Menu

2020 ViBilagare SUV Tire Test

Jonathan Benson
Data analyzed and reviewed by Jonathan Benson
6 min read Updated

Adjust Result Weighting

The overall scores below are calculated using our weighting system. Since the original publication may use a different scoring methodology that wasn't shared, these results may differ from their published rankings. You can adjust the weightings below to explore how different priorities affect the results.
Dry 35%
Wet 50%
Comfort 5%
Value 10%
Dry 35% · Wet 50% · Comfort 5% · Value 10%
Fine-tune sub-categories
Dry
Wet
Comfort
Value

Test Results Data

BEST Good Average Below Average
# Tire Total Score Dry Wet Comfort Value
Braking M Handling s % Braking M Handling s Straight Aqua Km/H % Subj. Comfort Points Subj. Noise Points % Rolling Resistance kg / t %
1 Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV 97.6% 33.9 66.8 3 99.7% 21.5 71.59 90.4 100% 3 2 62.5% 5.18 96%
2 Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 96.7% 34.6 3 66.4 99% 23.6 71.82 2 88.1 3 95.8% 3 4 87.5% 5.08 3 97.8%
3 Nokian Hakka Blue 2 SUV 96.3% 36.9 67 95.5% 22.9 3 72.97 88.4 2 96.3% 4 4 100% 5.1 97.5%
4 Bridgestone Turanza T005 94.9% 34.2 2 66.4 99.6% 22.7 2 72.84 3 80 95.1% 2 2 50% 4.97 100%
5 Vredestein Ultrac Satin 94.1% 37.1 67 95.2% 24.8 74.51 87.2 92.3% 4 4 100% 5.17 96.1%
6 Pirelli Scorpion Verde 91% 36.9 67 95.5% 24.5 76.2 80.2 90.5% 2 2 50% 5.07 2 98%
7 Nankang AS1 90.1% 38 67.5 93.8% 25.6 77.79 79.1 87.9% 3 3 75% 5.19 95.8%
8 Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 89.4% 40.1 68.1 91% 26.3 78.01 76 86.3% 4 4 100% 5.29 94%
Scroll for more
Dry 100% Wet 100% Comfort 63% Value 96%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 33.9 M
Dry Handling 66.8 s 3
Wet
Wet Braking 21.5 M
Wet Handling 71.59 s
Straight Aqua 90.4 Km/H
Comfort
Subj. Comfort 3 Points
Subj. Noise 2 Points
Value
Rolling Resistance 5.18 kg / t
Dry 99% Wet 96% Comfort 88% Value 98%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 34.6 M 3
Dry Handling 66.4 s
Wet
Wet Braking 23.6 M
Wet Handling 71.82 s 2
Straight Aqua 88.1 Km/H 3
Comfort
Subj. Comfort 3 Points
Subj. Noise 4 Points
Value
Rolling Resistance 5.08 kg / t 3
Dry 96% Wet 96% Comfort 100% Value 98%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 36.9 M
Dry Handling 67 s
Wet
Wet Braking 22.9 M 3
Wet Handling 72.97 s
Straight Aqua 88.4 Km/H 2
Comfort
Subj. Comfort 4 Points
Subj. Noise 4 Points
Value
Rolling Resistance 5.1 kg / t
Dry 100% Wet 95% Comfort 50% Value 100%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 34.2 M 2
Dry Handling 66.4 s
Wet
Wet Braking 22.7 M 2
Wet Handling 72.84 s 3
Straight Aqua 80 Km/H
Comfort
Subj. Comfort 2 Points
Subj. Noise 2 Points
Value
Rolling Resistance 4.97 kg / t
Dry 95% Wet 92% Comfort 100% Value 96%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 37.1 M
Dry Handling 67 s
Wet
Wet Braking 24.8 M
Wet Handling 74.51 s
Straight Aqua 87.2 Km/H
Comfort
Subj. Comfort 4 Points
Subj. Noise 4 Points
Value
Rolling Resistance 5.17 kg / t
Dry 96% Wet 91% Comfort 50% Value 98%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 36.9 M
Dry Handling 67 s
Wet
Wet Braking 24.5 M
Wet Handling 76.2 s
Straight Aqua 80.2 Km/H
Comfort
Subj. Comfort 2 Points
Subj. Noise 2 Points
Value
Rolling Resistance 5.07 kg / t 2
7
90.1%
Dry 94% Wet 88% Comfort 75% Value 96%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 38 M
Dry Handling 67.5 s
Wet
Wet Braking 25.6 M
Wet Handling 77.79 s
Straight Aqua 79.1 Km/H
Comfort
Subj. Comfort 3 Points
Subj. Noise 3 Points
Value
Rolling Resistance 5.19 kg / t
Dry 91% Wet 86% Comfort 100% Value 94%
View detailed scores
Dry
Dry Braking 40.1 M
Dry Handling 68.1 s
Wet
Wet Braking 26.3 M
Wet Handling 78.01 s
Straight Aqua 76 Km/H
Comfort
Subj. Comfort 4 Points
Subj. Noise 4 Points
Value
Rolling Resistance 5.29 kg / t
Not every driver has the same priorities. Adjust the category weightings above to re-rank the tires based on what matters most to your driving style.
Scores are colour-coded from red (weakest) through yellow to green (strongest) to help you quickly spot each tire's strengths and weaknesses.
The original test ranking is shown in the # column. Arrows indicate how each tire moves when your custom weighting is applied.
comments powered by Disqus