Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

This head-to-head pits two all-season premium-touring staples: Kumho's Solus 4S HA32 Plus versus Michelin's CrossClimate 2. Across six shared tests from 2022-2024 in popular sizes (205/55 R16 to 225/50-45 R17), both target year-round road manners with winter capability, but they approach the brief differently.

The data shows a consistent pattern: Michelin dominates braking (dry and wet), aquaplaning resistance, rolling efficiency and snow capability, translating into markedly higher overall rankings. Kumho counters with secure, easy-going handling in the wet, competitive winter scores in some subtests, lower purchase price and, in certain tests, better projected mileage/value. Drivers choosing between them will be weighing ultimate safety margins and efficiency versus upfront cost and a comfort-biased feel.
Solus-4S-HA32-Plus VS CrossClimate-2

Test Results

Independent comparison tire tests are the best source of data to get tire information from, and the good news is there have been six tests which compare both tires directly!

Summary of six total tests comparing both tires directly
TireTest WinsPerformance
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plusone
one wins
Michelin CrossClimate 2five
five wins

While it might look like the Michelin CrossClimate 2 is better than the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus purely based on the higher number of test wins, tires are very complicated objects which means where one tire is better than the other can be more important in real world use.

Let's look at how the two tires compare across multiple tire test categories.

Key Strengths

  • Secure, easy-to-drive handling on wet and dry circuits
  • Competitive winter performance with occasional wins (ice braking, snow braking in ADAC)
  • Lower purchase price and strong value scores in several tests
  • Quiet ride and good comfort
  • Consistently shortest braking on dry and wet roads
  • Excellent aquaplaning resistance and snow traction/handling
  • Lower rolling resistance and fuel consumption
  • Very strong wear performance in major tests, with high overall test win rate

Dry Braking

Looking at data from six tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during six dry braking tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 stopped the vehicle in 10.04% less distance than the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus.

Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus
42.72M
Michelin CrossClimate 2
38.43M
Dry braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Dry Braking: Michelin CrossClimate 2

2022 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test
195/55 R16
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:44.4M Michelin CrossClimate 2: 39.9M
2023 All Season Tire 35 Set Shootout
225/45 R17
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:41.4M Michelin CrossClimate 2: 37.7M
2023 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test
225/45 R17
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:41.4M Michelin CrossClimate 2: 37.7M
2024 ADAC All Season Tire Test
205/55 R16
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:44.1M Michelin CrossClimate 2: 39.5M
2024 All Season Tire Market Overview
225/50 R17
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:42.5M Michelin CrossClimate 2: 37.9M
2024 AutoBild All Season Tire Test
225/50 R17
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:42.5M Michelin CrossClimate 2: 37.9M

Dry Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from three tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during two dry handling [km/h] tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was 0.39% faster around a lap than the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus.

Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus
91.97Km/H
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92.33Km/H
Dry Handling Average Speed, higher is better

Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: Michelin CrossClimate 2

2022 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test
195/55 R16
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:92.1Km/H Michelin CrossClimate 2: 93.3Km/H
2023 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test
225/45 R17
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:88.5Km/H Michelin CrossClimate 2: 89.2Km/H
2024 AutoBild All Season Tire Test
225/50 R17
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:95.3Km/H Michelin CrossClimate 2: 94.5Km/H

Wet Braking

Looking at data from six tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during six wet braking tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 stopped the vehicle in 3.83% less distance than the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus.

Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus
50.4M
Michelin CrossClimate 2
48.47M
Wet braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Wet Braking: Michelin CrossClimate 2

2022 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test
195/55 R16
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:51.9M Michelin CrossClimate 2: 49.2M
2023 All Season Tire 35 Set Shootout
225/45 R17
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:49.8M Michelin CrossClimate 2: 47M
2023 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test
225/45 R17
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:49.8M Michelin CrossClimate 2: 47M
2024 ADAC All Season Tire Test
205/55 R16
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:35.1M Michelin CrossClimate 2: 34.8M
2024 All Season Tire Market Overview
225/50 R17
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:57.9M Michelin CrossClimate 2: 56.4M
2024 AutoBild All Season Tire Test
225/50 R17
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:57.9M Michelin CrossClimate 2: 56.4M

