Nexen N Blue 4Season 2 vs Roadhog RGAS02
- TR Score
- 8.8/10
- Owners say
- 78% · 15
- TR Score
- 7.1/10
- Owners say
- -
The Nexen N Blue 4Season 2 and the Roadhog RGAS02 have met in 2 independent tests and the record is level at 1-1. The RGAS02 stopped 5.2% shorter in the dry.
Data updated
Which should you buy?
Choose the Nexen N Blue 4Season 2 if you want a genuinely usable all-season tire for mixed conditions (rain, standing water, and occasional snow/ice) and you value comfort; avoid the Roadhog RGAS02 for true all-season duty because its aquaplaning and winter deficits dominate the real-world risk profile, despite its slightly better straight-line braking on dry/wet asphalt.
Where the N Blue 4Season 2 is stronger
- Clearly better aquaplaning resistance (81.1 vs 74.7 km/h straight; 3.2 vs 2.4 m/s² curved)
- Stronger winter capability: better snow braking/traction and shorter ice braking (e.g., ice 20.5 m vs 22.5 m)
- Lower noise levels in test (69.8 vs 72.7 dB)
Where the RGAS02 is stronger
- Consistently shorter dry braking in both shared tests (e.g., 40.0 m vs 42.6 m in ADAC)
- Consistently marginally shorter wet braking in both shared tests (e.g., 35.1 m vs 35.6 m in ADAC)
- Lower abrasion measurement in ADAC (68 vs 72 mg/km/t)
The bullet points are analysis of the shared tests and of owner reviews; the measured wins in each discipline are in the tables below. Where the two disagree, the figures are right.
N Blue 4Season 2 vs RGAS02 at a glance
| Category | N Blue 4Season 2 | Gap | RGAS02 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shared tests won2 shared tests | 1 | 1 | |
| Dry2 measurements | 0 | The RGAS02 stopped 5.2% shorter in the dry (2 tests) | 2 |
| Wet5 measurements | 2 | The RGAS02 stopped 1% shorter in the wet (2 tests) | 3 |
| Snow2 measurements | 2 | 0 | |
| Ice1 measurement | 1 | 0 | |
| Comfort1 measurement | 1 | 0 | |
| Value3 measurements | 1 | Level between the two. | 1 |
| Tire Reviews Scoreevery test and review we hold | 8.8/10 | The N Blue 4Season 2 by 1.7 | 7.1/10 |
| Sizes madeEU label registrations | 118 | 58 sizes made in both | 61 |
Wins count every measurement the shared tests recorded for both tires; a tick marks the tire ahead on that line. Subjective driver scores count as wins but are never averaged, because each test uses its own scale.
Head to head in 2 tests, 2025 to 2026
Each row is one published test in which both tires ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | N Blue 4Season 2 | Field | RGAS02 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 ADAC All Season Tire Test - 185/65 R15 | P9 of 16 | P15 of 16 | |
| 2025 All Season 30 Tire Braking Test | P20 of 30 | P13 of 30 |
Performance profile
12 measurements from the 2 shared tests, each tire shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
N Blue 4Season 2
RGAS02
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 118 ft stop against 112 ft is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. The scale stops at 90%: a point further in sits on the hub's edge, hollow.
Where each scores higher
N Blue 4Season 2
RGAS02
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tires of the same season and class: 90 means this tire out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tires posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Open a discipline for its measurements, and a measurement for every test's figure.
| Measurement | N Blue 4Season 2 | Gap | RGAS02 | Wins | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 136 | 5.2% | 129 | 0-2 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| 145 | 1% | 144 | 0-2 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| 134 | 1.2% | 132 | 0-1 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| 50.4 | 8.6% | 46.4 | 1-0 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| 10.5 | 33.3% | 7.9 | 1-0 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| 40 | 7.6% | 43 | 1-0 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| 530 | 9.2% | 485 | 1-0 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| 67 | 8.9% | 74 | 1-0 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| 69.8 | 2.9 dB | 72.7 | 1-0 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| 23,115 | 6.3% | 21,748 | 1-0 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| 5.6 | = | 5.6 | 0-0 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| 72 | 5.6% | 68 | 0-1 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tires shared. "Scored" rows are subjective driver ratings: each test uses its own scale, so only the wins are counted.
