Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus vs Vredestein Quatrac

This head-to-head puts two popular premium-touring all-season tires under the microscope: Kumho's Solus 4S HA32 Plus and Vredestein's Quatrac. Across six shared tests from 2022-2024, the Quatrac consistently ranks higher overall, including a decisive win in AutoBild 2024 (1/17 vs. 13/17), while the Kumho posts a few isolated strengths.

Patterns are clear: Vredestein dominates on wet and dry roads with shorter braking, better aquaplaning resistance, and sharper handling. Kumho counters with solid winter aptitude-especially on snow and ice-and, in several tests, a stronger value proposition. The result is a contrast between year-round safety and precision (Quatrac) versus budget-friendly winter assurance (HA32+).
Solus-4S-HA32-Plus VS Quatrac

Test Results

Independent comparison tire tests are the best source of data to get tire information from, and the good news is there have been six tests which compare both tires directly!

Summary of six total tests comparing both tires directly
TireTest WinsPerformance
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plusone
one wins
Vredestein Quatracfive
five wins

While it might look like the Vredestein Quatrac is better than the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus purely based on the higher number of test wins, tires are very complicated objects which means where one tire is better than the other can be more important in real world use.

Let's look at how the two tires compare across multiple tire test categories.

Key Strengths

  • Stronger snow and ice performance (wins in snow/ice braking and traction in multiple tests)
  • Competitive value and lower purchase price in several sizes
  • Quiet exterior noise in some tests
  • Occasionally better wear/value mix depending on size (e.g., ADAC 2024 wear edge)
  • Consistently shorter wet and dry braking (6/6 category wins in wet and dry braking)
  • Outstanding aquaplaning resistance (notably +22-34% in curved tests)
  • Balanced, precise handling with direct steering
  • Strong efficiency package in recent tests (lower RR, fuel use; standout wear in AutoBild 2024)

Dry Braking

Looking at data from six tire tests, the Vredestein Quatrac was better during six dry braking tests. On average the Vredestein Quatrac stopped the vehicle in 4.45% less distance than the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus.

Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus
42.72M
Vredestein Quatrac
40.82M
Dry braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Dry Braking: Vredestein Quatrac

2022 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test
195/55 R16
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:44.4M Vredestein Quatrac: 41.7M
2023 All Season Tire 35 Set Shootout
225/45 R17
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:41.4M Vredestein Quatrac: 40.3M
2023 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test
225/45 R17
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:41.4M Vredestein Quatrac: 40.3M
2024 ADAC All Season Tire Test
205/55 R16
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:44.1M Vredestein Quatrac: 42.2M
2024 All Season Tire Market Overview
225/50 R17
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:42.5M Vredestein Quatrac: 40.2M
2024 AutoBild All Season Tire Test
225/50 R17
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:42.5M Vredestein Quatrac: 40.2M

Dry Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from three tire tests, the Vredestein Quatrac was better during two dry handling [km/h] tests. On average the Vredestein Quatrac was 0.17% faster around a lap than the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus.

Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus
91.97Km/H
Vredestein Quatrac
92.13Km/H
Dry Handling Average Speed, higher is better

Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: Vredestein Quatrac

2022 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test
195/55 R16
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:92.1Km/H Vredestein Quatrac: 93.1Km/H
2023 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test
225/45 R17
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:88.5Km/H Vredestein Quatrac: 89Km/H
2024 AutoBild All Season Tire Test
225/50 R17
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:95.3Km/H Vredestein Quatrac: 94.3Km/H

Wet Braking

Looking at data from six tire tests, the Vredestein Quatrac was better during six wet braking tests. On average the Vredestein Quatrac stopped the vehicle in 6.19% less distance than the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus.

Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus
50.4M
Vredestein Quatrac
47.28M
Wet braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Wet Braking: Vredestein Quatrac

2022 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test
195/55 R16
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:51.9M Vredestein Quatrac: 47.1M
2023 All Season Tire 35 Set Shootout
225/45 R17
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:49.8M Vredestein Quatrac: 45.4M
2023 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test
225/45 R17
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:49.8M Vredestein Quatrac: 45.4M
2024 ADAC All Season Tire Test
205/55 R16
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:35.1M Vredestein Quatrac: 35M
2024 All Season Tire Market Overview
225/50 R17
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:57.9M Vredestein Quatrac: 55.4M
2024 AutoBild All Season Tire Test
225/50 R17
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:57.9M Vredestein Quatrac: 55.4M

Wet Braking - Concrete

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Vredestein Quatrac was better during one wet braking - concrete tests. On average the Vredestein Quatrac stopped the vehicle in 1.48% less distance than the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus.

Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus
40.6M
Vredestein Quatrac
40M
Wet braking on Concrete in meters, lower is better

Best In Wet Braking - Concrete: Vredestein Quatrac

2024 ADAC All Season Tire Test
205/55 R16
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:40.6M Vredestein Quatrac: 40M

Wet Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from three tire tests, the Vredestein Quatrac was better during three wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the Vredestein Quatrac was 3.02% faster around a wet lap than the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus.

Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus
73Km/H
Vredestein Quatrac
75.27Km/H
Wet Handling Average Speed, higher is better

Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: Vredestein Quatrac

2022 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test
195/55 R16
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:72Km/H Vredestein Quatrac: 74.5Km/H
2023 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test
225/45 R17
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:74.7Km/H Vredestein Quatrac: 76.1Km/H
2024 AutoBild All Season Tire Test
225/50 R17
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:72.3Km/H Vredestein Quatrac: 75.2Km/H

Wet Circle

Looking at data from three tire tests, the Vredestein Quatrac was better during three wet circle tests. On average the Vredestein Quatrac was 2.01% faster around a wet circle than the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus.

Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus
11.97s
Vredestein Quatrac
11.73s
Wet Circle Lap Time in seconds, lower is better

Best In Wet Circle: Vredestein Quatrac

2022 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test
195/55 R16
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:12.17s Vredestein Quatrac: 12.03s
2023 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test
225/45 R17
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:11.83s Vredestein Quatrac: 11.62s
2024 AutoBild All Season Tire Test
225/50 R17
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:11.9s Vredestein Quatrac: 11.55s

Straight Aqua

Looking at data from four tire tests, the Vredestein Quatrac was better during four straight aqua tests. On average the Vredestein Quatrac floated at a 6.91% higher speed than the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus.

Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus
73.15Km/H
Vredestein Quatrac
78.58Km/H
Float Speed in Km/H, higher is better

Best In Straight Aqua: Vredestein Quatrac

2022 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test
195/55 R16
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:77Km/H Vredestein Quatrac: 81.4Km/H
2023 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test
225/45 R17
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:72.8Km/H Vredestein Quatrac: 79.2Km/H
2024 ADAC All Season Tire Test
205/55 R16
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:73.4Km/H Vredestein Quatrac: 78.7Km/H
2024 AutoBild All Season Tire Test
225/50 R17
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:69.4Km/H Vredestein Quatrac: 75Km/H

Curved Aquaplaning

Looking at data from four tire tests, the Vredestein Quatrac was better during four curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Vredestein Quatrac slipped out at a 19.38% higher speed than the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus.

Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus
2.62m/sec2
Vredestein Quatrac
3.25m/sec2
Remaining lateral acceleration, higher is better

Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Vredestein Quatrac

2022 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test
195/55 R16
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:2.81m/sec2 Vredestein Quatrac: 3.18m/sec2
2023 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test
225/45 R17
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:2.44m/sec2 Vredestein Quatrac: 3.27m/sec2
2024 ADAC All Season Tire Test
205/55 R16
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:2.6m/sec2 Vredestein Quatrac: 3.3m/sec2
2024 AutoBild All Season Tire Test
225/50 R17
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:2.64m/sec2 Vredestein Quatrac: 3.24m/sec2

Snow Braking

Looking at data from four tire tests, the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus was better during three snow braking tests. On average the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus stopped the vehicle in 1.97% less distance than the Vredestein Quatrac.

Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus
21.35M
Vredestein Quatrac
21.78M
Snow braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Snow Braking: Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus

2022 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test
195/55 R16
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:27.4M Vredestein Quatrac: 28.3M
2023 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test
225/45 R17
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:23.4M Vredestein Quatrac: 23.1M
2024 ADAC All Season Tire Test
205/55 R16
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:10.6M Vredestein Quatrac: 11.6M
2024 AutoBild All Season Tire Test
225/50 R17
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:24M Vredestein Quatrac: 24.1M

Snow Traction

Looking at data from four tire tests, the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus was better during three snow traction tests. On average the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus had 1.31% better snow traction than the Vredestein Quatrac.

Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus
1981.55N
Vredestein Quatrac
1955.65N
Pulling Force in Newtons, higher is better

Best In Snow Traction: Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus

2022 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test
195/55 R16
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:2430N Vredestein Quatrac: 2400N
2023 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test
225/45 R17
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:2672N Vredestein Quatrac: 2600N
2024 ADAC All Season Tire Test
205/55 R16
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:223.2N Vredestein Quatrac: 217.6N
2024 AutoBild All Season Tire Test
225/50 R17
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:2601N Vredestein Quatrac: 2605N

Snow Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from three tire tests, the Vredestein Quatrac was better during two snow handling [km/h] tests. On average the Vredestein Quatrac was 0.23% faster around a lap than the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus.

Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus
55.2Km/H
Vredestein Quatrac
55.33Km/H
Snow handling average speed, higher is better

Best In Snow Handling [Km/H]: Vredestein Quatrac

2022 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test
195/55 R16
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:56.8Km/H Vredestein Quatrac: 55.9Km/H
2023 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test
225/45 R17
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:56.4Km/H Vredestein Quatrac: 57.1Km/H
2024 AutoBild All Season Tire Test
225/50 R17
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:52.4Km/H Vredestein Quatrac: 53Km/H

Snow Slalom

Looking at data from three tire tests, the Vredestein Quatrac was better during two snow slalom tests. On average the Vredestein Quatrac was 3% faster through a slalom than the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus.

Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus
3.88m/sec2
Vredestein Quatrac
4m/sec2
Lateral acceleration, higher is better

Best In Snow Slalom: Vredestein Quatrac

2022 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test
195/55 R16
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:4.16m/sec2 Vredestein Quatrac: 4.12m/sec2
2023 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test
225/45 R17
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:3.8m/sec2 Vredestein Quatrac: 3.92m/sec2
2024 AutoBild All Season Tire Test
225/50 R17
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:3.68m/sec2 Vredestein Quatrac: 3.97m/sec2

Ice Braking

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus was better during one ice braking tests. On average the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus stopped the vehicle 3.92% shorter than the Vredestein Quatrac.

Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus
19.6M
Vredestein Quatrac
20.4M
Ice braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Ice Braking: Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus

2024 ADAC All Season Tire Test
205/55 R16
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:19.6M Vredestein Quatrac: 20.4M

Noise

Looking at data from four tire tests, the Vredestein Quatrac was better during three noise tests. On average the Vredestein Quatrac measured 0.3% quieter than the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus.

Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus
72.2dB
Vredestein Quatrac
71.98dB
External noise in dB, lower is better

Best In Noise: Vredestein Quatrac

2022 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test
195/55 R16
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:72.5dB Vredestein Quatrac: 72.1dB
2023 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test
225/45 R17
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:72dB Vredestein Quatrac: 72.9dB
2024 ADAC All Season Tire Test
205/55 R16
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:71.9dB Vredestein Quatrac: 71.1dB
2024 AutoBild All Season Tire Test
225/50 R17
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:72.4dB Vredestein Quatrac: 71.8dB

Tire Weight

Looking at data from three tire tests, the Vredestein Quatrac was better during three tire weight tests. On average the Vredestein Quatrac weighed 1.92% less than the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus.

Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus
2672.97Kg
Vredestein Quatrac
2621.57Kg
Tire Weight Per Set, lower is better

Best In Tire Weight: Vredestein Quatrac

2022 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test
195/55 R16
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:7972Kg Vredestein Quatrac: 7820Kg
2023 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test
225/45 R17
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:38Kg Vredestein Quatrac: 36.5Kg
2024 ADAC All Season Tire Test
205/55 R16
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:8.9Kg Vredestein Quatrac: 8.2Kg

Wear

Looking at data from four tire tests, the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus was better during three wear tests. On average the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus is predicted to cover 2.53% miles before reaching 1.6mm than the Vredestein Quatrac.

Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus
49381.5KM
Vredestein Quatrac
48131.5KM
Predicted tread life in KM, higher is better

Best In Wear: Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus

2022 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test
195/55 R16
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:57117KM Vredestein Quatrac: 46295KM
2023 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test
225/45 R17
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:49009KM Vredestein Quatrac: 43091KM
2024 ADAC All Season Tire Test
205/55 R16
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:50600KM Vredestein Quatrac: 48000KM
2024 AutoBild All Season Tire Test
225/50 R17
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:40800KM Vredestein Quatrac: 55140KM

Value

Looking at data from three tire tests, the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus was better during two value tests. On average the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus proved to have a 13.25% better value based on price/1000km than the Vredestein Quatrac.

Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus
8.05Price/1000
Vredestein Quatrac
9.28Price/1000
Euros/1000km based on cost/wear, lower is better

Best In Value: Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus

2022 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test
195/55 R16
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:5.69Price/1000 Vredestein Quatrac: 8.75Price/1000
2023 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test
225/45 R17
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:7.35Price/1000 Vredestein Quatrac: 9.75Price/1000
2024 AutoBild All Season Tire Test
225/50 R17
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:11.1Price/1000 Vredestein Quatrac: 9.34Price/1000

Price

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus was better during one price tests. On average the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus cost 19.75% less than the Vredestein Quatrac.

Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus
325
Vredestein Quatrac
405
Price in local currency, lower is better

Best In Price: Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus

2022 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test
195/55 R16
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:325 Vredestein Quatrac: 405

Rolling Resistance

Looking at data from three tire tests, the Vredestein Quatrac was better during three rolling resistance tests. On average the Vredestein Quatrac had a 7.02% lower rolling resistance than the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus.

Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus
8.69kg / t
Vredestein Quatrac
8.08kg / t
Rolling resistance in kg t, lower is better

Best In Rolling Resistance: Vredestein Quatrac

2022 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test
195/55 R16
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:8.34kg / t Vredestein Quatrac: 7.88kg / t
2023 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test
225/45 R17
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:8.51kg / t Vredestein Quatrac: 8.27kg / t
2024 AutoBild All Season Tire Test
225/50 R17
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:9.21kg / t Vredestein Quatrac: 8.1kg / t

Fuel Consumption

Looking at data from four tire tests, the Vredestein Quatrac was better during two fuel consumption tests. On average the Vredestein Quatrac used 0.74% less fuel than the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus.

Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus
5.4l/100km
Vredestein Quatrac
5.36l/100km
Fuel consumption in Litres per 100 km, lower is better

Best In Fuel Consumption: Vredestein Quatrac

2022 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test
195/55 R16
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:5.48l/100km Vredestein Quatrac: 5.56l/100km
2023 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test
225/45 R17
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:5.67l/100km Vredestein Quatrac: 5.78l/100km
2024 ADAC All Season Tire Test
205/55 R16
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:5.4l/100km Vredestein Quatrac: 5.2l/100km
2024 AutoBild All Season Tire Test
225/50 R17
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:5.06l/100km Vredestein Quatrac: 4.91l/100km

Abrasion

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Vredestein Quatrac was better during one abrasion tests. On average the Vredestein Quatrac emitted 11.22% less particle wear matter than the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus.

Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus
19.6Gram/1000km
Vredestein Quatrac
17.4Gram/1000km
Weight of Tire Wear Particles Lost (Gram/1000km), lower is better

Best In Abrasion: Vredestein Quatrac

2022 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test
195/55 R16
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:19.6Gram/1000km Vredestein Quatrac: 17.4Gram/1000km

Abrasion

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Vredestein Quatrac was better during one abrasion tests. On average the Vredestein Quatrac lost 40.05% less particle wear matter than the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus.

Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus
1116g
Vredestein Quatrac
669g
Total weight loss after wear test in grams, lower is better

Best In Abrasion: Vredestein Quatrac

2024 AutoBild All Season Tire Test
225/50 R17
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:1116g Vredestein Quatrac: 669g

Real World Driver Reviews

Tire Reviews also collects real world driver reviews for the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus and Vredestein Quatrac.

