Independent comparison tire tests are the best source of data to get tire information from, and the good news is there have been six tests which compare both tires directly!
Tire | Test Wins | Performance |
---|---|---|
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus | one | |
Michelin CrossClimate 2 | five |
While it might look like the Michelin CrossClimate 2 is better than the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus purely based on the higher number of test wins, tires are very complicated objects which means where one tire is better than the other can be more important in real world use.
Let's look at how the two tires compare across multiple tire test categories.
Looking at data from six tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during six dry braking tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 stopped the vehicle in 10.04% less distance than the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus.
Best In Dry Braking: Michelin CrossClimate 2
See how the Dry Braking winner was calculated >>
2022 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test 195/55 R16 |
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:44.4M | ✓ Michelin CrossClimate 2: 39.9M |
2023 All Season Tire 35 Set Shootout 225/45 R17 |
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:41.4M | ✓ Michelin CrossClimate 2: 37.7M |
2023 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test 225/45 R17 |
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:41.4M | ✓ Michelin CrossClimate 2: 37.7M |
2024 ADAC All Season Tire Test 205/55 R16 |
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:44.1M | ✓ Michelin CrossClimate 2: 39.5M |
2024 All Season Tire Market Overview 225/50 R17 |
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:42.5M | ✓ Michelin CrossClimate 2: 37.9M |
2024 AutoBild All Season Tire Test 225/50 R17 |
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:42.5M | ✓ Michelin CrossClimate 2: 37.9M |
Looking at data from three tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during two dry handling [km/h] tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was 0.39% faster around a lap than the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus.
Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: Michelin CrossClimate 2
See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
2022 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test 195/55 R16 |
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:92.1Km/H | ✓ Michelin CrossClimate 2: 93.3Km/H |
2023 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test 225/45 R17 |
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:88.5Km/H | ✓ Michelin CrossClimate 2: 89.2Km/H |
2024 AutoBild All Season Tire Test 225/50 R17 |
✓ Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:95.3Km/H | Michelin CrossClimate 2: 94.5Km/H |
Looking at data from six tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during six wet braking tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 stopped the vehicle in 3.83% less distance than the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus.
Best In Wet Braking: Michelin CrossClimate 2
See how the Wet Braking winner was calculated >>
2022 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test 195/55 R16 |
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:51.9M | ✓ Michelin CrossClimate 2: 49.2M |
2023 All Season Tire 35 Set Shootout 225/45 R17 |
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:49.8M | ✓ Michelin CrossClimate 2: 47M |
2023 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test 225/45 R17 |
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:49.8M | ✓ Michelin CrossClimate 2: 47M |
2024 ADAC All Season Tire Test 205/55 R16 |
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:35.1M | ✓ Michelin CrossClimate 2: 34.8M |
2024 All Season Tire Market Overview 225/50 R17 |
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:57.9M | ✓ Michelin CrossClimate 2: 56.4M |
2024 AutoBild All Season Tire Test 225/50 R17 |
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:57.9M | ✓ Michelin CrossClimate 2: 56.4M |
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus was better during one wet braking - concrete tests. On average the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus stopped the vehicle in 1.22% less distance than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.
Best In Wet Braking - Concrete: Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus
See how the Wet Braking - Concrete winner was calculated >>
2024 ADAC All Season Tire Test 205/55 R16 |
✓ Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:40.6M | Michelin CrossClimate 2: 41.1M |
Looking at data from three tire tests, the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus was better during three wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus was 1.19% faster around a wet lap than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.
Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus
See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
2022 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test 195/55 R16 |
✓ Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:72Km/H | Michelin CrossClimate 2: 71.8Km/H |
2023 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test 225/45 R17 |
✓ Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:74.7Km/H | Michelin CrossClimate 2: 72.7Km/H |
2024 AutoBild All Season Tire Test 225/50 R17 |
✓ Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:72.3Km/H | Michelin CrossClimate 2: 71.9Km/H |
Looking at data from three tire tests, the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus was better during two wet circle tests. On average the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus was 0.99% faster around a wet circle than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.
Best In Wet Circle: Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus
See how the Wet Circle winner was calculated >>
2022 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test 195/55 R16 |
✓ Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:12.17s | Michelin CrossClimate 2: 12.39s |
2023 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test 225/45 R17 |
✓ Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:11.83s | Michelin CrossClimate 2: 11.99s |
2024 AutoBild All Season Tire Test 225/50 R17 |
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:11.9s | ✓ Michelin CrossClimate 2: 11.89s |
Looking at data from four tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during four straight aqua tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 floated at a 7.05% higher speed than the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus.
Best In Straight Aqua: Michelin CrossClimate 2
See how the Straight Aqua winner was calculated >>
2022 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test 195/55 R16 |
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:77Km/H | ✓ Michelin CrossClimate 2: 80.5Km/H |
2023 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test 225/45 R17 |
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:72.8Km/H | ✓ Michelin CrossClimate 2: 79Km/H |
2024 ADAC All Season Tire Test 205/55 R16 |
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:73.4Km/H | ✓ Michelin CrossClimate 2: 81Km/H |
2024 AutoBild All Season Tire Test 225/50 R17 |
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:69.4Km/H | ✓ Michelin CrossClimate 2: 74.3Km/H |
Looking at data from four tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during four curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 slipped out at a 15.76% higher speed than the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus.
Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Michelin CrossClimate 2
See how the Curved Aquaplaning winner was calculated >>
2022 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test 195/55 R16 |
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:2.81m/sec2 | ✓ Michelin CrossClimate 2: 3.01m/sec2 |
2023 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test 225/45 R17 |
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:2.44m/sec2 | ✓ Michelin CrossClimate 2: 3.29m/sec2 |
2024 ADAC All Season Tire Test 205/55 R16 |
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:2.6m/sec2 | ✓ Michelin CrossClimate 2: 3.2m/sec2 |
2024 AutoBild All Season Tire Test 225/50 R17 |
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:2.64m/sec2 | ✓ Michelin CrossClimate 2: 2.95m/sec2 |
Looking at data from four tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during three snow braking tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 stopped the vehicle in 0.09% less distance than the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus.
Best In Snow Braking: Michelin CrossClimate 2
See how the Snow Braking winner was calculated >>
2022 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test 195/55 R16 |
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:27.4M | ✓ Michelin CrossClimate 2: 27.3M |
2023 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test 225/45 R17 |
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:23.4M | ✓ Michelin CrossClimate 2: 23M |
2024 ADAC All Season Tire Test 205/55 R16 |
✓ Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:10.6M | Michelin CrossClimate 2: 11.1M |
2024 AutoBild All Season Tire Test 225/50 R17 |
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:24M | ✓ Michelin CrossClimate 2: 23.9M |
Looking at data from four tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during four snow traction tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 had 4.07% better snow traction than the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus.
Best In Snow Traction: Michelin CrossClimate 2
See how the Snow Traction winner was calculated >>
2022 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test 195/55 R16 |
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:2430N | ✓ Michelin CrossClimate 2: 2574N |
2023 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test 225/45 R17 |
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:2672N | ✓ Michelin CrossClimate 2: 2765N |
2024 ADAC All Season Tire Test 205/55 R16 |
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:223.2N | ✓ Michelin CrossClimate 2: 225.5N |
2024 AutoBild All Season Tire Test 225/50 R17 |
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:2601N | ✓ Michelin CrossClimate 2: 2698N |
Looking at data from three tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during three snow handling [km/h] tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was 2.7% faster around a lap than the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus.
Best In Snow Handling [Km/H]: Michelin CrossClimate 2
See how the Snow Handling winner was calculated >>
2022 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test 195/55 R16 |
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:56.8Km/H | ✓ Michelin CrossClimate 2: 57Km/H |
2023 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test 225/45 R17 |
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:56.4Km/H | ✓ Michelin CrossClimate 2: 58.1Km/H |
2024 AutoBild All Season Tire Test 225/50 R17 |
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:52.4Km/H | ✓ Michelin CrossClimate 2: 55.1Km/H |
Looking at data from three tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during three snow slalom tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was 11.42% faster through a slalom than the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus.
Best In Snow Slalom: Michelin CrossClimate 2
See how the Snow Slalom winner was calculated >>
2022 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test 195/55 R16 |
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:4.16m/sec2 | ✓ Michelin CrossClimate 2: 4.6m/sec2 |
2023 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test 225/45 R17 |
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:3.8m/sec2 | ✓ Michelin CrossClimate 2: 4.27m/sec2 |
2024 AutoBild All Season Tire Test 225/50 R17 |
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:3.68m/sec2 | ✓ Michelin CrossClimate 2: 4.26m/sec2 |
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus was better during one ice braking tests. On average the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus stopped the vehicle 1.01% shorter than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.
Best In Ice Braking: Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus
See how the Ice Braking winner was calculated >>
2024 ADAC All Season Tire Test 205/55 R16 |
✓ Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:19.6M | Michelin CrossClimate 2: 19.8M |
Looking at data from four tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during two noise tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 measured 0.35% quieter than the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus.
Best In Noise: Michelin CrossClimate 2
See how the Noise winner was calculated >>
2022 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test 195/55 R16 |
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:72.5dB | ✓ Michelin CrossClimate 2: 71.6dB |
2023 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test 225/45 R17 |
✓ Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:72dB | Michelin CrossClimate 2: 72.6dB |
2024 ADAC All Season Tire Test 205/55 R16 |
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:71.9dB | ✓ Michelin CrossClimate 2: 71.1dB |
2024 AutoBild All Season Tire Test 225/50 R17 |
✓ Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:72.4dB | Michelin CrossClimate 2: 72.5dB |
Looking at data from three tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during three tire weight tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 weighed 0.42% less than the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus.
