s +0.20 s
5.9 s +0.20 s

Studded Winter Tires

Snow Traction: Studded Winter Tires
Position / TireResultGap to best
5.7 s Best
5.7 s Best
5.8 s +0.10 s
5.8 s +0.10 s
5.8 s +0.10 s
5.8 s +0.10 s
5.9 s +0.20 s
5.9 s +0.20 s
5.9 s +0.20 s

The difference between best and worst was 10.5% (0.6 s).

Snow Handling

Snow handling time in seconds

Lower is better ↓

Central European Winter Tires

Snow Handling: Central European Winter Tires
TireResultGap to best
55.9 s —

Nordic Friction Winter Tires

Snow Handling: Nordic Friction Winter Tires
Position / TireResultGap to best
52.7 s Best
53.1 s +0.40 s
53.2 s +0.50 s
53.4 s +0.70 s
53.6 s +0.90 s
53.6 s +0.90 s

Studded Winter Tires

Snow Handling: Studded Winter Tires
Position / TireResultGap to best
52.3 s Best
52.7 s +0.40 s
53.1 s +0.80 s
53.3 s +1.00 s
53.4 s +1.10 s
53.4 s +1.10 s
53.5 s +1.20 s
53.7 s +1.40 s
55.3 s +3.00 s

The difference between best and worst was 6.9% (3.6 s).

Ice

3

Ice Braking

Ice braking in feet (31 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓

Central European Winter Tires

Ice Braking: Central European Winter Tires
TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
188 ft — —

Nordic Friction Winter Tires

Ice Braking: Nordic Friction Winter Tires
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
146 ft Best 0 mph
151 ft +5 ft 15 mph
153 ft +7 ft 17 mph
160 ft +14 ft 24 mph
162 ft +16 ft 26 mph
170 ft +24 ft 30 mph

Studded Winter Tires

Ice Braking: Studded Winter Tires
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
119 ft Best 0 mph
124 ft +5 ft 16 mph
127 ft +8 ft 20 mph
128 ft +9 ft 21 mph
132 ft +13 ft 24 mph
134 ft +15 ft 27 mph
137 ft +18 ft 29 mph
138 ft +19 ft 30 mph
142 ft +23 ft 32 mph

The difference between best and worst was 57.1% (69 ft ≈ 4.6 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the CST Medallion Winter WCP1 would still be travelling at 48 mph when the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Ice Traction

Ice acceleration time (3 - 12 mph)

Lower is better ↓

Central European Winter Tires

Ice Traction: Central European Winter Tires
TireResultGap to best
6.7 s —

Nordic Friction Winter Tires

Ice Traction: Nordic Friction Winter Tires
Position / TireResultGap to best
5.1 s Best
5.2 s +0.10 s
5.4 s +0.30 s
5.5 s +0.40 s
5.6 s +0.50 s
6 s +0.90 s

Studded Winter Tires

Ice Traction: Studded Winter Tires
Position / TireResultGap to best
3.6 s Best
3.7 s +0.10 s
3.8 s +0.20 s
3.9 s +0.30 s
3.9 s +0.30 s
3.9 s +0.30 s
4 s +0.40 s
4.2 s +0.60 s
4.4 s +0.80 s

The difference between best and worst was 86.1% (3.1 s).

Ice Handling

Ice handling time in seconds

Lower is better ↓

Central European Winter Tires

Ice Handling: Central European Winter Tires
TireResultGap to best
74.7 s —

Nordic Friction Winter Tires

Ice Handling: Nordic Friction Winter Tires
Position / TireResultGap to best
65 s Best
65.8 s +0.80 s
66.6 s +1.60 s
68.6 s +3.60 s
70 s +5.00 s
70 s +5.00 s

Studded Winter Tires

Ice Handling: Studded Winter Tires
Position / TireResultGap to best
54.1 s Best
54.5 s +0.40 s
55.1 s +1.00 s
55.6 s +1.50 s
55.6 s +1.50 s
55.8 s +1.70 s
57.8 s +3.70 s
60.3 s +6.20 s
62.7 s +8.60 s

The difference between best and worst was 38.1% (20.6 s).

Comfort

1

Subj. Noise

Subjective in car noise levels

Higher is better ↑

Central European Winter Tires

Subj. Noise: Central European Winter Tires
TireResultGap to best
8 Points —

Nordic Friction Winter Tires

Subj. Noise: Nordic Friction Winter Tires
Position / TireResultGap to best
10 Points Best
9 Points -1.00 Points
9 Points -1.00 Points
9 Points -1.00 Points
9 Points -1.00 Points
8 Points -2.00 Points

Studded Winter Tires

Subj. Noise: Studded Winter Tires
Position / TireResultGap to best
7 Points Best
7 Points Best
7 Points Best
7 Points Best
7 Points Best
6 Points -1.00 Points
6 Points -1.00 Points
6 Points -1.00 Points
5 Points -2.00 Points

The difference between best and worst was 50% (5 Points).

Test setup & methodology

The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.

Recorded test conditions

Recorded test conditions

Dry Braking
49.7 → 0.0 mph
Wet Braking
49.7 → 0.0 mph
Snow Braking
49.7 → 0.0 mph
Snow Traction
3.1 → 21.7 mph
Ice Braking
31.1 → 0.0 mph
Ice Traction
3.1 → 12.4 mph
Rate your tires

My tires

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tires

Save tires from a tire page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tires. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.