Scores beyond the shared tests
On the Tire Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the N Blue 4Season 2 scores 8.8 and the RGAS02 7.1 out of 10.
| N Blue 4Season 2 | Category | RGAS02 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 86 | Dry | 98 | ||
| 51 | Wet | 31 | ||
| 71 | Comfort | 7 | ||
| 64 | Value | 35 | ||
| 47 | Snow | 12 | ||
| 91 | Ice | 16 | ||
Category scores are percentiles among tires of the same season and class: 90 means this tire out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
What owners say
| N Blue 4Season 2 | Category | RGAS02 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8.1 | Dry Grip | - | ||
| 7.9 | Wet Grip | - | ||
| 7.6 | Road Feedback | - | ||
| 7.7 | Handling | - | ||
| 8.5 | Wear | - | ||
| 8.5 | Comfort | - | ||
| 7.2 | Snow Grip | - | ||
| 6.4 | Ice Grip | - | ||
Owners rate the N Blue 4Season 2 78% from 15 reviews; the RGAS02 has no owner reviews yet. Reviews are vetted by hand before publication; ownership is not verified.
Nexen N Blue 4Season 2
- 78%from 15 reviews
- 86%would buy again
- 145,500 milesdriven by reviewers
With an 80% average score and 10 of 12 reviews rating it positively, owners generally find the Nexen N Blue 4Season 2 to be a capable all-season option with dependable dry and wet grip, plus reassuring traction in snow for everyday driving. A notable minority mention ice performance, and opinions are mixed here (around a third of owners commenting), with a couple finding it excellent and a similar number reporting it's not as confidence-inspiring as a dedicated winter tire. Comfort and refinement also come through strongly, with several owners describing it as particularly quiet.
- Strong dry grip for an affordable all-season
- Confident wet grip in mixed conditions
- Surprisingly capable traction in snow
- Very low road noise
- Mixed ice grip versus a proper winter tire
- Soft/squishy feel or sidewalls when pushed
Summarised by AI from 12 vetted reviews; the reviews themselves are on the tire page.
All 15 N Blue 4Season 2 reviewsIn the meantime, I've driven 32,000 miles (51,000 km) on these tires (see current photos), and I have to say, they're still performing excellently on my car. Summers here are hot, and winters are mild; we rarely get snow, just wet and slushy roads. These all-season tires are the perfect choice for these conditions, eliminating the need for unnecessary tire changes (except for swapping the front tires to the rear and vice versa). And they’re a great fit for my car (Kia Optima K5). The only downside is that at highway speeds, within a certain speed range, a pulsating noise occurs due to the tread pattern, but as soon as the speed goes above or below that range, it goes away. I highly recommend them for everyday driving—I’d buy them again.
Roadhog RGAS02
No owner reviews yet. Be the first to review it →
Sizes, EU label and lineage
From the EU label registrations for each tire: 118 sizes of the N Blue 4Season 2 and 61 of the RGAS02, 58 of them made in both.
| Category | N Blue 4Season 2 | RGAS02 |
|---|---|---|
| Season | All Season | All Season |
| Sizes made | 118 sizes, 14 to 21 inch | 61 sizes, 14 to 19 inch |
| Made in both | 58 sizes 155/65 R14165/60 R14165/65 R14165/70 R14175/65 R14175/70 R14185/60 R14185/65 R14175/65 R15185/55 R15185/60 R15185/65 R15and 46 more | |
| EU label wet grip | B86%A14%C1% | B99%A1% |
| EU label rolling resistance | C81%D18%B2% | C77%D21%B1% |
| EU label noise | 71-73 dB B100% | 71-73 dB B100% |
| Severe snow (3PMSF) sizes | 200 of 200 | 71 of 71 |
| On the market since | 2022 | 2023 |
Label grades are shown as the share of registered sizes carrying each grade, so "B (88%), C (12%)" means most sizes are B. Grades vary by size; check the label for yours.
Reading the results
Written from the test results and owner reviews above. It is analysis, not a measurement: where it and the tables disagree, the tables are right.