Wet Braking - Concrete

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus was better during one wet braking - concrete tests. On average the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus stopped the vehicle in 1.22% less distance than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus
40.6M
Michelin CrossClimate 2
41.1M
Wet braking on Concrete in meters, lower is better

Best In Wet Braking - Concrete: Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus

2024 ADAC All Season Tire Test
205/55 R16
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:40.6M Michelin CrossClimate 2: 41.1M

Wet Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from three tire tests, the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus was better during three wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus was 1.19% faster around a wet lap than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus
73Km/H
Michelin CrossClimate 2
72.13Km/H
Wet Handling Average Speed, higher is better

Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus

2022 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test
195/55 R16
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:72Km/H Michelin CrossClimate 2: 71.8Km/H
2023 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test
225/45 R17
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:74.7Km/H Michelin CrossClimate 2: 72.7Km/H
2024 AutoBild All Season Tire Test
225/50 R17
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:72.3Km/H Michelin CrossClimate 2: 71.9Km/H

Wet Circle

Looking at data from three tire tests, the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus was better during two wet circle tests. On average the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus was 0.99% faster around a wet circle than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus
11.97s
Michelin CrossClimate 2
12.09s
Wet Circle Lap Time in seconds, lower is better

Best In Wet Circle: Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus

2022 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test
195/55 R16
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:12.17s Michelin CrossClimate 2: 12.39s
2023 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test
225/45 R17
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:11.83s Michelin CrossClimate 2: 11.99s
2024 AutoBild All Season Tire Test
225/50 R17
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:11.9s Michelin CrossClimate 2: 11.89s

Straight Aqua

Looking at data from four tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during four straight aqua tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 floated at a 7.05% higher speed than the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus.

Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus
73.15Km/H
Michelin CrossClimate 2
78.7Km/H
Float Speed in Km/H, higher is better

Best In Straight Aqua: Michelin CrossClimate 2

2022 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test
195/55 R16
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:77Km/H Michelin CrossClimate 2: 80.5Km/H
2023 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test
225/45 R17
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:72.8Km/H Michelin CrossClimate 2: 79Km/H
2024 ADAC All Season Tire Test
205/55 R16
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:73.4Km/H Michelin CrossClimate 2: 81Km/H
2024 AutoBild All Season Tire Test
225/50 R17
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:69.4Km/H Michelin CrossClimate 2: 74.3Km/H

Curved Aquaplaning

Looking at data from four tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during four curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 slipped out at a 15.76% higher speed than the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus.

Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus
2.62m/sec2
Michelin CrossClimate 2
3.11m/sec2
Remaining lateral acceleration, higher is better

Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Michelin CrossClimate 2

2022 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test
195/55 R16
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:2.81m/sec2 Michelin CrossClimate 2: 3.01m/sec2
2023 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test
225/45 R17
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:2.44m/sec2 Michelin CrossClimate 2: 3.29m/sec2
2024 ADAC All Season Tire Test
205/55 R16
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:2.6m/sec2 Michelin CrossClimate 2: 3.2m/sec2
2024 AutoBild All Season Tire Test
225/50 R17
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:2.64m/sec2 Michelin CrossClimate 2: 2.95m/sec2

Snow Braking

Looking at data from four tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during three snow braking tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 stopped the vehicle in 0.09% less distance than the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus.

Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus
21.35M
Michelin CrossClimate 2
21.33M
Snow braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Snow Braking: Michelin CrossClimate 2

2022 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test
195/55 R16
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:27.4M Michelin CrossClimate 2: 27.3M
2023 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test
225/45 R17
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:23.4M Michelin CrossClimate 2: 23M
2024 ADAC All Season Tire Test
205/55 R16
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:10.6M Michelin CrossClimate 2: 11.1M
2024 AutoBild All Season Tire Test
225/50 R17
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:24M Michelin CrossClimate 2: 23.9M

Snow Traction

Looking at data from four tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during four snow traction tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 had 4.07% better snow traction than the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus.

Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus
1981.55N
Michelin CrossClimate 2
2065.63N
Pulling Force in Newtons, higher is better

Best In Snow Traction: Michelin CrossClimate 2

2022 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test
195/55 R16
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:2430N Michelin CrossClimate 2: 2574N
2023 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test
225/45 R17
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:2672N Michelin CrossClimate 2: 2765N
2024 ADAC All Season Tire Test
205/55 R16
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:223.2N Michelin CrossClimate 2: 225.5N
2024 AutoBild All Season Tire Test
225/50 R17
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:2601N Michelin CrossClimate 2: 2698N

Snow Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from three tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during three snow handling [km/h] tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was 2.7% faster around a lap than the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus.

Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus
55.2Km/H
Michelin CrossClimate 2
56.73Km/H
Snow handling average speed, higher is better

Best In Snow Handling [Km/H]: Michelin CrossClimate 2

2022 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test
195/55 R16
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:56.8Km/H Michelin CrossClimate 2: 57Km/H
2023 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test
225/45 R17
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:56.4Km/H Michelin CrossClimate 2: 58.1Km/H
2024 AutoBild All Season Tire Test
225/50 R17
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:52.4Km/H Michelin CrossClimate 2: 55.1Km/H

Snow Slalom

Looking at data from three tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during three snow slalom tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was 11.42% faster through a slalom than the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus.

Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus
3.88m/sec2
Michelin CrossClimate 2
4.38m/sec2
Lateral acceleration, higher is better

Best In Snow Slalom: Michelin CrossClimate 2

2022 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test
195/55 R16
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:4.16m/sec2 Michelin CrossClimate 2: 4.6m/sec2
2023 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test
225/45 R17
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:3.8m/sec2 Michelin CrossClimate 2: 4.27m/sec2
2024 AutoBild All Season Tire Test
225/50 R17
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:3.68m/sec2 Michelin CrossClimate 2: 4.26m/sec2

Ice Braking

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus was better during one ice braking tests. On average the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus stopped the vehicle 1.01% shorter than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus
19.6M
Michelin CrossClimate 2
19.8M
Ice braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Ice Braking: Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus

2024 ADAC All Season Tire Test
205/55 R16
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:19.6M Michelin CrossClimate 2: 19.8M

Noise

Looking at data from four tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during two noise tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 measured 0.35% quieter than the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus.

Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus
72.2dB
Michelin CrossClimate 2
71.95dB
External noise in dB, lower is better

Best In Noise: Michelin CrossClimate 2

2022 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test
195/55 R16
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:72.5dB Michelin CrossClimate 2: 71.6dB
2023 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test
225/45 R17
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:72dB Michelin CrossClimate 2: 72.6dB
2024 ADAC All Season Tire Test
205/55 R16
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:71.9dB Michelin CrossClimate 2: 71.1dB
2024 AutoBild All Season Tire Test
225/50 R17
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:72.4dB Michelin CrossClimate 2: 72.5dB

Tire Weight

Looking at data from three tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during three tire weight tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 weighed 0.42% less than the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus.

Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus
2672.97Kg
Michelin CrossClimate 2
2661.77Kg
Tire Weight Per Set, lower is better

Best In Tire Weight: Michelin CrossClimate 2

2022 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test
195/55 R16
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:7972Kg Michelin CrossClimate 2: 7942Kg
2023 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test
225/45 R17
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:38Kg Michelin CrossClimate 2: 35Kg
2024 ADAC All Season Tire Test
205/55 R16
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:8.9Kg Michelin CrossClimate 2: 8.3Kg

Wear

Looking at data from four tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during two wear tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 is predicted to cover 4.84% miles before reaching 1.6mm than the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus.

Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus
49381.5KM
Michelin CrossClimate 2
51891.5KM
Predicted tread life in KM, higher is better

Best In Wear: Michelin CrossClimate 2

2022 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test
195/55 R16
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:57117KM Michelin CrossClimate 2: 43840KM
2023 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test
225/45 R17
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:49009KM Michelin CrossClimate 2: 57046KM
2024 ADAC All Season Tire Test
205/55 R16
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:50600KM Michelin CrossClimate 2: 44000KM
2024 AutoBild All Season Tire Test
225/50 R17
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:40800KM Michelin CrossClimate 2: 62680KM

Value

Looking at data from three tire tests, the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus was better during two value tests. On average the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus proved to have a 23.7% better value based on price/1000km than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus
8.05Price/1000
Michelin CrossClimate 2
10.55Price/1000
Euros/1000km based on cost/wear, lower is better

Best In Value: Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus

2022 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test
195/55 R16
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:5.69Price/1000 Michelin CrossClimate 2: 12.2Price/1000
2023 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test
225/45 R17
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:7.35Price/1000 Michelin CrossClimate 2: 8.76Price/1000
2024 AutoBild All Season Tire Test
225/50 R17
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:11.1Price/1000 Michelin CrossClimate 2: 10.69Price/1000

Price

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus was better during one price tests. On average the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus cost 39.25% less than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus
325
Michelin CrossClimate 2
535
Price in local currency, lower is better

Best In Price: Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus

2022 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test
195/55 R16
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:325 Michelin CrossClimate 2: 535

Rolling Resistance

Looking at data from three tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during three rolling resistance tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 had a 14.38% lower rolling resistance than the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus.

Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus
8.69kg / t
Michelin CrossClimate 2
7.44kg / t
Rolling resistance in kg t, lower is better

Best In Rolling Resistance: Michelin CrossClimate 2

2022 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test
195/55 R16
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:8.34kg / t Michelin CrossClimate 2: 7.24kg / t
2023 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test
225/45 R17
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:8.51kg / t Michelin CrossClimate 2: 7.69kg / t
2024 AutoBild All Season Tire Test
225/50 R17
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:9.21kg / t Michelin CrossClimate 2: 7.4kg / t

Fuel Consumption

Looking at data from four tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during three fuel consumption tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 used 1.67% less fuel than the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus.

Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus
5.4l/100km
Michelin CrossClimate 2
5.31l/100km
Fuel consumption in Litres per 100 km, lower is better

Best In Fuel Consumption: Michelin CrossClimate 2

2022 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test
195/55 R16
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:5.48l/100km Michelin CrossClimate 2: 5.67l/100km
2023 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test
225/45 R17
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:5.67l/100km Michelin CrossClimate 2: 5.48l/100km
2024 ADAC All Season Tire Test
205/55 R16
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:5.4l/100km Michelin CrossClimate 2: 5.3l/100km
2024 AutoBild All Season Tire Test
225/50 R17
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:5.06l/100km Michelin CrossClimate 2: 4.78l/100km

Abrasion

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during one abrasion tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 emitted 27.04% less particle wear matter than the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus.

Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus
19.6Gram/1000km
Michelin CrossClimate 2
14.3Gram/1000km
Weight of Tire Wear Particles Lost (Gram/1000km), lower is better

Best In Abrasion: Michelin CrossClimate 2

2022 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test
195/55 R16
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:19.6Gram/1000km Michelin CrossClimate 2: 14.3Gram/1000km

Abrasion

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during one abrasion tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 lost 52.78% less particle wear matter than the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus.

Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus
1116g
Michelin CrossClimate 2
527g
Total weight loss after wear test in grams, lower is better

Best In Abrasion: Michelin CrossClimate 2

2024 AutoBild All Season Tire Test
225/50 R17
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:1116g Michelin CrossClimate 2: 527g

Real World Driver Reviews

Tire Reviews also collects real world driver reviews for the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus and Michelin CrossClimate 2.

In total the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus has been reviewed 3 times and drivers have given the tire 76% overall.

The Michelin CrossClimate 2 has been reviewed 128 times and drivers have given the tire 81% overall.

This means in real world driving, people prefer the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best Review for the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus
Given 83% 185/65 R15 on a combination of roads for 2,500 average miles
I took a chance on some Kumho Solas 4S HA32 Plus tires for here in England this year, as a mid-budget all season tire with the 3 peaks symbol.