Best In Tire Weight: Michelin CrossClimate 2
See how the Tire Weight winner was calculated >>
2022 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test 195/55 R16 |
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:7972Kg | ✓ Michelin CrossClimate 2: 7942Kg |
2023 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test 225/45 R17 |
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:38Kg | ✓ Michelin CrossClimate 2: 35Kg |
2024 ADAC All Season Tire Test 205/55 R16 |
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:8.9Kg | ✓ Michelin CrossClimate 2: 8.3Kg |
Looking at data from four tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during two wear tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 is predicted to cover 4.84% miles before reaching 1.6mm than the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus.
Best In Wear: Michelin CrossClimate 2
See how the Wear winner was calculated >>
2022 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test 195/55 R16 |
✓ Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:57117KM | Michelin CrossClimate 2: 43840KM |
2023 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test 225/45 R17 |
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:49009KM | ✓ Michelin CrossClimate 2: 57046KM |
2024 ADAC All Season Tire Test 205/55 R16 |
✓ Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:50600KM | Michelin CrossClimate 2: 44000KM |
2024 AutoBild All Season Tire Test 225/50 R17 |
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:40800KM | ✓ Michelin CrossClimate 2: 62680KM |
Looking at data from three tire tests, the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus was better during two value tests. On average the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus proved to have a 23.7% better value based on price/1000km than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.
Best In Value: Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus
See how the Value winner was calculated >>
2022 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test 195/55 R16 |
✓ Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:5.69Price/1000 | Michelin CrossClimate 2: 12.2Price/1000 |
2023 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test 225/45 R17 |
✓ Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:7.35Price/1000 | Michelin CrossClimate 2: 8.76Price/1000 |
2024 AutoBild All Season Tire Test 225/50 R17 |
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:11.1Price/1000 | ✓ Michelin CrossClimate 2: 10.69Price/1000 |
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus was better during one price tests. On average the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus cost 39.25% less than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.
Best In Price: Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus
See how the Price winner was calculated >>
2022 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test 195/55 R16 |
✓ Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:325 | Michelin CrossClimate 2: 535 |
Looking at data from three tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during three rolling resistance tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 had a 14.38% lower rolling resistance than the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus.
Best In Rolling Resistance: Michelin CrossClimate 2
See how the Rolling Resistance winner was calculated >>
2022 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test 195/55 R16 |
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:8.34kg / t | ✓ Michelin CrossClimate 2: 7.24kg / t |
2023 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test 225/45 R17 |
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:8.51kg / t | ✓ Michelin CrossClimate 2: 7.69kg / t |
2024 AutoBild All Season Tire Test 225/50 R17 |
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:9.21kg / t | ✓ Michelin CrossClimate 2: 7.4kg / t |
Looking at data from four tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during three fuel consumption tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 used 1.67% less fuel than the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus.
Best In Fuel Consumption: Michelin CrossClimate 2
See how the Fuel Consumption winner was calculated >>
2022 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test 195/55 R16 |
✓ Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:5.48l/100km | Michelin CrossClimate 2: 5.67l/100km |
2023 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test 225/45 R17 |
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:5.67l/100km | ✓ Michelin CrossClimate 2: 5.48l/100km |
2024 ADAC All Season Tire Test 205/55 R16 |
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:5.4l/100km | ✓ Michelin CrossClimate 2: 5.3l/100km |
2024 AutoBild All Season Tire Test 225/50 R17 |
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:5.06l/100km | ✓ Michelin CrossClimate 2: 4.78l/100km |
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during one abrasion tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 emitted 27.04% less particle wear matter than the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus.
Best In Abrasion: Michelin CrossClimate 2
See how the Abrasion winner was calculated >>
2022 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test 195/55 R16 |
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:19.6Gram/1000km | ✓ Michelin CrossClimate 2: 14.3Gram/1000km |
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during one abrasion tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 lost 52.78% less particle wear matter than the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus.
Best In Abrasion: Michelin CrossClimate 2
See how the Abrasion winner was calculated >>
2024 AutoBild All Season Tire Test 225/50 R17 |
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus:1116g | ✓ Michelin CrossClimate 2: 527g |
Tire Reviews also collects real world driver reviews for the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus and Michelin CrossClimate 2.
In total the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus has been reviewed 3 times and drivers have given the tire 76% overall.
The Michelin CrossClimate 2 has been reviewed 128 times and drivers have given the tire 81% overall.
This means in real world driving, people prefer the Michelin CrossClimate 2.
Looking for more tire comparisons? Here are other direct comparisons involving these tires:
This page has been developed using tire industry testing best practices. This means we are only comparing tests which have had both tires in the same test.
Why is this important? Tire testing is heavily affected by things like surface grip levels and surface temperature, which means you can only compare values from the same day. During a tire test external condition changes are calculated into the overall results, but it is not possible to calculate this between tire tests performed on different days or at different locations.
As a result you will see other tests on Tire Reviews which feature both the %s and %s, but as they weren't conducted on the same day, the results are not comparable.
Lots of other websites do this sort of tire comparison, Tire Reviews doesn't.