In total the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus has been reviewed 3 times and drivers have given the tire 76% overall.

The Vredestein Quatrac has been reviewed 21 times and drivers have given the tire 85% overall.

This means in real world driving, people prefer the Vredestein Quatrac.

Best Review for the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus
Given 83% 185/65 R15 on a combination of roads for 2,500 average miles
I took a chance on some Kumho Solas 4S HA32 Plus tires for here in England this year, as a mid-budget all season tire with the 3 peaks symbol.

Don't confuse the Plus model with the previous HA32 model, these are a much improved design.

With all the snow, frost, and sub 5°c weather in England this 2024 to 2025 winter, my Kumhos been fantastic so far, irrespective of price.

As I don't have £600 to drop on tires at a moments notice, I chose the Kumhos 4S HA32 Plus.

I had to get rubber fitted quickly, as I bought a car with four... Continue reading this review using the link below
Helpful 312 - tire reviewed on February 18, 2025
View all Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus driver reviews >>
Best Review for the Vredestein Quatrac
Given 77% 205/55 R16 on a combination of roads for 7 spirited miles
They grip surprisingly well for an all season tire in the dry and snow. I have these mounted on a 8th generation Honda civic sedan with the r18 engine and these tires have me absolutely glued to the ground. I replaced my old Goodyear eagle "all season" tire which had the snow performance of a summer tire in the snow and didn't even preform well in wet or dry. But back to the vredestein, I once was screwing around (dry, 65°f) taking a highway exchang ramp a bit too fast, I hit one rather sharp bend at probably 55+mph and didn't break traction for a second, no tire squeal or anything. Another... Continue reading this review using the link below
Helpful 552 - tire reviewed on May 4, 2024
View all Vredestein Quatrac driver reviews >>

Conclusion

If your priority is confidence in changeable UK/EU weather-frequent rain, standing water, and mixed temperatures-the Vredestein Quatrac is the safer, more rounded choice. It repeatedly stops shorter in the wet (often by 4-9%), resists aquaplaning far better (up to ~27-34% advantage in curved aqua), and brings composed, precise handling. It also posted excellent tread life and economy in AutoBild 2024, reinforcing long-term value despite a generally higher purchase price.

The Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus suits drivers who face regular winter episodes and want a lower upfront price: it often edges snow/ice braking and traction, and can deliver good mileage/value in some test sizes. However, its weaker aquaplaning reserves and longer wet/dry stops make it a compromise in rainy seasons. In short: choose Quatrac for all-weather security and handling polish; pick HA32+ if snow/ice traction and initial cost matter most.
Key Differences
  • Overall results: Quatrac finishes higher across the test set (5 overall wins vs. 1 for Kumho)
  • Wet safety: Quatrac brakes 4-9% shorter and handles better in the wet across years
  • Aquaplaning: Quatrac holds a significant advantage in straight and curved aquaplaning (+6-34%)
  • Dry stopping: Quatrac consistently stops shorter; Kumho only nicks a dry handling win once
  • Winter focus: Kumho generally performs better on snow/ice braking and traction
  • Efficiency/longevity: Quatrac shows lower rolling resistance and, in 2024 AutoBild, much longer wear (+35%) and lower abrasion
Vredestein Quatrac

Overall Winner: Vredestein Quatrac

Based on the tire test data and user reviews we have in our database, the Vredestein Quatrac has demonstrated better overall performance in this comparison. However, as you can see from the spider diagram above, each tire has its own strengths which should be considered in your final tire buying choice.

Similar Comparisons

Looking for more tire comparisons? Here are other direct comparisons involving these tires:


Footnote

This page has been developed using tire industry testing best practices. This means we are only comparing tests which have had both tires in the same test.

Why is this important? Tire testing is heavily affected by things like surface grip levels and surface temperature, which means you can only compare values from the same day. During a tire test external condition changes are calculated into the overall results, but it is not possible to calculate this between tire tests performed on different days or at different locations.

As a result you will see other tests on Tire Reviews which feature both the %s and %s, but as they weren't conducted on the same day, the results are not comparable.

Lots of other websites do this sort of tire comparison, Tire Reviews doesn't.