Don't confuse the Plus model with the previous HA32 model, these are a much improved design.

With all the snow, frost, and sub 5°c weather in England this 2024 to 2025 winter, my Kumhos been fantastic so far, irrespective of price.

As I don't have £600 to drop on tires at a moments notice, I chose the Kumhos 4S HA32 Plus.

I had to get rubber fitted quickly, as I bought a car with four... Continue reading this review using the link below
Helpful 297 - tire reviewed on February 18, 2025
View all Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus driver reviews >>
Best Review for the Michelin CrossClimate 2
Given 81% 235/50 R18 on a combination of roads for 5,000 average miles
Car = 2014 Infiniti Q60 AWD (aka G37 Coupe / CV36 Skyline - RWD bias ATTESA AWD) Overall, pleased with the tire as I wanted a comfortable tire with long tread life and a true "All-Season" tire for the winter months as I have not yet purchased a set of dedicated summer wheels/tires yet. Coming from previous Michelin Pilot Sport AS3+ which lasted around 52k of 45k mile rating with sometimes spirited driving, so have no reason to doubt Michelin's tread ware claims, at least on my vehicle. Handling in the dry, the AS3+ was better when taking curves/turns and activated the VDC/TCS less often,... Continue reading this review using the link below
Helpful 746 - tire reviewed on May 13, 2021
View all Michelin CrossClimate 2 driver reviews >>

Conclusion

Michelin CrossClimate 2 is the more complete performer. It wins 5 of 6 shared tests, leads every dry and wet braking metric (often by ~9-11% in dry and ~3-6% in wet), and is clearly superior in aquaplaning resistance. It's also more efficient (lower rolling resistance and fuel use) and repeatedly stronger on snow traction/handling. In AutoBild 2024 it also delivered vastly better wear (62,680 km vs 40,800 km). These advantages translate to wider safety margins and long-term running-cost benefits despite a higher price.

Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus appeals on price/value and subjective stability: it often feels secure in wet and dry handling laps, posts a few winter and ice-braking wins, and in ADAC 2024 returned a longer mileage projection than Michelin. Its drawbacks are meaningful: longer braking distances, weaker aquaplaning reserves, and generally higher rolling resistance. For most buyers prioritizing safety, all-weather confidence and efficiency, Michelin is the safer bet; value-focused drivers in milder climates or urban use may find the Kumho's lower entry cost and agreeable manners sufficient.
Key Differences
  • Braking safety: Michelin stops 8-11% shorter in dry and ~3-6% shorter in wet across tests
  • Aquaplaning: Michelin has notably higher straight and curved aquaplaning speeds
  • Snow: Michelin leads traction/handling and slalom; Kumho snags isolated braking/ice wins
  • Efficiency: Michelin's rolling resistance is lower (up to ~20%), reducing fuel use
  • Wear: Mixed, but major 2024 test shows Michelin far longer tread life; ADAC 2024 favored Kumho
  • Value/price: Kumho is cheaper upfront and often scores better on value indices
Michelin CrossClimate 2

Overall Winner: Michelin CrossClimate 2

Based on the tire test data and user reviews we have in our database, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 has demonstrated better overall performance in this comparison. However, as you can see from the spider diagram above, each tire has its own strengths which should be considered in your final tire buying choice.

Similar Comparisons

Looking for more tire comparisons? Here are other direct comparisons involving these tires:


Footnote

This page has been developed using tire industry testing best practices. This means we are only comparing tests which have had both tires in the same test.

Why is this important? Tire testing is heavily affected by things like surface grip levels and surface temperature, which means you can only compare values from the same day. During a tire test external condition changes are calculated into the overall results, but it is not possible to calculate this between tire tests performed on different days or at different locations.

As a result you will see other tests on Tire Reviews which feature both the %s and %s, but as they weren't conducted on the same day, the results are not comparable.

Lots of other websites do this sort of tire comparison, Tire Reviews doesn't.