This is a comparison between two budget-leaning all-season touring tires aimed at everyday passenger cars: the Nexen N Blue 4Season 2 and the Roadhog RGAS02. Both target the same “one set year-round” buyer, but the shared test data shows they go about that brief very differently-especially once conditions turn wet, wintry, or waterlogged.
Across two shared test sets (including ADAC's demanding 185/65 R15 all-season test), the Roadhog often posts slightly shorter braking distances on dry and wet asphalt in straight-line stops, while the Nexen answers back with clearly stronger aquaplaning resistance, better snow/ice capability, and noticeably better refinement. The result is a trade-off between marginal braking wins in benign conditions versus broader all-season safety margins and day-to-day comfort.
Conclusion
Looking at the combined evidence, the Nexen N Blue 4Season 2 is the more rounded all-season tire of these two, even though it is not a class leader. In ADAC's 185/65 R15 test it decisively outperformed the Roadhog in the areas that typically separate acceptable all-seasons from risky ones: aquaplaning (81.1 vs 74.7 km/h straight aquaplaning and 3.2 vs 2.4 m/s² curved), winter braking/traction (e.g., snow braking 12.1 m vs 13.1 m; ice braking 20.5 m vs 22.5 m), plus it was quieter (69.8 vs 72.7 dB) and projected slightly longer wear (37,200 vs 35,000 km). That said, ADAC still criticized the Nexen for weak dry and wet grip versus better tires in the field-so it's a “better of these two” call, not a blanket endorsement.
The Roadhog RGAS02's main advantage is small but repeatable straight-line braking wins on dry and wet asphalt across both tests (e.g., 42.6 m vs 40.0 m dry braking in ADAC; 40.2 m vs 38.5 m in the 225/40 R18 test, with similarly tiny wet braking edges). However, ADAC's qualitative verdict is damning: poor winter performance and early aquaplaning are exactly the kinds of limitations that turn an all-season tire into a fair-weather tire. Practical takeaway: if you truly need an all-season tire for mixed weather, the Nexen is the safer, more usable option; if you're considering the Roadhog purely for price, the data suggests its wet/winter and aquaplaning deficits are not worth the savings.
N Blue 4Season 2 vs RGAS02: your questions
Is the Nexen N Blue 4Season 2 or the Roadhog RGAS02 the better tire?
The Nexen N Blue 4Season 2 and the Roadhog RGAS02 have met in 2 independent tests and the record is level at 1-1. On the Tire Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the N Blue 4Season 2 scores 8.8 and the RGAS02 7.1 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the N Blue 4Season 2 or the RGAS02?
The RGAS02 led 3 of the 5 wet measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 1% shorter in the wet across 2 tests.
Which is better in the dry?
The RGAS02 led 2 of the 2 dry measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 5.2% shorter in the dry across 2 tests.
Which is better in snow?
The N Blue 4Season 2 led 2 of the 2 snow measurements the shared tests recorded.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the N Blue 4Season 2 78% from 15 reviews; the RGAS02 has no owner reviews yet.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The N Blue 4Season 2 is made in 118 sizes (14 to 21 inch) and the RGAS02 in 61 (14 to 19 inch). 58 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the N Blue 4Season 2 is graded B for wet grip and C for rolling resistance in most sizes; the RGAS02 B and C.
Which is the newer tire?
The RGAS02 is the newer design: it reached the market in 2023, the N Blue 4Season 2 in 2022.
More comparisons with these tires
vs
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 vs Nexen N Blue 4Season 2
5-1 in 6 shared tests
vs
Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs Nexen N Blue 4Season 2
8-0 in 8 shared tests
vs
Kleber Quadraxer 3 vs Nexen N Blue 4Season 2
7-2 in 9 shared tests
vs
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 vs Nexen N Blue 4Season 2
8-1 in 9 shared tests
vs
Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Nexen N Blue 4Season 2
9-0 in 9 shared tests
vs
Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 vs Nexen N Blue 4Season 2
10-0 in 10 shared tests
vs
Dunlop All Season 2 vs Nexen N Blue 4Season 2
4-2 in 6 shared tests
vs 
Nexen N Blue 4Season 2 vs Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3
0-8 in 8 shared tests
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tire wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tires ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tire Reviews Score rates each tire out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tires can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tire Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tires independently since 2007.
Discussion